Lololol, it’s fun when two terrible teams agree before the game to treat it like an all star game.
after having watched him live, he is noticeably less athletic than the guys he plays against. He can shoot it, and gets to fire at will in Phoenix, so he goes off once in a while. But, ma does he get torched of the dribble. I think if the left him on HArden of Westbrook for a whole game they would get into the 70s.Devin Booker is one of the most overrated players out there. Has like one good game every five and the rest of the time it’s just terrible hero ball, like late Kobe hero ball.
Yes six shots blocked. Plus he was 12-27 so he threw the ball up a lot.Lonzo must have had six layups blocked. He just cannot get a contested shot off against anyone.
He's also one of the most underrated players out there due to being one of the most overrated. The dude is still 20 years old and has an incredible offensive game. He's younger than Jaylen Brown. He also improved his overall game in the 2nd half last year and if preseason and this game are any indication of things to come, he did this off season as well. He's never going to be great on defense but he has a chance to be special on offense.Devin Booker is one of the most overrated players out there. Has like one good game every five and the rest of the time it’s just terrible hero ball, like late Kobe hero ball.
Watching the end of the game, I felt bad for Chandler and Bledsoe. They both looked good playing a 2 man game on offense and both were trying to make things happen on defense. The rest of the team seemed mostly interested in taking bad shots and, well, they appear to have no interest in the other side of the floor.Wow thats a terrible phoenix team.
Yes, by a couple of days. Let's not pretend that there's some huge age gap between them.He's also one of the most underrated players out there due to being one of the most overrated. The dude is still 20 years old and has an incredible offensive game. He's younger than Jaylen Brown.
But he's been in the league a year longer. I think people judge him as if he were 23.Yes, by a couple of days. Let's not pretend that there's some huge age gap between them.
The "Lonzo stinks" (think if he'd started out with TWO games like Josh Jackson's -- ESPN would have the world coming to an end and this forum would have a thousand posts on it) and "Lonzo comes back" (I love the "he started summer AND pre-season with a bad game, but then...." line) alternating narratives that will probably go on all year are really unfair to Lonzo. But when it's his dad is leading the hot take charge it's sort hard to blame everyone else for their stupidity. Did I invent that his idiot dad said he was going to shut up? I guess even if he did make that promise, it'd be stupid of me to think there'd by any substance to it.Lavar’s crowing after this game will be glorious
34-86 under Earl Watson and nothing but a steady downtrend under Ryan McDonough's leadership. Countdown to the days when both are fired on same day. This organization needs a complete overhaul. I was sick to my stomach watching Josh Jackson jog down the floor completely disinterested in his first NBA game. The culture here appears to be god awful and that begins at the top.Watching the end of the game, I felt bad for Chandler and Bledsoe. They both looked good playing a 2 man game on offense and both were trying to make things happen on defense. The rest of the team seemed mostly interested in taking bad shots and, well, they appear to have no interest in the other side of the floor.
The Lakers, in contrast, clearly are trying on defense and just are terrible at it.
Fox has looked good early and so has Markkanen. Dillon Brooks is looking like a steal in the 2nd round too.The "Lonzo stinks" (think if he'd started out with TWO games like Josh Jackson's -- ESPN would have the world coming to an end and this forum would have a thousand posts on it) and "Lonzo comes back" (I love the "he started summer AND pre-season with a bad game, but then...." line) alternating narratives that will probably go on all year are really unfair to Lonzo. But when it's his dad is leading the hot take charge it's sort hard to blame everyone else for their stupidity. Did I invent that his idiot dad said he was going to shut up? I guess even if he did make that promise, it'd be stupid of me to think there'd by any substance to it.
I will say from Fultz to Ball to Tatum and Jackson and Smith, this is going to be a great two years tracking which ones grow and develop and how.
We'll have to wait for the season to wrap up for the stats to tell the whole story, but by the eye test this year's crop of rookies looks more impactful than last year's. Some of that has to do with Simmon's injury delaying his start, but seems to be true further down the draft order too.Fox has looked good early and so has Markkanen. Dillon Brooks is looking like a steal in the 2nd round too.
I'd guess that's what most people expected. The 2017 class is going to be really good, even if it ends up lacking that generational talent. I think most people have/had Ben Simmons on par with Fultz, Ball, Tatum, and Jackson. Going into the 2017 draft, had Jaylen been available, there is no way he would have went in the top 3.We'll have to wait for the season to wrap up for the stats to tell the whole story, but by the eye test this year's crop of rookies looks more impactful than last year's. Some of that has to do with Simmon's injury delaying his start, but seems to be true further down the draft order too.
I know there were others on this train but I've felt that this 2017 drafts will go down as one of the best and most complete we've ever seen even without the once-a-decade talent like a LeBron or Brow at the top.We'll have to wait for the season to wrap up for the stats to tell the whole story, but by the eye test this year's crop of rookies looks more impactful than last year's. Some of that has to do with Simmon's injury delaying his start, but seems to be true further down the draft order too.
Yeah, I was going to say they need a coaching change, but I don't think it happens this year since tanking is probably the right decision so why try to fix a broken system when you want it to stay broken.34-86 under Earl Watson and nothing but a steady downtrend under Ryan McDonough's leadership. Countdown to the days when both are fired on same day. This organization needs a complete overhaul. I was sick to my stomach watching Josh Jackson jog down the floor completely disinterested in his first NBA game. The culture here appears to be god awful and that begins at the top.
Yup. I'm thinking of the 99 draft with Elton brand, Steve Francis, Baron Davis, Lamar Odom, Wally Szczerbiak, Richard Hamilton, Andrew Miller, Shawn Marion and Jason Terry all in the first ten picks (Jonathan Bender was the one bust). No superstars there, but everyone was above average, and most were all stars at some point. Later in the draft there was Artest, Corey Maggette, James Posey, Andrei Kirilenko and Manu Ginobili. An incredibly deep draft with no all-timers (although I suppose that depends on how one feels about ginobili). Definitely the early feeling I'm getting from 2017.I know there were others on this train but I've felt that this 2017 drafts will go down as one of the best and most complete we've ever seen even without the once-a-decade talent like a LeBron or Brow at the top.
I know, making fun of the Ball hype-train is like shooting fish in a barrel. But today, ESPN had the caption "Lonzo nearly records triple-double in loss to Pelicans". His line: 36min, 8pts (on 3-13 shooting), 8 Reb, 13 ast, 5 turnovers, -24.The "Lonzo stinks" (think if he'd started out with TWO games like Josh Jackson's -- ESPN would have the world coming to an end and this forum would have a thousand posts on it) and "Lonzo comes back" (I love the "he started summer AND pre-season with a bad game, but then...." line) alternating narratives that will probably go on all year are really unfair to Lonzo. But when it's his dad is leading the hot take charge it's sort hard to blame everyone else for their stupidity. Did I invent that his idiot dad said he was going to shut up? I guess even if he did make that promise, it'd be stupid of me to think there'd by any substance to it.
ESPN is pumping him up because Lonzo is what the consumer, particularly the west coast consumer, wants to see. I shared my story in Vegas this past summer of the Lakers summer league games being sold out the day before in a nearly 18,000 seat arena......for NBA summer league at a venue not associated with an NBA team! People were driving over 2 hours from CA to watch Lonzo play summer league......they surely want to click on their television set to do so.I know, making fun of the Ball hype-train is like shooting fish in a barrel. But today, ESPN had the caption "Lonzo nearly records triple-double in loss to Pelicans". His line: 36min, 8pts (on 3-13 shooting), 8 Reb, 13 ast, 5 turnovers, -24.
I think he'll be fine, but... if he winds up seriously struggling throughout the season, it will be the most entertaining ESPN self-inflicted coverage contortion to watch since the point when it became clear Tim Tebow couldn't throw a football.
Lolz, the triple-double (or worse, the "almost triple double") remains the dumbest thing ever.I know, making fun of the Ball hype-train is like shooting fish in a barrel. But today, ESPN had the caption "Lonzo nearly records triple-double in loss to Pelicans". His line: 36min, 8pts (on 3-13 shooting), 8 Reb, 13 ast, 5 turnovers, -24.
I think he'll be fine, but... if he winds up seriously struggling throughout the season, it will be the most entertaining ESPN self-inflicted coverage contortion to watch since the point when it became clear Tim Tebow couldn't throw a football.
2-of-7, 4 turnovers, actually.The baby Lakers have a game to forget against the Raptors. Lonzo shoots 2-of-6, 5 points, 7 rebounds, 6 assists and 2 turnovers. A pretty ugly game overall, but the Lakers were uglier.
Don't underestimate the "Triple Trip!"The baby Lakers have a game to forget against the Raptors. Lonzo shoots 2-of-6, 5 points, 7 rebounds, 6 assists and 2 turnovers. A pretty ugly game overall, but the Lakers were uglier.
So where will the Lakers finish given your insightsThis Lakers team is way too young to blossom this season. They're going to fade hard and we're going to get their pick. Brooklyn is going to win 3-5 more games than them and Danny will shine again.
Apparently Walton benched the starters down the stretch because they weren't trying hard enough on transition defense:The baby Lakers have a game to forget against the Raptors. Lonzo shoots 2-of-6, 5 points, 7 rebounds, 6 assists and 2 turnovers. A pretty ugly game overall, but the Lakers were uglier.
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/21190159/luke-walton-benches-los-angeles-lakers-starters-teaching-lesson-lossBall, Brandon Ingram, Kentavious Caldwell-Pope, Larry Nance Jr. and Brook Lopez were all yanked with 3 minutes, 42 seconds remaining and the Lakers trailing 91-83 before dropping a 101-92 loss to the Toronto Raptors at Staples Center.
"I took the starters out a little early in the third because they didn't get back in transition defense, which is our No. 1 key to being a good defensive team," Walton said. "We talked about how important that third quarter was with the momentum of the game changing and them being a playoff team, so we can't afford to give those up. So as a teaching lesson, we took them out a little earlier than I normally have done.
"Unfortunately, we didn't get back on defense again with four minutes to go in a close, winnable game," Walton added. "You can't just give away free points. To let them know how serious we are about transition defense, we pulled them out again. We were going to let the starters see what they can do with the game. But when they didn't get back on the break, they are telling me and each other that they don't really want to finish that game."
I wonder about this too. It's amazing - and a quasi-miracle - how well this worked out for Lavar and Lonzo. Wanting to get on the Lakers, stating that want publicly, and actually getting on the Lakers is quite a feat and a lot of moving parts had to fall into place.Wonder if Lavar will take the bait and share his thoughts on this, or let Walton coach the team without speaking out publicly. Interesting test for that dynamic.
Watched chunks of this game and Walton was spot-on to bench them. What stuck out to me wasn't just not getting back on defense, but that Ball was walking the ball up the court pretty consistently -- incredibly low energy and not at all like the style of pushing the ball constantly that Lonzo (and Walton) are supposed to be bringing. I didn't see any of the first half when I guess the Lakers were all over the place, but coming off a victory over Washington and a big first half lead, you'd think the one thing a young team would be is energetic. When Ball says:Apparently Walton benched the starters down the stretch because they weren't trying hard enough on transition defense:
http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/21190159/luke-walton-benches-los-angeles-lakers-starters-teaching-lesson-loss
Wonder if Lavar will take the bait and share his thoughts on this, or let Walton coach the team without speaking out publicly. Interesting test for that dynamic.
You really have to wonder. The game was tied (I think, or close) when Walton put the starters back in during the 4th quarter -- what's not to accept? I will say, on the more positive side, that Kuzma especially and Josh Hart in a more limited manner seem like real draft day finds. I assume Ball will continue to get open looks and his shot will start to drop more often, and he's not just a great passer but a superior rebounder for a guard, too (with the added ability make those long passes, so fast breaks aren't hurt by his banging the boards). All the harumphing about his point scoring so far seems silly, but I'd be worried about seeing quit in a guy so early. Be interesting to see how they play against the Jazz tonight, when at least they have 2nd night of back-to-back on the road to justify being low energy."I think we just lost our intensity, to be honest," Ball said. "A good team over there, and they came back [in the] second half strong, and we didn't accept it very well, and we lost.
Is there any reason to assume Ball's shot will drop more often? He needs a lot of space to get his shot off, and he's not a great FT shooter. I'm not saying it's impossible, but his college 3P sample is quite small. Regarding his point scoring, people are harrumphing because he hasn't shown much explosiveness, much ability to finish against NBA defenders, or much ability to beat guys off the dribble who aren't members of the Suns.I assume Ball will continue to get open looks and his shot will start to drop more often, and he's not just a great passer but a superior rebounder for a guard, too (with the added ability make those long passes, so fast breaks aren't hurt by his banging the boards). All the harumphing about his point scoring so far seems silly, but I'd be worried about seeing quit in a guy so early. Be interesting to see how they play against the Jazz tonight, when at least they have 2nd night of back-to-back on the road to justify being low energy.
GM's do foolish things all the time. All it takes is one to say he's young, he's box office, new culture, etc. and they're on the road to ruin or riches. But you're right that his value does go down.If he gets loud and it's because Lonzo isn't playing well, then I'm not sure how tradable Lonzo would be at that point.
Curious about this and where you see it, 3pt% is generally tough to accurately predict based on college, especially single seasons, his HS and tournament % suggest he's not a particularly good shooter and his FT% which is often considered a better indicator points toward him not being a good shooter.There's never any reason to assume anything, which is leading way to pose a question. But, yes, the stats guys all say his shot should translate and the "needs a lot of space" thing is a red herring. He's not a 3 and D guy whose job is to get a 3-ball off against closing defenders. He's the offensive initiator who needs to make 3s when he's given space. The shots I saw him miss last night -- I'm an expert because I saw him for 15 minutes -- were all missed with plenty of space to spare. I don't particularly assume he will or will not start making those -- imperfect stats say he should and the Lakers say during practice he regularly makes them so based on those highly imperfect indicators I'd guess more likely than not he will. But I think rather than assuming one way or the other it'd be better to wait until there's more evidence. Ball is regularly compared to Jason Kidd, and Kidd hit 27% of his 3 pointers in his first year (I assume Kidd was older, too) and overall shot 38% his first two years and just 37% in year 2. Kidd got considerably better as time wore on. I know it's radical to say in this forum, but judging a very young player based on 4 games (or even 4 months) really doesn't fly.
I don't know what you define as "blossom," but the Vegas O/U of 33 wins feels about right. Of course, we know LeBron & Silver are going to conspire to ensure the Lakers win the lottery, so the Celtics won't be getting the pick.This Lakers team is way too young to blossom this season. They're going to fade hard and we're going to get their pick. Brooklyn is going to win 3-5 more games than them and Danny will shine again.
Normally I'd expect that as well but the pick is going to Philly or Boston. There's no scenario where it stays in LA.I don't know what you define as "blossom," but the Vegas O/U of 33 wins feels about right. Of course, we know LeBron & Silver are going to conspire to ensure the Lakers win the lottery, so the Celtics won't be getting the pick.
You are correct, I misread it, the pick is top 1 protected, but for the Sixers, not LA.Normally I'd expect that as well but the pick is going to Philly or Boston. There's no scenario where it stays in LA.
Working off memory putting 2+2 together from ESPN, basically Pelton's statistical projection (though he includes Chad Ford's scouting that cited to Ball's deep range as one of Ball's positives). Ball is projected as by far the highest WARP this year at 4+ (and if I recall that was historically high) and in chat talked about his range and being the perfect 3 pointer/lay-up dunk efficient scorer as part of that high ranking.Curious about this and where you see it, 3pt% is generally tough to accurately predict based on college, especially single seasons, his HS and tournament % suggest he's not a particularly good shooter and his FT% which is often considered a better indicator points toward him not being a good shooter.
Beyond that, some people had real concerns about his not having the ability to score off the dribble.
I saw much more of "he'll be good even if he can't get his own shot" than "he'll be a good shooter/scorer" from most draft guys.
I agree it's way too early to judge, and he could improve. On the other hand he's showing all the issues people were concerned about, and his unorthodox mechanics make people less confident of improvement. It's fine to have a weird shot that goes in, but if it doesn't, you just have a guy who needs not tweaks, but an entirely rebuilt shot and that's really hard to do.
But that can't be... Lonzo don't lose twice in a week...Comfortable loss in Utah tonight
Most rookies don't play 35 min a night (Lonzo leads all rookies in playing time), so I think the 10.2 PPG looks a little rosy out of context. The 31 FG% undergirding it isn't pretty. I agree about the rest of your post butLonzo's averaging 10.2/8.6/8.8 with 3.2 TO/1.2 steals in 34 minutes. That is just fine for a rookie five games in.
This. He's playing for a team with zero expectations and even less talent, so he can fuck around all he wants to get those 10 points. If he were on a playoff team, he'd be averaging at most 6 points a game, and that's assuming he shot 100% on every FG he was allowed to take in the short time he saw the floor each night.Most rookies don't play 35 min a night (Lonzo leads all rookies in playing time), so I think the 10.2 PPG looks a little rosy out of context. The 31 FG% undergirding it isn't pretty. I agree about the rest of your post but
offense is still a serious question mark.
I think this is all spot on. He's not Magic II, he'll have growing pains, this may even be a rocky year for him overall. He's still got talent that can't be taught and a few key areas where he needs to improve that will no doubt be a focus of his offseason training. And, playing on a crap team, he'll get loads of experience. I'd buy - not sell - stock in Lonzo at this time.There's never any reason to assume anything, which is leading way to pose a question. But, yes, the stats guys all say his shot should translate and the "needs a lot of space" thing is a red herring. He's not a 3 and D guy whose job is to get a 3-ball off against closing defenders. He's the offensive initiator who needs to make 3s when he's given space. The shots I saw him miss last night -- I'm an expert because I saw him for 15 minutes -- were all missed with plenty of space to spare. I don't particularly assume he will or will not start making those -- imperfect stats say he should and the Lakers say during practice he regularly makes them so based on those highly imperfect indicators I'd guess more likely than not he will. But I think rather than assuming one way or the other it'd be better to wait until there's more evidence. Ball is regularly compared to Jason Kidd, and Kidd hit 27% of his 3 pointers in his first year (I assume Kidd was older, too) and overall shot 38% his first two years and just 37% in year 2. Kidd got considerably better as time wore on. I know it's radical to say in this forum, but judging a very young player based on 4 games (or even 4 months) really doesn't fly.