Coming up with a couple examples of what was claimed requires having previously kept detailed handwritten notes? Umm, OK.
I would agree that 98.5 has certain hosts (and we all know who they are) who frequently traffic in creating negative slants about the local teams. However, "negative" is not at all the same thing as "objectionable" (but nice try attempting to conflate the two concepts). Manufacturing negative slants is just standard garden-variety sports talk radio. Even if you were to limit the discussion to "negative" slants, saying that 98.5 has "built a brand" around that notion is an absurd overstatement. There is not a lot of that sort of thing on the morning show; in fact, they have a recurring segment centered around mocking "hot takez", which is often directed at personalities on their own station. And I would say the midday show is a mixed bag at best on that count.
All of the above is actually besides the point, though, since the claim made above was that there were "objectionable" (not negative) things said on 98.5 all the time that just aren't reported on for whatever reason. I'm just asking for a couple examples. EDIT: got some now.