Here, ready?I’m fucking sick of ‘I’m fucking sick of’.
Who cares how you feel about it. You just named a non-contextual statistical fact to counter a contextual statistical fact. ‘Skill’ has nothing to do with splitting on 18 in the face of 7, but skill (and other context) has a lot to do with going it on 4th and whatever.
oo000uuuhö really? A blackjack reference? That’s relevant how?
im not even saying the game decisions were correct. But your emotions and blackjack analogies aren’t worth much.
People look back on games and determine if it would have made sense to go for 2 or 1 based on the ensuing outcome.
Thats it.
It's retroactive bullshit at its finest. Revisionist history nonsense. As if the whole flow of a game wouldn't change based on the retroactively changed score.
But, really. It gives people the comfys. And makes them feel smart when they see a % sign. So much smarter than the dumb heathens of the last generation. Snake oil sales man taking advange of the upper middle class intelligence.
Whatever.
Last edited: