This is now: BB and the direction of the Patriots

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,229
Missoula, MT
IMO, the Patriots won a week ago, some of the conversation of BB's future calmed down a bit, so Curran released this for clicks when less people were dominating the talk radio waves with this.

It may happen that BB is not with NE next season but I don't think this "report" is indicative of anything.
 

Jungleland

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 2, 2009
2,381
IMO, the Patriots won a week ago, some of the conversation of BB's future calmed down a bit, so Curran released this for clicks when less people were dominating the talk radio waves with this.

It may happen that BB is not with NE next season but I don't think this "report" is indicative of anything.
I had this same thought. The win and basically every other team in the top 3 pick hunt winning (and Bill’s fun Gameday appearance) had the vibes too good. Doesn’t mean there’s nothing to see here, but the timing is suspect in a town and year where negativity has driven the conversation.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,297
Something called the "Score" app is reporting that the Patriots have decided to part ways with BB at the end of this season. They have 287,000 followers on Threads. Don't know if that's real or not.
The Score up is a really good smart phone app, it's out of Canada. Not sure if they're reporting that or aggregating it.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,297
I’d bring BB back for another season, since I figure it’s best to know for sure that he’s washed up as a GM/Coach than be left wondering if he had one last rabbit to pull out of his hat. Lots of coaches have had a few down years then rebounded.
No--I'd rather be a year too early than a year too late, especially with an EPICALLY important draft coming up.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,165
No--I'd rather be a year too early than a year too late, especially with an EPICALLY important draft coming up.
I mean sure, the counter would be.... wouldn't you want a GM/Coach who has proven he can be very very good to go into an important draft than one with either a worse track record or none at all?
 

Bongorific

Thinks he’s clever
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
8,474
Balboa Towers
We can debate Bill’s strengths with and without Brady, but is there any doubt that Kraft’s reputation as an owner and winner and all around good fella is based entirely on the two of them? Kraft seems like exactly like the kind of petty, lecherous scumbag who’d act out of the worst motivations.

I know we joke about it, and it’s a far remove, but if I knew a dude in real life who was rich and got busted getting hand jobs in a local mall, like we could still be friends, but would I ever think that person had good judgment or want to be in any way involved with him?
Are you basing the assumption in the first paragraph on the anecdote in the second? Or something else from Robert’s demeanor?

I met some of the Kraft fam 20 years ago when I was in college and volunteering at a charity ball in Boston. I am certainly not claiming that I know them or that I can judge someone’s character from 30 seconds of small talk. But Robert presented as rather humble in the moment. He took the time to talk to us “staff” and seemed genuinely appreciative when we thanked him for turning the team around. Jonathan was a bit of a jokester but was sort of on that line where you couldn’t tell if he was joking or sincere with the “we’re the Krafts” type comments. I could see him as less sentimental and loyal than pops.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,297
I mean sure, the counter would be.... wouldn't you want a GM/Coach who has proven he can be very very good to go into an important draft than one with either a worse track record or none at all?
I don't accept that he's been a good GM lately or that his recent track record with a young QB should give me confidence. I wouldn't hate if he was the coach, and not GM, but it seems that won't be an option.

And I understand reasonable minds can differ. I'm on the side of moving on. I know not everyone is. I just want a fresh start.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,839
Needham, MA
I go back and forth, I think the guy can probably still coach better than most at the NFL level. But, I just don't trust him to be able to assemble a roster on offense. If they end up with the #2 pick I think they have to draft one of the QBs and I don't trust that he'd do it. I wish he could continue on and just coach but that does not seem to be an option and unfortunately I just don't think he's the right guy to be calling the shots personnel wise anymore, at least on offense.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,174
IMO, the Patriots won a week ago, some of the conversation of BB's future calmed down a bit, so Curran released this for clicks when less people were dominating the talk radio waves with this.

It may happen that BB is not with NE next season but I don't think this "report" is indicative of anything.
This is where I am on this. I don't buy any of this reporting at all, but we'll obviously wait and see what happens.

That said, I don't understand the shrapnel being caught by Jonathan Kraft around here. He is not some random nepo baby who is just getting to lead the future of the franchise because of who his dad is. He's earned it, through 30+ years in that front office. Bob Kraft has been the face of the organization, but Jonathan Kraft has been the brains behind a TON of the major decisions that have happened with this team. Think of Robert Kraft as the head of sales, the public face, the affable, friendly, congenial guy that presses the flesh, goes to dinners and meetings, etc. Jonathan is the other side of that coin, the guy in the shadows with the pen and paper putting everything in motion, grinding out the details, etc. He's been an exec for this team since he was like 30 years old.

There have been a ton of pieces written about him over the years and what he does for the organization and for his father and I've known a ton of folks that have dealt with them and known them very well on a personal level and everyone says the same things. IMO, this one probably best explains it:

https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2019/09/03/jonathan-kraft/
 
Oct 12, 2023
747
If Bill moves on (trade or being fired via some “mutual agreement”), I just don’t see how Mayo makes sense as a replacement.

Any parting ways with Bill would presumably be motivated by the desire to bring in a new (hopefully proven and talented) GM. Ignoring that those are exceedingly rare and almost never available, one would think that either a veteran guy or an inexperienced guy looking to make his mark on the NFL would want to put his own stamp on the team. A complete refresh of sorts. To me, any Bill exit that isn’t a graceful retirement with the operations in good shape needs a full reboot and clean sweep of the entire organization.

replacing Bill is going to be a near impossible task for almost anyone asked to coach or GM the team. Fans are calling for the GOAT’s head after 2 mediocre years and one awful one. Any new guy might get a small grace period but it’s a brutal media market with fans having insanely unrealistic and lofty expectations. It’s going to be an almost unthinkable amount of pressure for any new coach, let alone someone who is completely inexperienced (both the GM and new HC). Mayo might make a good coach, who knows. But being one of “Bill’s guys” will just add more fuel to what will surely be a quick outrage party the second the team struggles to win double digit games.

furthermore, the team needs (and hopefully will get) a new franchise QB. They’re not going anywhere with Jones, Zappe or whatever the least terrible non-Cousins veteran might be. Let’s say Mayo becomes HC and hires some random offensive coordinator (also not easy to find a proven or talented guy there). If new QB and new OC do well early, new OC might quickly leave for a HC opportunity elsewhere and leave new QB facing a new scheme/new coordinator which is always an issue for developing QB.

I think any non-Bill HC needs to be an offensive guy to ensure long term continuity with New QB.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
38,179
Hingham, MA
This is where I am on this. I don't buy any of this reporting at all, but we'll obviously wait and see what happens.

That said, I don't understand the shrapnel being caught by Jonathan Kraft around here. He is not some random nepo baby who is just getting to lead the future of the franchise because of who his dad is. He's earned it, through 30+ years in that front office. Bob Kraft has been the face of the organization, but Jonathan Kraft has been the brains behind a TON of the major decisions that have happened with this team. Think of Robert Kraft as the head of sales, the public face, the affable, friendly, congenial guy that presses the flesh, goes to dinners and meetings, etc. Jonathan is the other side of that coin, the guy in the shadows with the pen and paper putting everything in motion, grinding out the details, etc. He's been an exec for this team since he was like 30 years old.

There have been a ton of pieces written about him over the years and what he does for the organization and for his father and I've known a ton of folks that have dealt with them and known them very well on a personal level and everyone says the same things. IMO, this one probably best explains it:

https://www.bostonmagazine.com/news/2019/09/03/jonathan-kraft/
I’m with you. I get the impression that Jonathan cares more about winning than his dad. I’m excited for the Jonathan era.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,516
No--I'd rather be a year too early than a year too late, especially with an EPICALLY important draft coming up.
People keep saying this, and I don't really know what it means.

Let's pretend the Pats end up with the second overall pick. What horrible thing is BB going to do in the draft that you have to preemptively relieve him of his duties?

And before we start with the, "he'll trade it for a bunch of day 2 picks!!"...stop it. This is message boarding and it's serious business.

No matter what option he takes, it'll be justifiable. Take a QB? Of course! Take Harrison Jr? He's an elite talent! Draft one of the great tackles? Gotta protect the pocket! Trade back a few spots? We have lots of holes, let's get an elite talent AND get a QB in round 2!

Any path he takes can be justified, which means people are fearmongering that he's going to make the wrong choice because...well, of course he would! But guess what? Whether it's BB or some amazing offensive genius they bring in as a new HC, nobody can predict if a player will be successful. You think some new HC is gonna come in and HE'S the one that has this "predict the future" thing figured out? Because BB is old and a new coach may be around longer...for some reason, that new HC will pick the better player?

If people want to get rid of BB, I get it (I don't really, but whatever). But it feels like there's some stretching to find any reason to can him.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,679
around the way
I don't accept that he's been a good GM lately or that his recent track record with a young QB should give me confidence. I wouldn't hate if he was the coach, and not GM, but it seems that won't be an option.

And I understand reasonable minds can differ. I'm on the side of moving on. I know not everyone is. I just want a fresh start.
I read CDs question as "do you want someone with no real track record, just hope?" vs. "or a guy with a 20-year run of awesome, unprecedented success in the salary cap era, followed by 3 years or so of suck?"

Fresh start is fair and understandable, but I think that people are dramatically under-appraising the risk here of door 2. The word "lately" and "recent" are doing a lot of work.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,165
I read CDs question as "do you want someone with no real track record, just hope?" vs. "or a guy with a 20-year run of awesome, unprecedented success in the salary cap era, followed by 3 years or so of suck?"

Fresh start is fair and understandable, but I think that people are dramatically under-appraising the risk here of door 2. The word "lately" and "recent" are doing a lot of work.
yeah, I don't think it's totally unreasonable to move on from Bill, but I also think people traditionally have done a bad job of evaluating Bill's GM work. He's at the very least average as a drafter, and traditionally was very good as a pro personnel guy. The last few years have been rough, and there were a couple big misses (Harry notably), but that happens to even the best GMs. If you add an ex-GM, that guy's record is highly unlikely to be on aggregate better than Bill's, if you go someone new... well there is a big risk there, some guys are really bad.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,876
I just keep coming back to this question: If Kraft was so down on BB, why did he keep extending his contract, and why did he give him a 2-year extension this past offseason? Obviously he thinks BB is good at his job, right?
 

PayrodsFirstClutchHit

Bob Kraft's Season Ticket Robin Hoodie
SoSH Member
Jun 29, 2006
8,323
Winterport, ME
It could be that the Krafts are looking at attendance numbers and are concerned about the financial aspects of trying to fill a stadium and sell season tickets with the current product on the field. I don’t think it is outrageous that they are not being sentimental about allowing BB to continue on this path because of past performance and are basing their decisions on what is best for the franchise moving forward.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,343
I just keep coming back to this question: If Kraft was so down on BB, why did he keep extending his contract, and why did he give him a 2-year extension this past offseason? Obviously he thinks BB is good at his job, right?
I'll start by saying I have no idea what Kraft (and Kraft) will do. But if they move on from Bill, it's not because they believe Bill is no longer good at his job.

During the offseason, the Pats had missed the playoffs 2 of the prior 3 seasons, one of which (2020) was a mulligan for a number of reasons. Now the team is looking like it's going to need to rebuild the offense from the studs, which was definitely not the plan during this past offseason. So the circumstances have changed. Bill runs the entire football side of the operation, which includes responsibilities no other head coach in the league has. And it's unlikely Bill would ever agree to change his job description while in New England, nor should he feel he needs to do so. Bottom line is that the Krafts may feel the organizations needs no longer align with Bill's approach. Doesn't mean they think less of Bill or think that Bill would be nothing without Brady. Just that now may be the time given Bill's age, Robert Kraft's age, and the reality of the roster.

Do I agree with moving on? No. Just that I can see how and why the Krafts may decide to do so. And I'm confident it has nothing to do with what happened in 2017, lol, guffaw.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,432
AZ
And before we start with the, "he'll trade it for a bunch of day 2 picks!!"...stop it. This is message boarding and it's serious business.
I'm team keep BB, and in fact have in another thread put my money where my mouth is by betting for charity that he'll still be here next year. That said, the idea that he will trade down doesn't strike me as preposterous at all. Maybe not likely, but not implausible.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,297
If people want to get rid of BB, I get it (I don't really, but whatever). But it feels like there's some stretching to find any reason to can him.
I mean, I don't *think* I'm stretching. I just think it's time. Why? I don't like his drafting over the past few seasons, some of his decisions, etc. I'm 60/40 on this, maybe 55/45. If you could tell me he'd agree to coach with someone else calling the shots, I'm fine. I'm more down on BB the GM than I am on BB the coach. I just don't think we can separate them at this point.
 

Mugsy's Jock

Eli apologist
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 28, 2000
15,155
UWS, NYC
Purely speculative/observational, but I thought Robert looked/sounded/ seemed noticeably older , weaker, and slower on Gameday last Saturday. I wonder if he’s fully entered figure head status.
I'm gonna say no, because he's still the head of the broadcasting committee on behalf of the owners and has actively been taking meetings with all the big TV players over the last couple of months. The owners aren't going to just trust grandpa with that responsibility.
 

Ralphwiggum

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2012
9,839
Needham, MA
I just keep coming back to this question: If Kraft was so down on BB, why did he keep extending his contract, and why did he give him a 2-year extension this past offseason? Obviously he thinks BB is good at his job, right?
Bottoming out and having potentially a two win season with a historically bad offense with a roster constructed by Bill might have changed their minds?

Like I said up-thread I go back and forth on what the right move is for the Krafts here, but there's more than a little evidence to support the fact that they may not want Bill in charge of the rebuild that needs to happen on offense.
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,572
It could be that the Krafts are looking at attendance numbers and are concerned about the financial aspects of trying to fill a stadium and sell season tickets with the current product on the field. I don’t think it is outrageous that they are not being sentimental about allowing BB to continue on this path because of past performance and are basing their decisions on what is best for the franchise moving forward.
This is an underrated point. It's losing plus the unwatchable version of the team that's been out there this year. It's sapping interest in the product. People show up for success or potential. If we had a young gunslinger putting up points but lost a lot of close games and were 3-10, the feeling might be different. (Hell, this may happen next year so we'll see.)
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,297
I read CDs question as "do you want someone with no real track record, just hope?" vs. "or a guy with a 20-year run of awesome, unprecedented success in the salary cap era, followed by 3 years or so of suck?"

Fresh start is fair and understandable, but I think that people are dramatically under-appraising the risk here of door 2. The word "lately" and "recent" are doing a lot of work.
Sure, but that argument can be extended to almost anything. "Why did Sox get rid of Bloom, next guy might be worse."

I get it. I liken it to a relationship. I may have been happy in it for 5 years. But that doesn't mean I need the next 5 years to be unhappy before thinking it's time to move on.


I just keep coming back to this question: If Kraft was so down on BB, why did he keep extending his contract, and why did he give him a 2-year extension this past offseason? Obviously he thinks BB is good at his job, right?
He could have been down on BB afer 2018, but not down enough. Same in 2019, but he's closer, etc., etc. Eventually the line is crossed. We can obviously disagree with that, but each season adds more evidence to each side. Why is it odd to think Kraft finally has decided it's time? That's how most decisions are made.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,229
Missoula, MT
This is an underrated point. It's losing plus the unwatchable version of the team that's been out there this year. It's sapping interest in the product. People show up for success or potential. If we had a young gunslinger putting up points but lost a lot of close games and were 3-10, the feeling might be different. (Hell, this may happen next year so we'll see.)
Maybe, maybe not. All home games are sold out this year and there is still a massive wait list for season seats. I just don't see how the marginal loss of concessions for a small number of games this season will impact the potential product next year(s) when we know the defense will be very good, the team will likely draft a franchise QB and T/WR and have a ton of money to spend in FA. Regardless of who is HC of the NEP, the equity in the team is there even after a potential 3-4 win season.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,165
Sure, but that argument can be extended to almost anything. "Why did Sox get rid of Bloom, next guy might be worse."

I
except these aren't remotely comparable. Bloom generally failed in a sport where he should have an advantage over most of his opposing GMs and had no track record of real success in that role.
Bill had 20 years as arguably the best to ever do it in a league that tries really hard to enforce parity.

The argument isn't "you don't know if the next guy is worse than the guy you have" it is.... "The guy you have put up 20 of the best years ever, and as such the next guy is likely to be worse given the success rates of guys in those roles"
 

astrozombie

New Member
Sep 12, 2022
434
I doubt the Pats are in danger of a substantial financial hit as a result of these last few years. The fanbase is large enough and the team is not destitute enough that there will still be people in seats. it took decades for the Browns and Lions fans wading through misery and even then, those teams still got people in the stands. I don't think people stop showing up to games.
FWIW, what I do believe is a factor with the Krafts though is prestige. I think they like being considered one of them premier franchises, especially after the Pats spent a long time on the level of those aforementioned Browns and Lions teams. I think they would like to be considered with the Cowboys, 49ers, Giants, Steelers, etc. as the vanguard of NFL teams. I don't think they want to be lumped in with the Raiders (once great, now mediocre at best) or the Bucs (some good to great seasons in a sea of largely bad seasons) or teams like that.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,509
Cleaning house means that you end up having to make three very big bets: on a new GM, on a new coaching staff and a new QB. It's pretty rare to have all three of those openings at the same time.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,745
I’m with you. I get the impression that Jonathan cares more about winning than his dad. I’m excited for the Jonathan era.
I think that Jonathan, who has never had a real job, will come out swinging his dick, given the opportunity.
The idea that BB's persona "doesn't play" when they are losing is silly, IMO. That's who he is. If he came out dressed like Elton John when they were 2-10, he'd be Coach Trytoohard. F. that.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,165
I think that Jonathan, who has never had a real job, will come out swinging his dick, given the opportunity.
yeah any time I see a guy whose Wikipedia shows nothing that is not directly related to his dad I assume he's going to be an incompetent prick so...
 

PayrodsFirstClutchHit

Bob Kraft's Season Ticket Robin Hoodie
SoSH Member
Jun 29, 2006
8,323
Winterport, ME
Many fans justify the expense of season tickets by selling seats to some of the games to recoup the costs. When tickets are going for $10 game day on the resale market, I am not convinced that this will be a sustainable model long term. That has to factor in at some level for the Krafts in all of this.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,229
Missoula, MT
I doubt the Pats are in danger of a substantial financial hit as a result of these last few years. The fanbase is large enough and the team is not destitute enough that there will still be people in seats. it took decades for the Browns and Lions fans wading through misery and even then, those teams still got people in the stands. I don't think people stop showing up to games.
FWIW, what I do believe is a factor with the Krafts though is prestige. I think they like being considered one of them premier franchises, especially after the Pats spent a long time on the level of those aforementioned Browns and Lions teams. I think they would like to be considered with the Cowboys, 49ers, Giants, Steelers, etc. as the vanguard of NFL teams. I don't think they want to be lumped in with the Raiders (once great, now mediocre at best) or the Bucs (some good to great seasons in a sea of largely bad seasons) or teams like that.
Over the last 10 years, every one of those teams has had a down year and it did absolutely nothing to those franchises. Not embarrassment, not loss of season ticket revenue, not equity. The NFL is more popular than it has ever been and, as we have seen, a down year or two will do nothing to this model of fandom.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,193
I just keep coming back to this question: If Kraft was so down on BB, why did he keep extending his contract, and why did he give him a 2-year extension this past offseason? Obviously he thinks BB is good at his job, right?
Is a 2yr extension a lot though? Keeps the financial commitment pretty low. He probably didn't want him to be a lame duck and a 1yr extension is almost as bad. 2yrs is probably the right extension given the circumstances. If this was a 3-4yr extension that would say a lot more IMO.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,229
Missoula, MT
Many fans justify the expense of season tickets by selling seats to some of the games to recoup the costs. When tickets are going for $10 game day on the resale market, I am not convinced that this will be a sustainable model long term. That has to factor in at some level for the Krafts in all of this.
Yeah, that game was also in a torrential rainstorm so it makes sense why fans wouldn't show up for it. There will be butts in seats for the KC game. The Jets game, who knows? But that game is sold out.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,390
For all the talk of moving on from Bill as coach and/or GM, who’s the hot pick to replace him? I’ve seen Mayo’s name, but do we know he had the chops, especially with Bill’s coaching tree looking about as robust as the stump at the end of the Silverstein favorite?

Even if Bill is just a mid level coach and exec now, that’s still fairly valuable.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,516
Maybe, maybe not. All home games are sold out this year and there is still a massive wait list for season seats. I just don't see how the marginal loss of concessions for a small number of games this season will impact the potential product next year(s) when we know the defense will be very good, the team will likely draft a franchise QB and T/WR and have a ton of money to spend in FA. Regardless of who is HC of the NEP, the equity in the team is there even after a potential 3-4 win season.
Even if people weren't showing up, ticket sale losses are mitigated. 40% of all team ticket sales go to revenue sharing, so its not like empty seats are going to really crush the Krafts either. And since the Krafts are one of only 4 ownership groups to own their own stadium - Dolphins, Patriots, Commanders, Panthers - they get 100% of concession and parking revenue instead of having to split it with stadium ownership (not to mention they don't have to pay millions to "rent" the stadium like these other teams).

None of that even touches on the fact that a good chunk of revenue comes from national shared revenue - which hit an alltime high of $12B last season. The Patriots took home $372M in shared revenue before they even touch regional revenue streams. Considering their operating expenses and team payroll total about $486M - and the team had $684M in total revenue during a down season last season - it would take a long time (a decade? more?) for the local revenue to drop far enough to start hitting the Krafts pockets.

All of that is to say that, between shrewd business deals, revenue sharing safety nets, and football still being really popular, I doubt Kraft has put much thought on how employing BB next season would impact revenue.
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
For all the talk of moving on from Bill as coach and/or GM, who’s the hot pick to replace him? I’ve seen Mayo’s name, but do we know he had the chops, especially with Bill’s coaching tree looking about as robust as the stump at the end of the Silverstein favorite?

Even if Bill is just a mid level coach and exec now, that’s still fairly valuable.
Two betting sites (bookies and sportsline) list many of the same candidates (Mayo, Vrabel, Ben Johnson, Dan Quinn) as well as some wildcards (Bieniemy, Kingsbury). Some of these feel Patriots specific whereas others seem just to be generic Head Coaching favorites (I haven't heard any specific rumors of Dan Quinn connections to the Patriots, which would be one of the most shocking possible outcomes after Super Bowl LI.)

If Belichick really is going, my uneducated hopes are for Mayo or Vrabel for similar reasons. Per Volin, two sources claim that the Krafts think Vrabel would be their "home run hire" (great reputation, Patriots legend, better record with the Titans than Belichick's with the Browns, etc.). A GM tried to map out what a trade for him would look like: https://www.boston.com/sports/new-england-patriots/2023/11/15/new-england-patriots-mike-vrabel-bill-belichick-nfl-football-trade/

Next New England Patriots Head Coach Odds via bookies.com
Coach Odds Implied Probability
Jerod Mayo +375 21.1%
Ben Johnson +500 16.7%
Kliff Kingsbury +575 14.8%
Mike Vrabel +600 14.3%
Brian Callahan +750 11.8%
Kellen Moore +1000 9.1%
Ron Rivera +1200 7.7%
Dan Quinn +1800 5.3%
The Field +425 19.1%


Via SportsLine oddsmakers: Who will be the Patriots' head coach for Week 1 of the 2024 season if not Bill Belichick?
  • Jerod Mayo +200
  • Mike Vrabel +300
  • Eric Bieniemy +700
  • Bill O'Brien +900
  • Ben Johnson +1000
  • Jim Harbaugh +1200
  • Josh McDaniels +1400
  • Brian Johnson +1500
  • Kliff Kingsbury +1800
  • Dan Quinn +1900
  • Brian Flores +2000
  • Zac Robinson +2500
 
Last edited:

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,876
Is a 2yr extension a lot though? Keeps the financial commitment pretty low. He probably didn't want him to be a lame duck and a 1yr extension is almost as bad. 2yrs is probably the right extension given the circumstances. If this was a 3-4yr extension that would say a lot more IMO.
Maybe. I am pretty sure that BB is getting paid a ton though each year.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
49,042
Its worth wondering if BB's future hinges on just how available Vrabel is at the end of the season. Given the smoke around him as the Kraft's preferred successor, maybe BB is safe until/unless they can pry him loose from Tennessee. It feels like Sportsline's odds are more in line with what we would expect out of the Krafts though a Ben Johnson hire would be fascinating. It doesn't feel like a Kraft move but maybe they want to change everything. A well known name (to them) just feels more in line with how they operate but perhaps they are going to do things differently all the way around this time.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,165
There should probably be no short list for coach, unless Kraft is giving one guy the Bill role. Otherwise they should hire the GM and have him hire the coach, doing the opposite almost always fails.


As to Bob Kraft's pockets..... he is and will continue to do just fine. Gameday revenue takes years of bad teams to drop, and gameday revenue is a drop in the bucket of the income for the team.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,165
Its worth wondering if BB's future hinges on just how available Vrabel is at the end of the season. Given the smoke around him as the Kraft's preferred successor, maybe BB is safe until/unless they can pry him loose from Tennessee. It feels like Sportsline's odds are more in line with what we would expect out of the Krafts though a Ben Johnson hire would be fascinating. It doesn't feel like a Kraft move but maybe they want to change everything. A well known name (to them) just feels more in line with how they operate but perhaps they are going to do things differently all the way around this time.
I mean... wow that would be quite the move to go to Vrabel.... fire Bill to hire a demonstrably worse coach, because he was a former player here, then go get your GM? That's some Mark Davis/Dan Snyder shit.
 

richgedman'sghost

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2006
1,897
ct
[


An all-time great coach. He did have an all-world offensive line for many of those years…that continuity and excellence had to help.
Gibbs is an all time great coach but 2 of the 3 SB wins came in years impacted by strikes/lockouts 1982 and 1987.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
49,042
I mean... wow that would be quite the move to go to Vrabel.... fire Bill to hire a demonstrably worse coach, because he was a former player here, then go get your GM? That's some Mark Davis/Dan Snyder shit.
I am not value judging this potential move. However I suspect the Kraft's reported interest in Vrabel has to be somewhat legit. He checks a lot of boxes. Known entity, relatively young, not part of the BB "coaching tree" (AKA the Least Giving Tree ever and if cited an indicator that someone you are talking with gets their sports takes from elsewhere), some success as a HC in his current role etc.

To be clear, I am not in the "BB needs to go" camp but there are enough signs that its a realistic outcome in the next few months. All I was noting was that the Krafts alleged affinity for Vrabel may mean that BB's job security is based on Vrabel's standing with the Titans. And to be clear, If Vrabel was on the outs with his current employer, I would expect the media drumbeat for him to replace BB to amp up significantly.
 

Dogman

Yukon Cornelius
Moderator
SoSH Member
Mar 19, 2004
15,229
Missoula, MT
My hunch is that that hasn't happened with Vrabel and the media because Vrabel successfully played a role in ousting the former GM after the Brown trade. Vrabel seems pretty safe in his HC role with TENN at the moment.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
35,165
I am not value judging this potential move. However I suspect the Kraft's reported interest in Vrabel has to be somewhat legit. He checks a lot of boxes. Known entity, relatively young, not part of the BB "coaching tree" (AKA the Least Giving Tree ever and if cited an indicator that someone you are talking with gets their sports takes from elsewhere), some success as a HC in his current role etc.

To be clear, I am not in the "BB needs to go" camp but there are enough signs that its a realistic outcome in the next few months. All I was noting was that the Krafts alleged affinity for Vrabel may mean that BB's job security is based on Vrabel's standing with the Titans. And to be clear, If Vrabel was on the outs with his current employer, I would expect the media drumbeat for him to replace BB to amp up significantly.
oh yeah, I wasn't saying you did, just that it's a terrible reason for a move, and feeds into the idea that the Krafts are both flailing and potentially setting the team up to fail.

Now, if they get a superstar QB this year... might not matter, but my faith in the Krafts is not high at all.
 

BusRaker

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 11, 2006
2,382
I mean the funniest thing (although pretty much impossible) in the world would be for Kraft's to fire BB, then he signs with Tampa Bay, wins the super bowl and goes to the hall of fame in a sleeveless Bucs hoodie.
I still think he gets another year in the dual role and then becomes some sort of GM/Special Advisor to the Krafts. Level of confidence in that is going down though. What does Vegas say?
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,509
Two betting sites (bookies and sportsline) list many of the same candidates (Mayo, Vrabel, Ben Johnson, Dan Quinn) as well as some wildcards (Bieniemy, Kingsbury). Some of these feel Patriots specific whereas others seem just to be generic Head Coaching favorites (I haven't heard any specific rumors of Dan Quinn connections to the Patriots, which would be one of the most shocking possible outcomes after Super Bowl LI.)

If Belichick really is going, my uneducated hopes are for Mayo or Vrabel for similar reasons. Per Volin, two sources claim that the Krafts think Vrabel would be their "home run hire" (great reputation, Patriots legend, better record with the Titans than Belichick's with the Browns, etc.). A GM tried to map out what a trade for him would look like: https://www.boston.com/sports/new-england-patriots/2023/11/15/new-england-patriots-mike-vrabel-bill-belichick-nfl-football-trade/

Next New England Patriots Head Coach Odds via bookies.com
Coach Odds Implied Probability
Jerod Mayo +375 21.1%
Ben Johnson +500 16.7%
Kliff Kingsbury +575 14.8%
Mike Vrabel +600 14.3%
Brian Callahan +750 11.8%
Kellen Moore +1000 9.1%
Ron Rivera +1200 7.7%
Dan Quinn +1800 5.3%
The Field +425 19.1%


Via SportsLine oddsmakers: Who will be the Patriots' head coach for Week 1 of the 2024 season if not Bill Belichick?
  • Jerod Mayo +200
  • Mike Vrabel +300
  • Eric Bieniemy +700
  • Bill O'Brien +900
  • Ben Johnson +1000
  • Jim Harbaugh +1200
  • Josh McDaniels +1400
  • Brian Johnson +1500
  • Kliff Kingsbury +1800
  • Dan Quinn +1900
  • Brian Flores +2000
  • Zac Robinson +2500
Feels like Flores should be getting more consideration here.
 

nattysez

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2010
8,583
Re: BB's successor, this is interesting:

“Multiple sources in and around the building say Mayo taking over next year is the most likely outcome,” Graziano wrote Tuesday, “though others are no longer certain that’s the way Kraft will go. Mayo would have to sell Kraft on who will be in charge of the offense, the quarterback’s development and personnel. That could all happen and work out in Mayo’s favor, but it doesn’t sound like it’s a 100% sure thing.”
https://nesn.com/2023/12/patriots-rumors-has-robert-kraft-changed-stance-on-bill-belichick-successor/
 
Status
Not open for further replies.