Search results

  1. WayBackVazquez

    The Bill Simmons Thread

    LOLBOOHOO. First a mischaracterization, and now an insinuation. Someone is catching so many hurt feels today.
  2. WayBackVazquez

    The Bill Simmons Thread

    Seemed pretty clear that I was stating that it's impossible to say which Dope/mod edited my post.
  3. WayBackVazquez

    The Bill Simmons Thread

    Impossible to say if the Dope/mod who edited my post is the one who started his own with "Dummy."
  4. WayBackVazquez

    The Bill Simmons Thread

    If I link you to it, what happens then? Do I "win the Internet" again? It wasn't made by anyone in this thread; if it had been, I would have quoted it in the examples post. It's been made elsewhere on the Internet. [ad hom try again]
  5. WayBackVazquez

    The Bill Simmons Thread

    I can see how it would be tiring to defend yourself using only ad hominems and below average intelligence agains a brutal and malicious attack like someone quoting a single sentence post of yours.
  6. WayBackVazquez

    The Bill Simmons Thread

    Little dummy to dope lesson: that little blue arrow next to a poster's name before a quoted post will take you right to that post, and its time stamp. Follow this tip and you can take your first step toward making your family proud. His numbers have cratered since football started, and NBA...
  7. WayBackVazquez

    The Bill Simmons Thread

    I don't know how I can be completely misrepresenting what you said when I directly and completely quoted it. Also, you don't recall correctly, because you said it after his third show. And your bread and butter theory appears to be wrong, too. Other than that, good point.
  8. WayBackVazquez

    The Bill Simmons Thread

    Yep. I think we can all agree there are many, many things people would rather watch than Any Given Wednesday, including the World Series.
  9. WayBackVazquez

    The Bill Simmons Thread

    Holy crap. The end is near.
  10. WayBackVazquez

    NFL's Declining Viewership: One Slice at a Time

    I bought it as a gift. Also, 100% of the proceeds are supposed to go to the NFL Foundation, so it's not a straight cash grab.
  11. WayBackVazquez

    NFL's Declining Viewership: One Slice at a Time

    Yes. I bought one of the Pats' jerseys.
  12. WayBackVazquez

    Robert Kraft- Gets his ya yas out.

    Excellent first post.
  13. WayBackVazquez

    About Gho$t...

    "There is no hard and fast rule of thumb, but if a kicker posts accuracy greater than 90% in two out of three seasons, he is worth investing in because of their ability to provide above-average performance on a regular basis. While one season is often too small of a sample size to provide...
  14. WayBackVazquez

    Liverpool 2016-17: Klopp's Kop

    No, he really wasn't.
  15. WayBackVazquez

    Liverpool 2016-17: Klopp's Kop

    Seems more likely they were being held back by Rodgers and his system. Lallana, for example looks like he's "growing" back into the player he promised to be at Southampton.
  16. WayBackVazquez

    Week 7 Game Thread

    When they had second and goal at the 1? They actually ran a play there, despite the fact that kickers were hitting extra points from the 2 at over 99% before the rule change. There is nobody to blame but the kicker. He failed to do the easiest part of the job hat he is paid seven figures a year...
  17. WayBackVazquez

    Week 7 Game Thread

    What a joke. These teams should be relegated, nevermind contending for the NFC title.
  18. WayBackVazquez

    2016 NFL Gambling Thread

    Overtime! So you mean there's still a chance?
  19. WayBackVazquez

    About Gho$t...

    Sure, I'll die on it. It would have been bottom five among qualified kickers, and bottom six among all players according to ESPN stats. I get that you're a kicker. Are you also a mathematician? It's a problem.
  20. WayBackVazquez

    About Gho$t...

    No, it isn't. 19-21 would've been bottom five in the league last year, and is in the same range this year. It may be a smallish sample size, but if it's kept up, it's not acceptable.
Top Bottom