2016 Colts: Always a Banner Year

SoxinSeattle

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 6, 2003
2,373
Here
Somebody called Mike Wells at ESPN says the Colts just hired Chris Ballard to be GM.

"The Colts hired Chris Ballard as their new general manager. Ballard, who spent the previous four seasons with the Kansas City Chiefs, replaces the fired Ryan Grigson."
 

richgedman'sghost

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2006
1,878
ct
He's the Kansas City Nick Cesario
So that means that the Colts will now be run in a professional and competent manner? Should we as Pats fans be worried? I was hoping they would hire the GM equivalent of Rich Kotite or John Idzik. Always hate to see the competition actually make a good move.
 

MarcSullivaFan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2005
3,412
Hoo-hoo-hoo hoosier land.
So that means that the Colts will now be run in a professional and competent manner? Should we as Pats fans be worried? I was hoping they would hire the GM equivalent of Rich Kotite or John Idzik. Always hate to see the competition actually make a good move.
Let's not go crazy here. Irsay is forcing him to keep Pagano this season. So there's still plenty of whackiness at the top.

That said, does seem like a good hire, and with a top-10 QB you're just a good draft or two from being a contender.
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
So that means that the Colts will now be run in a professional and competent manner? Should we as Pats fans be worried? I was hoping they would hire the GM equivalent of Rich Kotite or John Idzik. Always hate to see the competition actually make a good move.
Your reading waaay too much into that. It was more of a job and rank comparison. Sort of like Lincoln/Trump.
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
Jim Irsay with a gem on twitter last night. I do like his taste, so I'll say that. Of course I take it all back if he was actually hacked. His actual taste is probably somewhere between malnourished crack whore and an aging hooker and we wouldn't see eye to eye on that.

Linking the PFT story about the tweet as I assume that is likely SFW. To get the uncensored version, you need to google it.
 

SidelineCameras

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2011
1,813
Now here is the best defense of one's sports team that I've ever read - the ADA. Look it up!

bannedfromchoirpractice says:Jul 3, 2017 9:28 PM

How do you know the players weren’t hard of hearing? Hearing devices are protected under the ADA. That is federal law. We need to stop this ridiculous witch hunt to find teams other than the Patriots who cheat. You’re not going to find any. Get over it already. The Patriots are cheaters and it’s in the history books. Look it up.
 

Bowhemian

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2015
5,773
Bow, NH
Are you serious? He is a top 10, if not top 5 QB of all time. He WAS the franchise. I think it's a little too soon, but Manning absolutely deserves a statue.
I said that I knew he was real good. And he did a lot to help the franchise. But I don't know, I think we may have softened the criteria as to who would deserve a statue. For example, Brady could very well got one in Foxboro, but I am not sure there should be one.

Maybe I am just not a statue guy.
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
11,945
I said that I knew he was real good. And he did a lot to help the franchise. But I don't know, I think we may have softened the criteria as to who would deserve a statue. For example, Brady could very well got one in Foxboro, but I am not sure there should be one.

Maybe I am just not a statue guy.
If you're not sure that Brady should have a statue then I don't think it's a 'maybe' that you're not a statue guy.

What would possibly be your criteria?
 

Bowhemian

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2015
5,773
Bow, NH
Yeah, I knew as soon as I hit enter I would get pushback on that.
Honestly I don't know the answer. Maybe there are 2 problems with me:
1. I am not a statue guy
2. I really dislike Peyton Manning
 

Spelunker

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 17, 2005
11,945
Yeah, I knew as soon as I hit enter I would get pushback on that.
Honestly I don't know the answer. Maybe there are 2 problems with me:
1. I am not a statue guy
2. I really dislike Peyton Manning
At the least, I'd assume you'd be cool with the rhapsodic example right above you.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
Yeah, I knew as soon as I hit enter I would get pushback on that.
Honestly I don't know the answer. Maybe there are 2 problems with me:
1. I am not a statue guy
2. I really dislike Peyton Manning
I'm with you, brother. Statues really should serve some sort of civic purpose, educational value, and commemoration of community impact. Being a good sportster is nice, but he's no General Sheridan:


Because I know no one is clicking that link without an explanation:

In Baseball, when a National League team plays it's first away game in Chicago, it is traditional for the rookie players to be sent out into the night with a paint can, a brush and a map to the corner of Belmont and Sheridan Road, about a mile east of Wrigley Field. There they paint their team colors on the testicles.

To be just a little more serious, Sheridan is a very good argument for why being honored by a statue is a pretty big deal. Here's his wiki page, for the highlights. He was important enough to briefly appear on the $10 bill, FFS.

For Peyton Manning to have a statue isn't a travesty, but it might be a travishamockery. Then again, this is the Colts and their participation-banner-loving owner. Manning getting a statue for one Super Bowl win, a couple MVPs, and vamoosing to Denver to win a bit more is silly; it devalues what "getting a statue" used to mean. I'd argue there's only about 15 athletes worldwide who deserve a statue. Though I will note that rich owners can argue otherwise, by putting up monuments to whomever they choose.

What I'm saying is that I hope there is a new tradition born of the Manning Statue: paint his balls. THAT'S a monument that celebrates all of Manning's achievements.
 

Bowhemian

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2015
5,773
Bow, NH
I'm with you, brother. Statues really should serve some sort of civic purpose, educational value, and commemoration of community impact. Being a good sportster is nice, but he's no General Sheridan:

For Peyton Manning to have a statue isn't a travesty, but it might be a travishamockery. Then again, this is the Colts and their participation-banner-loving owner. Manning getting a statue for one Super Bowl win, a couple MVPs, and vamoosing to Denver to win a bit more is silly; it devalues what "getting a statue" used to mean. I'd argue there's only about 15 athletes worldwide who deserve a statue. Though I will note that rich owners can argue otherwise, by putting up monuments to whomever they choose.

What I'm saying is that I hope there is a new tradition born of the Manning Statue: paint his balls. THAT'S a monument that celebrates all of Manning's achievements.
Not sure if serious, but that is exactly where I am at.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
If you're not sure that Brady should have a statue then I don't think it's a 'maybe' that you're not a statue guy.

What would possibly be your criteria?
I don't think Brady should get a statue because a statue is not sufficient. At a minimum, he should be getting an airport.
 

BuellMiller

New Member
Mar 25, 2015
451
So Brady and Giselle are going to live in separate states?
I think if you're going to get caught up in Constitutional fine print, I'm guessing the fact that Giselle isn't a natural born citizen might preclude her from the VP anyways. Plus, the VP has got to be BB in the Dick Cheney kind of really-running-things-from-the-sidelines role, anyways, right?
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
I don't get the fuss over the Manning statue. Lucas Oil Stadium is always filled with busts anyway.
If we're not going to create a new tradition and paint the Manning Statue's balls a different color every week in the fall, then can I suggest we find some way for the statue to wave it's hands and install a loudspeaker that blares "OMAHA!" at random intervals?
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
I'm with you, brother. Statues really should serve some sort of civic purpose, educational value, and commemoration of community impact.
This is how I feel. Brady is great at football. I'm a huge football fan, but at the end of the day, so what?

I think Boston has done well with sports figure statues. The Ted Williams one is not just of Ted Williams, but with him and a kid, celebrating the history of both Williams and the Red Sox with the Jimmy Fund. The Teammates statue celebrates that group of guys. Bill Russell had civic impact beyond the court and the placement of the statue at government center signifies that. The Bobby Orr statue outside the garden commemorates not just his career but also that moment, one of the iconic images in hockey history.

In that vein, a statue of Brady with the backwards cap and either hands on head or the double-finger-point might be appropriate, because it celebrates not just Brady but also that moment, the first Super Bowl victory in franchise history. I'm not as keen on a statue of just Brady dropping back to pass or whatever.

I'm also for building a Tuck Rule statue, preferably in Oakland, just to piss off Raiders fans.
 

soxfan121

JAG
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
23,043
I'm also for building a Tuck Rule statue, preferably in Oakland, just to piss off Raiders fans.
I am SO on board for this. And it fits my "civic purpose" criteria - pissing off Raider fans is something we should all aspire to do.

Plus @Gunfighter 09 is reading this, clenching his teeth, and mumbling "those bastards" under his breath.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,747
This is how I feel. Brady is great at football. I'm a huge football fan, but at the end of the day, so what?

I think Boston has done well with sports figure statues. The Ted Williams one is not just of Ted Williams, but with him and a kid, celebrating the history of both Williams and the Red Sox with the Jimmy Fund. The Teammates statue celebrates that group of guys. Bill Russell had civic impact beyond the court and the placement of the statue at government center signifies that. The Bobby Orr statue outside the garden commemorates not just his career but also that moment, one of the iconic images in hockey history.

In that vein, a statue of Brady with the backwards cap and either hands on head or the double-finger-point might be appropriate, because it celebrates not just Brady but also that moment, the first Super Bowl victory in franchise history. I'm not as keen on a statue of just Brady dropping back to pass or whatever.

I'm also for building a Tuck Rule statue, preferably in Oakland, just to piss off Raiders fans.
You missed a few (and I may have, too)- Red/Yaz/Johnny Kelly/ the Hoyts/Ouimet





Edit: I like all these statues, but I like statues. Put up a few more and it's fine with me.