2017 College Football Game Thread - Week 10

The Needler

New Member
Dec 7, 2016
1,803
My mistake.I pulled up their schedule and there was only 11 games listed. Their opener against Appalachian St. wasn't listed.

So, they're in a similar situation to Bama in that they will play one more game in total than ND, but given that they play Appalachian St. and Samford, it can be argued they are playing less meaningful football than ND, not more.
App. State is bowl-bound, and Samford and Miami are basically a toss-up. Sagarin has them rated 118 and 112 respectively. And Georgia will play an extra game against the SEC West Champ, so I think it would be a pretty weak argument.
 

Sox and Rocks

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2013
5,862
Northern Colorado
App. State is bowl-bound, and Samford and Miami are basically a toss-up. Sagarin has them rated 118 and 112 respectively. And Georgia will play an extra game against the SEC West Champ, so I think it would be a pretty weak argument.
Let me return to my main point, as it seems to be getting lost in a comparison of schedules: Unlike you, I don't think ND playing one less game than other possible playoff teams is problematic because their schedule, overall, is as strong as anyone else's in the country, and even if they don't have to play an extra game against a top team in the final week, they still play just as many games or more against top teams as the others because they don't schedule FCS teams or, for the most part, non-power 5 conference teams.
 

The Needler

New Member
Dec 7, 2016
1,803
Let me return to my main point, as it seems to be getting lost in a comparison of schedules: Unlike you, I don't think ND playing one less game than other possible playoff teams is problematic because their schedule, overall, is as strong as anyone else's in the country, and even if they don't have to play an extra game against a top team in the final week, they still play just as many games or more against top teams as the others because they don't schedule FCS teams or, for the most part, non-power 5 conference teams.
That's fine, but decisions don't get made in a vacuum, and there are often close calls to be made. And I think that when all things are otherwise equal (or close to it), it's fair to give the benefit of the doubt to the team that had to play an extra game at the end of a long season against the best team from the other division with a championship on the line.
 

LeftyTG

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
1,346
Austin
You're right about UNC and Miami-OH. I didn't realize they played Miami-OH. The rest of the schedule, though, supports my point.

Yes, the committee ranks what's in front of them, and given that Notre Dame now plays a top ten team in Miami on the road, a win will only validate or perhaps even raise their ranking. Same with Stanford on the road the final week. In other words, that ND is in the top 4 now with a solid schedule to finish, they will stay in the top 4. And if they lose, of course, this discussion becomes meaningless.
Stanford has 3 losses and plays Washington this week (a game where they are about 8 point underdogs). It is very likely Standford has 4 losses when they play Notre Dame. I don't think beating a 7-5 Stanford team in a down year for the Pac12 does a lot to validate or raise Notre Dame's ranking.
 

nolasoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 11, 2004
6,966
Displaced
Not in all cases; Georgia only plays eleven games to ND's 12, so playing in the SEC Championship will give them the same number as ND, not one more. Alabama will play 13 assuming they make the SEC championship, but one of those games is against Mercer, which doesn't/shouldn't really count.

ND is clearly benefiting financially from their independent status, but they aren't benefiting by playing an easier schedule or less games.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but ND will play one less game because they don’t play in a conference and won’t have a conference championship. Again, I just like that one extra hurdle before playoff consideration.
 

Sox and Rocks

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2013
5,862
Northern Colorado
Correct me if I’m wrong, but ND will play one less game because they don’t play in a conference and won’t have a conference championship. Again, I just like that one extra hurdle before playoff consideration.
You're right. I was looking at a Georgia schedule that didn't include their first game, and admitted my mistake. I should edit my post.

My main point, though, is that saying other teams, for example Georgia and Alabama, play 13 games while ND only plays 12 is a bit disingenuous given that most teams play an FCS team as part of their 13.

ND's top 12 games is as good or better than other teams, and their top 5/6 is even better. If ND were to play an extra game to get to 13 (and they can't do this based on rules), and that extra game was against a weak opponent like most schools schedule at least once, it wouldn't make me feel any better about their statues, but apparently others would feel better.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
We seem to be taking as a given that ND will be a playoff team if it wins out, but I'm not 100% sure of that - if Clemson, Oklahoma and Wisconsin also all win out (unlikely, but possible), are we sure that the committee would rank ND ahead of two of those teams? (In this scenario I'm also assuming that Alabama and GA are undefeated headed into the SEC Champ game, in which case I imagine that both will end up in the playoff.)

Edited to add: For what it's worth (probably not much), 538's Playoff Predictor gives ND only a 26% chance of making the playoff in that scenario, but also gives the loser of the SEC Champ game almost no shot in that scenario, which I don't really agree with/don't think tracks how the committee will approach it.
 

Royal Reader

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2005
2,293
UK
We seem to be taking as a given that ND will be a playoff team if it wins out, but I'm not 100% sure of that.
Sox and Rocks said he felt like that. I'd agree with you - I think Wisconsin is in if it wins out, period. I'd guess Clemson is in over ND if both win out, though if Clemson scrapes by Miami while ND blows out the Canes, that might move the needle. ND seems to be ahead of Washington and probably Oklahoma/TCU.

As above, I think Georgia is actually better placed with a loss than Alabama is. It'd be tough to leave out Georgia in a head to head comparison with ND having won in South Bend and having the same number of losses.
 

Sox and Rocks

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2013
5,862
Northern Colorado
We seem to be taking as a given that ND will be a playoff team if it wins out, but I'm not 100% sure of that - if Clemson, Oklahoma and Wisconsin also all win out (unlikely, but possible), are we sure that the committee would rank ND ahead of two of those teams? (In this scenario I'm also assuming that Alabama and GA are undefeated headed into the SEC Champ game, in which case I imagine that both will end up in the playoff.)

Edited to add: For what it's worth (probably not much), 538's Playoff Predictor gives ND only a 26% chance of making the playoff in that scenario, but also gives the loser of the SEC Champ game almost no shot in that scenario, which I don't really agree with/don't think tracks how the committee will approach it.
No chance Wisconsin jumps ahead of ND, nor should they with their pathetic schedule.

Two teams would have to jump ND. Who are they, and what's their case?

ND plays 4 of the top 12 and has the best loss. No one can compete with that.
 

Sox and Rocks

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 16, 2013
5,862
Northern Colorado
Sox and Rocks said he felt like that. I'd agree with you - I think Wisconsin is in if it wins out, period. I'd guess Clemson is in over ND if both win out, though if Clemson scrapes by Miami while ND blows out the Canes, that might move the needle. ND seems to be ahead of Washington and probably Oklahoma/TCU.

As above, I think Georgia is actually better placed with a loss than Alabama is. It'd be tough to leave out Georgia in a head to head comparison with ND having won in South Bend and having the same number of losses.
I agree with your latter point about Georgia/Alabama. As for the former, what makes you sure Wisconsin is in if they win out? I'm sure they won't be in without help based on their current ranking, weak schedule, and the committee chairman's comments tonight.
 

Infield Infidel

teaching korea american
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,463
Meeting Place, Canada
The frustrating part with Wisconsin is they actually had Washington and USF scheduled for this season, but they cancelled the Washington series and postponed the return game at USF. With Indiana, Illinois and Maryland on the conference schedule they didn't need to water down the non-conf. I guess if they go unbeaten they can get in but it's sucks to reward shitty scheduling.

(And the next two years too: 2018 BYU, WKU, New Mexico; 2019 at USF, Kent St, Central Michigan. Some of these have had good teams lately but no P5 and only one road game that I wouldn't be surprised if they cancel.)
 
Last edited: