I suspect the problem is ownership, not the gm--big name free agents are lot easier to market than re-signing a swing tackle, a DT and a special teams maven.This is the fear of any Tannenbaum-lead FO, right? I think this year's moves will indicate who's truly in charge -- the Chris Grier/Gase combo or Mikey? Hoping for the former.
Miami was pretty quiet the last offseason. I could make the argument that Gase was their splashiest signing. If you want to insist that Williams was a "splashy FA signing" while they let OV and Lamar Miller walk for big dollars to other teams, that's fine.I suspect the problem is ownership, not the gm--big name free agents are lot easier to market than re-signing a swing tackle, a DT and a special teams maven.
Minnesota?So...Albert wasn't released yet evidently there is a team who might be willing to trade for him. Probably for a 6th or 7throunder
While Miami could tweak the contract before officially completing any transaction on March 9 or later, Thomas’ cap hits in the next three seasons are scheduled to be: $8.3 million, $9.8 million and $10.3 million. The deal is structured so that Thomas could be cut after the 2017 season with a cap hit of only $1.2 million if it were to occur after June 1, 2018.
Well there's some coverage benefits to being the 3rd option after Demaryius Thomas, Emmanual Sanders and Erik Decker with Wes Welker also getting attention and a still excellent Peyton Manning throwing balls to you.Obviously that never materialized, but it all seems positive having Julius Thomas and Gase reunite in Miami. Thomas had 12 TDs in each season under Gase. That kind of production doesn't just grow on trees. Also frees Miami up to address the defensive side of the ball in the first round and not concern themselves with Howard or Njoku.
You guys crack me up sometimes. If there isn't an instant ROI, it's a bad deal, right? If Kenny Stills bolts in a few weeks, guess who is the number three WR on the roster? Leonte "Waste of Draft Picks" Carroo. It's ok to actually have a little foresight and plan ahead, and have some depth on the roster. Did Leonte Carroo fill an immediate need in 2016? No.Mike Tannenbaum is allergic to draft picks...
frankly it doesn't excuse the Carroo deal. How much better shape would this team be in heading into the new league season with two additional 2nd day picks in their back pocket?
I don't want to say Miami has what Denver had because they don't. But they are building a stable of offensive weapons. Parker, Stills, Landry, and Ajayi are all dangerous in their own ways. Who do you double? Who do you take away? Miami's offense is going to present defenses with a lot of issues if everyone is healthy. We sort of started to see it click when Parker was actually healthy for about 3 games. Obviously, Stills is a question mark right now, but Miami is building and offense that can compete on many levels.Well there's some coverage benefits to being the 3rd option after Demaryius Thomas, Emmanual Sanders and Erik Decker with Wes Welker also getting attention and a still excellent Peyton Manning throwing balls to you.
Funny you mention foresight - where was Tannebaum's when he was selecting a luxury pick in Carroo as the front seven on the opposite side of the ball was literally falling apart? You know - this wasn't a good run defense in 2015 either. People in last year's iteration of this very thread were commenting in July and August about the total lack of talent/depth at all three LB spots.You guys crack me up sometimes. If there isn't an instant ROI, it's a bad deal, right? If Kenny Stills bolts in a few weeks, guess who is the number three WR on the roster? Leonte "Waste of Draft Picks" Carroo. It's ok to actually have a little foresight and plan ahead, and have some depth on the roster. Did Leonte Carroo fill an immediate need in 2016? No.
I recall a similar situation when Miami had Mike Wallace, Brian Hartline, and Brandon Gibson as their top 3 WRs and they wasted a 2nd round pick on a slow, small slot receiver. We should probably just chalk up Jarvis Landry as a complete miss. I'm willing to wait and see what Leonte Carroo becomes before calling the move a bad deal.
Stills and Carroo are not the same player, you're correct about that. The defense had holes last year and may have bigger holes now. Look at the names of LBs drafted after the third round where Carroo was picked. Can you even recognize a single name? It's not like they passed up on some stud. They said repeatedly Carroo is a guy they targeted and had valued much higher than a late third rounder. Is it the absolute best marriage of need and best player available? Probably not. Is it a complete waste like everyone seems to think it is? I don't think so. Taking a LB just for the sake of taking a LB makes less sense than taking a WR that you think can contribute in a meaningful way and value highly.Funny you mention foresight - where was Tannebaum's when he was selecting a luxury pick in Carroo as the front seven on the opposite side of the ball was literally falling apart? You know - this wasn't a good run defense in 2015 either. People in last year's iteration of this very thread were commenting in July and August about the total lack of talent/depth at all three LB spots.
The Stills replacement argument makes zero sense. Carroo doesn't have the deep speed to replicate what Stills brings to this offense. But for the sake of argument, let's assume he does for a second. If they keep Stills (and from every indication, the FO is going to make it a priority), what was the point of the Carroo draft day deal? They're not letting Landry walk and they had just used a 1st round pick on Parker. What was this master plan that Tannenbaum envisioned where he could find the necessary snaps to promote Carroo's growth at the position? Despite your weird defense of this move, it was and continues to be an indefensibly bad utilization of draft resources. It has nothing to do with Carroo's production or lackthereof last season, its about the opportunity cost.
Stills and Carroo are not the same player, you're correct about that. The defense had holes last year and may have bigger holes now. Look at the names of LBs drafted after the third round where Carroo was picked. Can you even recognize a single name? It's not like they passed up on some stud. They said repeatedly Carroo is a guy they targeted and had valued much higher than a late third rounder. Is it the absolute best marriage of need and best player available? Probably not. Is it a complete waste like everyone seems to think it is? I don't think so. Taking a LB just for the sake of taking a LB makes less sense than taking a WR that you think can contribute in a meaningful way and value highly.
Is anyone mad that they drafted Tunsil when they already had a LT and LG on the roster? They could have taken Myles Jack. Why is no one complaining that we have Tunsil instead of Jack?
My larger point is the draft is a crapshoot, especially outside of the first two rounds. Selecting someone does not equate to them being a successful member of your organization. Dion Jordan could have been a solution at either DE or LB but we obviously know how that worked out.I don't know why you're running with this, but LB was simply an example of a position that was neglected by the selection of Carroo who, by your own admission, doesn't really have a role in this offense. DT would be another position, as is OG or hell even DE (since, you know, Wake will be 35 this season). The point is the pick would have been put to much better use at pretty much any other position on the roster.
People aren't upset at the Tunsil pick because Tannenbaum showed foresight (hey, there's that word!) by recognizing the age of BA and his rapidly declining skill-set. The Carroo pick on the other hand, showed absolutely zero foresight because Carroo cannot replicate the skills of the only asset in the WR core that has any chance of walking over the duration of his rookie deal.
I think there's an enormous difference between what you're writing here in bold - and what actually transpired in the Carroo deal. If it was their own pick - fine, but that wasn't close to the case. Instead, they traded a trove of picks (two of which were 2017) to move back into the 3rd round to pick a WR with no clear path to consistent snaps. If Stills is resigned, you've got a young player that's only going to be getting on the field in 4 WR-sets and/or an injury situation. How exactly do you expect any young player to blossom under those circumstances? And the (material) cost of the deal has yet to come due, though it will in another couple of months. Wouldn't they have been way better off just resigning Rishard Matthews and holding onto their 2017 mid-round picks? Certainly Matthews would've been a clear upgrade on the positional depth early season while Parker was working though his foot issues/inconsistency. And he would've only cost money. Also, let's stop referencing players from last draft that were selected during the second day - its not relevant.My larger point is the draft is a crapshoot, especially outside of the first two rounds. Selecting someone does not equate to them being a successful member of your organization. Dion Jordan could have been a solution at either DE or LB but we obviously know how that worked out.
I'm more than fine with them selecting Carroo instead of ANOTHER Billy Turner or Dallas Thomas or Jamil Douglas for about the fifth straight year. Would selecting Nick Vigil or Charles Tapper or BJ Goodson instead of Carroo made you feel any better about the team this year? These are seriously the dudes that you're up in arms about Miami passing on. Miami won't get anywhere this year because they didn't take Joe Schoebert.
They addressed two huge needs in LT/LG Tunsil and CB in Howard in the first two rounds. After that, pick the guys you feel good about. What else can you ask for out of a draft?
I also don't concede the point of Carroo not having a place on the offense. He might not be a direct replacement in terms of speed that Stills has, but Carroo averaged right around 20 yards per catch his sophomore and junior years at Rutgers. The dude was a very productive receiver in college. He might not be an exact apples to apples replacement for Stills if he leaves, but that doesn't mean he can't operate within the offense and be successful.
Not only did they get three picks, they got the #1 comp pick possible. Pretty much a best case scenario for Miami.Dolphins got a third and two fifths as compensatory picks for losing Vernon, Miller and Matthews.
So I think they now have 1-2-3-5-5-5-6 in 17 draft
Interesting. On the Dolphins Snapchat, Tannehill, Wake, Jelani Jenkins, Michael Thomas and others were attending what Ross calls the Business Combine. Basically about life and career and business opportunities outside of football and for post-career success. Really cool of Ross, obviously a successful businessman, to share some of his wisdom and expertise with his players.A propos of nothing but thought I'd mention that I met Ryan Tannehill in an elevator today here in NYC. Was in a building owned by Ross so not sure the reason but a bunch of other guys were with him.
He didn't really like it when I mentioned that I am a Patriots fan.
Cool. Cameron Wake was definitely there. I saw about 12-15 or so guys. More NFL owners need to do this.Interesting. On the Dolphins Snapchat, Tannehill, Wake, Jelani Jenkins, Michael Thomas and others were attending what Ross calls the Business Combine. Basically about life and career and business opportunities outside of football and for post-career success. Really cool of Ross, obviously a successful businessman, to share some of his wisdom and expertise with his players.
That's a bit of a shame but I think FS might have been on Miami's radar anyways. Michael Thomas isn't the guy and IAQ is a bit of a journeyman.I feel like this kind of came out of nowhere:
Add another position to the list of defensive needs. Not good - he was very solid last season.
“Obviously we don’t want to be big spenders,” Gase added. “We’re moving away from that thing.”
Grier reiterated that he runs the draft, but takes input from everyone, most especially Adam Gase and Mike Tannenbaum. “Adam looks at the players that I tell him to look at because he doesn’t have to look at all the players. The one great thing about Adam is he’s like, ‘Listen, whoever you want me to look at, just tell me. Whoever you believe in, I trust you.’ He said, ‘We did great last year and let’s go.’”
When asked why they have that philosophy instead of adding depth with the leftover funds, Grier responded: “ I don’t think spending to the cap every year is what we have to do to be successful. You look at some of the teams that are winning they’re not spending (to the cap). For here, for so long, always the big fish — go out and spend all the money on everybody. For us we’re just trying to build the team the right way and trying to spread it now with us. We have no set plan in terms of how much we’re going to spend. We’re just working right now on our plan of who we’re going to target in free agency.”
This number is way better than what I was anticipating. Difficult to not like.
Kenny Stills is staying. We can officially run Carroo over with a bus. I have to say, based off the 12 million per season number that was floating around previously, I think 8/season for Stills is reasonable. He's still only 24 and seemed to really click in this offense and with Tannehill.
Just saw Schefter's second tweet. 8/year 20 guaranteed. He'll be 28 at the end of this deal.Its 20 million guaranteed. Schefty got it wrong.
Perhaps there's an 8 million signing bonus? Could make the cap hit around 6.Just saw Schefter's second tweet. 8/year 20 guaranteed. He'll be 28 at the end of this deal.