She also wants to be married to Giselle?I'd like to swap spouses with Tom Brady (as would my wife), doesn't mean I get to.
Perfect signing for the Mets.Yeah, he's going to be an interesting one. He is still young but had absolutely horrendous defensive numbers this past season, like plopping down Andujar in RF with no practice level numbers. He has only hit 2 WAR in 2 of the past 5 seasons (admittedly those were 10.0 and 4.7) and the defense is scary.
I’d like to swap my spouse for Tom Brady. Sometimes I put on my Tom Brady jersey and pretend I’m Tom Brady dreaming of leaving his spouse for me. It’s ok, my wife does the same. It’s what makes it all work.I'd like to swap spouses with Tom Brady (as would my wife), doesn't mean I get to.
Got some room at first base for him.Yeah, he's going to be an interesting one. He is still young but had absolutely horrendous defensive numbers this past season, like plopping down Andujar in RF with no practice level numbers. He has only hit 2 WAR in 2 of the past 5 seasons (admittedly those were 10.0 and 4.7) and the defense is scary.
Can you blame her? Huge upgrade.She also wants to be married to Giselle?
You have to wonder if his ego is going to hurt him because he really hasn't shown the maturity that you want in a player who you're about to give $200-300m. Machado, for all his warts, looks like his teammates like him and he's a good clubhouse guy.Harper will be one of the more interesting FA cases of all-time. I think for the most part hes been widely regarded as the best player after Mike Trout, at least before Betts this year. He has the pedigree and a sky high ceiling that he has reached before (9.3 WAR, 197 wRC+ in 2015.) He has 30.7 WAR and a career 140 and he’s still only entering his age 26 season. He’s genuinely one of the top younger players entering free agency in the games history. But he’s had some injuries and solid seasons but on the other hand he’s never had a season between 5.0 and 9.0 fWAR.
It got them a title, but it will be interesting to see how all of those SPs bounce back next season.The way the Sox approached pitching in the Series makes Boone look even worse. God, Lance fucking Lynn.
The interesting thing is that, in the end, Sale is the one who wasn't overused.It got them a title, but it will be interesting to see how all of those SPs bounce back next season.
I would definitely take Cora of those three to manage my team, and it wouldn't be close.For sure, but I'd take a title over Boone or Roberts' conservative approach.
Does he have trade value?NY has three days from the end of the WS to make a decision on Brett Gardner so we'll hear that decision soon, $12.5M for 2019 if they keep him, $2M buyout if they don't. He does still have value defensively and in the clubhouse and if NY lets him go, they will need to figure out a backup CF option behind Hicks, but would be at least a bit surprising if NY picks up the option IMO.
They had no interest in Stanton ... or ARodYankees supposedly not interested in pursuing Harper.
https://www.sny.tv/yankees/news/sources-yankees-not-expected-to-pursue-free-agent-bryce-harper/299926808
You've already got that CF under contract for 2 more years . . .He does still have value defensively and in the clubhouse and if NY lets him go, they will need to figure out a backup CF option behind Hicks, but would be at least a bit surprising if NY picks up the option IMO.
And he may actually be a possibility, Boras said this week he expects to be healthy for spring training.You've already got that CF under contract for 2 more years . . .
Which continues to remain true to this day.They had no interest in Stanton ... or ARod
We keep having to make this same comment, but they are not mutually exclusive. The Yankees have the budget this year to do basically do whatever they want and still probably stay under the first luxury threshold. Cot's right now has them at $141m after arb. That gives them $70+ million to play with in AAV before getting to the threshold. The Sox, by comparison, are at $210m estimated after arb and will need to fill at least 2 bullpen spots and 1-2 rotation spots. I bring up the Sox as a reference because they have deep pockets but if Cashman wants to get a guy, he's in a position to overpay.No discussion of Eovaldi here? If they can't/don't trade for a young stud SP, then picking up Corbin and Eo makes more sense to me than signing Machado or Harper. (And yes, I realize that it's likely wish-casting to think the Yankees don't pick up ALL of those guys, but there are likely to be a few other interested teams with deep pockets out there!)
I think you're forgetting player benefits and players in minors which can add up to about $17 million. Plus the first threshold is at $206 million. So it's more like $48 million give or take.We keep having to make this same comment, but they are not mutually exclusive. The Yankees have the budget this year to do basically do whatever they want and still probably stay under the first luxury threshold. Cot's right now has them at $141m after arb. That gives them $70+ million to play with in AAV before getting to the threshold. The Sox, by comparison, are at $210m estimated after arb and will need to fill at least 2 bullpen spots and 1-2 rotation spots. I bring up the Sox as a reference because they have deep pockets but if Cashman wants to get a guy, he's in a position to overpay.
Re: Eovaldi specifically, I'm sure 30 teams are going to bid for his upside. My guess is that he winds up somewhere with a 4/60 deal. He won't be cheap but I think with SP in such high demand, he might wind up with a Mike Leake or Danny Duffy contract.
It's inexact math right now but we have to be careful not to mix up payroll and payroll for LT purposes. Looking at Cot's, the Yankees have $99m (LT purposes) committed after benefits and 40-man roster salaries. The estimated arb is about $40-50m for the Yankees. Cashman is going to trade Gray which will shave off his salary. Give or take, the Yankees are starting from a baseline of about $140 to $145m. They could easily get themselves to the threshold, but I don't think it will be guaranteed that they go over.I think you're forgetting player benefits and players in minors which can add up to about $17 million. Plus the first threshold is at $206 million. So it's more like $48 million give or take.
Totally, and Mookie and Xander are probably going to help set some precedents. I'm curious to follow what happens with Mookie and when the Sox start engaging on extension talks.Sure they can always adjust the arb bucket by trading away or non-tendering. They also need to weigh the pending arbs of Judge and Sanchez after next season.
Brett's fate is probably largely decided by, goddammit, the inescapable fact that we have to pay Ellsbury $47 million over the next 2 years, as pointed out in the Post today. sighNY has three days from the end of the WS to make a decision on Brett Gardner so we'll hear that decision soon, $12.5M for 2019 if they keep him, $2M buyout if they don't. He does still have value defensively and in the clubhouse and if NY lets him go, they will need to figure out a backup CF option behind Hicks, but would be at least a bit surprising if NY picks up the option IMO.
I love the idea of Michael Brantley as the 4th/5th outfielder and I wonder if Cashman can find a 2b option to use through the deadline that we could trade before or after Didi got back. Great way to get value on both ends.My favorite Yankee follow on Twitter (@Yankeesource) who is or was a NY scout living in Japan, just posted this as his guess for NY's lineup entering spring training:
"Realistic:
Hicks CF
Judge RF
Machado 3B
Stanton LF
Sanchez C
Andujar DH
Torres SS
Voit/Bird 1B
Torreyes/Wade 2B"
I think if this is the plan that you also get Hechevarria back cheaply for SS and keep Torres at 2B, that would be a superb defensive infield trio and they have so much offense already.
I was sure he was a gonerYankees are for some reason bringing Brett Gardner back per Mark Feinsend. Deal is for 1 year at $7.5 million after the team declined his option.
Why would Michael Brantley sign a FA contract to be a 4th/5th outfielder?I love the idea of Michael Brantley as the 4th/5th outfielder and I wonder if Cashman can find a 2b option to use through the deadline that we could trade before or after Didi got back. Great way to get value on both ends.
This is reasonable, probably the best explanation of a move that makes little sense. Maybe they worry that Frazier could concuss himself again and Gardy is insurance.Maybe they think Gardner is an important veteran presence for the position players? Besides Romine, everyone else has been there 4 years or fewer I think.
It seems like there could be a better use of the roster spot and cash, but of course we need to see the full plan to really know. If Frazier had finished the year healthy, this would make more sense to me because then Frazier could be a big chip for a stud SP (let's not forget in between concussion stints this year he was hitting like the top 20 prospect he'd still be if he hadn't gotten a bit too much time in 2017, easily leading the IL in OPS at 23). Maybe teams will value him like he is, but seeing him do so again would obviously be ideal. Although I guess the opposite is true also, Brett is a bit of Frazier insurance, but it seems like they could have done better, dunno.What's the downside of Gardner? I'm confused. I would have been fine letting him go but what was the alternative we were hoping for? A more expensive Marwin?