Are you worried about the Red Sox?

Well, are you

  • 1. Not at All worried

  • 2. Just a tiny bit

  • 3. Getting there

  • 4. It's appropriate to be concerned

  • 5. Depends on the last bit of news I got

  • 6. Yeah, I'm worried

  • 7. Who needs fingernails?

  • 8. I am staying away from chicken and beer

  • 9. Fuck Bucky Dent and Aaron Boone

  • 10. Kill me now.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,183
If the Sox can win 7 of their next 11, which basically means winning their current series against the Braves, along with the upcoming series against the Astros, Blue Jays, and Mets, then the magic number will be well into the single digits by the time they go to NY. They could even go 6-5; either way, if the Sox can pull that off, they make the math for the Yankees be somewhere between very difficult and impossible, barring a 6 game sweep.

I'm still keeping it at a 4, just because I'm scarred from earlier collapses. But could easily go to a 2 or 1 in the next week or two.
 

FinanceAdvice

New Member
Apr 1, 2008
167
Albany, NY
Although anything can happen ( I don't like to think of 2011) and the Sox have a difficult stretch with 3 v Astros,3 v Tribe and six with NY, I look at it this way. It took the Yankees 16 games (since aug. 18) to make up two games in the loss column. Given that math with 23 games remaining, it seems unlikely the Yankees can make up the remaining 8 games to win the division title.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,870
Maine
If the Sox can win 7 of their next 11, which basically means winning their current series against the Braves, along with the upcoming series against the Astros, Blue Jays, and Mets, then the magic number will be well into the single digits by the time they go to NY. They could even go 6-5; either way, if the Sox can pull that off, they make the math for the Yankees be somewhere between very difficult and impossible, barring a 6 game sweep.
If they can win 6 or 7 of their next 11, and we assume the Yankees do the same (@OAK, @SEA, @MIN, TOR), that would put the magic number in the 4-5 range. They could theoretically clinch the division during the series in the Bronx.
 

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,097
When do the Yankees start playing all of those bad teams they’re certainly going to steamroll? Asking for a friend.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
I'll just throw out there that the 2011 comps don't add up. Then it was their actual starting pitching staff (Lackey, Lester, Beckett, Wakefield) that completely collapsed. Here it is the temporary absence of our starting rotation that has slowed down their pace. I'd be worried if the injured pitchers weren't all about to return.
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,691
When do the Yankees start playing all of those bad teams they’re certainly going to steamroll? Asking for a friend.
At this point, it basically comes down to the MFY's getting three games against Seattle and four games against the Rays, while the Sox get three against the Astros and three against the Indians, plus the six head to head contests of course. The rest pretty much washes itself out IMO.
 

InsideTheParker

persists in error
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
40,463
Pioneer Valley
Although anything can happen ( I don't like to think of 2011) and the Sox have a difficult stretch with 3 v Astros,3 v Tribe and six with NY, I look at it this way. It took the Yankees 16 games (since aug. 18) to make up two games in the loss column. Given that math with 23 games remaining, it seems unlikely the Yankees can make up the remaining 8 games to win the division title.
It looks now that the best hope for NY is Judge coming back effective. I don't know when Chapman is expected, but he could help, too.
 

AB in DC

OG Football Writing
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2002
13,783
Springfield, VA
When do the Yankees start playing all of those bad teams they’re certainly going to steamroll? Asking for a friend.
That was August. Sox had a two week stretch of @Phi, vs TB, vs. Cle, @ TB where the Sox went 5-7. During that stretch the Yanks had vs. Mets (makeup), vs. TB, vs Tor, @Florida, @Bal and went 9-4.

At this point, it basically comes down to the MFY's getting three games against Seattle and four games against the Rays, while the Sox get three against the Astros and three against the Indians, plus the six head to head contests of course. The rest pretty much washes itself out IMO.
More than that -- both teams have home series left against Tor and Bal, so they exactly wash out. Otherwise the Sox have two more @Atl (while NY is @ Oak) and three vs. Mets (compared to NY @Minnesota)
 

AB in DC

OG Football Writing
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2002
13,783
Springfield, VA
Speaking of the Mets -- DeGrom pitched last night, so he'll pitch again either September 8 (four days rest) or September 9 (pushed back due to Thursday off-day). If he pitches the 9th, then he probably pitches the opening game of the Sox-Mets series, but if he goes on the 8th, the Sox will most likely get to miss him altogether.
 

Sam Ray Not

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
8,871
NYC
For those inclined to project the remaining schedule, we're probably at the point now where we can get granular with likely opposing starters as opposed to just opposing teams. For example, vs. HOU we'll likely get one rookie starter (Josh James), vs. NYM we'll likely miss Syndegaard but get DeGrom, etc.

(D'oh: and on cue, AB in DC's post above!)
 
Last edited:

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,097
That was August. Sox had a two week stretch of @Phi, vs TB, vs. Cle, @ TB where the Sox went 5-7. During that stretch the Yanks had vs. Mets (makeup), vs. TB, vs Tor, @Florida, @Bal and went 9-4.
Their “weak” stretch included the CWS/DET series, both of which they lost and tied, respectively. So 12-8 over this part of the schedule they were to assert their dominance. I seriously don’t understand how anyone can be worried about the division at this point, barring nonsensical superstitions about 40 year old clubs.

Edit: split w/ DET
 
Last edited:

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Cole, Keuchel, deGrom, Wheeler, Severino, Tanaka over the next 12 games.

Just a tad worried this is a 6-6 stretch coming up.
A 6-6 stretch is not a problem. The Yankees need us to be worse than that.

I mean, seriously -- if we play .500 the rest of the way (or just under, since we have an odd number of games -- 11-12) the Yankees need to go 20-4 to catch us.
 
Last edited:

AB in DC

OG Football Writing
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2002
13,783
Springfield, VA
I mean, the Sox are now at 96 wins. If they finish 11-11, that would still beat the franchise record for wins by two games. It would beat the franchise record for expansion era (162 game season) wins by eight. That's insane.
 

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
The level of resignation about the AL East on WFAN yesterday afternoon was extraordinary and delicious. I always thought Yankees fans and media cheerleaders would show that classic Yankees confidence and arrogance when put in their current position. Not that they’re wrong or the math doesn’t back them up. But confident they are not.

I assume that one win and recency bias will lead to slightly more confidence today.

Still, hearing how worried, and really resigned, MFYFs are in early September was a schadenfreude Festivus.

[Late edit to fix a few errors]

And PS: I just now focused on the poll answers. Nine is the correct answer. To ANY poll.
 
Last edited:

VORP Speed

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
6,645
Ground Zero
I'll just throw out there that the 2011 comps don't add up. Then it was their actual starting pitching staff (Lackey, Lester, Beckett, Wakefield) that completely collapsed. Here it is the temporary absence of our starting rotation that has slowed down their pace. I'd be worried if the injured pitchers weren't all about to return.
2011 could be repeating....just not the Sox part of it
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
I think an interesting weekend starts Friday 21 September when, after visiting the Yankees, the Red Sox fly to Cleveland while the Orioles slither into the Toilet to hand the Yankees three guaranteed wins. Yankees could gain 2 games that weekend (and 1 game in the BOS-NYY series before). That sets up the Showalters to play their hearts out and win one against Boston. If the Yankees take out Tampa in a sweep they could make up another game. That's 4 games made good (without considering the Houston series). The final 3 games could be fun...for Boston, as they send NY to Oakland.
 

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
I think an interesting weekend starts Friday 21 September when, after visiting the Yankees, the Red Sox fly to Cleveland while the Orioles slither into the Toilet to hand the Yankees three guaranteed wins. Yankees could gain 2 games that weekend (and 1 game in the BOS-NYY series before). That sets up the Showalters to play their hearts out and win one against Boston. If the Yankees take out Tampa in a sweep they could make up another game. That's 4 games made good (without considering the Houston series). The final 3 games could be fun...for Boston, as they send NY to Oakland.
Obviously this is all speculation but the Rays have been playing at least as well as the Yankees for a while now and while a sweep is of course possible I think it is clearly unlikely.

Anyone worried about the Sox losing the east is being pretty irrational at this point.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
19,977
St. Louis, MO
Obviously this is all speculation but the Rays have been playing at least as well as the Yankees for a while now and while a sweep is of course possible I think it is clearly unlikely.

Anyone worried about the Sox losing the east is being pretty irrational at this point.
More like completely irrational. The Rays have just as much chance as sweeping them. We just saw them do it to us.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,183
On the morning of September 5th in 2011, the Sox had slipped to 1.5 games behind the Yankees. But they did still have an 8 game lead over Tampa in the wild card standings.

In 1978, the Sox were up 5 games, but had just lost to the Orioles while in the middle of a key 1-5 slump in the lead up to the infamous Massacre series.
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,692
Put differently (and ignoring rounding error), if the Sox gagged out a .500 record the rest of the way (in other words, their worst 22 game stretch of the season), the MFY would need to go 20-3 to catch us. If the Sox managed to step on their dick to the tune of winning 33% of their remaining games, the MFY still wouldn't catch them at their current win % of .626.

So yeah, if the Sox completely shit down their proverbial leg, they could lose the division. And that would suck. But we have seen no evidence to support that as a likely outcome of this season.
 

AB in DC

OG Football Writing
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2002
13,783
Springfield, VA
On the morning of September 5th in 2011, the Sox had slipped to 1.5 games behind the Yankees. But they did still have an 8 game lead over Tampa in the wild card standings.

In 1978, the Sox were up 5 games, but had just lost to the Orioles while in the middle of a key 1-5 slump in the lead up to the infamous Massacre series.
The 2011 Rays finished on an 17-8 run, and the 1978 Yankees finished on a 29-9 run. That's the kind of performance today's Yankees would need, on top of a Red Sox collapse.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,647
Put differently (and ignoring rounding error), if the Sox gagged out a .500 record the rest of the way (in other words, their worst 22 game stretch of the season), the MFY would need to go 20-3 to catch us. If the Sox managed to step on their dick to the tune of winning 33% of their remaining games, the MFY still wouldn't catch them at their current win % of .626.

So yeah, if the Sox completely shit down their proverbial leg, they could lose the division. And that would suck. But we have seen no evidence to support that as a likely outcome of this season.
The Yankees, most likely, will need to win basically all six remaining games against the Red Sox. Going 5-1 only picks up 4 games in the standings, and they're currently 8.5 games up in the standings. So the Yanks would need to make up 4.5 games with just 17 left (16 for Bos). That's a lot of ground to make up in a short span of time. Going 6-0 vs. Boston would make it pretty doable though. Going 4-2 vs. Boston is almost useless for NY.
 

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
19,977
St. Louis, MO
The Yankees, most likely, will need to win basically all six remaining games against the Red Sox. Going 5-1 only picks up 4 games in the standings, and they're currently 8.5 games up in the standings. So the Yanks would need to make up 4.5 games with just 17 left (16 for Bos). That's a lot of ground to make up in a short span of time. Going 6-0 vs. Boston would make it pretty doable though. Going 4-2 vs. Boston is almost useless for NY.
More difficult for them is that 3 of those 6 games are the final 3. They will have a lot of magic to do to even make those last 3 mean anything.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,193
It's very much in the Sox' interest to have the division clinched before the final 3 games; so in my mind they are 5 1/2 ahead with 19 to go (20 to go for NYY). So if the Sox were a mediocre 9-10 the Yanks would need to be 15-5 to overcome that. That's still .750 ball.
10-9 and they would have to go 16-4, .800 ball.

(edit). Make that 5 to go with 18/20, my guess is they ain't comin' back from 7-1 down today. So 9-9 or 10-8 the rest of the way.
 

SemperFidelisSox

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2008
31,334
Boston, MA
The Indians magic number is 10. That series in Cleveland on Sept 21 may be meaningless to them. Tito could rest players or set up the rotation to avoid showing a potential playoff opponent his best starters.
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,870
Maine
The Indians magic number is 10. That series in Cleveland on Sept 21 may be meaningless to them. Tito could rest players or set up the rotation to avoid showing a potential playoff opponent his best starters.
It's entirely possible the series will be meaningless for the Red Sox too. The magic number is 15 and they've got 12 games (not including today) to play before they get to Cleveland. Unless they have a significantly bad home stand and get swept in the Bronx, they should at least be at a point where the series in Cleveland won't be life and death for either team.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
The level of resignation about the AL East on WFAN yesterday afternoon was extraordinary and delicious. I always thought Yankees fans and media cheerleaders would show that classic Yankees confidence and arrogance when put in their current position. Not that they’re wrong or the math doesn’t back them up. But confident they are not.

I assume that one win and recency bias will lead to slightly more confidence today.

Still, hearing how worried, and really resigned, MFYFs are in early September was a schadenfreude Festivus.

[Late edit to fix a few errors]

And PS: I just now focused on the poll answers. Nine is the correct answer. To ANY poll.
Can you provide us with a WFAN update THIS afternoon? Much obliged.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Remember when Wade Boggs was so good at hitting with two strikes that when he got to 0-2 we used to say he had the pitcher right where he wanted him? I'm starting to feel that way about 7th-inning deficits. It's like they get a bunch of runs behind just to get psyched up.
The numbers don't really bear it out but their 2nd best inning this year is the 7th. The 8th is/was their worst. That may have changed today.

Most of their damage comes between the 5th-7th innings and on the pitchers 3rd time thru the lineup. They are basically hitting like Aaron Judge as a team in the 5th. Insane.

They are better from 7th-9th than 1st-3rd and that gap grew today, but it's not that huge of a gap. I don't know how that compares relative to the rest of the league.
 

Attachments

bosockboy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
19,977
St. Louis, MO
The numbers don't really bear it out but their 2nd best inning this year is the 7th. The 8th is/was their worst. That may have changed today.

Most of their damage comes between the 5th-7th innings and on the pitchers 3rd time thru the lineup. They are basically hitting like Aaron Judge as a team in the 5th. Insane.
Which means the in game adjustments they are making on pitchers are terrific.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Or that this is when starting pitchers are the most vulnerable, and when all but the most elite starters experience a significant decline in their performance.
Yeah. That's why on its own, the 9th inning numbers don't look all that impressive but when you consider a large chunk of that performance is against the most elite relievers, it actually is.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Here are the league numbers by inning but it includes pitchers and I'm not sure how to remove them or find AL specific splits. The Sox performance in the 7th inning is well beyond the league average. And while the league as a whole hits better in innings 1-3 than they do 7-9, the reverse is true for the Sox.

This made me curious so I looked up SP/Reliever splits.

League Wide
.250/.316/.417 vs SP
.246/.322/.401 vs MR
Redsox
.273/.336/.472 vs SP
.262/.340/.432 vs MR

Not what I expected to see but they do follow the league wide trend of lower avg/higher obp/lower slugging vs MR. The team is also hitting worse than league average in the 4th and 8th innings. The 4th inning is interesting, given how much better they've hit in the 5th, 6th and 7th compared to the rest of the league. Their 8th inning performance today may be closer to league average after today tho.
 

Attachments

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,410
Remember when Wade Boggs was so good at hitting with two strikes that when he got to 0-2 we used to say he had the pitcher right where he wanted him? I'm starting to feel that way about 7th-inning deficits. It's like they get a bunch of runs behind just to get psyched up.
Hadn't thought of that in years!

In the twenty-four seasons of data, there is only one player who has been a .300 hitter for all of his 2-strike at-bats in the data set. The data isn’t available for his whole career, but it covers 14 seasons and nearly 70% of his career plate appearances. In over 2000 plate appearances when down to his last strike, this player hit .302. The next closest among the other retired players is Hall of Famer Wade Boggs, who hit .262 with two-strikes on him.

The clear master of two-strike hitting is none other than Hall of Famer Tony Gwynn, and being able to hit .300 when down to his last strike made it a little easier for him to win his eight batting titles.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Hadn't thought of that in years!
Didn't Gwynn and Boggs do a commercial together? I remember them being compared a lot despite not really being that similar, outside of hitting for average and never striking out. Ironic they'd be 1 and 2 on the list.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,193
I am quite happy to eat shit when it comes to my statement earlier! "my guess is they ain't comin' back from 7-1 down today". So 6 ahead with 18 to go, 20 for the Yanks. No problemo.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,410
I am quite happy to eat shit when it comes to my statement earlier! "my guess is they ain't comin' back from 7-1 down today". So 6 ahead with 18 to go, 20 for the Yanks. No problemo.
Don't worry about it-- @bosockboy has you covered. ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.