Celtics in 18-19

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,037

Two sources peg Irving’s change in demeanor to early February, around the time he was asked about the possibility of joining the New York Knicks next season. That’s when Irving infamously said he’d make the best decision for his family, and that he didn’t “owe anybody shit.” This induced panic among Boston fans. After all, it was a much different tune than the one he was singing in October 2018, when Irving told a gathering of Celtics season-ticket holders that he intended to re-sign with the team (multiple sources say that same commitment was expressed to his teammates).
Makes total sense to freeze out teammates when the media brings something from OUTSIDE the team to you in a question.

Christ, it's not like Brown was calling him out---the media was doing what the media did and now suddenly Kyrie is disinterested? That does not compute.
 

Light-Tower-Power

ask me about My Pillow
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2013
16,006
Nashua, NH
It sounds eerily similar to what happened with Kyrie during his last season in Cleveland. They're a better team without him if he's not engaged. We saw it yesterday. The defensive intensity is light years better with Rozier, Smart, and Brown out there and Kyrie on the bench right now.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,150
I guess what I don’t get about this is that the team hasn’t been playing good, team-centric basketball since well before early February. So I have trouble attributing the frustrating play to Kyrie’s mood suddenly changing a month or so ago.
There was a stretch from November 26 to the infamous Lakers game where there was a lot more good than bad. Yes, a lot of it was against a weak schedule, but the team played the right way against that weak schedule, and played some good teams well (Toronto, Philly, OKC).

Something clearly changed with Kyrie's attitude once the AD drama started. No idea what it was, but shit got weird then.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
There was a stretch from November 26 to the infamous Lakers game where there was a lot more good than bad. Yes, a lot of it was against a weak schedule, but the team played the right way against that weak schedule, and played some good teams well (Toronto, Philly, OKC).

Something clearly changed with Kyrie's attitude once the AD drama started. No idea what it was, but shit got weird then.
Klutch Sports kept lobbing grenades into the Boston clubhouse to create exactly this situation. It’s why I want no part of Davis no matter how talented he is. Some guys aren’t worth the baggage.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
Something clearly changed with Kyrie's attitude once the AD drama started. No idea what it was, but shit got weird then.
The conspiracy theory would be that AD told Kyrie something along the lines of "there's no fucking way I'm signing with Boston long term" (or that this got to Kyrie through the NBA grapevine). If that happened, of if Kyrie believes that to be true, he may have already made his decision to leave and is just playing out the string.

Edited to add: Right, as nighthob points out, even if this isn't AD's actual thoughts maybe the rumors got to Kyrie. Or maybe he more generally figures that either way this isn't the C's year - either they do get AD next year, in which case he can turn the switch on again, or they don't, in which case he can leave for somewhere else.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,770
Or Kyrie, being the odd duck that he is, really expects to rally his team for the playoffs, and considers the regular season at this point to be a waste of time, since they're not getting a top seed. I don't doubt that he truly believes that he and this Celtics team can beat any of the Eastern teams in a best of seven, even without home court.

He's probably looking at the Bucks and Sixers teams that have never won a playoff series, and a re-tooled Raptors team that has as a bunch of its roster the team that has collapsed the last couple of playoffs.
 

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
10,131
He's probably looking at the Bucks and Sixers teams that have never won a playoff series, and a re-tooled Raptors team that has as a bunch of its roster the team that has collapsed the last couple of playoffs.
Sixers beat the Heat in the first round last year.
 

Light-Tower-Power

ask me about My Pillow
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2013
16,006
Nashua, NH
They have the roster to make a run to the Finals. Maybe they'll shock us and flip some kind of switch but that is looking like a real long shot right now. 25 guys 25 cabs can work in baseball because so much of the game is based on individual batter vs. pitcher matchups. I don't think it works in the NBA and that's what seems to be going on with this team. I just re-watched some highlights from the playoffs last year and it's night and day. Guys genuinely seemed to enjoy playing with each other while this year it seems to be much more of a disconnected, uninterested vibe.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,770
Sixers beat the Heat in the first round last year.
Brain freeze there. The Sixers didn't cover themselves in glory in the second round last year, and of the new additions, Butler had some playoff success on his resume, getting to the second round twice in six tries as a rotation player. Harris was swept in his one playoff appearance. Jonathan Simmons got to the WCF as a 20 mpg guy with the Spurs two seasons ago. For the Bucks, only new additions George Hill, Ilyasova and Mirotic have been out of the first round,
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,037
They have the roster to make a run to the Finals. Maybe they'll shock us and flip some kind of switch but that is looking like a real long shot right now.
It's gonna be weird around here if they make a postseason run. Like, pretty much the entire regular season (outside of 2 stretches) was miserable up til now. But if they run to ECF again or beyond do we look back more fondly on this? I have no idea.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
It's gonna be weird around here if they make a postseason run. Like, pretty much the entire regular season (outside of 2 stretches) was miserable up til now. But if they run to ECF again or beyond do we look back more fondly on this? I have no idea.
If they make the finals and people are upset, that's ridiculous. I guess "fondly" is different but I have a hard time believing people wouldn't get behind any team in the finals, regardless of how unlikable they are.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
If they make the finals and people are upset, that's ridiculous. I guess "fondly" is different but I have a hard time believing people wouldn't get behind any team in the finals, regardless of how unlikable they are.
Yeah, if they make the ECF I'm throwing a party because that's the sort of thing that could help move Durant to forcing his way here.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,037
I didn't realize that Marcus Morris was with Klutch. I wonder if there were words in the locker room after the trading deadline kerfuffle about how Klutch was leaking/making shit up and Morris responded.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,275
They have the roster to make a run to the Finals. Maybe they'll shock us and flip some kind of switch but that is looking like a real long shot right now.
The good news is we should have a favorable draw in the opening round vs Philly, who is seemingly as dysfunctional as we are. One fan base will gain some false hope from that series.
 

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
10,131
Don't worry, Kevin Durant says we'll be fine once the playoffs start.
"They're right up there at the top," Durant said when asked about the Celtics. "They've been losing a couple games but they've got the top talent, some of the top talent on that team, so they'll be fine once the playoffs start."

Durant said he thinks the Celtics still need time to find a rhythm within their roster. Both Gordon Hayward and Irving missed the Celtics' strong playoff run last year, and the team has struggled to find consistency at times.

"Everybody else probably thought they were supposed to be clicking and winning 65 games," Durant said. "Because they had the talent and they went to the Eastern Conference finals last year, Game 7, but it's a new season. There's a lot of teams that changed their rosters to play, to stack up in the East, so it's a different team. So they're still getting used to each other, getting Gordon Hayward back and Kyrie back, and another year of experience for the guys that went through the playoffs, so it's going to be throughout the season."
I invite @nighthob to speculate on if this makes it more likely that Durant Chis Pauls his way to the Celtics this off-season.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,552
Don't worry, Kevin Durant says we'll be fine once the playoffs start.

I invite @nighthob to speculate on if this makes it more likely that Durant Chis Pauls his way to the Celtics this off-season.
I mean, they are just garden variety positive comments about Golden State's next opponent but talk about timing is interesting.

In a league where well telegraphed potential moves often don't come to pass (e.g. PG13 and Kawhi to the Lakers), this is one of those situations where the seeds are there for something to happen. Wyc needs to vacation with Rich Kleiman this summer.

But seriously, if there is a wildcard for Durant, its Boston. He and Kyrie are obviously close, he was reportedly impressed with Stevens and the franchise and he wouldn't have to take a total flier like LeBron did on a downtrodden franchise turning it around quickly. I have to imagine LeBron's struggles in LA aren't lost on Durant and other players who think its easy to just team up on any platform.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,552
The Warriors host us tomorrow. Durant is a smart veteran. He is going to say nice things about every next opponent. Big nuthinburger here.
You are likely right but again, if Durant (and Irving) had designs on joining forces in NY, it cannot be lost on them that LeBron may be sitting home when the real season begins because he simply doesn't have the horses to get there.

KD and Kyrie together provide more firepower to a team but the Knicks are pretty young still. Boston may fall off but the East is getting tougher - the Hawks and Bulls may be better next year and the Bucks & Sixers should still be very good and Toronto will be competitive even without Leonard. Its not beyond the pale that they have discussed joining forces in Boston where, even with a reconfigured roster, they will have more veterans than NY and coaching/front-office/ownership stability that is more established than the Knicks.

Durant's general platitudes are to be expected but his talk about taking time to gel with teammates and for players to learn to play with one another is interesting to me. Its likely just a general observation but he really didn't have to go that deep into things.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
Is there any scenario where Kyrie, Durant and Davis is possible in Boston?
Realistically? No. But I think there is a way to do it if you send Hayward out to match Durant’s salary and then Tatum/Rozier/Filler/Picks for AD.
 

Reardon's Beard

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 3, 2005
3,798
Is there any scenario where Kyrie, Durant and Davis is possible in Boston?
As far as I can tell the key is unloading GH somehow. That clears enough space. I always assumed it meant you'd have to pair GH with JT and /orpicks to get it done but as mentioned above maybe there are other creative sign and trade scenarios.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
I was just curious if it was improbable or impossible. That's arguably 3 top 10 players, and arguably 2 top 5 players. That's like having KG, Pierce and Allen all at their peak. It wouldn't take much at all to fill the team out. At least if Brad Stevens would actually play the 3 of them 35 minutes a game instead of 30. That scenario would be even better if they could somehow keep Smart. Add 9 random SoSHers and it's title 18.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,552
In short, its either Davis or Durant.

This article gets at how a trade might work but I believe mcpickl or someone else pointed out that the author made some mistakes with assumptions. In short, the most likely scenario to obtain Durant would be a S&T with GS where the C's ship out Tatum and Hayward to the Warriors.

Again, this is not anywhere close to a base case but if the rumors about Irving and Durant wanting to pair up are true, Boston probably gives them a better shot at winning near-term...unless the Knicks get Zion, in which case they could just sign both Irving and Durant outright and ship Zion+ out for...Davis.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
Is there any scenario where Kyrie, Durant and Davis is possible in Boston?
If the owners are willing to venture to payroll levels only experienced by the Thunder, sure. But realistically, no, because they’re not spending $300 million per year.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
In short, its either Davis or Durant.

This article gets at how a trade might work but I believe mcpickl or someone else pointed out that the author made some mistakes with assumptions. In short, the most likely scenario to obtain Durant would be a S&T with GS where the C's ship out Tatum and Hayward to the Warriors.

Again, this is not anywhere close to a base case but if the rumors about Irving and Durant wanting to pair up are true, Boston probably gives them a better shot at winning near-term...unless the Knicks get Zion, in which case they could just sign both Irving and Durant outright and ship Zion+ out for...Davis.
It’s silly because if Durant says “Trade me to Boston or I’m leaving” they aren’t getting Tatum, Brown, or a lottery pick. They’re going to take what they can get because the Warriors are otherwise faced with the option of replacing Durant and Cousins with a Morrii. But, who knows, maybe they’re fine wasting the rest of Steph’s prime.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,552
It’s silly because if Durant says “Trade me to Boston or I’m leaving” they aren’t getting Tatum, Brown, or a lottery pick. They’re going to take what they can get because the Warriors are otherwise faced with the option of replacing Durant and Cousins with a Morrii. But, who knows, maybe they’re fine wasting the rest of Steph’s prime.
Its not silly.

Durant's only realistic path to the Celtics is via S&T. If Durant is leaving Golden State either way but strongly prefers Boston and the Cs want him, Golden State has some leverage in order to facilitate a deal. And they will need something to sweeten taking on Hayward's salary given his current production. That is most likely Tatum who would have a tricky role with Irving and Durant anyway.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,233
I guess a lot depends on whether they view Hayward as potentially being a contributing player again, or just a salary cap albatross. If they think he's garbage, letting KD leave for nothing is better than having Hayward. If they think he could be the player we all thought he would be when he signed here, it's certainly better than nothing.

Although, what I don't know is, if KD leaves for nothing, what does that leave GS with in terms of being able to sign other FAs?
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
All those scenarios really do seem to have the Celtics giving up a lot in a situation where the Warriors have little leverage.
I'm guessing that GS would much rather let Durant go away for nothing than take on Hayward's awful deal. I think DeJesus is right that we'd need to sweeten although I don't think Tatum would be needed. Would GS really pass on, say, Hayward/Brown?
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,496
around the way
Because he can’t close on a jump shooter for shit — good NBA wings will shoot over Semi like he isn’t there. Even a less-than-motivated MaMo is a better option.
I don't think that's fair at all. Nobody will confuse Semi with Manute Bol, but you could say the same for Morris. He doesn't affect many shots. Semi would at least run some guys off the line and stay in front of a few people.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,496
around the way
Klutch Sports kept lobbing grenades into the Boston clubhouse to create exactly this situation. It’s why I want no part of Davis no matter how talented he is. Some guys aren’t worth the baggage.
I wonder how much of that was retribution for DA tanking the LAL deal. Sorry if I'm late to the party in that theory.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,552
I guess a lot depends on whether they view Hayward as potentially being a contributing player again, or just a salary cap albatross. If they think he's garbage, letting KD leave for nothing is better than having Hayward. If they think he could be the player we all thought he would be when he signed here, it's certainly better than nothing.

Although, what I don't know is, if KD leaves for nothing, what does that leave GS with in terms of being able to sign other FAs?
I think the Warriors would prefer something if Durant leaves but I think Hayward, especially given his contract, is more of a liability than anything for them.

Regarding Tatum vs Brown, my view is that this is a complicated transaction and that the Cs are going to have to be prepared to surrender some actual value to even get GS to discuss it.

The other thought here is that were the Cs able to get Durant, Tatum's development would likely be stunted whereas Brown would still have a pretty clear role. I can see Ainge agreeing to move Tatum because of redundancy and fit issues.

In any event, this is highly unlikely to happen but its fun (for me at least - apologies to those who get bothered by this sort of talk) to discuss.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,233
Since KD is often used as a analog for Tatum, giving him up for KD does fit from a team perspective. The Hayward situation is the most confusing. He's a big salary to help make the numbers work, but the question mark is whether he is viewed as a positive or a negative from the GS side. I guess the season is fairly rapidly winding down, but it certainly would be nice for everyone involved if he could put together a nice run to end the season and into the playoffs of the "Gordon Hayward of old". If Hayward ends up being his old self, Hayward and Tatum for KD seems like we are getting hosed. If Hayward doesn't end up that way, it's a much more fair trade.
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,851
I don't think that's fair at all. Nobody will confuse Semi with Manute Bol, but you could say the same for Morris. He doesn't affect many shots. Semi would at least run some guys off the line and stay in front of a few people.
I agree. Teams have no problem getting exactly where they want against this defense in part because of soft guys like Morris. Semi can at least clog up some space and body a guy with that big ol' barrel chest. Maybe make some teams think twice about how easily they can take what they want from the C's defense. Either way I'd rather go down swinging with people who give it all they've got.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,496
around the way
I agree. Teams have no problem getting exactly where they want against this defense in part because of soft guys like Morris. Semi can at least clog up some space and body a guy with that big ol' barrel chest. Maybe make some teams think twice about how easily they can take what they want from the C's defense. Either way I'd rather go down swinging with people who give it all they've got.
I'm not sure how much more Ojeleye I want to see, but I'm not stapling him to the bench on the grounds that we need Marcus Morris out there bothering shots.

There's a 3 inch standing reach difference, which is real. But there's also making an effort.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,944
Los Angeles, CA
Since KD is often used as a analog for Tatum, giving him up for KD does fit from a team perspective. The Hayward situation is the most confusing. He's a big salary to help make the numbers work, but the question mark is whether he is viewed as a positive or a negative from the GS side. I guess the season is fairly rapidly winding down, but it certainly would be nice for everyone involved if he could put together a nice run to end the season and into the playoffs of the "Gordon Hayward of old". If Hayward ends up being his old self, Hayward and Tatum for KD seems like we are getting hosed. If Hayward doesn't end up that way, it's a much more fair trade.
There is no scenario where we get Gordon’s old self this season. Just watch old video and see the difference - it looks like he’s glued to the floor by comparison. He needs time to train while not suffering from the bumps and bruises of competitive basketball. If we move him before next season, we are unfortunately selling very low.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,275
I don't think that's fair at all. Nobody will confuse Semi with Manute Bol, but you could say the same for Morris. He doesn't affect many shots. Semi would at least run some guys off the line and stay in front of a few people.
Then factor him being a complete zero offensively and you currently have a rea bad NBA player. This Semi over Morris thing is giving me flashbacks to the Jae Crowder is better than Paul George crew.

The effort issue is the product of a coach on the verge of losing his team. Benching starters in their comtract year for Semi should finish off any hold that Brad still has with them.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
Its not silly.

Durant's only realistic path to the Celtics is via S&T. If Durant is leaving Golden State either way but strongly prefers Boston and the Cs want him, Golden State has some leverage in order to facilitate a deal. And they will need something to sweeten taking on Hayward's salary given his current production. That is most likely Tatum who would have a tricky role with Irving and Durant anyway.
Boston would be over the luxury tax line and so can’t receive a player in a sign & trade. The way it has to work is the way the CP3 to Houston deal did, Durant offers to pick up his option if the Warriors trade him to Boston. Outside that the likelihood is that Irving and Durant team up on one of the many teams with the cap space to sign them.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
I wonder how much of that was retribution for DA tanking the LAL deal. Sorry if I'm late to the party in that theory.
The leaks started from the very day of the trade demand. The Lakers didn’t have much to offer New Orleans, so the only way that Klutch could get Davis to their team was to damage the other bidders for his services.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,496
around the way
Then factor him being a complete zero offensively and you currently have a rea bad NBA player. This Semi over Morris thing is giving me flashbacks to the Jae Crowder is better than Paul George crew.
I'm just pointing out that you're not sacrificing shot blocking if you play Semi over Morris. Morris gives you a little more credible post defense, but he's not running anyone off the line whatsoever.

You certainly lose offense though. Bad Morris is still better than Ojeleye.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,730
Saint Paul, MN
The leaks started from the very day of the trade demand. The Lakers didn’t have much to offer New Orleans, so the only way that Klutch could get Davis to their team was to damage the other bidders for his services.
Unfortunately, AD to LAL is still the most likely IMO. If Kyrie bolts, I can't see Ainge offering up Tatum for AD. In this scenario, we are comparing Brown + salary + picks vs Ingram + Ball + Kuzma + picks (one of which would be this years pick which is likely pick # 11'ish. I think I pick LAL package over BOS
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,552
Boston would be over the luxury tax line and so can’t receive a player in a sign & trade. The way it has to work is the way the CP3 to Houston deal did, Durant offers to pick up his option if the Warriors trade him to Boston. Outside that the likelihood is that Irving and Durant team up on one of the many teams with the cap space to sign them.
Apologies - I was unclear. This is the scenario I was referring to in my post.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
Unfortunately, AD to LAL is still the most likely IMO. If Kyrie bolts, I can't see Ainge offering up Tatum for AD. In this scenario, we are comparing Brown + salary + picks vs Ingram + Ball + Kuzma + picks (one of which would be this years pick which is likely pick # 11'ish. I think I pick LAL package over BOS
To be brutally frank I’m hoping that Ingram plays well enough in a losing cause and that the Lakers end up with a high enough pick that Davis to LA becomes a fait accompli and that Boston can finally move on.

Another year of will he stay or will he go complete with Klutch tossing flaming bags of swine shit into the Boston clubhouse will have me dumping the Celtics from my NBATV rotation for the Kings or Nuggets.

Apologies - I was unclear. This is the scenario I was referring to in my post.
But that’s not a sign & trade, it’s just a trade. And they don’t occur because the player picks up the option out of the goodness of his heart. It would be conditional on the team completing the deal before the deadline (which is the week before the draft if memory serves).

In terms of the deal Boston only needs to match Durant plus his trade kicker, they aren’t going to offer up much more than Hayward and a draft pick or two. The Warriors would have to choose between replacing Durant and Cousins with a Morii or betting that Hayward will continue to progress like other players recovering from broken bones do.

I’m resigned on Irving leaving at this point. The Davis fiasco looks to have resulted in a massive stinkbomb going off in the Boston clubhouse. Durant forcing his way to Boston is about the only scenario where I see Irving remaining.

Boston’s other hope at this point is that Irving and 24/7 agree to do them a solid and make the exit a sign & trade so that Boston has a TPE with which to rebuild on the fly.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,186
...
I’m resigned on Irving leaving at this point. The Davis fiasco looks to have resulted in a massive stinkbomb going off in the Boston clubhouse. Durant forcing his way to Boston is about the only scenario where I see Irving remaining.

Boston’s other hope at this point is that Irving and 24/7 agree to do them a solid and make the exit a sign & trade so that Boston has a TPE with which to rebuild on the fly.
I know the bolded is the preferred narrative on 93.7/98.5 these days, but I'm not sure the relationship between Kyrie and the team is irreparable just yet. Kyrie seemed much more positive about his relationship with Brad Stevens and the team during yesterday's interview. The timing of the Klutch/Davis crap and the losing streak is more probable than not just coincidence.

Marcus Morris is gone after this season. Rozier is also gone if Kyrie stays. Both of those moves are addition by subtraction, and Kyrie knows all this. Ainge could still go into salesman mode and tell Kyrie: "Look, we still have some good draft picks and some coveted young players. If you stay, I promise I will do everything I can to use those assets to improve the team. It may not be Anthony Davis, and I doubt very much it will be Durant due to the CBA rules. But we'll get someone either this offseason or next. "

I realize the NBA doesn't normally work that way anymore, and, even if it did, I also realize that Kyrie may really have his heart set on NY no matter what Ainge says. And it's possible that Ainge has already concluded Kyrie is gone and so the only choice is to play for this season. But we shouldn't discount Kyrie sticking around just because Felger and Mazz have concluded he should leave yesterday.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,662
There is no scenario where we get Gordon’s old self this season. Just watch old video and see the difference - it looks like he’s glued to the floor by comparison. He needs time to train while not suffering from the bumps and bruises of competitive basketball. If we move him before next season, we are unfortunately selling very low.
I think Hayward is going to be terrific.... next season. This year seems like a washout but I think he'll be ready to go next year.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,233
Kyrie has a lot of financial incentive to opt-out of his contract, so he can sign another one, correct? If he simply opts out after July 1, his available options are fairly limited (to get a max deal). And those available options are not going to be good teams.

If we trade Kyrie to someone else (don't know if before or after July 1 matters), does he still have the ability to opt out and get the same kind of max deal? At that point, would his new team have his Bird rights, or not?

To put it another way, would there be some way that the Celtics could benefit from trading Kyrie somewhere where he couldn't get on his own via free agency?

The challenge, unfortunately, is what do the Celtics get in return? Because that team would have to match salary, and hard to see exactly what that would be.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
I know the bolded is the preferred narrative on 93.7/98.5 these days, but I'm not sure the relationship between Kyrie and the team is irreparable just yet. Kyrie seemed much more positive about his relationship with Brad Stevens and the team during yesterday's interview. The timing of the Klutch/Davis crap and the losing streak is more probable than not just coincidence.
I don’t listen to radio at all, so I’m unfamiliar. I’m looking at the play on the court, and since Klutch began its rumormongering campaign Boston’s on-court results have been ugly. And it’s understandable, their talented young players were faced with the knowledge that they were gone the minute Boston could trade them. And Irving hasn’t dealt well with the situation. (But this isn’t Irving’s fault, the whole Klutch Killer Klown Show would try the patience of Jesus. It’s why I want no part of Davis no matter how talented he is.)

I don’t think the relationship with the team has been damaged per se, so much as he’s just soured on the circumstances in general. My suspicion is that he and Durant are planning on teaming up somewhere this summer, and that’s the real reason he’ll be leaving, to go form a super team with Durant. I’ve been saying for a while now I’d prefer it to be here. But absent that, I think Irving and Durant are going to be a tandem deal for someone (it would be hilarious if it ended up being the Clippers).
 
Last edited:

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
Kyrie has a lot of financial incentive to opt-out of his contract, so he can sign another one, correct? If he simply opts out after July 1, his available options are fairly limited (to get a max deal). And those available options are not going to be good teams.

If we trade Kyrie to someone else (don't know if before or after July 1 matters), does he still have the ability to opt out and get the same kind of max deal? At that point, would his new team have his Bird rights, or not?
At this point the only way that Boston could trade Irving would be if he wanted to sign with a team without sufficient cap space. Or to a team that needed to create more. For example, if the LA Clippers wanted to sign the Irving/Durant tandem, they’d need to clear some more space in order to add pieces around them.

So Boston could conceivably put together a sign & trade where LA offloaded the Galinari deal onto Boston with a first round pick or two tossed in to sweeten the pot for Boston, and LA would be able to add pieces around the Irving/Durant tandem (while already having a good start with Shai Gilgeous-Alexander and Montrezl Harrell).

The other scenario would be where Ainge convinces Irving and his management team to do them a solid and leave via a sign & trade to an under the cap team so that Boston gets a TPE to use. So, for example, if Irving/Durant decided on Brooklyn or the Knicks, Boston would trade Irving for a second round pick (and probably;y a conditional one at that) and generate a roughly $35 million trade exception to use to rebuild with.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,037
I don’t listen to radio at all, so I’m unfamiliar. I’m looking at the play on the court, and since Klutch began its rumormongering campaign Boston’s on-court results have been ugly.
If an influence like that can so impact a team the NBA might need to think about bigger sanctions.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
I mean the reason it's had this outsized impact is the number of kids playing for their next contract on the roster. About the only thing Boston could have done is express no interest in trading for Davis. The Lakers have had a similar problem since the rumors began.