Departure at Logan. Destination, Tennessee

SeoulSoxFan

I Want to Hit the World with Rocket Punch
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
22,102
A Scud Away from Hell
CB Ryan Logan signs with the Titans, where former NEP Jon Robinson is the current GM.

Reportedly a 3-year deal for $30m. Not sure what the guarantee is though.

At least he will feel right at home, playing with the carbon-copy McCourty.
 
Last edited:

TheoShmeo

Skrub's sympathy case
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
12,890
Boston, NY
Getting that David Givens Deja Vu feeling.

I clearly do not understand the Ways of Bill Belichick but that contract seems sort of manageable. Wondering a little why they didn't just bring back both Ryan and Butler. Not a criticism. Just a question. And it's really prompted by a contract that is less in years and annual amount than I expected.

Then again, when you consider that the SB 51 Pats had only 20 of the players who played in SB 49, nothing along these lines can be all that surprising.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,186
Getting that David Givens Deja Vu feeling.

I clearly do not understand the Ways of Bill Belichick but that contract seems sort of manageable. Wondering a little why they didn't just bring back both Ryan and Butler. Not a criticism. Just a question. And it's really prompted by a contract that is less in years and annual amount than I expected.

Then again, when you consider that the SB 51 Pats had only 20 of the players who played in SB 49, nothing along these lines can be all that surprising.
First, Butler hasn't gone anywhere yet. And it's become clear that Butler's agent was going to explore the free agent market no matter what.

As for Ryan, it's clear that the Pats just didn't consider him a $10m/yr player. It's one of those decisions every team has to make in the age of the salary cap.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
While I'd rather have Ryan at $10 than Gilmore at $13 - I think - I trust that the team loves Gilmore.

That being said, I always wonder about the locker room ripple effect of paying an outside guy big $$. Probably an overrated thing created in the minds of mediots and fans.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
Why would you prefer Ryan over Gilmore? Would you prefer Ryan over Butler at the same cost?
A few reasons
- We know what we have
- Contract length (hopefully Gilmore is cuttable after 3 years with minimal cost)
- Goodwill of paying our own guys

Just seems like a contract THAT big exposes them cap-wise in a way that we haven't seen much before.

Hard to compare Ryan and Butler since one was an RFA. But if Butler was an UFA this year, then yes, I would prefer Butler at $10M annually over Ryan.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
While I'd rather have Ryan at $10 than Gilmore at $13 - I think - I trust that the team loves Gilmore.

That being said, I always wonder about the locker room ripple effect of paying an outside guy big $$. Probably an overrated thing created in the minds of mediots and fans.
The risk is that guys in contract years play to impress other teams rather than doing what's best for their own. So maybe the downside of re-upping a below-average number of your own guys (if BB in fact does this) is having to make the occasional Collins or (less clearly) Jones deal.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
Why would you prefer Ryan over Gilmore? Would you prefer Ryan over Butler at the same cost?
Well they did just win the SB with Ryan playing a significant role all season.
Gilmore has talked previously about getting paid big $$ and just turned a 5 game stretch into the biggest defensive contract in NE history. Gilmore was considered to be having a down contract year before finishing strong, well after BUF season was over.
Time will tell if he is worth it. They are clearly paying for potential.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,476
Well they did just win the SB with Ryan playing a significant role all season.
Gilmore has talked previously about getting paid big $$ and just turned a 5 game stretch into the biggest defensive contract in NE history. Gilmore was considered to be having a down contract year before finishing strong, well after BUF season was over.
Time will tell if he is worth it. They are clearly paying for potential.
They also won a SB with McClellin and Van Noy playing significant roles this season. Not sure what your point is.

Gilmore had a very good 2015 prior to some bad games to start 2016. He then closed out 2016 strong.

Without knowing how exposed he was or wasn't left by his own teammates - which can probably only be done at a film level (*cough, ITP, cough*) - as well as all the other things then go into analyzing a DB's play, I don't implicitly trust that he parlayed 5 good games into a monster contract. Paying for potential and 5 good games certainly doesn't follow suit with the way BB has operated for 15+ years, so if that's the argument being made, then I'm comfortable with rolling out the "In BB we trust" for this signing.
 
Last edited:

Hoodie Sleeves

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 24, 2015
1,204
While I'd rather have Ryan at $10 than Gilmore at $13 - I think - I trust that the team loves Gilmore.
This is exactly the sort of thing BB never does though. He absolutely refuses to give elite contracts to players like Ryan (good, but not elite) - Gilmore is a much better player than Ryan.

He's a little bigger than Ryan, and much faster.

We'll see what happens with Butler, but Butler/Gilmore is a lot better tandem than Butler/Ryan.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,476
A few reasons
- We know what we have
- Contract length (hopefully Gilmore is cuttable after 3 years with minimal cost)
- Goodwill of paying our own guys

Just seems like a contract THAT big exposes them cap-wise in a way that we haven't seen much before.

Hard to compare Ryan and Butler since one was an RFA. But if Butler was an UFA this year, then yes, I would prefer Butler at $10M annually over Ryan.
So, of all the concerns that exist, only one of them is on the football field (we know what we have)? That isn't a snarky question, by the way. I think salary cap/locker room stuff is important, too. But they have oodles of dollars to spend, the contract is probably very similar to every other "large" contract handed out in the NFL (as you noted, he very well could be expendable in 3 years), and the Patriots already have a stigma of not paying for their players (Spikes, Jones, Seymour had all made gripes about it after leaving). If paying for guys like Mankins, Mayo, Wilfork, etc didn't move the needle on that stigma, I'm inclined to think that signing a slot corner for a few years wouldn't help.

On the flip side, while we "know what we have" in Logan Ryan...we also know what we have with Logan Ryan. He's a slot corner that can't play on the outside - which BB is willing to pay for (Kyle Arrington), but not at $10m a year - and needs some help from the defensive system he's in due to lack of speed/agility. He's also a very heady football player that can make great plays and who was a huge part to the success of the team last year.

While we don't necessarily know what we have in Gilmore, there is a feeling that he can be a true shutdown corner and has the ability to play all over the field while doing so (Adam Mays and Mike Lombardi talked about this in passing on The Ringer a few days ago prior to the signing). For an extra $3m a year, I take that every day and twice on Sunday.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,837
AZ
This is a big loss. The Patriots were first in the league in yards after catch in 2006. If you want a stat to help explain why a defense that was 8th in the league in yards allowed was 1st in the league in points allowed, I think YAC is a good candidate. Tackling gets you off the field on third down, and we're losing a really really good tackler.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,476
This is a big loss. The Patriots were first in the league in yards after catch in 2006. If you want a stat to help explain why a defense that was 8th in the league in yards allowed was 1st in the league in points allowed, I think YAC is a good candidate. Tackling gets you off the field on third down, and we're losing a really really good tackler.
They haven't lost Malcolm Butler yet.

The Patriots cycled through corners at the #2 slot all year. IF Butler stays, a Butler/Gilmore/3rd CB combo is, imo, a significant upgrade over a Butler/pu-pu platter/Ryan combo.

And, fwiw, I loved Butler this year and thought his play in the slot was phenomenal.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
So, of all the concerns that exist, only one of them is on the football field (we know what we have)? That isn't a snarky question, by the way. I think salary cap/locker room stuff is important, too. But they have oodles of dollars to spend, the contract is probably very similar to every other "large" contract handed out in the NFL (as you noted, he very well could be expendable in 3 years), and the Patriots already have a stigma of not paying for their players (Spikes, Jones, Seymour had all made gripes about it after leaving). If paying for guys like Mankins, Mayo, Wilfork, etc didn't move the needle on that stigma, I'm inclined to think that signing a slot corner for a few years wouldn't help.

On the flip side, while we "know what we have" in Logan Ryan...we also know what we have with Logan Ryan. He's a slot corner that can't play on the outside - which BB is willing to pay for (Kyle Arrington), but not at $10m a year - and needs some help from the defensive system he's in due to lack of speed/agility. He's also a very heady football player that can make great plays and who was a huge part to the success of the team last year.

While we don't necessarily know what we have in Gilmore, there is a feeling that he can be a true shutdown corner and has the ability to play all over the field while doing so (Adam Mays and Mike Lombardi talked about this in passing on The Ringer a few days ago prior to the signing). For an extra $3m a year, I take that every day and twice on Sunday.
Good points. I disagree about the slot corner thing a bit - not in that Ryan can't play outside, but in that you play 3 CBs a ton anyway, so slot is basically a starter anyway.

And I guess I feel like, if they have oodles of cash anyway, why not sign both Ryan and Gilmore and trade Butler for a pick? They'd still have a ton of room.
 

bankshot1

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 12, 2003
24,759
where I was last at
Thinking about the Pats prospective schedule this year, (and if I'm thinking this so is BB) they are going to face a shit-ton of good QBs, Brees, Benny R, Matty Ice,Cam Newton, Derek Carr, they could use some quality at CB. The D is going to be tested.
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,476
Good points. I disagree about the slot corner thing a bit - not in that Ryan can't play outside, but in that you play 3 CBs a ton anyway, so slot is basically a starter anyway.

And I guess I feel like, if they have oodles of cash anyway, why not sign both Ryan and Gilmore and trade Butler for a pick? They'd still have a ton of room.
Good question. Let me answer your question with my own question:

Would you rather have Ryan and Gilmore at $23 million a year, or Gilmore and Butler at the same price?

I ask because my read of the tea-leaves is, despite all the Butler/Cooks talk, that the Patriots want to keep Butler. If they do, then a 3-4 year deal at $9-10 million a pop could very well be the settling point since the Patriots are basically buying out a year of RFA.

In other words, you could have two true #1 CB's that both have the ability to play all over the field (including the slot occasionally) for basically the same price as one of Butler/Gilmore & Ryan (who can only play the slot).
 

9percenthurdle

New Member
Jun 29, 2015
3
Back Bay
Why pay Logan Ryan that when you have a 24 year old Eric Rowe under your control for a very inexpensive next two years? At 6'1" 205 Rowe strikes me as being able to cover the larger more physical WRs as Ryan often did (Ryan is ~5'11" 195).
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,476
Why pay Logan Ryan that when you have a 24 year old Eric Rowe under your control for a very inexpensive next two years? At 6'1" 205 Rowe strikes me as being able to cover the larger more physical WRs as Ryan often did (Ryan is ~5'11" 195).
I do not think, however, that Rowe can play in the slot, which was Ryan's primary responsibility.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,837
AZ
Right -- if Butler stays it's an upgrade for sure. I would be fine with those two back there and then forget about this Cooks stuff, renegotiate Amendola to save $4 or $5 million and focus on Hightower.

The problem is that you can't have certainty on a Butler for six weeks unless they extend him, and while most rfas are not a risk to be signed he actually is.

I guess if it happens, you use the pick to get someone to help make up for losing Butler.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,275
While I'd rather have Ryan at $10 than Gilmore at $13 - I think - I trust that the team loves Gilmore.

That being said, I always wonder about the locker room ripple effect of paying an outside guy big $$. Probably an overrated thing created in the minds of mediots and fans.
The real question should be whether you prefer Gilmore at 13 over Butler moving forward as Ryan's position will likely be filled by a much lower cost replacement and not Gilmore assuming we move Butler now for Cooks' ridiculously cheap contract. We acquired Revis and Browner, then won a Super Bowl. We watched the mediots lose their minds when they were replaced by Butler and Ryan.....and what do you know, we won another Super Bowl. I have no problem moving forward with Gilmore and a low cost Ryan-replacement while adding the dirt cheap Cooks to our receiver corps (saving more money over Amendola with better production to boot). It also allows us to retain Jimmy G as a highly paid backup the following season with our CB and WR still on value deals in 2018.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
On the flip side, while we "know what we have" in Logan Ryan...we also know what we have with Logan Ryan. He's a slot corner that can't play on the outside - which BB is willing to pay for (Kyle Arrington), but not at $10m a year - and needs some help from the defensive system he's in due to lack of speed/agility. He's also a very heady football player that can make great plays and who was a huge part to the success of the team last year.
I don't agree Ryan can't play outside - he did play outside in base defense, and for the most part he was fine. His speed limits him out there - he needs safety help that a real shutdown guy wouldn't - but he could also match up to the big guys outside, which is something Arrington couldn't do (and Butler doesn't do either).

While we don't necessarily know what we have in Gilmore, there is a feeling that he can be a true shutdown corner and has the ability to play all over the field while doing so (Adam Mays and Mike Lombardi talked about this in passing on The Ringer a few days ago prior to the signing). For an extra $3m a year, I take that every day and twice on Sunday.
I think this is right. I haven't watched a lot of Gilmore, but in theory he's a guy who checks all the boxes. Butler is limited by his lack of size, Ryan by his lack of speed, but they complemented each other well. Gilmore doesn't have as many limitations as those guys and gives the team more flexibility in filling out the rest of the secondary.

I do not think, however, that Rowe can play in the slot, which was Ryan's primary responsibility.
Rowe hasn't played much slot, but he did play some safety in college, so you'd think he would have an understanding of the middle-of-the-field responsibilities there. I'm guessing Cyrus Jones or Coleman gets a crack at slot duties.
 

Tony C

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Apr 13, 2000
13,706
This is exactly the sort of thing BB never does though. He absolutely refuses to give elite contracts to players like Ryan (good, but not elite) - Gilmore is a much better player than Ryan.

He's a little bigger than Ryan, and much faster.

We'll see what happens with Butler, but Butler/Gilmore is a lot better tandem than Butler/Ryan.
I love the signing/non-signing and agree that to call this a contract based on 5 games is just flat silly -- Gilmore is a better CB. My only question/doubt is in re YAC as someone else mentioned but also how good Ryan was against the run. Does anyone have a sense of Gilmore in run support?
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,476
I don't agree Ryan can't play outside - he did play outside in base defense, and for the most part he was fine. His speed limits him out there - he needs safety help that a real shutdown guy wouldn't - but he could also match up to the big guys outside, which is something Arrington couldn't do (and Butler doesn't do either).
That's fair, although I feel like he was put in that role because he was the de facto #2 CB out of sheer necessity. As you (and I) stated previously, due to his lack of speed, he needs help regardless of where he plays on the field. If his numbers are below par on the outside despite the requirement of additional team help, I have a hard time understanding how some folks would want to pay him $10 million but shudder at paying Gilmore $13. Further, I get the impression Bill may be comfortable using Rowe in the role to cover bigger WR's on the outside in the coming year.

Rowe hasn't played much slot, but he did play some safety in college, so you'd think he would have an understanding of the middle-of-the-field responsibilities there. I'm guessing Cyrus Jones or Coleman gets a crack at slot duties.
Yeah, I suppose my bigger concern is Rowe's lack of agility/side-to-side quickness required from playing the slot. I haven't researched, but I'd have to assume there aren't a ton of top-notch 6'1 slot corners.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
That's fair, although I feel like he was put in that role because he was the de facto #2 CB out of sheer necessity. As you (and I) stated previously, due to his lack of speed, he needs help regardless of where he plays on the field. If his numbers are below par on the outside despite the requirement of additional team help, I have a hard time understanding how some folks would want to pay him $10 million but shudder at paying Gilmore $13.
I think that's right - Gilmore should get more than Ryan or Butler, because he doesn't have the limitations those guys have.

Further, I get the impression Bill may be comfortable using Rowe in the role to cover bigger WR's on the outside in the coming year.
We kind of saw that in the Super Bowl - in three receiver sets when Julio Jones was outside, Rowe generally covered him, and Ryan got Jones in two receiver sets and when he lined up in the slot.

Yeah, I suppose my bigger concern is Rowe's lack of agility/side-to-side quickness required from playing the slot. I haven't researched, but I'd have to assume there aren't a ton of top-notch 6'1 slot corners.[/QUOTE]
Yeah, although Rowe actually had awesome agility drills at the Combine. I don't think he plays to that though (nor his 4.45 40).
 

Morgan's Magic Snowplow

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 2, 2006
22,379
Philadelphia
Yeah, although Rowe actually had awesome agility drills at the Combine. I don't think he plays to that though (nor his 4.45 40).
Its a tangential point, but I think Rowe has some real upside to eventually play to those physical talents. He only played one year of CB at Utah and then had to really learn the position for real in the NFL in 2015, then switched DC/HC in 2016 and fell out of favor with the new regime in Philly, then switched DC/HC again when he came over to the Patriots. So he has had to learn a new position while also playing in three different schemes in two years. He might be one of those guys whose poor instincts undermine his physical gifts. But he could also just be a tiny bit slow mentally because of that unusual career trajectory.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,132
Pittsburgh, PA
Ryan is a player whose sentimental favoritism has increased dramatically the last few years. To hear BBTL talk about him in, say, 2014 or 2015, he was a total bust who couldn't cover anyone, least of all in zone. If he was on the field in nickel, you could watch him and frequently see the big play develop. His footwork was a shambles (by NFL standards), his route reading was average at best. I'll give him that his tackling has become quite solid, but if we had a stat for the average distance between a CB and the player he was man-marking, Butler would basically be rated as "in his guy's pocket" and from all the film I've seen, Ryan would average a couple steps behind. Eric Rowe will probably be better than Logan Ryan in 2018, at a cap hit of $878k, and possibly in 2017 as well.

I'm not upset at all to lose him if the price to keep him was 3/30. Good for him and his family, he'll always be a champion here, but with Gilmore on board, this is the least upsetting FA departure for me since Brandon Spikes, maybe since Jabar Gaffney.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
Ryan is a player whose sentimental favoritism has increased dramatically the last few years. To hear BBTL talk about him in, say, 2014 or 2015, he was a total bust who couldn't cover anyone, least of all in zone. If he was on the field in nickel, you could watch him and frequently see the big play develop. His footwork was a shambles (by NFL standards), his route reading was average at best. I'll give him that his tackling has become quite solid, but if we had a stat for the average distance between a CB and the player he was man-marking, Butler would basically be rated as "in his guy's pocket" and from all the film I've seen, Ryan would average a couple steps behind. Eric Rowe will probably be better than Logan Ryan in 2018, at a cap hit of $878k, and possibly in 2017 as well.

I'm not upset at all to lose him if the price to keep him was 3/30. Good for him and his family, he'll always be a champion here, but with Gilmore on board, this is the least upsetting FA departure for me since Brandon Spikes, maybe since Jabar Gaffney.
I think you have adequately summed up the general fan perception of how Ryan is perceived relative to Butler. I do not think that perception reflects reality. Their Football Outsiders charting numbers are pretty similar:
2016 Butler: 67 targets, 7.1 YPA, 57% defensive success
2016 Ryan: 72 targets, 6.1 YPA, 53% success
2015 Butler: 93 targets, 9.0 YPA, 56% success
2015 Ryan: 80 targets, 8.0 YPA, 53% success

I don't think the numbers should be taken on face value - playing in slot depresses YPA, which favors Ryan, Ryan gets more safety help, Ryan generally had the tougher matchup - but I think they would surprise most fans who have your general perception of the two. Butler's game is more aesthetically pleasing, and it complements Gilmore's better. Because of the aesthetics, or because of his story, or because of the greatest play in Super Bowl history, Butler gets a pass on stuff Ryan wouldn't - I can only imagine what the game thread would have looked like if Ryan had tripped over his own feet and gave up a 30+ yard catch to Taylor Gabriel in the Super Bowl.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
Ryan is a player whose sentimental favoritism has increased dramatically the last few years. To hear BBTL talk about him in, say, 2014 or 2015, he was a total bust who couldn't cover anyone, least of all in zone. If he was on the field in nickel, you could watch him and frequently see the big play develop. His footwork was a shambles (by NFL standards), his route reading was average at best. I'll give him that his tackling has become quite solid, but if we had a stat for the average distance between a CB and the player he was man-marking, Butler would basically be rated as "in his guy's pocket" and from all the film I've seen, Ryan would average a couple steps behind. Eric Rowe will probably be better than Logan Ryan in 2018, at a cap hit of $878k, and possibly in 2017 as well.

I'm not upset at all to lose him if the price to keep him was 3/30. Good for him and his family, he'll always be a champion here, but with Gilmore on board, this is the least upsetting FA departure for me since Brandon Spikes, maybe since Jabar Gaffney.
Not entirely dissimilar to Shane Vereen when you think about it - Super Bowl hero, but was clearly replaceable.

And we'll be saying the same thing about James White after 2017.
 

bradmahn

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
591
complements
My compliments to you.

Signing Gilmore for just a few million more than Ryan is a coup and provides so much relief. As you've noted, right now the options after Butler are Rowe, Cyrus Jones, and Justin Coleman. If they were scraping by with that as the depth chart right now, I would be pretty nervous to rely on three roller coaster young vets who are more potential than reliable at this stage of their careers.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
Signing Gilmore for just a few million more than Ryan is a coup and provides so much relief. As you've noted, right now the options after Butler are Rowe, Cyrus Jones, and Justin Coleman. If they were scraping by with that as the depth chart right now, I would be pretty nervous to rely on three roller coaster young vets who are more potential than reliable at this stage of their careers.
That's fair. OTOH, they turned the secondary over from Revis, Browner, and Arrington two offseasons ago to a modestly-experienced Ryan, an inexperienced Butler, and rookie UDFA Justin Coleman (with veteran backstops Tarell Brown and Bradley Fletcher, for a while). Gilmore is a lot more experienced than Ryan was then, Rowe is about as experienced as Ryan was, Coleman is more experienced than Butler was and Jones not much less. Then again, the front seven was better-equipped at the time. They could certainly bring in a low-priced vet to compete with these guys: a quick perusal of the FA list shows guys like Mo Claiborne, Brandon Flowers, Sam Shields, Leon Hall, Revis, Brandon Carr, Keenan Lewis, etc., who could compete with the young guys if they aren't ready.