ESPN Is Pathetic

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,797
People taking a news story and spinning it in some fashion to fit their political beliefs is old hat.
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
I mean Shannon Sharpe and Skip are trying hard, but they can't even come close. All clowns may be clowns, but not all are funny. I have no doubt that if ESPN lets SAS go, somebody else will show him the money.
I dont know where the empirical support is, but when it comes to getting eyeballs to watch hyper-amplified vapidity, I suppose the personality of the shouting clown is probably the draw.
Oh, I have no doubt that SAS would make good money at another network if he ever left ESPN. I guess the question is whether that would be money well spent, and I would think the Bayless example suggests it wouldn't be: the ratings when he was on First Take were by all accounts great, but he's gotten nothing on FS1, suggesting that the draw was not the personality but instead the mere fact that he was on ESPN as opposed to some other network.
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,149
Tuukka's refugee camp
Oh, I have no doubt that SAS would make good money at another network if he ever left ESPN. I guess the question is whether that would be money well spent, and I would think the Bayless example suggests it wouldn't be: the ratings when he was on First Take were by all accounts great, but he's gotten nothing on FS1, suggesting that the draw was not the personality but instead the mere fact that he was on ESPN as opposed to some other network.
You're missing viewing habits though. People instinctively turn ESPN on because it has had quality programming over an extended period, yes, even today. FS1 has yet to shown the ability to make any original content worth a damn that aren't a blatant attempt to copy ESPN. FS1 has live sports rights and that's about its only value prop to get people to instinctively switch from ESPN. NBC Sports was able to do this somewhat successfully by focusing on niche areas like hockey and soccer whereas FS1 has tried to be ESPN out of the box.
 

Ale Xander

Hamilton
SoSH Member
Oct 31, 2013
73,108
You're missing viewing habits though. People instinctively turn ESPN on because it has had quality programming over an extended period, yes, even today. FS1 has yet to shown the ability to make any original content worth a damn that aren't a blatant attempt to copy ESPN. FS1 has live sports rights and that's about its only value prop to get people to instinctively switch from ESPN. NBC Sports was able to do this somewhat successfully by focusing on niche areas like hockey and soccer whereas FS1 has tried to be ESPN out of the box.
Garbage time is better original content than anything current (not biographical like 30/30) ESPN has.
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
I still can't believe Katie Nolan hasn't jumped ship yet.
Is her content really anything great? I've tried a few times and outside of her bashing sexist remarks (like Peter king, et al), I thought it wasn't anything clever. and her interviews are rough. Her show got killed by Barstool relatively speaking in ratings.

I can see her being a good foil for SAS, lolol
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,445
deep inside Guido territory
Some names I haven't seen mentioned here
--Ashley Fox
--Analytics expert Rufus Peabody
--College reporter Chantel Jennings
--Pelicans writer Justin Verrier
--ESPN Radio host Robin Lundberg
--ESPNW columnist Melissa Issacson
--Columnist Johnette Howard
--CBB writer C.L. Brown
--SEC recruiting analyst Derek Tyson
 

OurF'ingCity

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 22, 2016
8,469
New York City
Given the success of Fox News and the weird but apparently real complaints of conservatives about ESPN, I'm actually kind of surprised FS1 hasn't tried harder to become the Fox News of sports. They already have a bunch of "politically incorrect" personalities like Cowherd, Bayless and Whitlock - if you told them to emphasize their more conservative leanings, bought some rights to NASCAR and started criticizing ESPN for being the "liberal sports media" I would think the Trump voters of the world would flock to the channel. Maybe they are already trending in this direction, or maybe it's just not viable in the sports sector. Still surprised no one has really gone for this angle, though (as annoying and depressing as it would be to everyone else).
 

TFP

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2007
20,388
I still can't believe Katie Nolan hasn't jumped ship yet.
Is her content really anything great? I've tried a few times and outside of her bashing sexist remarks (like Peter king, et al), I thought it wasn't anything clever. and her interviews are rough. Her show got killed by Barstool relatively speaking in ratings.

I can see her being a good foil for SAS, lolol
I'm shocked she hasn't gone to Barstool actually. Her humor and social media presence would fit in perfectly there, and finding a true female lead has been Portnoy's white whale ever since Jenna Marbles left forever ago. It almost seems like too obvious of a match.
 

NYCSox

chris hansen of goats
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 19, 2004
10,476
Some fancy town in CT
Given the success of Fox News and the weird but apparently real complaints of conservatives about ESPN, I'm actually kind of surprised FS1 hasn't tried harder to become the Fox News of sports. They already have a bunch of "politically incorrect" personalities like Cowherd, Bayless and Whitlock - if you told them to emphasize their more conservative leanings, bought some rights to NASCAR and started criticizing ESPN for being the "liberal sports media" I would think the Trump voters of the world would flock to the channel. Maybe they are already trending in this direction, or maybe it's just not viable in the sports sector. Still surprised no one has really gone for this angle, though (as annoying and depressing as it would be to everyone else).
For the love of God, please no. Can't we have anything that isn't polluted by politics?
 

Snoop Soxy Dogg

Well-Known Member
Silver Supporter
May 30, 2014
407
You're missing viewing habits though. People instinctively turn ESPN on because it has had quality programming over an extended period, yes, even today. FS1 has yet to shown the ability to make any original content worth a damn that aren't a blatant attempt to copy ESPN. FS1 has live sports rights and that's about its only value prop to get people to instinctively switch from ESPN. NBC Sports was able to do this somewhat successfully by focusing on niche areas like hockey and soccer whereas FS1 has tried to be ESPN out of the box.
Boy, this is so true. Just about the only time I look for FS1 is when they have a Champions league game on. I get irritated fiddling with the remote like "where the hell is that channel again.."
 

kenneycb

Hates Goose Island Beer; Loves Backdoor Play
SoSH Member
Dec 2, 2006
16,149
Tuukka's refugee camp
Boy, this is so true. Just about the only time I look for FS1 is when they have a Champions league game on. I get irritated fiddling with the remote like "where the hell is that channel again.."
Basically the same thing you heard when NBC Sports (nee Versus) first started growing. Then they became a lot more focused. Not sure if that's a recipe for success or actually making but you can find the channel now and it's on most hotel cable packages. So it's something.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,484
Oregon
Dottie Pepper
✔@Dottie_Pepper

My time with ESPN comes to a close today as I join the sidelines with so many other talented… https://www.instagram.com/p/BTXF6wnFFSB/

Reese Waters
✔@reesewaters

ESPN gave me the light and it's time to leave stage. Sincere gratitude to those who were so kind and supportive. Sorry for the mess I made.

Jaymee Sire
✔@jaymee

I was only at ESPN for 4 years, but they were some of the best of my career. Thanks to all of the fans and to my entire SportsCenterAM crew.

Dave Tuley‏Verified account @ViewFromVegas 29m29 minutes ago
Somewhere sports bettors cheer and somewhere dirty cops get payoffs but there's no joy in ViewFromVegas Nation -- I'm among the ESPN layoffs
 
Last edited:

Mueller's Twin Grannies

critical thinker
SoSH Member
Dec 19, 2009
9,386
I have no idea who Michelle Beadle is or if this actually applies to her, but generally speaking this seems like a fair point (i.e, the media never thinks twice about calling for a firing).
She's worth throwing in your Google Machine.

Nice to see that the MLBN show they'll be simulcasting is the most hot take-y on the channel. Fits right in with the other shit they have on there.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,446
Overland Park, KS
In the big scheme of things, isn't the amount of money saved here negligible? ESPN is fucked because of the cord-cutting and rights fees. When is the correction about rights fees coming? It has to happen sooner or later.
 

Clears Cleaver

Lil' Bill
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2001
11,370
2021 I think. The only content that is a money loser is CFB and the NBA. But they massively overpaid for their garbage NFL package.

These cuts will be an annual thing is my guess. Espn still makes money but margins go down. I don't see any seven figure names being thrown out.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,484
Oregon
The regional reporters seem so arbitrary ... the Titans reporter, the Warriors reporter, the Pelicans reporter
 

Captaincoop

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
13,488
Santa Monica, CA
There is no programming strategy change that is going to save ESPN's ratings. The entire concept behind ESPN is obsolete. But if you're the executive charged with convincing Disney not to fire you and everyone who works for you...time to make the 6pm SportsCenter more wacky!
 

Infield Infidel

teaching korea american
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,463
Meeting Place, Canada
In the big scheme of things, isn't the amount of money saved here negligible? ESPN is fucked because of the cord-cutting and rights fees. When is the correction about rights fees coming? It has to happen sooner or later.
Part of the difficulty with a correction is there's more competition now. ESPN will have to bid less on future deals, which means they'll lose some stuff to NBC/Fox, which means ESPN will have less live content, which means more airtime to fill with fluff, which usually gets worse ratings than live stuff.
 

genoasalami

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 4, 2006
2,582
The combination of losing subscribers while paying more for content is a death spiral. The number crunchers are staring at a balance sheet that is getting uglier over time. Not paying Ed Werder or Jayson Stark is a mere drop in the bucket, but it is the easiest thing to do. I haven't watched a SportsCenter in years ... when I was younger I wouldn't miss it. That's a big part of letting talent go. People want to watch the games. The rest of it is blah blah blah. Why do you have to tune in to ESPN when Schefter will tweet it long before it gets on the air? .more importantly ..if you have your apps set up with alerts you will never miss a breaking sports story...That's a big reason talent is expendable.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
They just said on Wednesday night baseball that Doug Glanville was laid off---had not seen it earlier, but could have missed it
 

shaggydog2000

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2007
11,563
The regional reporters seem so arbitrary ... the Titans reporter, the Warriors reporter, the Pelicans reporter
I'm just guessing here, but it may have to do with contract timing. If they have to buy out less of some guys contracts than others, that makes it cheaper to cut those guys.
 

Captaincoop

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
13,488
Santa Monica, CA
The combination of losing subscribers while paying more for content is a death spiral. The number crunchers are staring at a balance sheet that is getting uglier over time. Not paying Ed Werder or Jayson Stark is a mere drop in the bucket, but it is the easiest thing to do. I haven't watched a SportsCenter in years ... when I was younger I wouldn't miss it. That's a big part of letting talent go. People want to watch the games. The rest of it is blah blah blah. Why do you have to tune in to ESPN when Schefter will tweet it long before it gets on the air? .more importantly ..if you have your apps set up with alerts you will never miss a breaking sports story...That's a big reason talent is expendable.
Somebody above noted that they wished ESPN would go back to its original format and just show sports instead of people talking.

The way I remember ESPN back in the 80s was that (in between tractor pulls, world's strongest man, and arena football), the best content on ESPN was the talking. It was sports-obsessed people, with no agenda, not beholden to the pro sports leagues in any way, discussing sports.

They dipped their toes in the rights fees game with Sunday Night Football, then some baseball, then Disney/ABC bought the network and it completely lost its outsider status and became a marketing partner for the NFL/NBA/MLB. That was the beginning of the end. The cord-cutting then triggered the current death spiral. ESPN is a zombie product now, it's all over but the executives getting paid for as long as they can.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,463
On their show tonight BBTN announced that Dallas Braden and Raul Ibanez were let go
 

taoofoj

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 16, 2007
227
laserbeam high school
The way I remember ESPN back in the 80s was that (in between tractor pulls, world's strongest man, and arena football), the best content on ESPN was the talking. It was sports-obsessed people, with no agenda, not beholden to the pro sports leagues in any way, discussing sports.
I enjoyed SportsCenter back in the 90s when the shtick was genuine. Then it became a victim of its own success and the sausage factory started cranking out all these cheap facsimiles. It all became noticeably manufactured and lost its appeal.

That and ESPN shifted from talking about sports stories to trying to be the story with the worthless hot takez and bombastic debates. It took awhile but they finally ran it into the ground. I won't shed a tear for the demise of a worthless network but I do feel for the regular folks working behind the scenes who are affected.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
In the big scheme of things, isn't the amount of money saved here negligible? ESPN is fucked because of the cord-cutting and rights fees. When is the correction about rights fees coming? It has to happen sooner or later.
Yep.

Roger Cossack the prime example of form over substance. He was not full time or close to it. The money devoted to him was negligible or close to it. You can whack 100 Cossacks, and it would not put a dent in the underlying economic problem. This is make believe, let's pretend.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,484
Oregon
Ravech on BBTN mentioned Stark, Ibanez, Braden, Granville and "so many others." I'm sure it was an overwhelming day, but a part of me hopes he purposely left out Bowden