February NHL News- Trade Season

TheRealness

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 8, 2006
11,696
The Dirty Shire
Dom from the board we won't mention is suggesting their is a lot of smoke around Simmonds and the B's thinks it happens today.
Dom is well regarded and connected, was one of the first to connect B's to Coyle. He also said no on Stone.
Depending on the price, it might be worth it just to keep him from Tampa. FWIW though, Dom seemed convinced Bruins would get Hayes or Zuccarello, so probably good to temper expectations.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
Maybe Stone isn’t getting moved unless it’s for a haul. If he liked it in Ottawa, they have to pay someone to get to the cap floor. Now that they already have Coyle, I’d rather have Simmonds than nobody. I’ve always liked his game. I know he hasn’t been very productive lately but if the price is right why not see if he can open some room up for Krejci and DeBrusk.
 

TSC

SoSH's Doug Neidermeyer
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2007
12,291
Between here and everywhere.
Simmonds would have the 5th most goals on the team were he added via trade (16). He's not a 55-60 point player anymore, but that may be the result of being on a shitty team more than anything. He's only 30.

I've always loved him and would love him on the Bruins. You can't win with a team full of Simmonds, but having one or two guys like that on the roster will help you more nights than it hurts you. He's tough, he finishes his checks, and he's a better goal scorer than a lot of the Bruins roster right now.

He's not worth a 1st, or a top prospect. But he'd make the Bruins a much tougher team to play in the playoffs, and helps with their biggest weakness - secondary scoring.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
If they do add Simmonds, would they consider doing something like this:

Marchand - Bergeron - Heinen
Cehlarik - Krejci - Pastrnak
DeBrusk - Coyle - Simmonds

For the top 9? That third line is a nightmare matchup for 3rd D pairs.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
If they do add Simmonds, would they consider doing something like this:

Marchand - Bergeron - Heinen
Cehlarik - Krejci - Pastrnak
DeBrusk - Coyle - Simmonds

For the top 9? That third line is a nightmare matchup for 3rd D pairs.
I don't think you break up DeBrusk and Krej, took them awhile to get going but they are clicking well lately.
Any move that bumps DeBrusk down a line is a net negative in my book.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,213
306, row 14
I think Simmonds would probably go on Krejci’s wing and then they reunite the big line. Simmonds is a big, physical right shot winger, similar to Horton and Iginla who Krejci had a lot of success with. Also, the big line has tortured Toronto, so my guess is they’ll put them back together for the playoffs.

My biggest worry in acquiring Simmonds is they can’t resist an extension. A lot of red flags there.
 

Maximus

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
5,774
I think Simmonds would probably go on Krejci’s wing and then they reunite the big line. Simmonds is a big, physical right shot winger, similar to Horton and Iginla who Krejci had a lot of success with. Also, the big line has tortured Toronto, so my guess is they’ll put them back together for the playoffs.

My biggest worry in acquiring Simmonds is they can’t resist an extension. A lot of red flags there.
This. If we can't get Stone, Simmonds would be a great add to Krejci's line with Debrusk if the price is right for him being a rental, just don't extend him.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,213
306, row 14
LeBrun Stone update on the Athletic:

- Winnipeg, Calgary, Boston, Nashville the biggest suitors, NYI and Vegas lurking potentially.

- Winnipeg and Nashville seem OK with him as a rental.

- B’s may be reluctant to do it as a rental, but Bruins have assets Ottawa coverts.

- His money is on Winnipeg stepping up if Ottawa drops the ask a tad
 

jk333

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 26, 2009
4,326
Boston
Interesting, what do the Bruins have that Ottawa would want that they would be possibly willing to part with? And that Nashville and Winnipeg can’t match.

All I can come up with is Debrusk... but that doesn’t really make them better this year. Perhaps Carlo?

I don’t think McAvoy or Krug are realistic for different reasons. And I find it hard to believe they are that into Carlo or Heinen.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
Interesting, what do the Bruins have that Ottawa would want that they would be possibly willing to part with? And that Nashville and Winnipeg can’t match.

All I can come up with is Debrusk... but that doesn’t really make them better this year. Perhaps Carlo?

I don’t think McAvoy or Krug are realistic for different reasons. And I find it hard to believe they are that into Carlo or Heinen.
If I were willing to bet based on reports. Top 2 prospects and two 1’s. They’re not going to get that of course, or they would’ve traded him already.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,213
306, row 14
Grzelyck might be of interest to Ottawa. Vaakanainen, certainly. I wouldn’t trade both, but one I would. Carlo is tough, the Bruins are thin on RHD in the system. I don’t think the Bruins would trade DeBrusk. Cehlarik seems more likely as a roster F if one needed to go.

Zboril and Senyshyn won’t be headliners, but I could see Ottawa having interest in them. Zboril played junior hockey with Chabot so they should be familiar with him. Senyshyn is from Ottawa.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
Grzelyck might be of interest to Ottawa. Vaakanainen, certainly. I wouldn’t trade both, but one I would. Carlo is tough, the Bruins are thin on RHD in the system. I don’t think the Bruins would trade DeBrusk. Cehlarik seems more likely as a roster F if one needed to go.

Zboril and Senyshyn won’t be headliners, but I could see Ottawa having interest in them. Zboril played junior hockey with Chabot so they should be familiar with him. Senyshyn is from Ottawa.
I’m sure the initial ask on D was McAvoy. And Sweeney told them to call him back when the get serious.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,213
306, row 14
Ducks trade Montour to Buffalo for Brendan Guhle and a 1st (either STL’s or SJS).

I think that is a nice pickup for Buffalo. Wonder if they now flip Ristolainen.
 

veritas

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2009
3,151
Somerville, MA
All I can come up with is Debrusk... but that doesn’t really make them better this year.
I don't think they should include DeBrusk in a Stone deal, but it would make them significantly better this year.

I'm ok if this is all the Bruins end up doing, but I really can't believe Nino Niederreiter got traded for a 4th liner and the Bruins (or any other contender) weren't in on that. He's exactly what they needed -- a two way RW who can put the puck in the net. Carolina is looking scary right now.
 

Salem's Lot

Andy Moog! Andy God Damn Moog!
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
14,610
Gallows Hill
I don't think they should include DeBrusk in a Stone deal, but it would make them significantly better this year.

I'm ok if this is all the Bruins end up doing, but I really can't believe Nino Niederreiter got traded for a 4th liner and the Bruins (or any other contender) weren't in on that. He's exactly what they needed -- a two way RW who can put the puck in the net. Carolina is looking scary right now.
Minnesota’s GM must really love Victor Rask. It’s the only thing that makes sense.
 

veritas

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2009
3,151
Somerville, MA
Wow, that's a much lower price than I would have expected. He's much better than Dzingel, would have been a great add for the Bruins
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,213
306, row 14
Yeah, that’d be a nightmare. I don’t think it’ll happen though, given the price for Nyquist and Zuccarello.

Speaking of, how did Dzingel get more that Nyquist and Zuc!?
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
I don't think they should include DeBrusk in a Stone deal, but it would make them significantly better this year.

I'm ok if this is all the Bruins end up doing, but I really can't believe Nino Niederreiter got traded for a 4th liner and the Bruins (or any other contender) weren't in on that. He's exactly what they needed -- a two way RW who can put the puck in the net. Carolina is looking scary right now.
Bruins didn't have a Victor Rask to trade though. Rask did score 20G as a 22YO and has twice put up 45+ pts. Nino was having a downish year and was due 5.2+ for 3more years. The cost would have been Heinen+ and would have been a significant gamble because if it doesn't work that 5.2 would have been a significant hit. Nino has been a ppg player for CAR thus far but has been a .5ppg player his career.

Nino has always been a CORSI star so perhaps he should have been an under the radar target. Still B's didn't have a Victor Rask and Heinen had little trade value at the time of the trade given 1/2 his points this season have come when he was moved to top line.

Better question is why did MN move Nino so early before the trade deadline.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
Yeah, that’d be a nightmare. I don’t think it’ll happen though, given the price for Nyquist and Zuccarello.

Speaking of, how did Dzingel get more that Nyquist and Zuc!?
I would imagine CBJ would like to resign Dzingel and Duchene, not having any conditions tied to resigning probably played into them giving up what they did. Zucc costs a lot more if you are considering resigning him which obv DAL is not.
 

cshea

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
36,213
306, row 14
Calgary out on Stone too. So among the teams reported to be “in” we’re down to Boston, Nashville, Vegas, NYI.