Dismiss Notice
Guest, I have a big favor to ask you. We've been working very hard to establish ourselves on social media. If you like/follow our pages it would be a HUGE help to us. SoSH on Facebook and Inside the Pylon Thanks! Nip

Greened Illusion: Lebron to the Celtics

Discussion in 'Mark Blount's Port Cellar: Celtics Forum' started by TripleOT, Jun 4, 2018.

  1. nighthob

    nighthob Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,188
    Ingram is a terrible NBA defender and really shouldn’t be mentioned in the same sentence as Jayson Tatum unless that sentence is some variant of The Lakers hope that one day Brandon Ingram will be the poor man’s Jayson Tatum.
     
  2. JakeRae

    JakeRae Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,188
    You're making the mistake of only considering the negative. Ball does a lot of things really well and those things made him an overall positive player as a rookie. Ingram does enough things really poorly that he is a negative player. Both have upside, but Ball has just one skill he needs to develop to be an elite talent. Ingram has to improve at basically everything.
     
  3. HomeRunBaker

    HomeRunBaker bet squelcher SoSH Member

    Messages:
    15,269
    Ball shoots 30% from 3 as a rookie against the speed, quickness, length and athleticism of NBA players and he's written off.

    Doncic shoots 30% from 3 against players with inferior S, Q, L and A.......and he's considered a good shooter with generational talent.
     
  4. the moops

    the moops Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    1,368
    Lonzo shot better from three his rookie year than Ingram did during his.
     
  5. DrewDawg

    DrewDawg Dorito Dink SoSH Member

    Messages:
    27,873
    I think you're misreading this board, the NBA, and both players.

    In Ingram's second year, he got his VORP to .4. Ball was at 1.7. Ingram benefited from playing with Ball.
     
  6. nighthob

    nighthob Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,188
    It works both ways, Ingram got a lot better when Ball was injured and LA ran the offense through him, and Ball certainly benefitted from playing with a guy that commanded more attention. I do think that just due to length and athleticism many NBA teams would put a slightly higher premium on Ingram's upside. However I don't think either is good enough to be the centerpiece of anything but a firesale trade.

    Luckily we Celtics fans don't need to have these debates as Boston's prospects are better.
     
  7. PedroKsBambino

    PedroKsBambino Well-Known Member Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    20,257
    How do you get to either of those conclusions?
     
  8. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    23,120

    Advanced stats generally say Ball was either better than or roughly as good as Ingram, despite Ball’s horrendous shooting. I mean, does anyone really think he’s a 45% FT shooter? And I don’t think anyone would argue that Ingram isn’t better than Ball in terms of intangibles, unless you think Ball’s family is a major consideration.

    As for fit, Ingram does seem to have developed the ability to hit open 3s (39% 3% last season, though only on 105 attempts). Ball, of course, couldn’t hit water if he fell out of a boat. So if you’re the Lakers deciding which young guy to keep as a complementary player, I think Ingram is the right choice — even if I’m wrong about Ball having the far greater trade value of the two.
     
  9. cheech13

    cheech13 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    673
    It would have to be a sign and trade and New Orleans doesn't really have the draft assets or contracts to get Cleveland to bite. Theoretically you could build a deal around Mirotic and Solomon Hill plus filler and future picks. Problem is those picks won't have much value to Cleveland since they'd be in the 20s and then NO is left without any ammo to upgrade the team going forward.

    Also, Rondo and Boogie are free agents. They'd have to use the mid-level on Rondo. Boogie they could sign with Bird rights but then that team is getting very expensive very fast. All that being said, Rondo/Jrue/Lebron/Davis/Cousins is really, really good.

    Even if Cousins was willing to go to Cleveland I don't even think they could work a sign and trade as Cleveland would be ineligible to do a deal since they are over the apron.
     
    #459 cheech13, Jun 14, 2018 at 4:51 PM
    Last edited: Jun 14, 2018 at 5:39 PM
  10. DrewDawg

    DrewDawg Dorito Dink SoSH Member

    Messages:
    27,873
    The thing about a team trading their own draft picks to get Lebron—he devalues those picks. If only a team had the ability to trade some other crappy team’s picks...
     
  11. wade boggs chicken dinner

    wade boggs chicken dinner Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,087
  12. DrewDawg

    DrewDawg Dorito Dink SoSH Member

    Messages:
    27,873
  13. djbayko

    djbayko Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,397
    It’s kind of hard to believe that, in today’s world, no one would have snapfaced a picture of him somewhere in that city.
     
  14. Reverend

    Reverend for king and country Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    33,427
    He should go visit a high school in China.
     
  15. GoDa

    GoDa lurker

    Messages:
    180
    As a native of Houston and a guy that has spent some time in Philly... though obviously his lifestyle is different than your average guy... I can’t imagine being Lebron and choosing to play/live in either city.
     
  16. reggiecleveland

    reggiecleveland sublime Lifetime Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    18,065
    This is all window dressing before his selfish "the decision" similar move to LA. I don't see any other end to this.

    There is no other place that makes sense.
    1. His titles in Miami get almost no credit. How would a title in Houston, or Philly change his legacy. Plus no family reasons to go to either place.
    2. Kyrie complicates Boston. Plus Boston almost beat him without Kyrie. Either he wins with Kyrie, again and opens the can of worms as to his ability to win sans Kyrie, or Kyrie is traded opening more selfish noise.
    3. In LA he has a chance to start a new show time with celebrities kissing his butt. The fact they were bad this year makes him look like a savior. Any selfishness noise is drowned out by the relentlessly pro-Laker media.
    4. He won a title for Cleveland until Tito or Baker Mayfield bring a title to the Cleve Bron is the only guy since Jim Brown to bring a parade to town. So he can walk away with nothing owed.
     
  17. Bosox1528

    Bosox1528 lurker

    Messages:
    79

    By who? I see lots of people giving him credit for those titles, as is deserved. Look at the stats in those playoffs. Have you seen how badly D-Wade played? Lebron carried those teams.
     
  18. snowmanny

    snowmanny Well-Known Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    8,841
    Yeah and many people are dying to proclaim him the GOAT at the next title wherever and however he gets there. So I don't think there's a lot of title devaluing with James. Kobe (Shaq) and Durant and maybe even Magic (KAJ) get more of that than LeBron.
     
  19. slamminsammya

    slamminsammya Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    2,027
    Yea that original TV special where he devoted all the money to boys and girls club sure was a selfish act.

    This take is like Joe Buck calling Randy Moss's fake Lambeau moon a "disgusting act".
     
  20. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    23,120
    I don’t think @reggiecleveland is trashing LeBron. He’s walking through the way a person who is almost obsessively focused on legacy might weigh the options LeBron has. Viewed through that lens, I agree with Reggie that the Lakers offer LeBron the most attractive proposition, unless he relishes the prospect of playing with Ben Simmons — which is possible, but seems like a less logical fit than PG13 and a third star acquired by trading one of the Lakers’ young players.
     
  21. bosox79

    bosox79 Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    7,175
    Where Ball and Ingram are the same age (Ingram is <2 months older), don't you have to take into consideration that Ingram's rookie year was as a 19 year old while Ball's was as a 20 year old? That is a pretty big deal.

    Would it make more sense to compare them as 20 year olds or is the 1st off season just that important? I know a lot of players don't really make the leap until their 3rd or 4th season.
     
  22. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    23,120
    The extra year of control favors Ball, plus I think all things equal, you’d expect a bigger improvement from a player entering his 2nd season than a player the same age entering his 3rd season.
     
  23. Papelbon's Poutine

    Papelbon's Poutine Homeland Security SoSH Member

    Messages:
    15,001
    Yes I’m sure his thoughts were all about the donation of $2.5M to the boys and girls club. He sincerely cared about them so much and had no resources of his own to contribute, so he sat down with Jim Gray for the little kiddies; he even worked on his tagline of ‘taking his talents to south beach’ with an ad agency to make sure they got every penny.

    I don’t like Lebron but I’ll grant him that he made a publicity stunt as a young kid and tried to make it seem unselfish, easy to do when you’re a kid; but sorry, if you think that was anything more than that I find it pretty naive. I give him all the credit in the world for being a seemingly solid human being off court and being an amazing player, but he’s the ARod of the nba when it comes to prepackaged PR shit and drama.
     
  24. Eddie Jurak

    Eddie Jurak Go Leafs Go Lifetime Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    16,586
    Against this (to some extent, anyway) is that Ingram still has room for physical development, so there's reason to think he might take a big leap. I still like both players. If I could grab one for the Celtics it would be Ball because he is a better fit.
     
  25. Eddie Jurak

    Eddie Jurak Go Leafs Go Lifetime Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    16,586
    It sounds like, if Lebron goes to LA, it is going to be the same kind of deal for him as his Cleveland stop. He'll go with a couple of other veteran stars (eg, Kawhi and PG) to an otherwise stripmined roster lacking depth.

    Philly and Boston each give him the opportunity to go to a younger, deeper roster.
     
  26. maufman

    maufman Dope Staff Member Dope Gold Supporter

    Messages:
    23,120
    I’d say it’s more like the Miami situation — clearing the cap space to sign two max players virtually ensures there won’t be much else to work with, unless you’re fortunate enough to have a cost-controlled young player or two (Chalmers in Miami, one of Ball/Ingram in LA).

    If LeBron wants to play with Ball, I’ll bet the Grizzlies would do Ingram + Deng for Mike Conley.
     
  27. OnWisc

    OnWisc Pegs his jeans

    Messages:
    2,995
    I lived in Houston for almost four years and absent one or two exceptions, I really don't miss anything about it. That said, what I, and probably most people, look for in a city is likely a lot different than what LeBron is looking for. He could live in a ridiculous house in River Oaks within ten minutes of where he works, where his kids go to school, an array of top restaurants, and one or two shopping centers used to catering to the ultra wealthy. I doubt he really gives a shit about walkability, a vibrant downtown scene or public transportation.

    That said, outside the fajitas at El Tiempo, my understanding is that LA offers all those same things and then some. So I still think it's there or Philly.
     
  28. djbayko

    djbayko Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,397
    Well, everything except living 10 minutes from work...or from anywhere :)
     
  29. Devizier

    Devizier Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    8,830
    Could Lebron helicopter it from Bel Air to the Staples Center?
     
  30. HomeRunBaker

    HomeRunBaker bet squelcher SoSH Member

    Messages:
    15,269
    I agree with the Miami comp and I feel Paul is the certainty to join him if it is the Lakers. They're best friends off the court, Paul is the godfather to LeBron's kids, and are both hungry for championships with ties to LA. You then have the flexibility to acquire inexpensive fits around them unlike in Cleveland where Tristan, JR, Korver, etc were locked into expensive long-term deals. I'd like a guy like Shane Larkin to be in that backcourt depth mix as a cheap option who can knock down shots.
     
  31. djbayko

    djbayko Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    6,397
    Helipads in downtown LA are for emergency use only AFAIK. Until recently, it was a requirement of any new skyscraper.
     
  32. RGREELEY33

    RGREELEY33 Potty Mouth Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    3,258
    I think it will either be superteam with Lakers or playing for Brad Stevens and the Celtics deep roster, a la KD wanting to go to Golden State and play an elightened form of basketball. Nothing else makes sense.
     
  33. Eddie Jurak

    Eddie Jurak Go Leafs Go Lifetime Member Gold Supporter SoSH Member

    Messages:
    16,586
    I don't think Boston. Maybe a 5% chance, at most.
     
  34. wade boggs chicken dinner

    wade boggs chicken dinner Member SoSH Member

    Messages:
    14,087
    PHI with LBJ would be the EC finals favorite and assuming they make it, they would be the best team the KD Warriors will have faced.
     

Share This Page