NCAA Tournament Friday 1st Round Game Thread

garlan5

Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2009
2,684
Virginia
Bennett needs to look in the mirror and change his offensive system. Fucking pathetic March performances relative to the regular season...over and fucking over.
This one was bad but he's only danced at uva a handful of times and every year a key player and players have been hurt. His offense was fine this year. Just picked a bad day to play bad and get off track. Jesus, umbc looked like golden State out there.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
This one was bad but he's only danced at uva a handful of times and every year a key player and players have been hurt. His offense was fine this year. Just picked a bad day to play bad and get off track. Jesus, umbc looked like golden State out there.
Yeah even with last night their adjusted offense ranks 32nd in the country. But perhaps they need to pick up pace of play. It wasn't so much a factor last night but the less possessions there are the more chance of an upset happening. It's kind of like in both Pats-Giants Super Bowls. The more possessions in a game the more talent will separate.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
UVA did not give up 70 all year. Not in 2 games against UNC (49 and 63). Not against Duke (63). Not against anyone. What happened last night was completely out of left field. Ridiculously stunning.
 

garlan5

Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2009
2,684
Virginia
UVA did not give up 70 all year. Not in 2 games against UNC (49 and 63). Not against Duke (63). Not against anyone. What happened last night was completely out of left field. Ridiculously stunning.
Nothing went right for uva. Umbc couldn't miss. Every rebound seemed to go there way. The refs weren't the factor at all but even calls went in their favor. I'll be pulling for them but umbc will probably lose by 30 next.
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
20,323
This one was bad but he's only danced at uva a handful of times and every year a key player and players have been hurt. His offense was fine this year. Just picked a bad day to play bad and get off track. Jesus, umbc looked like golden State out there.
I want to believe this, but I can’t anymore. Too many pathetic performances in March.
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
UVA did not give up 70 all year. Not in 2 games against UNC (49 and 63). Not against Duke (63). Not against anyone. What happened last night was completely out of left field. Ridiculously stunning.
It wasn’t out of left field if you watched the WVU-UVA film of the last few games they’ve played. This game plan was a Bob Huggins blueprint. Most teams don’t have the personnel to attempt what WVU does, but UMBC followed it to a T, both pressing and the half court D. UVA has no answer for that.
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
20,323
It wasn’t out of left field if you watched the WVU-UVA film of the last few games they’ve played. This game plan was a Bob Huggins blueprint. Most teams don’t have the personnel to attempt what WVU does, but UMBC followed it to a T, both pressing and the half court D. UVA has no answer for that.

Pretty sure a team or two in the acc, which uva rolled through, has the personnel.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
It wasn’t out of left field if you watched the WVU-UVA film of the last few games they’ve played. This game plan was a Bob Huggins blueprint. Most teams don’t have the personnel to attempt what WVU does, but UMBC followed it to a T, both pressing and the half court D. UVA has no answer for that.
Sure but that game was on December 5, in a true road game, against a top 20 team. This was a neutral site game against a far far far less talented game. And WVU scored 68 in that game. There weren’t high enough odds you could make on UMBC scoring 70 to get any action on it. They did the impossible.

Edit: to be clear while it would still be stunning if UMBC had won say 53-52 on a miracle buzzer beater it would be more believable than UVA giving up 74.
 

twibnotes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
20,323
Sure but that game was on December 5, in a true road game, against a top 20 team. This was a neutral site game against a far far far less talented game. And WVU scored 68 in that game. There weren’t high enough odds you could make on UMBC scoring 70 to get any action on it. They did the impossible.

Edit: to be clear while it would still be stunning if UMBC had won say 53-52 on a miracle buzzer beater it would be more believable than UVA giving up 74.

This is spot on.

It’s no excuse bc uva should have won regardless but the hunter loss was a killer. He would have neutralized Lyles and I’m not sure Umbc would had had an answer for him on the other side of the floor.

Hunter was not the team’s mvp necessarily, but he is by far their best talent
 

PaulinMyrBch

Don't touch his dog food
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 10, 2003
8,316
MYRTLE BEACH!!!!
Sure but that game was on December 5, in a true road game, against a top 20 team. This was a neutral site game against a far far far less talented game. And WVU scored 68 in that game. There weren’t high enough odds you could make on UMBC scoring 70 to get any action on it. They did the impossible.

Edit: to be clear while it would still be stunning if UMBC had won say 53-52 on a miracle buzzer beater it would be more believable than UVA giving up 74.
WVU was at UVA the year before. Same result. Point is the blueprint is out there if you’ve got personnel and go with that game plan. Sure teams in ACC have personnel that can play D. But those teams typically are elite enough to play their own style. Is it a shock that UMBC won? Absolutely. But they did exactly what UVA has issues with, so when you peel it back, it’s not as shocking.
 

Dan Murfman

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 21, 2001
4,215
Pawcatuck
OT but no upset in Women’s NCAA 1 v 16. LIke the NIT they play 4 10 minute quarters. UConn put up a 55 spot in the 1st quarter.
 

thehitcat

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,385
Windham, ME
Someone tell me again how this helps women’s hoops.
Why is it UConn's job to "help women's hoops" Were people making this complaint about Wooden's UCLA teams, the Auerbach Celtics or the current Patriots? Get better and compete if you don't want to get embarrassed. This isn't Alabama playing a 1AA team and torching them this is an NCAA tournament game.

Geno is totally that CYO coach that presses when up 70 to 5.
Don't want to get blown out, recruit and coach better. This isn't CYO/CYC this is for real stakes. Everybody needs to toughen up.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,276
WVU was at UVA the year before. Same result. Point is the blueprint is out there if you’ve got personnel and go with that game plan. Sure teams in ACC have personnel that can play D. But those teams typically are elite enough to play their own style. Is it a shock that UMBC won? Absolutely. But they did exactly what UVA has issues with, so when you peel it back, it’s not as shocking.
This is bingo right here and why I had VA out early (honestly I expected it to be vs K-St even though I had to pick UMBC to fit my narrative) plus they were without a critical element to what made them so good. The top teams in the ACC are not game planning to beat Virginia during the course of the regular season.......they are running their system. It's one reason why they crushed some of them while squeaking by a pair of NIT teams two weeks ago.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,044
Why is it UConn's job to "help women's hoops" Were people making this complaint about Wooden's UCLA teams, the Auerbach Celtics or the current Patriots? Get better and compete if you don't want to get embarrassed. This isn't Alabama playing a 1AA team and torching them this is an NCAA tournament game.

Don't want to get blown out, recruit and coach better. This isn't CYO/CYC this is for real stakes. Everybody needs to toughen up.
I didn’t say it was UConn’s job.

And yes, people hated it was the Patriots again.
 

Cuzittt

Bouncing with Anger
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 20, 2001
20,301
Sinister Funkhouse #17
I admire St. Francis for continuing to do what got them there. They tried to be UMBC. Problem was, UCONN wasn't UVA.

Specifically... UCONN may not play the old LMU style, but they play quick. 7 100+ point games during the season (high of 124) and eight additional games of 90+ means that SFPA was just playing into the Huskies hands.

And then... they couldn't hit a shot. 18 for 81 from the field. 10 for 57 from 3. And who hoovered up the rebounds?

UCONN out rebounded SFPA 69 to 30. Which led to quick layups (UCONN had 38 assists on 59 made buckets).

Perhaps the most amazing Stat of the night is the UCONN'S bench scored 62 points... or more than the entire St. Francis team. Given that Geno has never been much for an extended bench...

(In a 4th quarter that was bench against bench... the Huskies won 24-4)
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,668
To be fair to the NCAA (in this instance only - I don't advocate this in general!) there was nothing they legally could do once UNC shamelessly played the card that the sham courses were used and abused by non-athletes as well as athletes and so was therefore out of their jurisdiction.
So the key is that when you cheat, just make sure you cheat for non-athletes too and you're good to go.

Genius move by UNC.
 

garlan5

Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2009
2,684
Virginia
It wasn’t out of left field if you watched the WVU-UVA film of the last few games they’ve played. This game plan was a Bob Huggins blueprint. Most teams don’t have the personnel to attempt what WVU does, but UMBC followed it to a T, both pressing and the half court D. UVA has no answer for that.
WVU was at UVA the year before. Same result. Point is the blueprint is out there if you’ve got personnel and go with that game plan. Sure teams in ACC have personnel that can play D. But those teams typically are elite enough to play their own style. Is it a shock that UMBC won? Absolutely. But they did exactly what UVA has issues with, so when you peel it back, it’s not as shocking.
This is true but very hard to do against virginia. You must shoot lights out, play solid defense to guard our perimeter offense and hope uva doesnt shoot well. UVA lost to wva because we just played like crap overall i wouldnt say it was the same plan as umbc or vt this year. I'd say Louisville and VT played us the same. Strong perimeter defense and they shot lights out while we couldn't get a shot. UMBC we had lots of open shots but didn't get them down. They had our defense out of rhythm something that i havent seen before under Tony. I think the injury to Guy was more a factor than Hunter. The biggest problem was we didn't play in the paint and drive to the basket. Devon Hall looked timid and not himself. Guy looked slow curling and moving. He couldnt get a decent shot.
 

garlan5

Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2009
2,684
Virginia
I want to believe this, but I can’t anymore. Too many pathetic performances in March.
Too many? This is the only bad loss in the tourney for us under TB. Sure we could have beaten Michigan State and Syracuse the other years back but those were tough teams. Not to make excuses but uva has had some tough injuries happen just before the tourney. Justin Anderson, Anthony Gill, Kyle Guy, DeAndre Hunter, London Perrantes, and I feel like i'm missing 3 or 4 more under the handful of times they've danced since Bennett turned them around. 2013/2014 was the first year they really turned things around and had expectations in the tourney. It's still early in his rebuild.
 

uk_sox_fan

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 11, 2006
1,273
London, England
Bennett is a phenomenally good coach. He'll get them there before long - he's already shown the ability to reload and bring back his teams to a high level of excellence year after year. It's just a matter of time before that translates into Final Fours and a title.
 

wonderland

New Member
Jul 20, 2005
532
Bennett is a phenomenally good coach. He'll get them there before long - he's already shown the ability to reload and bring back his teams to a high level of excellence year after year. It's just a matter of time before that translates into Final Fours and a title.
Yeah, from talking with UVA fans before the season, my understanding was this would be a down year relatively speaking. They also played a fairly favorable conference schedule (another dumb outcome of larger conferences).
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
Yeah, from talking with UVA fans before the season, my understanding was this would be a down year relatively speaking. They also played a fairly favorable conference schedule (another dumb outcome of larger conferences).
There was a reason they weren't preseason top 25. To go from unranked to consensus overall #1 seed was pretty remarkable. They had one of the great ACC seasons ever.