Patriots trade for Danny Shelton

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,417
Hingham, MA
I love this deal, especially trading a future pick for a current one, while TB12 is still young. They can always trade for a 2019 pick after next season.

He's not going to be as good as prime Wilfork, but can certainly be TWash or better.

He was a state champion shot-putter and an Academic All-American. Sounds like a Belichickian player.
Ted Washington was an absolute beast in 2003. If Shelton is anything in the same zip code this trade is a steal.
 

mcpickl

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 23, 2007
4,550
5th year option was 11.7M, so makes sense for the Browns to move him. Really good against the run, but they have a lot of interior D-line depth/
I think you were looking at the total of his four year deal. His option should be in the ballpark of 7.4M. I'd guess they'd pick it up if they don't work out a longterm deal first, since it's only guaranteed for injury.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,480
deep inside Guido territory

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,138
Here
I think he’s referring to Michael Bennett and the Pats making an arguably better offer than Philly but getting in too late.
I don’t think it’s really arguable, it was a much better deal, as that WR Philly gave up is a nobody. Seattle would have taken it, apparently, but the Pats were too late. I don’t understand how that happens in this scenario from a Pats FO perspective. Those two men are huge assets at positions of need. They aren’t going to find another Michael Bennett this offseason.

This move I like.
 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,684
I don’t think it’s really arguable, it was a much better deal, as that WR Philly gave up is a nobody. Seattle would have taken it, apparently, but the Pats were too late. I don’t understand how that happens in this scenario from a Pats FO perspective. Those two men are huge assets at positions of need. They aren’t going to find another Michael Bennett this offseason.

This move I like.
Not really sure how the fault for that is on the Pats and not on the Seahawks.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,759
I think you were looking at the total of his four year deal. His option should be in the ballpark of 7.4M. I'd guess they'd pick it up if they don't work out a longterm deal first, since it's only guaranteed for injury.
yeah I was going off Robert Mays' tweet, he screwed it up
 

Soxy

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2008
6,095
I don’t think it’s really arguable, it was a much better deal, as that WR Philly gave up is a nobody. Seattle would have taken it, apparently, but the Pats were too late. I don’t understand how that happens in this scenario from a Pats FO perspective. Those two men are huge assets at positions of need. They aren’t going to find another Michael Bennett this offseason.

This move I like.
It's behind a paywall on Boston Sports Journal, so I won't post a link, but Bedard reached out to a source with Seattle and they denied that was true. His source claimed that Rapoport's reporting that the Pats tried to swoop in late with a better offer was not accurate. Bedard also said that it be very unusual for the Patriots to do such a thing, and that if they had legitimate interest in Bennett then they wouldn't have waited until the last minute to inquire about him. FWIW.
 

Rough Carrigan

reasons within Reason
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Not really sure how the fault for that is on the Pats and not on the Seahawks.
It's simple. If Belichick trades Jimmy G without first placing fresh calls to every team in the league then he's wrong.
If another team trades a desirable player to someone besides the Patriots perhaps because they didn't first place a fresh call to the Patriots, that's also Belichick's fault.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,586
Oregon
It's simple. If Belichick trades Jimmy G without first placing fresh calls to every team in the league then he's wrong.
If another team trades a desirable player to someone besides the Patriots perhaps because they didn't first place a fresh call to the Patriots, that's also Belichick's fault.
And if they trade for a young player who can help them in a spot where older players are being phased out ... but they don't address other needs ... he's wrong again
 

Leather

given himself a skunk spot
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
28,451
It's simple. If Belichick trades Jimmy G without first placing fresh calls to every team in the league then he's wrong.
If another team trades a desirable player to someone besides the Patriots perhaps because they didn't first place a fresh call to the Patriots, that's also Belichick's fault.
I’m worried he’s going to lose the locker room over this. I mean, not really worried, but it’s possible is all I’m saying.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,417
Hingham, MA
Barnwell

Shelton is never going to rack up big stats, but he was an effective piece in a Browns run defense that quietly finished fourth against the run in DVOA in 2017. Splitting out individual pieces of a run defense is nearly impossible, but during Shelton's career in Cleveland, the Browns were far stouter with him on the field. Cleveland allowed 3.9 yards per carry and 20.6 percent of rushes to turn into a first down or a touchdown with Shelton on the field. With the former 12th overall pick off the field, the Browns allowed 4.7 yards per rush and a conversion 26.2 percent of the time.

The 24-year-old Shelton should slot in as a replacement for the departing Alan Branch up front for the Patriots. New England was 30th in the league against the run, and while Branch had been impressive in previous seasons, he had fallen so far out of favor that the Pats scratched him for Super Bowl LII in favor of keeping Malcolm Butler inexplicably active. New England will probably decline Shelton's fifth-year option, given that run-stuffing defensive linemen just aren't making eight-figure salaries often in free agency; but it wouldn't be a surprise to see the Pats offer Shelton a contract extension if he starts his career in Foxborough well.
 

BlackJack

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 11, 2007
3,458
"They hate their coach" - a wise man once.
Well, it’s clear evidence that Belichick’s going to retire. Kraft’s pushing him out in favor of Brady (who’s also retiring) and Gronk because they want to have more fun. Gronk is also retiring.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
The more I think about this move, the more fascinated I am. The Patriots got destroyed in the Super Bowl in large part because their front seven is so slow and the solution was to add maybe the slowest front seven player in the entire league. Will be really interesting to see what they do in the draft.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,105
Newton
What’s this about the Pats being destroyed in the Super Bowl?

Anyway, what about Claiborne? And are you saying the Wilfork model clogging the middle doesn’t work in today’s NFL?
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
What’s this about the Pats being destroyed in the Super Bowl?
The defense, I should have clarified.

Anyway, what about Claiborne? And are you saying the Wilfork model clogging the middle doesn’t work in today’s NFL?
Clayborn ran pretty well for an edge guy at the Combine but he's 30 now. He's not materially improving team speed. Shelton will absolutely soak up double teams in the middle of the line, but was that the problem the Patriots' D had last year? That's not rhetorical; I didn't see the middle run D as a huge issue but maybe it was much more of a problem than I perceived, and maybe compensating for that hurt the D in other, more obvious areas.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,942
Dallas
The defense, I should have clarified.


Clayborn ran pretty well for an edge guy at the Combine but he's 30 now. He's not materially improving team speed. Shelton will absolutely soak up double teams in the middle of the line, but was that the problem the Patriots' D had last year? That's not rhetorical; I didn't see the middle run D as a huge issue but maybe it was much more of a problem than I perceived, and maybe compensating for that hurt the D in other, more obvious areas.
Football Outsiders had them as the worst team against runs up the middle with 5.06 adjusted line yards. It's football outsiders so take it with a grain of salt but I believe I read they were giving up around 5-6 yards on average on runs up the middle during the regular season.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,942
Dallas
So it has been a bit slow today. Who wants to hear about what great shape Danny Shelton is getting into? It's not quite the "I'm in the best shape of my life" kind of article - Shelton admitted to needing help with conditioning and thinks he can respond better to the Patriots program.

Shelton said the amount of running the Patriots are doing is “definitely” a radical departure from what he was used to with the Browns. “It was a struggle. I think it would be a struggle for anybody coming in and not knowing how much running the program asks of everyone. It’s been great so far, though.”

Shelton is listed at 6-foot-2, 335 pounds, but he’s still hovering above that weight in mid-May. He’s played at 335 pounds in the past and intends to do the same with the Patriots. His focus this season is maintaining that weight throughout the season. “That’s the number that I’ve always been at,” Shelton said. “Obviously I’d get up at the end of the year, but over here it’s going to be more of the standard that I’m going to keep myself at and expecting to stay at 335 and dominating at 335.”

Shelton knows the work he’s putting in now with the rest of teammates will benefit him during the regular season. “That’s what I like about the change is that I know that my body will be more trained for the endurance and trained for the fourth quarter, overtime,” Shelton said. “I’m excited for the rest of the year.”
The emphasizing endurance part is something I am sure is not unique to just Belichick but his focus and level of commitment to it is perhaps the most in the league. Any one know another program that puts as much of an emphasis on it as the Patriots?
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,024
Mansfield MA
Shelton's workload continues to go down. Some of that is probably gameplan (they were more worried about the pass than the run last night), but 10 snaps isn't exactly what you envision when you trade a third for someone (especially with only one year on his contract left).