The evolution and evaluation of Jamie Collins

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
The Pats defense is 1st in points but haven't played any good offenses except Pitt's and even then they faced Jones at QB instead of the Rapist. So it's really hard to tell their quality, although in my book leaving Denver with a win and 3 points allowed is a good day for any team.

As for Collins, I haven't watched full Browns games much but from what I saw yesterday he was dogging it pretty good against Buffalo. But they're 0-14 and have nothing else so that's unfair to judge too.
The Patriots schedule has - through no fault of theirs - been astonishingly easy this year. The AFC East did its usual Buster Keaton-esque house collapse around the Patriot foundation (in fairness, the Dolphins have looked good at times, and the Bills have had about 3 games where they have looked like they don't belong in the XFL, but generally, not good), then the Pats got the Steelers without Ben, Denver in the midst of a death spiral, and while the Seahawks played out of their gourds against them, it was a home game.

That doesn't take anything away from what they have done, you win the games on your schedule. But it is interesting given that, at the beginning of the season their schedule looked pretty tough.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
35,893
Deep inside Muppet Labs
Well, I think it's a tad tougher than has been portrayed at times. Getting Pitt with Jones was a break, but playing on the road in Arizona without your starting QB is tough, even if Arizona's been a disappointment this year. Playing in Denver at any time is very difficult. Miami's 9-5, beating them with your backup and then your 3rd-stringer in at QB is impressive. Houston's 8-6 and the Pats shut them out with Brissett (admittedly, Osweiler's terrible, but the team itself isn't trash). Any win against the Ravens is a good one, etc.

The games against LAR, NYJ, SF, CIN, and BUF were all against trash opponents though. And yeah, we're talking about defense so perhaps having Jimmy and Jacoby in at QB isn't germane to the conversation.
 

Royal Reader

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 21, 2005
2,293
UK
The Patriots schedule has - through no fault of theirs - been astonishingly easy this year. The AFC East did its usual Buster Keaton-esque house collapse around the Patriot foundation (in fairness, the Dolphins have looked good at times, and the Bills have had about 3 games where they have looked like they don't belong in the XFL, but generally, not good), then the Pats got the Steelers without Ben, Denver in the midst of a death spiral, and while the Seahawks played out of their gourds against them, it was a home game.

That doesn't take anything away from what they have done, you win the games on your schedule. But it is interesting given that, at the beginning of the season their schedule looked pretty tough.
There are what, three good (as in arguably top 10) non-Brady QBs in the AFC? Two of them weren't on the slate (and one of those won't make the postseason) and the one who was missed the game through injury. Seems like the worst QB on the NFC side who's still alive is Cousins.

Oakland seems like the biggest threat because they've got an above average QB and a good pass rush. Not sure there's anyone pre SB where both Brady and the defense playing an average game for them should be enough, though.
 

EricFeczko

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 26, 2014
4,851
When measured by points allowed the Pats' defense has pretty consistently outperformed its DVOA ratings; I'm sure in part this results from defense and special teams but the bend but don't break philsophy--which will lead to a lot of plays that are successful per DVOA--is a culprit.
Actually, it has more to do with a low turnover rate per drive. The patriots rank towards the bottom of the league in turnover rate per drive. The patriots have been good at limiting opponent scoring but have not benefited from many turnovers.
DVOA tends to rate turnovers more highly compared to EP, where the patriots are in the top ten.
 

MainerInExile

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2003
4,825
Bay Area
I think when the trade was made, we thought about Elandon Roberts too much and not enough about Shea McClellin and Van Noy. Roberts seems to be a running-game-only LB, so while he has his place, McClellin and Van Noy are playing a lot, and playing well. And they're talented guys, who have good measurables. I guess I'm saying the freaking out was overdone from the start, because of the "replacing him with a rookie 6th-rounder" stuff.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,513
#Browns Jamie Collins, set to be a free agent, said the losing is a factor but likes his teammates and he'll stay if the money is right

Of course he would stay if the money is right. It's all about the $$$$$$ for most players.
 

CantKeepmedown

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
2,590
Portland, ME
Of course he would stay if the money is right. It's all about the $$$$$$ for most players.
Be interesting to see, if you took a poll of players, what the responses would be.

A. 15M guaranteed and your team will be in the playoffs on a regular basis. 9-11 wins a year.

B 30M guaranteed and your team will rarely, if ever even contend. You'll average 4-6 wins a year.

I assume 90+% of players would take option B? More? Less?

Obviously both options are life changing money. I guess it depends how long your career is going to be. I suppose anyone could take 3-5 years of losing for that amount of money.
 

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Be interesting to see, if you took a poll of players, what the responses would be.

A. 15M guaranteed and your team will be in the playoffs on a regular basis. 9-11 wins a year.

B 30M guaranteed and your team will rarely, if ever even contend. You'll average 4-6 wins a year.

I assume 90+% of players would take option B? More? Less?

Obviously both options are life changing money. I guess it depends how long your career is going to be. I suppose anyone could take 3-5 years of losing for that amount of money.
The average career in the NFL is less than 5 years. It is a sport that regularly grinds talented humans in and out and a career can be flourishing at 2:46 on a Sunday and over at 2:47 the same day.

It's entertainment and yes, every player talks about how awesome the culture is in the place they just signed, and how they want to win, but at the end of the day these guys work their asses off to put food on the table and the "I love it here!!!" message is as hollow in Foxboro as it is in San Diego, Philadelphia, Miami, or wherever else the check gets signed. Junior Seau going to the Patriots once he had made his money and wanted a shot at a ring made sense, his tradeoff was small. But expecting guys like Malcolm Butler or Richard Sherman to take hometown discounts because you like their team a lot is irrational.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,240
Any player who would willingly sacrifice $15M guaranteed just to be a "winner" is a moron. You have to get your money while you can in this league.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,093
The Pats defense is 1st in points but haven't played any good offenses except Pitt's and even then they faced Jones at QB instead of the Rapist. So it's really hard to tell their quality, although in my book leaving Denver with a win and 3 points allowed is a good day for any team.
This is true of course. But the worst offense in the NFL this year has scored 218 points (the Rams) and #2 is Cleveland at 240. The Pats have allowed 236. So while the schedule was easy, it was Rams/Browns every week easy, and they essentially allowed as many points as those 2 doormats scored.

On average, they've turned every team they played into the scoring offense of the Cleveland Browns.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,093
Any player who would willingly sacrifice $15M guaranteed just to be a "winner" is a moron. You have to get your money while you can in this league.
No problem with what he said, but it seems that would be something that's better left unsaid, because "hot takez!!!!"
 

Al Zarilla

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
59,305
San Andreas Fault
This is true of course. But the worst offense in the NFL this year has scored 218 points (the Rams) and #2 is Cleveland at 240. The Pats have allowed 236. So while the schedule was easy, it wasn't Rams/Browns every week easy, and they essentially allowed as many points as those 2 doormats scored.

On average, they've turned every team they played into the scoring offense of the Cleveland Browns.
Waren't that shoulda been a wasn't there?
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,373
Be interesting to see, if you took a poll of players, what the responses would be.

A. 15M guaranteed and your team will be in the playoffs on a regular basis. 9-11 wins a year.

B 30M guaranteed and your team will rarely, if ever even contend. You'll average 4-6 wins a year.

I assume 90+% of players would take option B? More? Less?

Obviously both options are life changing money. I guess it depends how long your career is going to be. I suppose anyone could take 3-5 years of losing for that amount of money.
I think the only guys who pick A are guys who already made their money on rookie deals/1st FA contract. If you've put enough away, you can afford to care how thet team is doing---but it's nuts to assume other guys who haven't yet hit that payday ascribe a great deal of value to winning.
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
63,964
Rotten Apple
A player is also his brand.

What's Collins' worth both now and after he is done playing by being paid in Cleveland versus possibly being a Super Bowl MVP or a star player on a team that is always shown in prime time? How many endorsement deals, covers of magazines or media gigs will he get by staying in Cleveland? Not saying he's guaranteed all those things with the Pats but it's part of the equation that has value, too. Does Bruschi or Harrison get those TV gigs by taking the money and playing with some generic team? Players should also be thinking about their long term goals and revenue possibilities.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,317
A player is also his brand.

What's Collins' worth both now and after he is done playing by being paid in Cleveland versus possibly being a Super Bowl MVP or a star player on a team that is always shown in prime time? How many endorsement deals, covers of magazines or media gigs will he get by staying in Cleveland? Not saying he's guaranteed all those things with the Pats but it's part of the equation that has value, too. Does Bruschi or Harrison get those TV gigs by taking the money and playing with some generic team? Players should also be thinking about their long term goals and revenue possibilities.
Have you heard my man Jamie talk?
 

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I have. I also realize he wants no part of football life or anything else after football. But for a lot of other players it's a huge factor. Also, you don't need to talk to get a shoe deal or a Gatorade spot.
Dude. Outside of Brady and Gronkowski there really hasn't been a ton of Patriots cashing big checks on endorsement deals on the national stage over the past 15 seasons. Collins and players like Collins are as likely or possibly more likely to get the local tv and radio ads being big fish in small pond as they are having stood on the podium.
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,882
Washington, DC
Dude. Outside of Brady and Gronkowski there really hasn't been a ton of Patriots cashing big checks on endorsement deals on the national stage over the past 15 seasons. Collins and players like Collins are as likely or possibly more likely to get the local tv and radio ads being big fish in small pond as they are having stood on the podium.
Yeah I was stunned when I saw a Jerod Mayo ad for Old Spice. Didn't think anyone outside New England knew who he was.

Even if potential endorsement deals should be factored in, unless you're a Brady/Gronk level superstar the value of them is marginal.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,093
Malcolm Butler is in a new Papa John's spot with Antonio Brown.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Then you missed them.

Amendola had an ad campaign series for Gillette Fusion, print and TV, with Clay Matthews and Victor Cruz (amongst others ). https://www.ispot.tv/ad/7bGX/gillette-fusion-proglide-high-tech-gear

Edelman also did a national campaign for Puma (http://nep.247sports.com/Bolt/Julian-Edelman-stars-in-new-PUMA-commercial-38533312) and is featured on their website along with Usain Bolt, Arsenal FC, etc (fucking Rihanna?) http://us.puma.com/en_US/sports/sports/training/edelman.

I dont know wtf SK energy drinks are, but Welker had a national ad for Depends (of all things), with Demarcus Ware and Clay Matthews.
Those aren't regional.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,317
Hmm look at all those good looking white dudes getting national ads. I like Jamie's chances!
 

amarshal2

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2005
4,913
I have seen none of those guys endorsing any of those products on my tv or radio. Regional ads.
Welder did a Depends national ad. The butler one is national too.

Edit: and I've seen Edelman for puma a bunch but it's possible that wasn't on tv out here that I saw it. I think it was though
 

amarshal2

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2005
4,913
Hmm look at all those good looking white dudes getting national ads. I like Jamie's chances!
There's definitely a white guy bias but there's also a wide receiver bias. Julian keeps facial hair which is tough for Gillette and Jordy would have exceeded the white Packers player quota filled by Clay.

Danny Amendola come on down!
 
Last edited:

Rick Burlesons Yam Bag

Internet Cowboy, Turbo Accelerator, tOSU Denier
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Then you missed them.

Amendola had an ad campaign series for Gillette Fusion, print and TV, with Clay Matthews and Victor Cruz (amongst others ). https://www.ispot.tv/ad/7bGX/gillette-fusion-proglide-high-tech-gear

Edelman also did a national campaign for Puma (http://nep.247sports.com/Bolt/Julian-Edelman-stars-in-new-PUMA-commercial-38533312) and is featured on their website along with Usain Bolt, Arsenal FC, etc (fucking Rihanna?) http://us.puma.com/en_US/sports/sports/training/edelman.

I dont know wtf SK energy drinks are, but Welker had a national ad for Depends (of all things), with Demarcus Ware and Clay Matthews.
Those aren't regional.
Ummmmm......,,with the exception of Edelman's "Patriot website" Puma bit, all of those ads were ensemble ads where the Patriot cited were at best second, at worst fourth tier guys...,,,,usually behind Clay Matthews. I am going to hold to my point that these aren't bringing in "I'm changing my mind about which franchise I'm going to" money.
 

pappymojo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2010
6,684
Depends could have a wonderful advertisement featuring Jamie Collins in a Browns uniform.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,139
Here

I don't think I'd hire Jamie Collins to shill my products. Guy doesn't exactly exude excitement:
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
63,964
Rotten Apple
‘Get That Money, Girl’ is about as Hot Take-y as it gets.
Your salary is old thinking. Your brand is new thinking.
Brands have far more potential value.
Your salary has a short window. Your brand is a lifetime.
Your salary is literally capped by the league and kept artificially low. Your brand is limitless and can be sold repeatedly on open markets for whatever amounts you are savvy enough to leverage.
Your salary is an entryway to eyeballs. You brand cashes in on your worth.
The money you make from salary during your playing years should be dwarfed by the money you earn as spinoffs into auxiliary marketing fees and licenses into perpetuity; or for other career opportunities that may hold more value than just strictly income.
The value of your brand and longterm financial opportunities should be the true goal of every player in the league, regardless of position.
Salaries are for suckers, brands are for wealth. Even the Kardashians know this. Every player in professional sports should be thinking about longterm worth over salaries.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,248
Pittsburgh, PA
That's true for, at best, the top 10% of players in the league. The vast majority are fungible and never acquire anything resembling a brand, not for lack of creativity or good advice but for lack of opportunity.
 

allstonite

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 27, 2010
2,491
Yeah Jamie Collins was never going to become a "brand" unless maybe he was a perpetual DPOY candidate and even then there's already JJ Watt who is basically a marketers wet dream.

In the NFL it should be 100% about getting as much as possible and getting out as healthy as you can because a) injury and quality of life history and b) fuck the owners
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,240
‘Get That Money, Girl’ is about as Hot Take-y as it gets.
Your salary is old thinking. Your brand is new thinking.
Brands have far more potential value.
Your salary has a short window. Your brand is a lifetime.
Your salary is literally capped by the league and kept artificially low. Your brand is limitless and can be sold repeatedly on open markets for whatever amounts you are savvy enough to leverage.
Your salary is an entryway to eyeballs. You brand cashes in on your worth.
The money you make from salary during your playing years should be dwarfed by the money you earn as spinoffs into auxiliary marketing fees and licenses into perpetuity; or for other career opportunities that may hold more value than just strictly income.
The value of your brand and longterm financial opportunities should be the true goal of every player in the league, regardless of position.
Salaries are for suckers, brands are for wealth. Even the Kardashians know this. Every player in professional sports should be thinking about longterm worth over salaries.
This is simply just not true for the overwhelming majority of NFL players and it's not "hot takey" at all. Sure - Brady can sacrifice salary but what about a guy like Hightower? Should he give up 10-15M in guaranteed money for the opportunity to play with the Patriots? How does he get that back after he's done?
 

McBride11

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
22,175
Durham, NC
Ya, Ghost, Edelman, Brady, Butler all in national ads (Ive seen in Pitt and Sea). Others in the past. I think BB preventing marketing deals is pretty overblown. Do your job.
 

bakahump

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2001
7,558
Maine
UPS has failed to utilize the various Browns in Football.

"Antonio imagine Tearing threw a secondary, maybe a spin and a stiff arm, arriving in the end zone and giving a cute kid in glasses the football with a "A special delivery for Max!" Cue Voice over about UPS......finally fade out with Antonio saying "What Can Brown do for YOU!""

"Malcolm follow me here .....slow motion of you using a rip move to seperate and get through the Double team. The QB Tries to avoid him but you grab him and bring him down with a perfect form tackle. As you get up you say "UPS Ground Baby! WHOOOO!" Voiceover about UPS Dependability....finally fade out with you in our three Point....maybe We can see your breath in the cold air and you looking intensively at the camera saying "WHAT CAN BROWN DO FOR YOU!"

"Josh...imagine you didnt beat your wife....."