We have a Jonny Gomes thread, but somehow not a local broadcaster thread. So now we do.
What do you all think about the quality of our guys? Mostly, I want to be entertained, have fairly balanced analysis and criticism, and a voice that knows when to shut up.
Red Sox - I won't rehash my DO annoyances here, since I've posted in the Orsillo thread about it, but overall I still think the current team ranks at least middle of the pack. Remy has good and bad years so the consistency isn't always there, but he is one of the better analysts when he is inspired.
Castig gets very little praise or criticism despite him being a relative institution here, and I think that speaks to his consistency and humility, rather than his wordsmithing. I find Neverett harmless, but a downgrade from when O'Brien moved out of the booth.
Bruins - Jack is someone only the locals can love. He's not quite Tommy Heinsohn (thank god), but you have to give him credit for the genuine passion even if his partner wants to strangle him from time to time. More often than not I am entertained, but if the hockey schedule were 162, I'm not sure I could take it. I love Goucher and Beers. Both are very easy to listen to, and Goucher is excellent at rising to the occasion when the Bruins have extended pressure. Beers is even handed with his criticism.
I'll stay away from the other two sports and let others weigh in, since I'm a casual Celtics fan, and never leave the house during Patriots games so don't catch the radio crew.
How do others feel?
What do you all think about the quality of our guys? Mostly, I want to be entertained, have fairly balanced analysis and criticism, and a voice that knows when to shut up.
Red Sox - I won't rehash my DO annoyances here, since I've posted in the Orsillo thread about it, but overall I still think the current team ranks at least middle of the pack. Remy has good and bad years so the consistency isn't always there, but he is one of the better analysts when he is inspired.
Castig gets very little praise or criticism despite him being a relative institution here, and I think that speaks to his consistency and humility, rather than his wordsmithing. I find Neverett harmless, but a downgrade from when O'Brien moved out of the booth.
Bruins - Jack is someone only the locals can love. He's not quite Tommy Heinsohn (thank god), but you have to give him credit for the genuine passion even if his partner wants to strangle him from time to time. More often than not I am entertained, but if the hockey schedule were 162, I'm not sure I could take it. I love Goucher and Beers. Both are very easy to listen to, and Goucher is excellent at rising to the occasion when the Bruins have extended pressure. Beers is even handed with his criticism.
I'll stay away from the other two sports and let others weigh in, since I'm a casual Celtics fan, and never leave the house during Patriots games so don't catch the radio crew.
How do others feel?
Last edited: