The Picture/Video Thread

LogansDad

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 15, 2006
29,716
Alamogordo
reggiecleveland said:
That was the only way to beat Quick. Martin Jones is my cousin, but I can't see him becoming a starter in LA.
Having Brooks Orpik standing around doing absolutely nothing certainly is an effective way to beat his goalie.
 

wibi

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,842
Greg29fan said:
 
Players 2, 3 and 4 dont really get to be counted for this scenario as thats how 100% of on the fly line changes happen in the NHL ... Still makes it 8 on 5 with only one other player even heading off the ice although he is far from off the ice at this point
 

TSC

SoSH's Doug Neidermeyer
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2007
12,291
Between here and everywhere.
The Napkin said:
That's awesome. Can you get suspended for a hit against your own player?
 
If I had any faith in the league - I would say you she be able to especially in a case like this. Phaneuf clearly jumps, and throws the elbow up at the head of Marleau. Unfortunately JVR gets in the way of his attempt.
 
But in this league - intent matters little. It's only the effect of the hit that seems to elicit a response. 
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,975
Here
Um, holy shit.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CFsz3KIEQo
 
The Lucic hit on Miller gets me every time. The Thomas hit on Sedin is class as well.
 

catomatic

thinks gen turgidson is super mean!!!
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
3,414
Park Slope, Brooklyn
Ed Hillel said:
Um, holy shit.
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-CFsz3KIEQo
 
The Lucic hit on Miller gets me every time. The Thomas hit on Sedin is class as well.
Marchand's low bridge on the Canuck in the SCF was post-whistle, was it not?
 

Dropkick Izzy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 28, 2003
5,980
Miltappan
catomatic said:
Marchand's low bridge on the Canuck in the SCF was post-whistle, was it not?
 
No.  It was also in January, during the first meeting post-SCF with Vancouver.
 
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGD5DbljtfE[/youtube]
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,975
Here
Dropkick Izzy said:
 
No.  It was also in January, during the first meeting post-SCF with Vancouver.
 
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGD5DbljtfE[/youtube]
He actually did it twice, the little douche. The one in the Jim Ross video was in the SCF post whistle on one of the Sedins.
 

catomatic

thinks gen turgidson is super mean!!!
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
3,414
Park Slope, Brooklyn
Ed Hillel said:
He actually did it twice, the little douche. The one in the Jim Ross video was in the SCF post whistle on one of the Sedins.
Yeah, that's the one I'm thinking of—the SCF one. I think post-whistle move is pretty much ok, though. If someone wants to run you after the whistle is blown then they deserve whatever comes their way. I would feel the same if someone took steps to avoid Lucic on any one of his post-whistle adventures. From the department of who the fuck cares: I was in a bar in Brooklyn watching that game and there was a huge Habs fan behind me who maintained that the whistle had not blown and that it was an unforgivable offense. I took the opposite view and things got quite heated. I told him I still played twice weekly and had some context to speak on the matter but that only ratcheted up his defensiveness—we actually almost took it outside because he was such an embittered douchenozzle about it.
 

SidelineCameras

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2011
1,813
catomatic said:
Yeah, that's the one I'm thinking of—the SCF one. I think post-whistle move is pretty much ok, though. If someone wants to run you after the whistle is blown then they deserve whatever comes their way. I would feel the same if someone took steps to avoid Lucic on any one of his post-whistle adventures. From the department of who the fuck cares: I was in a bar in Brooklyn watching that game and there was a huge Habs fan behind me who maintained that the whistle had not blown and that it was an unforgivable offense. I took the opposite view and things got quite heated. I told him I still played twice weekly and had some context to speak on the matter but that only ratcheted up his defensiveness—we actually almost took it outside because he was such an embittered douchenozzle about it.
 
You fought a Habs fan? At what point did he dive and start looking for the refs?
 

catomatic

thinks gen turgidson is super mean!!!
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
3,414
Park Slope, Brooklyn
SidelineCameras said:
 
You fought a Habs fan? At what point did he dive and start looking for the refs?
Nearly as fast as PK Subban did when Andy Ference was looking to tune him up after the flying elbow to Krejci…...
 

catomatic

thinks gen turgidson is super mean!!!
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
3,414
Park Slope, Brooklyn
Dropkick Izzy said:
I'm not sure how, but I completely forgot Marshand ducking the incoming Sedin.  And it was most certainly after the whistle.
I watched the one on Salo moments ago and heard Brick very pointedly make note that it was the second low hit of the afternoon. Jack then cited Ballard's low hit earlier that day. It certainly gives context to Marchand's perhaps retaliatory hit afterwards. Brad was just observing "Marchand's low-bridge code." 
 

McDrew

Set Adrift on Memory Bliss
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,064
Portland, OR
Is there a specific penalty against the low-check that marchand has thrown a couple times, or does it just fall under the general "roughing" category. 
 

TSC

SoSH's Doug Neidermeyer
SoSH Member
Oct 25, 2007
12,291
Between here and everywhere.
AMcGhie said:
Is there a specific penalty against the low-check that marchand has thrown a couple times, or does it just fall under the general "roughing" category. 
 
The penalty is "clipping," but what Marchand did to Salo I don't think is a good example of it. Marchand goes low, but appears to get his hip on Salo's hip.
 
Rule 44 - Clipping
44.1 Clipping - Clipping is the act of throwing the body, from any direction, across or below the knees of an opponent.
A player may not deliver a check in a “clipping” manner, nor lower his own body position to deliver a check on or below an opponent’s knees.
An illegal “low hit” is a check that is delivered by a player or goalkeeper who may or may not have both skates on the ice, with his sole intent to check the opponent in the area of his knees. A player may not lower his body position to deliver a check to an opponent’s knees
 

McDrew

Set Adrift on Memory Bliss
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2006
4,064
Portland, OR
So basically going for a low check to get guys to tumble like Marchand did, especially near the boards, is a no-no.  Got it.  Thanks.