UFC owners in advanced talks to sell business for as much as $4 BILLION

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,472
CNBC Now ‏@CNBCnow 14m14 minutes ago
Owners of UFC are in "advanced talks to sell the business" & have received at least 4 bids; final offer expected to be $3.5B to $4B - ESPN
The owners of the UFC are in advanced talks to sell the business, sources told ESPN.com.

At least four bidders are believed to have submitted bids for the organization, including WME/IMG, China Media Capital, The Blackstone Group and Dalian Wanda Group. The winning bid, should things proceed, is expected to be for a valuation between $3.5 billion and $4 billion, multiple sources with knowledge of the negotiations told ESPN.com.

"As a private company, we don't discuss speculation or rumors related to our business," said David Sholler, vice president of public relations and athlete marketing for the UFC.

Investment bank Goldman Sachs has been representing Zuffa LLC, which bought the UFC in 2001 for only $2 million. Sources with knowledge of the numbers presented to potential investors said that Goldman Sachs had represented UFC's last full year earnings in the $200 million to $250 million range, before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. A new television rights deal, which would begin in 2019, could add an additional $250 million in annual revenue to the bottom line, investors were advised.

Lorenzo Fertitta, who with his brother Frank owned more than 80 percent of the business at last public acknowledgment, told CNN in December that the private company grossed about $600 million in revenue last year. Besides the Fertittas, who are each worth about $1.6 billion, according to Forbes, the company has two other minority investors: UFC president Dana White and the Abu Dhabi government, which, under its Flash Entertainment arm, bought a 10 percent stake in the business for an undisclosed sum in 2010.

The leader in the bid to buy the biggest mixed martial arts business in the world is said to be Chinese-based conglomerate Dalian Wanda Group, sources said. Its chairman, Wang Jianlin, is the richest man in China, worth nearly $35 billion, according to Forbes Magazine.

The company has slowly been getting into sports. Last year, Wanda bought a 20 percent stake in soccer superpower Atletico Madrid for a reported $48 million. In March, amid the FIFA scandal, the company agreed to sign on as a FIFA partner, the highest level of sponsorship, through 2030.

In January, Dalian Wanda Group became the first Chinese company to become owners of a major Hollywood film studio when it agreed to buy Legendary Entertainment from Pittsburgh Steelers minority owner Thomas Tull for about $3.5 billion.

The UFC, under parent company Zuffa, is privately owned and does not publicly reveal financial information. It's safe to say, however, the company is coming off a monster financial year in 2015, led by the emergence of crossover stars inRonda Rousey and Conor McGregor.

Rousey and McGregor each headlined three UFC events in 2015. Rousey's title fight against Holly Holm in November set a new company attendance record at Etihad Stadium. One month later, McGregor's title fight against Jose Aldo in Las Vegas drew the promotion's second-highest gate receipts in its history, with ticket sales grossing more than $10 million.

Other bidders said to be in the mix are WME/IMG, which owns media properties and represents athletes, including Rousey, the former UFC bantamweight champion. Blackstone Group is also believed to be a bidder. A senior executive at the private equity firm, David Blitzer, owns a minority stake in the New Jersey Devils, Philadelphia 76ers and British soccer team Crystal Palace.
http://espn.go.com/mma/story/_/id/15503004/ufc-owners-advanced-talks-sell-promotion
 

Infield Infidel

teaching korea american
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,463
Meeting Place, Canada
This had been rumbling, didn't think it would happen this soon
According to Jon Snowden (below), Dana White's status is a negotiating point for the bids. They may not want to keep him around


 

Vinho Tinto

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 9, 2003
7,068
Auburn, MA
I think any deal that doesn't leave Dana White with equity interest and retain him as president is doomed. Fans can hate on him, but he is the UFC's biggest asset and Rainmaker
 

Dehere

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2010
3,143
I think any deal that doesn't leave Dana White with equity interest and retain him as president is doomed. Fans can hate on him, but he is the UFC's biggest asset and Rainmaker
Fully agree. At first I thought I had misread Snowden's tweet. Any buyer who thinks the brand doesn't lose something if they lose Dana Is engaging in serious hubris IMO.
 

Vinho Tinto

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 9, 2003
7,068
Auburn, MA
Any buyer who thinks the brand doesn't lose something if they lose Dana Is engaging in serious hubris IMO.
Why spend so much to run a business experiment? He's run it from near bankruptcy to the dominant name in prize fighting. I can't keep track of how many promotions that have come and gone in the last 15 years. Without White, the buyer is way too likely to run it into the ground (like Pride) in 10 years.
 

beezer

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 9, 2009
598
I think the Ferritas brothers have seen the writing on the wall with the McGregor fiasco. They've been talking about selling for a while, but now they realize that individual fight purses are going to have to begin rising and the margin is going to take a hit because of it. Selling now while the value is high would be huge, the only thing that could really take the value higher is if one of the groups from China (China Media or Delian Wanda) could grow the market in China. Everyone talks about the opportunity in China, but none of the organizations, including One FC, have been able to capitalize on that area.
 

rembrat

Member
SoSH Member
May 26, 2006
36,345
I think any deal that doesn't leave Dana White with equity interest and retain him as president is doomed. Fans can hate on him, but he is the UFC's biggest asset and Rainmaker
Pride was pretty awesome and Dana didn't have his finger on that.
 

Dehere

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2010
3,143
I don't know that a sale now reflects a lack of faith in the future growth of UFC. If you ran a business you had grown from 2m to 4b, what would you do? Stay on and try to manage the next billion in growth or get out, enjoy your unfathomable wealth, and let someone else try to grind out 5-10% growth every year? Lorenzo has a son playing football at Notre Dame. Supposedly he now owns a huge place in South Bend and is spending as little time in Vegas as possible. Maybe there just comes a time when you take your chips off the table even if you think you could keep going and make more.
 

Infield Infidel

teaching korea american
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,463
Meeting Place, Canada
I think it takes two to tango with Dana, buyers may/may not want to keep him, he may/may not want to stay. He's got a 9% stake in UFC, so if they cash out at $4b, he could walk away with $360m if he doesn't want to hang around.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Companies typically sell for something like 8x earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). Multiples vary, but that's a decent benchmark.

Based on the figures in the OP ($200-250mm EBITDA, $3.5-4b sales price), UFC is going to command a multiple somewhere between 14x and 20x EBITDA. Even if we assume a multiple at the low end of that range (for a variety of reasons, it's more likely that UFC is understating its profits than inflating them), the buyer is banking on their ability to grow the business much more quickly over the next 5 years than its current owners have grown it over the past 5. (This article says that UFC's EBITDA was $145mm in 2011, on $475mm in revenue.)

If someone actually pays that price, I would be surprised if they retain Dana White; they will be thinking they can run the business much more profitably than it has been run in the recent past.
 

Marciano490

Urological Expert
SoSH Member
Nov 4, 2007
62,314
Companies typically sell for something like 8x earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). Multiples vary, but that's a decent benchmark.

Based on the figures in the OP ($200-250mm EBITDA, $3.5-4b sales price), UFC is going to command a multiple somewhere between 14x and 20x EBITDA. Even if we assume a multiple at the low end of that range (for a variety of reasons, it's more likely that UFC is understating its profits than inflating them), the buyer is banking on their ability to grow the business much more quickly over the next 5 years than its current owners have grown it over the past 5. (This article says that UFC's EBITDA was $145mm in 2011, on $475mm in revenue.)

If someone actually pays that price, I would be surprised if they retain Dana White; they will be thinking they can run the business much more profitably than it has been run in the recent past.
Wonder how much of that has to do with New York now permitting UFC bouts.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
I think it takes two to tango with Dana, buyers may/may not want to keep him, he may/may not want to stay. He's got a 9% stake in UFC, so if they cash out at $4b, he could walk away with $360m if he doesn't want to hang around.
If the buyers want to retain White, they'll make it a condition of their offer. Perhaps they will keep him on for a year or two, for the sake of preserving the loyalty of existing fans and relationships with key talent (assuming those relationships are positive). As I said, though, I would be surprised if he continues to make strategic decisions for the business -- the buyers must think they can do better than the existing owners, or else they wouldn't agree to pay anywhere close to the amounts being reported.
 

Dehere

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2010
3,143
Companies typically sell for something like 8x earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). Multiples vary, but that's a decent benchmark.

Based on the figures in the OP ($200-250mm EBITDA, $3.5-4b sales price), UFC is going to command a multiple somewhere between 14x and 20x EBITDA. Even if we assume a multiple at the low end of that range (for a variety of reasons, it's more likely that UFC is understating its profits than inflating them), the buyer is banking on their ability to grow the business much more quickly over the next 5 years than its current owners have grown it over the past 5. (This article says that UFC's EBITDA was $145mm in 2011, on $475mm in revenue.)

If someone actually pays that price, I would be surprised if they retain Dana White; they will be thinking they can run the business much more profitably than it has been run in the recent past.
All fair points but in this case you can reasonably assume a sharp escalation in the next TV rights deal. Say the AAV of the new deal is an increase of 50-100m over the current deal. Now you're selling at a multiple of 10-16x EBITDA which may suggest a different point of view on how quickly you can grow revenue or what role there should be for Dana.
 
Dec 21, 2015
1,410
8x EBITDA is a good TEV multiple for a steel factory, I guess. Something declining and predictable.

Something growing fast will trade at a higher multiple. Financial and healthcare companies are typically sold in the low-to-mid teens. Technology? 15x median the last 5 years. A solid media property that's been growing fast and has a sustainable, memorable brand, 15-20x TEV/EBITDA is an aggressive ask but not unreasonable - you have to buy out their upside, and account for the growth trends that have existed in their market. No one can argue that UFC hasn't provably grown their market, and also figured out how to claim a decent share of value from it.
 
Last edited:

Infield Infidel

teaching korea american
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,463
Meeting Place, Canada
Why don't they have more fights at casinos? I would think the same logic that drives boxing promoters to Las Vegas would drive UFC there as well, especially as it's becoming more mainstream.
I'm a little confused by this question. Do you mean casinos outside of Las Vegas, like Mohegan Sun? The venue breakdown the past two years has been a roughly equal split between Las Vegas, domestic, and international venues. (I'm counting PPVs, Fight Nights, UFC on Fox, and TUF Finales). Used to be more like a 40/40/20 split but they've increased overseas focus bigtime the past few years. And there are more events now than ever, sometimes two in one week. Obviously Brazil is a big market for them, but they've been breaking into new markets. Just had their first event in the Netherlands last week

edit I underestimated how many events are overseas. Most of the int'l events are Fight Nights that I only watch If there's fighters I like. They are mainly saving Vegas for PPVs/TUF Finales
2015 41 events: Vegas 9, US 13, Int'l 19
2014 46 events: Vegas 7, US 18, Int'l 21
 
Last edited:

Infield Infidel

teaching korea american
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,463
Meeting Place, Canada
Bidding to buy the UFC is drawing closer to an end, sources told ESPN on Thursday. The two bid groups, WME-IMG in conjunction with Dalian Wanda Group, and China Media Capital, had similar bids in the $4.1 billion range, sources said.
Sources said that both bidding groups are still trying to completely finance the buyout, which would be for the entire company. Which company ultimately wins out might depend on the details of that financing. Sources say WME co-chair Ari Emanuel has been asking well-heeled investors to chip in $25 million to $50 million.
One of those investors that said yes, according to sources, was the Kraft Group, which owns the New England Patriots and the New England Revolution. A Kraft Group spokesman declined comment.
http://espn.go.com/mma/story/_/id/16258572/bidding-buy-ufc-drawing-closer-conclusion