They are. Like butter.Baltimore is now running ball down Cleve’s throat.
Would you say they are cleaving Cleveland?Baltimore is now running ball down Cleve’s throat.
What is this live table you speak of?Eagles are in the playoffs on the live table.
"You guys are crazy rooting for Pittsburgh. They would throw for 500 yards against the Pats."You guys are crazy rooting for Baltimore. They would run all over the Pats.
You can get in a shoot out with a team that hucks it for 500 yards and can't play defense. You can't do that with a team that can control the ball on the ground and limit your TOP and play awesome D."You guys are crazy rooting for Pittsburgh. They would throw for 500 yards against the Pats."
We gotta play someone.
And, another Raiders turnover.
Read something couple days ago about how Ravens’ running game is really confusing, blocking assignments very elaborate and so forth. I was very skeptical. Romo beginning to explain it. Cleveland’s defense is pretty stout.Would you say they are cleaving Cleveland?
I think that's been my favorite part of watching Brady all these years. Brady will get on his receivers, but Brady won't throw an INT that's clearly on him then act like it's someone else's fault. Manning used to do that all the time too. A lot of times there's a huge gray area - did a receiver do the wrong thing or did the refs miss a hold, etc. But on that one, there's nothing except Ben obviously not seeing the LB lurking, and yet there he is with his arms out looking for someone else to blame.What call were you looking for Ben
This is why the 2 seed might be alright. Let Houston come to us, who have yet to prove they can beat us. Only play one of KC/BAL at worst.
Unless the 6 beats Houston.We’d be most likely to meet the Ravens in the AFCCG, yes? If it comes to that I’m not going to sweat the opponent that much, especially at home.
Never underestimate the psychic income here of Steelers elimination day.You guys are crazy rooting for Baltimore. They would run all over the Pats.
This is why the 2 seed might be alright. Let Houston come to us, who have yet to prove they can beat us. Only play one of KC/BAL at worst.
Both of these things assume Houston beats the IND/TEN winner. If the Texans lose, the winner of Ravens-Chargers is coming to Foxboro for Round 2 and KC gets the easy game.We’d be most likely to meet the Ravens in the AFCCG, yes? If it comes to that I’m not going to sweat the opponent that much, especially at home.
Houston isn't losing to Tennessee. Nobody is. But if it's Indy, it's on the table.Both of these things assume Houston beats the IND/TEN winner. If the Texans lose, the winner of Ravens-Chargers is coming to Foxboro for Round 2 and KC gets the easy game.
Too hard to tell. As is:This is why the 2 seed might be alright. Let Houston come to us, who have yet to prove they can beat us. Only play one of KC/BAL at worst.
Right, so the least likely scenario results in NE-BAL. I’m okay with that. We did just lose to Pittsburgh after all.Both of these things assume Houston beats the IND/TEN winner. If the Texans lose, the winner of Ravens-Chargers is coming to Foxboro for Round 2 and KC gets the easy game.
Which is half the daily double of a statewide elimination day.Never underestimate the psychic income here of Steelers elimination day.
Totally agreed, I think HOU handles TEN easily. IND-HOU is a tossup though.Houston isn't losing to Tennessee. Nobody is. But if it's Indy, it's on the table.
Yep. But if they play NE, it'll be in Foxboro, where the Patriots have been dominant this year. I always worry about Baltimore, of course.Yeah, the Ravens running game is really worrisome at this point.
Absolutely. Kirk Cousins isn't winning a road playoff game in Chicago. Nick Foles sure could.So if you're the Bears and you're beating the hell out of the Vikings, do you pull everyone and let them come back in the 2nd half?
You'd get to host that same team you're crushing next week in the WC Round. The alternative is facing an Eagles team that has been very good lately.
Ravens 2010 playoff loss of courseIn the BB era has any team dominated the Pats in the ground without a strong passing game?
I guess the Dolphins in the wildcat game, but that’s flukey.
I guess in my memory Pats are always able to at least somewhat control the run when they are able to game plan around it. Great passing sometimes they can’t.
Am I missing contrary examples?