That Time BB Was Wrong

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,837
AZ
One of the things that makes Belichick great is that he is not afraid to make tough decisions. And then he sticks to them. Sometimes they don't work but in the long run this method and instinct has led to incredible success.

The team was in absolute cap jail last year. They had less than $1m. They already had deferred about $14 million of Brady's salary and while they could have done some structuring tricks to smooth it out for one year, eventually you pay the piper. Even if Brady had been free they just didn't have the talent this year to get past the incredible talent in the AFC. To go another $50 million in the hole when you're not going to win a championship and for a player that is not a long-term option was a hard decision.

You could make a list of arguments for and against, I suppose. But the fact that the Bucs won the Super Bowl barely even makes that list, to me.

Brady's contract with Tampa isn't anywhere near market value, though. 2/50 for top 5 QB play is peanuts.
Just for completeness, since he earned all of his incentives his contract for this year will end up paying him 28,750,000 and since he has the same incentives next year they are all LTBE and will count on next year's cap. So, his contract turns out to 2/57.5 for now.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,662
But Shula not even mentioned on your list
It is. I accidentally forgot to include him and added him. Must have been while you were replying to me. So it makes sense what you said...thinking that I didn't even include him on the list.
 

BusRaker

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 11, 2006
2,373
Probably right. I’ve read about the Manchester United bro, Sir Alex Ferguson, but don’t really know that sport well enough to comment.
The EPL has nothing that even approaches a salary cap. Closer to a luxury tax (like MLB) which the rich clubs like Man U wank to. Revenue sharing is the only real control. But similar to the NEP "In Bill we trust" motto, no one really felt comfortable second guessing Fergie. And he definitely let a lot of stars walk for the right transfer fee
 

Bergs

funky and cold
SoSH Member
Jul 22, 2005
21,695
What part of the salary cap success should be attribute to BB the coach, and what part to the GM? If we're literally just focusing on his successes as a coach, getting attribution for success during the salary cap era doesnt feel fair.

Which is why this exercise is dumb. Because, while we could sit and argue about the greatest coach of all time, what BB did was significantly, significantly larger and more difficult. He may have not been the best drafter, pursuer of free agent talent, or trader. But, regardless of his warts, he is the biggest reason the Patriots went on the most historic run in any major sport. He drafted Brady. He traded key cogs. He built the game plans. He worked the salary cap. He did it. Fucking all of it.

Was he the greatest coach of all time? I dunno. I think so, but I'm biased. But he is, inarguably, the most successful leader in NFL history (non-player division). He built it, he oversaw it short, medium, and long term. And he was in the weeds every single day to make it successful. Every day. For over 20 fucking years. In regards to winning, nobody has ever, or probably will ever, do more for a single organization than Belichick.
Great post, KFP.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,543
Legit candidates for GOAT coach:

Belichick - Coached in an era where it is virtually impossible to sustain success - the only one on this list to coach in this era. Everyone else coached when team building was much more sustainable. 2nd most victories ever. 6 SB rings as HC, 2 more as assistant. Most playoff wins of all time. Very few HOF players. But had the GOAT at QB. Also, like it or not, was involved in a scandal.

Lombardi - Legend. 5x NFL champ (including 2 SB titles). Also coached teams that were loaded with hall of famers.

Brown - 3x NFL champ, 4x AAFC champ. Belichick credits Brown as being the greatest, most innovative coach in NFL history.

Walsh - 3x SB champ. Had the second GOAT QB, and a bunch of other HOF players.

Gibbs - 3x SB champ, won with three different QBs. But two of those years were in strike-shortened seasons.

Noll - 4x SB champ, but had an insanely loaded HOF roster. Also had major steroid issues.

Shula - 2x SB champ, most wins all-time.

I think that's basically it. For me, it's Belichick at the clear #1, and then you argue about the rest. But BB is a big step over everyone else. But I can see arguments that resonate with people for other guys.
I would also add in Brown's column that he won a division in the expansion Bengals' 3rd season (their 1st in the merged NFL). Given that he modernized the game in ways that remain relevant today, I think he is the only real contender.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,787
This was the last place we were discussing all time NFL coaches that I can remember. I think we agree on BB @1 so let me ask this: What does Andy Reid need to do to get to second place? Let’s say he wins this year. That’s 2 SBs and he has been to 4 conference Championships in a row with 2 different teams.

That’s not enough to get to second but that puts him in some rare air.
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,484
Oregon
One thing about Lombardi ... it's 5 NFL championships plus 2 Super Bowls. His teams won the first two pre-merger, so he took the NFL champs into those games
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,787
One thing about Lombardi ... it's 5 NFL championships plus 2 Super Bowls. His teams won the first two pre-merger, so he took the NFL champs into those games
I have a hard enough time trying to think about the 1970s. Football is so hard to compare eras which makes for good discussions if not fruitful ones.
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,739
I have a hard enough time trying to think about the 1970s. Football is so hard to compare eras which makes for good discussions if not fruitful ones.
What’s the top ten? Is he already better than Shula? Lombardi? Noll? He’s only won one SB but been to three.. it would seem that winning two puts him onto the next tier with a number of other greats that won two. Noll won four. How does his winning percentage stack up?
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,787
What’s the top ten? Is he already better than Shula? Lombardi? Noll? He’s only won one SB but been to three.. it would seem that winning two puts him onto the next tier with a number of other greats that won two. Noll won four. How does his winning percentage stack up?
I have him in my top 10 for sure. I’m wondering what he has to do to approach someone like Walsh.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
Actually, it feels timely that this thread was bumped. As the thread starter, it's an interesting thing to talk about two years later. If Brady ends up retiring this offseason, then I become more at peace with the decision (made by both sides!). If he decides to keep playing and had 1-2 more MVP caliber years, it will be a tougher pill to swallow. The 2020 Pats weren't likely to win a damn thing, and if Brady was around in 2020, then it would have had downstream effects on the cap, who they signed as FA, the draft, etc. Maybe they would have been a contender in 2021, maybe not.
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,217
Actually, it feels timely that this thread was bumped. As the thread starter, it's an interesting thing to talk about two years later. If Brady ends up retiring this offseason, then I become more at peace with the decision (made by both sides!). If he decides to keep playing and had 1-2 more MVP caliber years, it will be a tougher pill to swallow. The 2020 Pats weren't likely to win a damn thing, and if Brady was around in 2020, then it would have had downstream effects on the cap, who they signed as FA, the draft, etc. Maybe they would have been a contender in 2021, maybe not.
All true but it’s not like this franchise is in materially better shape now. We might have a solid QB in Mac. We have a couple of good young RBs but those are generally fungible. Our WR/TE talent remains meh. Defense has a few nice pieces but one of those is a RFA. Still plenty of holes.

I’m at peace with all this because I think this team was headed for mediocrity no matter what Brady decided. And it was kind of neat to see him add #7, especially when you consider where things stood after the Kearse catch only 7 years ago.