Jayson Tatum's Rise to the Top

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,382
Santa Monica
Yeah, I have an irrational hope that the Celtics pursue a Zach Lavine S&T this offseason, not Beal. I can think of a lot of reasons that won't work out but I can dream.
Yea I'd much rather have Zach than Brad...Is Lavine super friendly with the JAYs? Seems like Chicago is a good situation for him, big market, etc

BUT honestly don't think the C's need to land that 3rd SuperStar/White Whale. Their defense-first approach + 3 JAYLords a leapin' will eventually yield championships
 

DGreenwood

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 2, 2003
2,469
Seattle
Yea I'd much rather have Zach than Brad...Is Lavine super friendly with the JAYs? Seems like Chicago is a good situation for him, big market, etc
The only connection I'm aware of is that Tatum and Lavine played together on the gold medal olympic team, which is often a bonding experience for players. Smart also played with LaVine on the 2016 Select team that trained with the USA basketball National team. I think you pointed out a couple months ago that Smart called LaVine his favorite non-Celtic player, which can often point to an under the radar recruitment effort.

Yeah, there's not much there, and Chicago seems like a decent situation for him right now so I'm not sure he'd want to take less money to go somewhere else.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,712
I saw something today that Beal is trying to get to Philadelphia in the offseason to play with Harden and Embiid. Maybe the Tatum/Beal bond isn't as strong as it has been reported.
I think most people mean it the other way when they discuss it. That the value of trading for Beal is that it would convince the player that sees himself as BB's little brother to commit to Boston long term.

I'm cross-posting this from the Philly thread but it seems relevant to Celtics discussion as well since it's been such a long standing rumor.

Rumor is Bradley Beal will join James Harden and Joel Embiid on 76ers
Honestly I would be fine with the Sixers running out that defenseless backcourt that will cost them $100 million per year. Since it would require the Wiz to eat Harris's ugly contract it will also require every useful roleplayer and available draft pick to soften the blow.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,693
Tatum is really in the top X of a lot of advanced metrics. Assuming his production level is sustainable, the debates about whether he is "top 10" or whatever can now be put to bed. The Celtics have one of the best players in the NBA, he is just 19 going on 24 and his size and defense argue that he is more valuable than some of the other young superstars like Morant or Doncic, at least for me.

Also, second-half Tatum may not be a thing but the data is getting kind of hard to ignore.
 

jmcc5400

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2000
5,356
To me, the ridiculous thing about Tatum is how good his defense is and how important he is to Ime's system. In the last couple of weeks we've seen him switched onto Kyrie and Trae in key situations and lock them up while also doing well against guys his own size. All while carrying a massive offensive load. It's a wonder to behold, and he's only 19.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,232
Tatum is really in the top X of a lot of advanced metrics. Assuming his production level is sustainable, the debates about whether he is "top 10" or whatever can now be put to bed. The Celtics have one of the best players in the NBA, he is just 19 going on 24 and his size and defense argue that he is more valuable than some of the other young superstars like Morant or Doncic, at least for me.

Also, second-half Tatum may not be a thing but the data is getting kind of hard to ignore.
While some posters (not you) have been curiously dismissive of Tatum's struggles recovering from a bad bout of CoVid last season, the reality is that he spent a good part of the middle of the season using inhalers. I have to believe that impacted some of his numbers last season.

The reasons for the first/second half imbalance this year are harder to identify, but he did participate in his first ever Olympics this past summer. And he also clearly bulked up in the offseason. Whether these factors, or his adjustment to a new coach/system, were at all contributing factors to his first half performance will never be conclusively known either way.

Still, would not complain if Tatum continues to be a greater force in the 2nd half and playoffs of subsequent seasons.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
28/8/4.4 on a 60% TS since December 1st.
Tatum's current career high for 2P% is .502, last season. He's currently at .512.

Regarding those 20 games: 35.1 mpg, 1.0 steal, 2.6 TO. 100 Assist/52 TO. Almost 2:1.

It's interesting that during the C's stretch of good play, Tatum and Brown have actually been playing less. First 44 games, Tatum was averaging 36.8.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,227
Imaginationland
Tatum is averaging 26.8 points, 8.2 rebounds and 4.2 assists per game. He's one of 6 guys this year averaging 26+ points, 8+ rebounds and 4+ assists. The others are Giannis, Embiid, Jokic, Luka and LeBron. Quite a group.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,742
Tatum is averaging 26.8 points, 8.2 rebounds and 4.2 assists per game. He's one of 6 guys this year averaging 26+ points, 8+ rebounds and 4+ assists. The others are Giannis, Embiid, Jokic, Luka and LeBron. Quite a group.
DARKO for the season interesting. Tatum not quite up to those elite guys yet.

Can only max out at 5 players so I left out Lebron. LBJ is mirroring Embiid as far as DARKO season value though.
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,618
That seems like a pretty reasonable list. If Tatum and the C's finish out the regular season like they have the last two months he might move up a slot or 2.
I think the highest he can possibly get is 4. That top 3 seems pretty set in stone (barring injury in the next week)
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,240
I think the highest he can possibly get is 4. That top 3 seems pretty set in stone (barring injury in the next week)
Having Ja and DeMar ahead of him seems weird, unless you really don't think that defense matters. Tatum is a bit behind those guys offensively, but it's not by much.

The Celtics offense (when he's on the floor) is completely driven by him drawing multiple defenders and making the right play. It doesn't lead to huge assist numbers, because teams don't (usually) help one pass away, but he's drawing multiple guys extremely consistently now in a way that leads to good offense.

The top 3 guys are all clearly better.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,227
Imaginationland
Having Ja and DeMar ahead of him seems weird, unless you really don't think that defense matters. Tatum is a bit behind those guys offensively, but it's not by much.
I don’t think anyone here actually thinks Ja or Derozen is more valuable than Tatum, but it feels unlikely that he finishes ahead of either in the voting. Early season narratives are still locked in to some extent - the Celtics and Tatum are finally playing up to their potential. It’s not as interesting as derozen having a career season at age 32 and helping turn the bulls into a solid playoff team, nor is it as interesting as ja taking a huge step forward and pulling the grizzlies will him, at least one year ahead of schedule.

His all around game and recent surge show he’s definitely better than both, but it’s hard to get too worked up considering the difference is between 4th and 6th. None of the guys has a chance to finish any better.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,382
Santa Monica
Having Ja and DeMar ahead of him seems weird, unless you really don't think that defense matters. Tatum is a bit behind those guys offensively, but it's not by much.

The Celtics offense (when he's on the floor) is completely driven by him drawing multiple defenders and making the right play. It doesn't lead to huge assist numbers, because teams don't (usually) help one pass away, but he's drawing multiple guys extremely consistently now in a way that leads to good offense.

The top 3 guys are all clearly better.
defense only matters if you're trying to win Championships

it barely helps Tatum in any of the popularity/NBA media/fanboy rankings or Awards

it's laughable how much defense is underrated and offense is overpaid in the NBA (unless you're Rudy)
 
Last edited:

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,528
around the way
defense only matters if you're trying to win Championships

it barely helps Tatum in any of the popularity/NBA media/fanboy rankings or Awards

it's laughable how much defense is underrated and offense is overpaid in the NBA (unless you're Rudy)
Been that way forever.

Funny part, since you mentioned Gobert. Most fanboys, NBA twitterverse, and pundits recognize and pump the well-known, elite defenders. There's generally a 1-2 year lag before they catch on to what the elite guys are doing, but they eventually do.

Problem is that most people don't really care about defense. They aren't really prepared to analyze it very well, so they analyze it poorly. 3 buckets--1. Elite guys (like a handful of DPOY conversation guys), 2. Suck guys (Trae, Kemba, young Harden) and 3. Everyone else. That's the bulk of opinion.

So a guy like Tatum gets typically lumped in with "everyone else", even though he could be points per game better than say Mitchell or a Kyle Kuzma. In baseball, everybody gets that defense is on a continuum. In hoop, we seem to not give a shit.

Edit: forgot to say "get off my lawn" /oldman
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,382
Santa Monica
Been that way forever.

Funny part, since you mentioned Gobert. Most fanboys, NBA twitterverse, and pundits recognize and pump the well-known, elite defenders. There's generally a 1-2 year lag before they catch on to what the elite guys are doing, but they eventually do.

Problem is that most people don't really care about defense. They aren't really prepared to analyze it very well, so they analyze it poorly. 3 buckets--1. Elite guys (like a handful of DPOY conversation guys), 2. Suck guys (Trae, Kemba, young Harden) and 3. Everyone else. That's the bulk of opinion.

So a guy like Tatum gets typically lumped in with "everyone else", even though he could be points per game better than say Mitchell or a Kyle Kuzma. In baseball, everybody gets that defense is on a continuum. In hoop, we seem to not give a shit.

Edit: forgot to say "get off my lawn" /oldman
+1 on all accounts.

Its sucks when the C's get sucked into overpaying for past offense (KW) and is glorious when they buy defense (Horford's 1st deal)

Also, another potential example, if they could add Romeo Langford for 2yrs @ $6MM (suggested on another thread) Brad should do that 100x over, unless he has some issues we're not aware of. Don't give a darn about what DARKO or LEBRON says on his individual metrics/curve
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,811
Not a particularly insightful post but I loved that the Cs shredded DET last night when they tried to double JT. He was getting rid of the ball to the right person; Cs were getting the ball into the middle of the floor and then playing 4 on 3. Far cry from how the Cs handled that earlier in the year. Remember when Embiid said that they were "Easy to guard"?
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,382
Santa Monica
Not a particularly insightful post but I loved that the Cs shredded DET last night when they tried to double JT. He was getting rid of the ball to the right person; Cs were getting the ball into the middle of the floor and then playing 4 on 3. Far cry from how the Cs handled that earlier in the year. Remember when Embiid said that they were "Easy to guard"?
good point, Tatum is almost inviting it now.

Embiid was right and probably helped IME sell his .5 offense to the JAYS
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,328
Lynn
good point, Tatum is almost inviting it now.

Embiid was right and probably helped IME sell his .5 offense to the JAYS
A few writers have pointed it out, but he’s 100% inviting them. He’s manipulating them, trying to draw them to an exact spot, and he tells all of his teammates where to go on the court. His basketball IQ is pretty underrated (not here), IMO.

Obviously this reflects good coaching, as well. Ime has gotten full buy in, it’s been cool to watch unfold.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,240
A few writers have pointed it out, but he’s 100% inviting them. He’s manipulating them, trying to draw them to an exact spot, and he tells all of his teammates where to go on the court. His basketball IQ is pretty underrated (not here), IMO.

Obviously this reflects good coaching, as well. Ime has gotten full buy in, it’s been cool to watch unfold.
There just aren't that many guys in the league who can consistently draw doubles 30 feet from the rim, and he's also able to drive and force doubles when single-covered out there.

Tatum is an elite offensive engine, with clear ways to keep improving that don't involve waiting for his 3-ball to come back (even though it already may be).
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,328
Lynn
There just aren't that many guys in the league who can consistently draw doubles 30 feet from the rim, and he's also able to drive and force doubles when single-covered out there.

Tatum is an elite offensive engine, with clear ways to keep improving that don't involve waiting for his 3-ball to come back (even though it already may be).
There was a few layups the last few games that have just kind of blown my mind, he dribbles around the trap, then through two other defenders on the way to the rim for what looks like an easy finish.

This below tweet is fun, and the picture is scoring gravity leaders this year.

View: https://twitter.com/AndrewDBailey/status/1502664398472564737?s=20&t=EOAqzglLkxfudTT0fU_zVA


6FD6438A-2963-427A-8883-FF1BE92EEDB9.png
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,528
around the way
There was a few layups the last few games that have just kind of blown my mind, he dribbles around the trap, then through two other defenders on the way to the rim for what looks like an easy finish.

This below tweet is fun, and the picture is scoring gravity leaders this year.

View: https://twitter.com/AndrewDBailey/status/1502664398472564737?s=20&t=EOAqzglLkxfudTT0fU_zVA


View attachment 50115
Great post.

I know that reading the comments section is usually a bad idea, but I saw what I expected to see in that twitter thread. "Clearly Luka impacts the game more than Tatum...". Yes, on offense. That's half of the game.

I wish that the NBA had an HD library of the 70s and early 80s that they looped on ESPN8 for these people. Not that watching Gervin, English, and Dantley dumping in 28 against no defense isn't fun, but to some people it's everything.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,843
Been that way forever.

Funny part, since you mentioned Gobert. Most fanboys, NBA twitterverse, and pundits recognize and pump the well-known, elite defenders. There's generally a 1-2 year lag before they catch on to what the elite guys are doing, but they eventually do.

Problem is that most people don't really care about defense. They aren't really prepared to analyze it very well, so they analyze it poorly. 3 buckets--1. Elite guys (like a handful of DPOY conversation guys), 2. Suck guys (Trae, Kemba, young Harden) and 3. Everyone else. That's the bulk of opinion.

So a guy like Tatum gets typically lumped in with "everyone else", even though he could be points per game better than say Mitchell or a Kyle Kuzma. In baseball, everybody gets that defense is on a continuum. In hoop, we seem to not give a shit.

Edit: forgot to say "get off my lawn" /oldman
This is really funny and true. Like there is a Gobert/Kawhi/Draymond/Smart class of players, and then the Trae/Harden/Doncic class, and then like, 99% of the league is in some mysterious middle ground.
 

JakeRae

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
8,167
New York, NY
Great post.

I know that reading the comments section is usually a bad idea, but I saw what I expected to see in that twitter thread. "Clearly Luka impacts the game more than Tatum...". Yes, on offense. That's half of the game.

I wish that the NBA had an HD library of the 70s and early 80s that they looped on ESPN8 for these people. Not that watching Gervin, English, and Dantley dumping in 28 against no defense isn't fun, but to some people it's everything.
I’m not even sure that the view that Luka is a more impactful offensive player is right. Tatum is a much better shooter, takes care of the ball better, and is starting to meaningfully close the gap on passing ability (recognizing that was a big gap and he’s unlikely to ever be Luka’s equal as a creator). If you forced me to choose between them on pure offense today, I think I’d pick Tatum because if you give me all the improvements Tatum has already made and a return to form shooting, he’s probably already better. Looking forward, I also now see Tatum as likely to build a meaningful lead over Luka. A year ago I would’ve bet the other way, that Luka was more likely to improve his shooting meaningfully than Tatum was to improve everything else about his offensive game. At this point, I think the smarter bet is on Tatum continuing to develop into a borderline elite playmaker v. Luka developing to the level of shooter where you’d consider him over Tatum. To reiterate, this is just assessing offense. As complete players I don’t think it is close anymore.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,240
I’m not even sure that the view that Luka is a more impactful offensive player is right. Tatum is a much better shooter, takes care of the ball better, and is starting to meaningfully close the gap on passing ability (recognizing that was a big gap and he’s unlikely to ever be Luka’s equal as a creator). If you forced me to choose between them on pure offense today, I think I’d pick Tatum because if you give me all the improvements Tatum has already made and a return to form shooting, he’s probably already better. Looking forward, I also now see Tatum as likely to build a meaningful lead over Luka. A year ago I would’ve bet the other way, that Luka was more likely to improve his shooting meaningfully than Tatum was to improve everything else about his offensive game. At this point, I think the smarter bet is on Tatum continuing to develop into a borderline elite playmaker v. Luka developing to the level of shooter where you’d consider him over Tatum. To reiterate, this is just assessing offense. As complete players I don’t think it is close anymore.
Yup, well put. I'm like you--didn't expect Tatum to close the gap with Luka on offense during their careers barring some crazy 3-point shooting, but he has.

As always, never bet against Jayson Tatum. It's ridiculous how much he improves each year.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,528
around the way
I’m not even sure that the view that Luka is a more impactful offensive player is right. Tatum is a much better shooter, takes care of the ball better, and is starting to meaningfully close the gap on passing ability (recognizing that was a big gap and he’s unlikely to ever be Luka’s equal as a creator). If you forced me to choose between them on pure offense today, I think I’d pick Tatum because if you give me all the improvements Tatum has already made and a return to form shooting, he’s probably already better. Looking forward, I also now see Tatum as likely to build a meaningful lead over Luka. A year ago I would’ve bet the other way, that Luka was more likely to improve his shooting meaningfully than Tatum was to improve everything else about his offensive game. At this point, I think the smarter bet is on Tatum continuing to develop into a borderline elite playmaker v. Luka developing to the level of shooter where you’d consider him over Tatum. To reiterate, this is just assessing offense. As complete players I don’t think it is close anymore.
This is well said. I would absolutely choose Tatum over Doncic now even just offensively. His trend is glorious. But those who have Luka as more impactful offensively this year to date aren’t crazy.

Yup, well put. I'm like you--didn't expect Tatum to close the gap with Luka on offense during their careers barring some crazy 3-point shooting, but he has.

As always, never bet against Jayson Tatum. It's ridiculous how much he improves each year.
Agreed. He's a machine and now as confident as anyone.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,328
Lynn
I know I’ve been told the sample isn’t the largest, but we just destroy teams when Tatum is on the court, almost regardless of who he shares the court with.

With Tatum on the court without any of the other starters, they have a +17.7 net rating, in 164 minutes. With Tatum on the court without Smart/Rob/Jaylen, the team has +14.6 net rating, and it’s 331 minutes. This tweet was from before yesterdays game, would make the differential 542.

View: https://twitter.com/itsbrianbarrett/status/1502289994802778130?s=20&t=LUL8CRXWtiFO-1AF73hvnw
 
Last edited:

slamminsammya

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
9,423
San Francisco
Luka has also yet to demonstrate the ability to operate in an offense besides one where he is the chief operator. In that way he is maybe similar to Lebron - if you have him on your team, you are sort of locked into a system where everything flows through him (its possible he is adaptable). In Tatum's case however, we have seen him growing as the main guy these past two years but also seen that he can excel sharing the initiation responsibilities like when good Kemba was here in 2019.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,618
Luka has also yet to demonstrate the ability to operate in an offense besides one where he is the chief operator. In that way he is maybe similar to Lebron - if you have him on your team, you are sort of locked into a system where everything flows through him (its possible he is adaptable). In Tatum's case however, we have seen him growing as the main guy these past two years but also seen that he can excel sharing the initiation responsibilities like when good Kemba was here in 2019.
That’s a great point and is extremely underrated when building a team.

Zach Lowe calls this being “an amplifier”. I think in 2022, Tatum has taken a MASSIVE step forward in amplifying his teammates abilities. Having a true superstar capable of doing that is priceless.

Also, I think that’s something that POBOBS has really done a great job at, worlds better than Ainge and I’m an Ainge fan. DA seemed to only care about collecting assets and talent whereas Brad is getting players in who can actually work with and adapt to the JayLords
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,754
Saint Paul, MN
If Tatum is not all-defense, the award is a joke.
I wouldn't go that far. There are only 4 forward spots and the first team is gonna be Giannis and Draymond I would think. Then there is whole lot of guys battling for the second team. Tatum is for sure in that mix and helps that Kawhi and George are dead. But there is Butler and Jackson Jr and Mobley and Thybulle (if he is classified as a SF). Maybe Herb Jones too?
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,693
We are dancing around the fact that Jayson Tatum is pretty awesome at basketball and trying to define what that means. In short, Jayson Tatum is awesome and still improving.

More to the point, we are now at the juncture of development where this team's ceiling this season and beyond is defined by Tatum's ceiling. We are finally there imo.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,328
Lynn
Doncic leads the NBA while being double-teamed an average of 18.4 times per game (or 31.3 percent of his total possessions), according to the NBA’s CourtOptix tracking data. The Mavericks average 1.16 points per possession in those instances.

Tatum is tied for 10th this season while being double teamed 14.2 times per game (or 30.4 percent of his offensive touches). The Celtics average the same 1.16 points per possession as the Mavericks do with Doncic.

Among the most double-teamed players in the league, only a handful are better than Tatum and Doncic at making opponents pay. Reigning MVP Giannis Antetokounmpo -- with all the shooting around him in Milwaukee -- averages 1.24 points per double-teamed possession. Among the top 20 -- the only data that the NBA makes publicly available at the moment -- only Bradley Beal (1.25) had a better mark.
https://www.nbcsports.com/boston/celtics/celtics-need-make-teams-pay-jayson-tatum-attention
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Last 24: 35.5 mpg, .492/.394/.878, 29.7 points, 7.7 rebounds, 4.9 assists, 2.5 TO.

Up to .443/.344/.854 shooting and at a career high .512 from 2.
His low point of the season was .416/.311/.841 after game 43.

If he finishes the next 11 games shooting .394 from 3 on 8.6 3PA/G, he will finish the year at .351 from 3. Not great, but not .311.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,783
Tatum upped his 3 point percentage from .337 to .344 in the first half of the Kings game. Plus two threes were wiped out due to offensive fouls. It was the most confident he ever shot the ball from three, like he was in the gym by himself, totally confident that the ball was going in.

Tatum shot 41% from three with 86% of those makes assisted his rookie year, on lower volume. He’s at 57% assisted this season. Self generated threes are tougher to hit at a high percentage than catch and shoot threes when open. Of the seven players ahead of JT in the scoring race, only one, Trae Young, self generates threes at a higher rate, hitting at 38% with only 28% of them assisted, which is remarkable.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Tatum upped his 3 point percentage from .337 to .344 in the first half of the Kings game. Plus two threes were wiped out due to offensive fouls. It was the most confident he ever shot the ball from three, like he was in the gym by himself, totally confident that the ball was going in.

Tatum shot 41% from three with 86% of those makes assisted his rookie year, on lower volume. He’s at 57% assisted this season. Self generated threes are tougher to hit at a high percentage than catch and shoot threes when open. Of the seven players ahead of JT in the scoring race, only one, Trae Young, self generates threes at a higher rate, hitting at 38% with only 28% of them assisted, which is remarkable.
Tatum's 3rd year: 54.5% assisted, .394, 7.5 3PA/36, 7.1 3PA/G
Tatum last year: 46.5% assisted, .386. 7.6 3PA/36. 7.6 3PA/G
This year, as noted: 57.1% assisted, .344. 8.6 3PA/36, 8.5 3PA/G

It wasn't an issue before this season. It hasn't been an issue for about the last 3rd (24 of 67 games) of this season either. The 24 game stretch started on 1/23. Marcus Smart also returned on 1/23. Since returning, he has been hitting 38.4% of his 3s and averaging 6.3 assists. I'm sure that's not the entire reason Tatum is shooting better, but I'm guessing good shooting Marcus helps a lot.. In previous years, the C's always had a good shooting PG (KI, Kemba). It doesn't hurt that Al Horford also decided to start shooting well right when MS returned

Prior to 1/23: .449/.285/.862 4.2 3PA/G
1/23 to now: .458/.373/.783, 3.6 3PA/G

Brown has struggled though
Prior to 1/23: .456/.358/.788, 7.7 3PA/G
1/23 to now: .467/.313/.714, 6.5 3PA/G

Back to Tatum, even with the career low 3 point %, he's tied his 2nd best TS% at .567. It's also better relative to the league than it was 2 seasons ago (barely, .565 to .561). Last year, was his career high at .576. League was at .572 tho. Kind of remarkable how close to league average he has been the last 3 seasons, and his career as a whole (.568 to .564).
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,240
Tatum's 3rd year: 54.5% assisted, .394, 7.5 3PA/36, 7.1 3PA/G
Tatum last year: 46.5% assisted, .386. 7.6 3PA/36. 7.6 3PA/G
This year, as noted: 57.1% assisted, .344. 8.6 3PA/36, 8.5 3PA/G

It wasn't an issue before this season. It hasn't been an issue for about the last 3rd (24 of 67 games) of this season either. The 24 game stretch started on 1/23. Marcus Smart also returned on 1/23. Since returning, he has been hitting 38.4% of his 3s and averaging 6.3 assists. I'm sure that's not the entire reason Tatum is shooting better, but I'm guessing good shooting Marcus helps a lot.. In previous years, the C's always had a good shooting PG (KI, Kemba). It doesn't hurt that Al Horford also decided to start shooting well right when MS returned

Prior to 1/23: .449/.285/.862 4.2 3PA/G
1/23 to now: .458/.373/.783, 3.6 3PA/G

Brown has struggled though
Prior to 1/23: .456/.358/.788, 7.7 3PA/G
1/23 to now: .467/.313/.714, 6.5 3PA/G

Back to Tatum, even with the career low 3 point %, he's tied his 2nd best TS% at .567. It's also better relative to the league than it was 2 seasons ago (barely, .565 to .561). Last year, was his career high at .576. League was at .572 tho. Kind of remarkable how close to league average he has been the last 3 seasons, and his career as a whole (.568 to .564).
I wonder whether getting Tatum out of the post and getting more of his 3s in the spots/rhythm he would take them in 2019-2021 helps. The way they use him now, initiating the offense and passing to a PG out of doubles, leaves him one-on-one in comfortable self-generated 3 situations more often.

Earlier in the year, playing out of the post, he was getting decent assisted looks from 3 (and more assisted chances than past few years) but missing a lot of them. There's something to be said for running an offense that is both more threatening to the defense, and gets Tatum the rhythm on 3s he likes.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,328
Lynn
The Tatum without any other starter out there lineups are approaching 200 minutes, they have a net rating of +22.96 in those minutes, with a 125 offensive rating.

So far in 2022…
The Celtics offensive rating w/ Tatum ON the floor: 118.6
The Celtics offensive rating w/ Tatum OFF the floor: 103.8

That net difference (14.8) is greater than the difference (13.1) between the current #1 offense and the current #30 offense in the NBA.

Next highest difference in ON/OFF offensive rating on the team is Smart at 6.0.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,382
Santa Monica
The Tatum without any other starter out there lineups are approaching 200 minutes, they have a net rating of +22.96 in those minutes, with a 125 offensive rating.

So far in 2022…
The Celtics offensive rating w/ Tatum ON the floor: 118.6
The Celtics offensive rating w/ Tatum OFF the floor: 103.8

That net difference (14.8) is greater than the difference (13.1) between the current #1 offense and the current #30 offense in the NBA.

Next highest difference in ON/OFF offensive rating on the team is Smart at 6.0.
we are seeing that Brad doesn't need to go ALL IN for a 3rd banana-like Beal or Lillard this Summer

just surround the JAYLords with high-end defense-first role players like Smart, White, Horford, Grant

Less turnovers/halfcourt clamp down D

Tatum Top5 NBA player by 2023 2022 Playoffs is in play.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,783
The one remaining thing that is needed for Tatum to be a Top 5 player is for him to be reffed like a Top 5 player.
 

PedrosRedGlove

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 5, 2005
670
He's getting there slowly. Thirteenth in the league with 6.2 FTA/g this year, up from 27th and 33rd the last 2 years.

With that it seems like his temperament with the refs has improved, I think how quickly he started whining emphatically when not getting superstar treatment may have hurt him a little in terms of winning the refs' favor. He's still vocal with them, but seems to be more level-headed, going about it like you'd expect a captain of a team too, not just flailing his arms in disgust at non-calls.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,528
around the way
The one remaining thing that is needed for Tatum to be a Top 5 player is for him to be reffed like a Top 5 player.
This is absolutely true, and agreed with PRG that he's making progress there. Some of it he controls, and some of it is league rep. The latter lags the former of course.

The way that he's getting to the rim at will, as his shot comes around, it almost doesn't matter.