I think it's a bit of a semantic argument. We clearly have different definitions of "one-dimensional". Mine is far more simple. If a RB isn't a threat to catch a pass, then I view him as one-dimensional. Doesn't matter to me if he's more dynamic as a runner than an Antowain Smith type back. When Damien Harris is in, teams know they don't have to really cover him out of the backfield. That doesn't mean that he doesn't have value in a variety of running formations, which he clearly does.
If Rhamondre can become a bigger threat out of the backfield, then that's something the Pats haven't really had in a lead back since, I dunno, Dion Lewis?
