That's what happens when you settle for FGs and drop your chances at INTs.GB is going to lose after basically dominating this game.
Yeah, but you can risk San Fran going 70 yards with no timeouts and a minute to have time if needed imo.they need a TD, SF has 3 timeouts, so you don't want it to be so much time that you get the stop then need to punt and give them another chance at it.
Yup. I posted after that 2nd FG they would regret that.That's what happens when you settle for FGs and drop your chances at INTs.
Didnt you hear? You can trade in unused time outs for pointsWell those time outs aren’t going to call themselves
Well if they took the FG in the first half instead of trying for it.........That's what happens when you settle for FGs and drop your chances at INTs.
Belichick says the opposite: it’s better to have less time and more timeouts than more time and fewer timeouts.GB def should have called TO before that play.
But no chance SF should have taken a knee at the 1. They were down 4!
If they just win 2 out of every 3 playoff games they will be fine.Thriller in Manila (as close to Manila as you can get for the NFL)..
The Ryland Way is to hit one when you least expect it.Got a feeling we're going see an epic missed FG coming up.