This is the problem with trying to limit possessions against the Chiefs. Their scoring drives only take two minutes anyway. Yikes they are scary.who said 34- 10 counting after half? Try 41
The Pats may lose, but they sure as hell will draw up a better defensive gameplan than this crap.Man the Patriots are gonna have a massive problem with these Chiefs. They're so good.
I doubt it.Sucks that the Chiefs starters will probably get the whole 4th quarter off.
Them and every other team in the league.Man the Patriots are gonna have a massive problem with these Chiefs. They're so good.
Butker thought he made itAre we sure that kick went wide left?
And commentators were too busy with a stupid anecdote to make any comment.That looked good.
Oh, that’s easy. He has one of the greatest QBs to ever play the game. Covers up some time management gaffesHow did Andy Reid ever win a Super Bowl?
He has a strange gait for an athlete of his caliber, and he’s shown a penchant for seeming more injured than he is (I don’t think it is intentional), so I think it’s a nothingburger.Mahomes limping?
ESPN will always be second rate.And commentators were too busy with a stupid anecdote to make any comment.
is he a Big Ben fan.He has a strange gait for an athlete of his caliber, and he’s shown a penchant for seeming more injured than he is (I don’t think it is intentional), so I think it’s a nothingburger.
Hard to tell but the refs stand right under the upright so in theory should have the best look.Are we sure that kick went wide left?
Don't you just need a sliver of the ball being at the outer edge of the upright? IOW, you don't need to have the whole ball inside the whole upright. I could be wrong about that.Hard to tell but the refs stand right under the upright so in theory should have the best look.
edit: to be clear, I mean, the production/broadcast team, not replay as in instant replay.It seemed like the replay booth thought maybe that FG was good. Two angles I saw told me the same thing.
I think that’s right that is why ref looking straight up probably has the right callDon't you just need a sliver of the ball being at the outer edge of the upright? IOW, you don't need to have the whole ball inside the whole upright. I could be wrong about that.
Whole ball needs to be inside the outer edge of the upright.Don't you just need a sliver of the ball being at the outer edge of the upright? IOW, you don't need to have the whole ball inside the whole upright. I could be wrong about that.
Are all FG’s subject to review? I’m not sure.It seemed like the replay booth thought maybe that FG was good. Two angles I saw told me the same thing.
I might have missed him, but it seemed like Kelce wasn't playing the last 5-6 minutes of the half.Sucks that the Chiefs starters will probably get the whole 4th quarter off.
I don’t know why anyone ever says this. No one is built to come back from huge deficitsRavens offense is not built to come back from a 17 point deficit.
ESPN did show a replay. The commentators were too busy with a stupid anecdote about getting home on the bus after a game.I’m guessing a review would prove it no good. Just annoyed ESPN didnt show a replay.
I think only very limited review. You can’t review whether the ball crosses the goal plane but I think can review whether it touches something beyond the goal.Are all FG’s subject to review? I’m not sure.
Thanks.To close the loop ball over upright not reviewable.
Item 3. Field Goal or Try Attempt. Whether a field goal or Try attempt crossed above the crossbar and inside the uprights is reviewable, but only if the ball crosses the plane of the goal post below the top of the uprights, or if the ball touches anything