Celtics vs. Nets, Round 1 Discussion

Who is your preferred opponent?

  • Cavs - I want an easy sweep

    Votes: 125 74.9%
  • Nets - I want to end their season / I like competitive basketball / DRAMA!!

    Votes: 42 25.1%

  • Total voters
    167
  • Poll closed .

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,153
I expect the Nets will come out with a ton of energy in game three, feed on the home crowd and shoot the ball well while the Celtics go cold. I won’t be surprised if they win the game by a large margin. I will be glad to be wrong.
 

The Mort Report

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 5, 2007
7,002
Concord
I expect the Nets will come out with a ton of energy in game three, feed on the home crowd and shoot the ball well while the Celtics go cold. I won’t be surprised if they win the game by a large margin. I will be glad to be wrong.
I agree this will happen in the first 5ish minutes of game time, but like game 2 I expect the C’s to stay the course, play their game and end up making it a game by Q4
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,770
The Celtics are due to start out a game hot. If they can put an early run on the Nets, they might get them to fold.
 

The Social Chair

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 17, 2010
6,102
I expect the Nets will come out with a ton of energy in game three, feed on the home crowd and shoot the ball well while the Celtics go cold. I won’t be surprised if they win the game by a large margin. I will be glad to be wrong.
+ a bunch of ticky tack fouls on the Celtics in the first half.
 

Philip Jeff Frye

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 23, 2001
10,283
I agree this will happen in the first 5ish minutes of game time, but like game 2 I expect the C’s to stay the course, play their game and end up making it a game by Q4
If they find themselves in a big hole like they did Wednesday night, its going to be a lot harder to dig themselves out of it on the road.
 

k-factory

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2005
1,862
seattle, wa
If they find themselves in a big hole like they did Wednesday night, its going to be a lot harder to dig themselves out of it on the road.
It’s Brooklyn though. There will be a lot of C’s fans there.

From a physical endurance standpoint the C’s have proved they can outlast the Nets and they don’t quit while the Nets have looked tired in both games. So no lead seems out of reach.

From a mental standpoint it sure seems this Nets team is on the verge of collapse. So much of the game is breaking the other team’s will and one team is brimming with confidence and the other seems lost so we’re close if not there already. I would be very surprised to see the Nets break out a big lead to be honest and more surprised to see them keep it.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,661
Melrose, MA
I expect the Nets will come out with a ton of energy in game three, feed on the home crowd and shoot the ball well while the Celtics go cold. I won’t be surprised if they win the game by a large margin. I will be glad to be wrong.
If they find themselves in a big hole like they did Wednesday night, its going to be a lot harder to dig themselves out of it on the road.
It’s Brooklyn though. There will be a lot of C’s fans there.

From a physical endurance standpoint the C’s have proved they can outlast the Nets and they don’t quit while the Nets have looked tired in both games. So no lead seems out of reach.
I think k-factory has the right of this. Brooklyn may win game 3, but they have not yet shown themselves capable of sustaining the effort-level needed to beat the Celtics for the full 48 and I am not sure there is any reason to expect that to change.

Brooklyn might take this one, but I do not foresee a blowout.
 

mikeford

woolwich!
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2006
29,656
St John's, NL
We know Kyrie is a quitter so if the Celtics could get off to a fast and sustained start (say up 15 at the end of the first or something), I could see the Nets completely wilting and leaving it to Durant to just do everything.
 

TrapperAB

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 25, 2002
3,061
West Hartford, CT
I’ll be interested to see how the start of Game 3 is officiated — not just because Durant is likely to get the early whistles given the physicality of Boston’s defense (which is wearing Durant down and contributing to his second half shooting woes), but because Tatum is getting bodied pretty hard, too. In Game 2, seemed pretty obvious that Brooklyn’s scheme was to double Tatum and be physical about it. Tatum did a good job passing out of it, but still wasn’t having a great shooting game (which made that dagger three in the fourth all the more impressive).

If the refs decide to call a tighter game, and they’re at all equitable about it, then Tatum should be going to the line a lot, too. Not as much as Durant, maybe, but it should still be a parade. And a whole lotta guys on both teams will be in foul trouble.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,661
Melrose, MA
I’ll be interested to see how the start of Game 3 is officiated — not just because Durant is likely to get the early whistles given the physicality of Boston’s defense (which is wearing Durant down and contributing to his second half shooting woes), but because Tatum is getting bodied pretty hard, too. In Game 2, seemed pretty obvious that Brooklyn’s scheme was to double Tatum and be physical about it. Tatum did a good job passing out of it, but still wasn’t having a great shooting game (which made that dagger three in the fourth all the more impressive).

If the refs decide to call a tighter game, and they’re at all equitable about it, then Tatum should be going to the line a lot, too. Not as much as Durant, maybe, but it should still be a parade. And a whole lotta guys on both teams will be in foul trouble.
It is not like they have been calling a loose game so far. The real question is whether they call a "look at Durant the wrong way and it is a foul" game.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,540
It is not like they have been calling a loose game so far. The real question is whether they call a "look at Durant the wrong way and it is a foul" game.
This makes sense. The Nets are "physical" as a substitute for overall great defense. The Celtics play overall great defense and are playing more "physical than usual." The only way this goes south is if only one team is allowed to play "physcial." I dont think the Nets can play above-average defense without committing fouls.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
8,232
The person that would be nice to get going a bit more would be Derrick White. Terrible foul trouble in Game 2, but also wasn't much of a factor in Game 1, either. I think the chances of it happening are pretty much zero, but would be interesting to start White instead of Theis to throw a different look at the Nets and try and get him going (I feel like White's been in sort of a slump since like his second week here). Starting White is difficult because of the timing on when you rest Smart - so as I said, extremely unlikely Ime goes away from the double big approach that he has used pretty much the whole season.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,656
I’ll be interested to see how the start of Game 3 is officiated — not just because Durant is likely to get the early whistles given the physicality of Boston’s defense (which is wearing Durant down and contributing to his second half shooting woes), but because Tatum is getting bodied pretty hard, too. In Game 2, seemed pretty obvious that Brooklyn’s scheme was to double Tatum and be physical about it. Tatum did a good job passing out of it, but still wasn’t having a great shooting game (which made that dagger three in the fourth all the more impressive).

If the refs decide to call a tighter game, and they’re at all equitable about it, then Tatum should be going to the line a lot, too. Not as much as Durant, maybe, but it should still be a parade. And a whole lotta guys on both teams will be in foul trouble.
Durant had 20 free throws last game. How many more can he realistically have? 30? 40?
 

TrapperAB

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 25, 2002
3,061
West Hartford, CT
Durant had 20 free throws last game. How many more can he realistically have? 30? 40?
If the refs/league decide that there were a lot of uncalled fouls despite KD’s 20 free throw attempts (and there’s a lot of footage from Game 2 where KD was abused attempting to go through screens), maybe Dwight Howard should worry about his record (39)…

Not really, of course — the list of most FTA is dominated by guys who were sent to the line for good reason (Howard, Chamberlain). But could Adrian Dantley’s mark of 31 (highest number for someone who could actually shoot free throws) be at risk? You betcha.

As @joe dokes said above, this is only a problem if the refs blow the whistle for only one team/one player. If they want to get the players to dial down the physical play, the refs are going to have to call Nets players for their equally aggressive approach to Tatum. Will they? I’m a jaded skeptic, so I doubt it.
 

Red Averages

owes you $50
SoSH Member
Apr 20, 2003
9,140
I think the foul concern is more if you see Tatum, Jaylen or Al pick up 2 or 3 in the first quarter more so than the free throw attempts.
 

BillMuellerFanClub

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
1,390
Have they reported the ref assignments for game 3? Expecting Tony Brothers or Scott Foster - hopefully both to take them out of the running for game 4.
 

djbayko

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
25,939
Los Angeles, CA
Durant had 20 free throws last game. How many more can he realistically have? 30? 40?
They could call a tighter game, resulting in more fouls earlier, which would cause the Celtics to have to be more careful down the stretch. The number of fouls doesn't have to be drastically different in order for there to be a significant impact.
 

Kliq

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 31, 2013
22,796
I cannot think of a more useless expenditure of energy than worrying about who the specific refs are going to be, and how the league is going to RIG the game to favor the Nets.
 

Red Averages

owes you $50
SoSH Member
Apr 20, 2003
9,140
I cannot think of a more useless expenditure of energy than worrying about who the specific refs are going to be, and how the league is going to RIG the game to favor the Nets.
In spite of all the data supporting it?
 

Light-Tower-Power

ask me about My Pillow
SoSH Member
Jun 14, 2013
16,006
Nashua, NH
I cannot think of a more useless expenditure of energy than worrying about who the specific refs are going to be, and how the league is going to RIG the game to favor the Nets.
I agree that the rigging angle is dumb but I would like a more experienced crew than we got on Wednesday, and I think we do.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,301
Santa Monica
I cannot think of a more useless expenditure of energy than worrying about who the specific refs are going to be, and how the league is going to RIG the game to favor the Nets.
and we're just the crowd that will expend that energy

half the game threads are dedicated to blown calls, ref bias, relitigating the whistles
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,296
Lynn
View: https://twitter.com/TheAthletic/status/1517859540997451777?s=20&t=t1NvAouZOworiGcCI2qwqw

Eastern Conference scout

You’ve got the best defensive team in the league. … They’re equipped to deal with Durant and Kyrie (Irving) probably better than most. Then you look at their physical makeup. Marcus Smart is built like a fucking linebacker. (Jayson) Tatum and (Jaylen) Brown both are so much bigger and stronger. They’re not the guys they were two, three years ago. … Those are physical monsters.

Then you get to Al Horford, who’s always been built like Adonis. And then Robert Williams, who’s not even playing in this series, but who is just a monster now and had gotten a lot bigger and filled out and matured since his early years. (Williams, who tore his meniscus in late March, could play in Game 3 or 4.) (So) they are monsters, right? They’re all big. They’re all strong and long. They can all guard multiple positions. Then, because they’re all so big and strong and physical, they can all switch everything and hand off guys to the next guy. There’s no disadvantage. Even without Robert Williams, they were built for this type of matchup.

You look at that starting lineup, and there’s not one weak link defensively. I’d say all five of those guys are ranked probably in the top 25 defenders in the league, or certainly in the top 50. And so you’ve got five guys who are all above-average defenders and physical specimens on top of it.
But I also don’t think what we’re witnessing is vintage Durant. And what we are witnessing is Tatum and Brown and that group entering their prime, whereas (Durant) is on the back end of the prime. Those guys are not chopped liver, man. I mean, I’ll tell you right now, obviously, I think most people think if you (evaluate) his career that Durant is a better player than (the 24-year-old) Tatum. I mean, if nothing else, it’s the track record. But if you gave me a choice of which one I would take from this point forward, it’s not even close to me. … To me, if you’re watching the game and you didn’t know who these guys were, I’m not watching Durant (and saying), “That’s the best player on the floor.” I’m not so sure Tatum’s not (the best).
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,146
and we're just the crowd that will expend that energy

half the game threads are dedicated to blown calls, ref bias, relitigating the whistles
And at the end of the day, with the exception of completely egregious screwjobs like Kings-Lakers, it doesn't affect the eventual champion.

The Celtics are getting called for a lot of fouls on Kevin Durant because they're fouling him a lot. It's part of an effective strategy to beat him up over the course of 1 game and a series. But you're going to hear whistles when you go with that strategy.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,729
Saint Paul, MN
The Celtics are getting called for a lot of fouls on Kevin Durant because they're fouling him a lot. It's part of an effective strategy to beat him up over the course of 1 game and a series. But you're going to hear whistles when you go with that strategy.
This. There are always going to be some ticky tack fouls (Horford's #6 on Brown for instance) but the Celtics were committing a foul on Durant just about every time down the floor.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,301
Santa Monica
There is always going to be bodying up/touching. The longer, stronger, more athletic player that is committed to defense will always be at a huge advantage to the shrimpy, less committed defender.

Trae Young puts his hands or body on the opposing PG most every trip down. But a good offensive player can easily play through it. Now when Marcus Smart puts his mitts or barrel chest on you it's like moving through a cement pillar.

I'm not sure the Celtics foul that much more than other teams.

I think its a cop-out to say physical defense = more fouls

At least that should be the narrative ;)
 
Last edited:

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,723
You look at that starting lineup, and there’s not one weak link defensively. I’d say all five of those guys are ranked probably in the top 25 defenders in the league, or certainly in the top 50. And so you’ve got five guys who are all above-average defenders and physical specimens on top of it.
Thanks for posting.

It's amazing to me that Jaylen Brown - who is off the charts athletically and in this series is tasked with guarding KI straight up at time, chasing around Curry and Mills, going mano-a-mano against KD, and guarding bigs like Drummond and Claxton and keeping them off the boards (JB had a couple of key rebounds down the stretch in G2) is considered the "worst" defender of the Cs starting five. Particularly on a lot of teams he might be considered the best defender.

I know at the beginning of the year people were pointing out that JB sometimes fell asleep on defense or missed rotations. That's not happening very much these days if at all.

Amazing what happens when you put five of the best 25-50 defenders in the NBA together, they might really be able to shut down opponents.

The starting 5 when TL is in reminds me of the 2000 Ravens.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,481
Thanks for posting.

It's amazing to me that Jaylen Brown - who is off the charts athletically and in this series is tasked with guarding KI straight up at time, chasing around Curry and Mills, going mano-a-mano against KD, and guarding bigs like Drummond and Claxton and keeping them off the boards (JB had a couple of key rebounds down the stretch in G2) is considered the "worst" defender of the Cs starting five. Particularly on a lot of teams he might be considered the best defender.

I know at the beginning of the year people were pointing out that JB sometimes fell asleep on defense or missed rotations. That's not happening very much these days if at all.

Amazing what happens when you put five of the best 25-50 defenders in the NBA together, they might really be able to shut down opponents.

The starting 5 when TL is in reminds me of the 2000 Ravens.
Is it possible the scheme is helping cover for some of Jaylen’s defensive shortcomings? He is known for falling asleep a bit, missing a rotation, etc, but to my eye the way this switching/handoff scheme works seems to actually simplify things a bit. A lot of little decisions to make, but easier and more clearly defined decisions because it’s really about everyone being able to cover anyone and winning individual matchups all over the floor, which is better for JB’s skillset on D.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,296
Lynn
Is it possible the scheme is helping cover for some of Jaylen’s defensive shortcomings? He is known for falling asleep a bit, missing a rotation, etc, but to my eye the way this switching/handoff scheme works seems to actually simplify things a bit. A lot of little decisions to make, but easier and more clearly defined decisions because it’s really about everyone being able to cover anyone and winning individual matchups all over the floor, which is better for JB’s skillset on D.
It’s the perfect defensive scheme for Jaylen.
 

the moops

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 19, 2016
4,729
Saint Paul, MN
No kidding. It's his 5th year, he's made 3 all-star teams, he's played in over 50 playoff games. Nothing Tatum is doing right now should be surprising to someone who watches NBA games for a living.
I can understand when he is talking about in context of covering Durant though. Nobody blocks Durant's midrange or bothers his shot as much as Tatum did these past two games. That is shocking
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,301
Santa Monica
It’s the perfect defensive scheme for Jaylen.
That last game was one of Jaylen's best defensive games ever.

It seemed like he helped and stripped KD 3x. Turning them into offensive transition baskets

IMEs attention to detail and accountability has tightened things up all season
 

BostonFanInCanesLand

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 16, 2011
1,965
Watching the Celtics pour their souls into defense is so rewarding as a fan. It makes me nostalgic for the days when college teams improved every year and the NCAA tournament was chock a block with games where an experienced team willed themselves to victory through a complete belief and commitment to the concept of preventing the other team from getting to do anything by choice.

Ime and staff must be excited by the prospect of folding TimeLord back into the mix - they’ve learned a lot about the rest of the team in his absence.

I’m not worried about how hard the Nets punch in game three. It’s coming and the Celtics will absorb, deflect and counter-attack.

The Nets are dead men walking, they just don’t know it yet (Well no. 11 has an inkling and even said it out loud).
 

bigq

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
11,153
Hard to believe that in game three of the same two teams matched up in last year's playoffs the Celtics top eight by minutes played was:

Tatum
Smart
Fournier
Walker
Thompson
Langford
G Williams
Nesmith

Having Jaylen Brown back is a huge. Moving on from Fournier, Walker, Thompson and Langford and bringing in Horford, White and Theis is a dramatic improvement.

Edit - forgot to mention that Rob Williams’ development this year has been a game changer.
 
Last edited:

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,661
Melrose, MA
I've been thinking more about Ben Simmons since this - even though I'm still skeptical we see him at all.

On offense, he fits best if the Nets play him with Durant and 3 guards. Then he can either handle the ball or go to the dunker spot. If they play him with Durant, Claxton/Drummond, and 2 guards, one of whom is Bruce Brown, then the Celtics can focus their defense on stopping the drive and the 2 shooters (Durant and KI) - but in that scenario Simmons is a liability when he is off ball, and both Durant and KI like to handle the ball.

On defense he's simply an asset no matter what the lineup.
 

worm0082

Penbis
SoSH Member
Sep 19, 2002
4,501
Do even any of Simmons teammates on the Nets want him to be there? If I was on the team I wouldn’t. You made no effort to help and your stalling as long as possible. We made it this far, I’d rather lose without you than win with you.
 

RorschachsMask

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2011
5,296
Lynn
Nets got it down to 4 with 7 minutes to go. From that point on, Tatum went 5-5 for 14 points, 2 assists, 3 rebounds, and a steal.