2023 Broncos: Payton’s Place

amfox1

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2003
6,834
The back of your computer
I hate the Broncos but this is BS and their fans should be pissed off. They still have a chance to make the playoffs; they need help but the teams in front of them have been struggling (Chiefs, Steelers) or just aren't very good / have key injuries (AFC South). And the reasoning is to save the possibility of having to guarantee his salary next year? Am I missing something?
Wilson has an additional $37mm that becomes guaranteed if he can’t pass a physical by early March.

EDIT: Wilson will count $35.4mm in dead cap money in 2024 and $49.6mm in 2025, once he is cut (by the 5th day of the new league year)
 
Last edited:

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,639
02130
Wilson has an additional $37mm that becomes guaranteed if he can’t pass a physical by early March.

EDIT: Wilson will count $35.4mm in dead cap money in 2024 and $49.6mm in 2025, once he is cut (by the 5th day of the new league year)
Right, I read this as well. They are giving up on the playoffs this year on the off chance that the guy who played at least 15 games in 12 straight seasons can't pass a physical next March.

The tiebreakers are unfavorable but again, the teams in front of them are not especially good. If they win out, it is not too difficult to pick plausible scenarios where they make the playoffs:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/upshot/denver-broncos-nfl-playoff-picture.html#&

It's bullshit.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,910
Right, I read this as well. They are giving up on the playoffs this year on the off chance that the guy who played at least 15 games in 12 straight seasons can't pass a physical next March.

The tiebreakers are unfavorable but again, the teams in front of them are not especially good. If they win out, it is not too difficult to pick plausible scenarios where they make the playoffs:
https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/upshot/denver-broncos-nfl-playoff-picture.html#&

It's bullshit.
Seems like the smart long term move if Wilson isn’t in their plans.
 

LoLsapien

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 5, 2022
199
I am terrible at understanding NFL salaries even when staring right at the Spotrac. So if the Broncos trade Wilson in the off-season, after not paying the injury guarantee, the Broncos pay the remaining bonus, and new team pays the annual salary? And the dead-cap is the guaranteed portion of the salary and becomes fully the burden to the new team?
 

E5 Yaz

polka king
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 25, 2002
90,697
Oregon
I am terrible at understanding NFL salaries even when staring right at the Spotrac. So if the Broncos trade Wilson in the off-season, after not paying the injury guarantee, the Broncos pay the remaining bonus, and new team pays the annual salary? And the dead-cap is the guaranteed portion of the salary and becomes fully the burden to the new team?
ESPN has an explainer
https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/39192143/denver-broncos-bench-russell-wilson-whats-next
 

amfox1

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2003
6,834
The back of your computer
It's bullshit.
According to the NFL, DEN has an 8% chance to make the playoffs. To win the division, DEN needs to win both & KC needs to lose both (to CIN & LAC).

To win a wild card is even more improbable because DEN loses most tiebreakers - for example, DEN would need all of the following to occur under one scenario: week 17, CIN over KC, LV over IND, SEA over PIT, CAR over JAX, TEN over HOU & week 18, MIA over BUF, BAL over PIT, CLE over CIN, KC over LAC, IND over HOU, TEN over JAX.
 

Seels

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
4,979
NH
I was one of the people who fervently argued that he was a hall of famer a few years ago. Man he's fallen off. Someone upthread mentioned he's been real good this year -- not really? Man has some of the emptiest stats ever, and passer rating doesn't reflect that he's continually one of the most sacked quarterbacks in history. In fact if he plays something resembling a full year next year, he's almost certainly going to breeze past Tarkenton. His career best sack % would be the worst of the career for really any other QB considered great except Aaron Rodgers.

Watch the Jets go after him.
 

j-man

Member
Dec 19, 2012
3,697
Arkansas
i dont disagree with moveing on but another bad choice by payton and the 85 million dead cap will be a killer peyton has always wanted to move on just the winning steak did not let him if it's not stdd next year then names to look at
is QB Mac jones NE only makes 2.7 mil james winton no sad danold sf
 

j-man

Member
Dec 19, 2012
3,697
Arkansas
what pissed me off is IF ne beats buff we are still in the playoff race

the best spot for a trade is
1 ATL
2 WASH
3 RAMS

if we just cut him the rams are the favs
 

j-man

Member
Dec 19, 2012
3,697
Arkansas
According to the NFL, DEN has an 8% chance to make the playoffs. To win the division, DEN needs to win both & KC needs to lose both (to CIN & LAC).

To win a wild card is even more improbable because DEN loses most tiebreakers - for example, DEN would need all of the following to occur under one scenario: week 17, CIN over KC, LV over IND, SEA over PIT, CAR over JAX, TEN over HOU & week 18, MIA over BUF, BAL over PIT, CLE over CIN, KC over LAC, IND over HOU, TEN over JAX.
foucs on this buff loses 2x den wins 2x
 

Seels

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
4,979
NH
Washington has no talent whatsoever and the Rams - is Stafford retiring?

Atlanta / Raiders
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,820
I wonder what Wilson will get on the open market as a FA. I know their offense has struggled, and last year was a catastrophe, but his stats are really solid:

297-447 (66.4%), 3,070 yds, 6.9 y/a, 26 td, 8 int, 98.0 rating

NFL ranks (qualified QBs)

Completion %: #10
Pass Yds: #18
Yds/Att: #21
Pass TD: #6
Pass INT: #14
Pass rating: #7

Heck, even as a team they rank #16 in scoring, which isn't great but it's not a disaster either. So it would be easy to look at this and say, obviously the guy can still play at a pretty high level. If he's cut, Denver takes the dead cap hit, and a new team only owes him for whatever they sign him for as a free agent.

He's no spring chicken (he's 35), so that's a factor. But wouldn't he get a nice 2-3 year contract from someone?
 

Justthetippett

New Member
Aug 9, 2015
2,528
I think any team that thinks Wilson is the answer to anything is going to be very disappointed. Those counting stats notwithstanding, the eye test (and sack/pressure rates) show a guy on the major decline from what he was. His current team is willing to eat a ton of money to show him the door. I’d be a hard no as a fan.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,639
02130
According to the NFL, DEN has an 8% chance to make the playoffs. To win the division, DEN needs to win both & KC needs to lose both (to CIN & LAC).

To win a wild card is even more improbable because DEN loses most tiebreakers - for example, DEN would need all of the following to occur under one scenario: week 17, CIN over KC, LV over IND, SEA over PIT, CAR over JAX, TEN over HOU & week 18, MIA over BUF, BAL over PIT, CLE over CIN, KC over LAC, IND over HOU, TEN over JAX.
Would Bill Belichick ever bench his best QB to potentially save money with an 8% chance at the playoffs? I actually can't believe anyone is defending this.

You also ignored the link I posted where there are plenty of reasonable scenarios that see them getting in to post the most "crazy" one.
 
Last edited:

MikeM

Member
SoSH Member
May 27, 2010
3,134
Florida
Watch the Jets go after him.
In a do over? As a Jets fan I would ultimately take a declining 35yo Rus with a fluffed up 2023 TD total and questionable underlying metrics over a declining 40yo Rodgers with a fluffed up 2022 TD total and questionable underlying metrics. Without even a hint of hesitation too once you factor in all surrounding concessions you won't have to make with Rus that you made with Rodgers. That ship has long sailed though.

I'm guessing he ends up in Atlanta given their low GFIN ready barrier coming out of the care bear division, and unlikely path to realistically trading into this year's top 3 draft class on QB even if they wanted to go that route. Plus the general feeling that Rus is probably too soft a personality fit to both gel with Tomlin and/or really sell all that well in the city of Pittsburgh.
 

amfox1

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2003
6,834
The back of your computer
You also ignored the link I posted where there are plenty of reasonable scenarios that see them getting in to post the most "crazy" one.
I didn't. The "reasonable" scenario is the division - 2 DEN wins, 2 KC losses. Type in "win the #7 seed" and then come back to me. Here's what I got - week 17, KC over CIN, LV over IND, SEA over PIT, NE over BUF, TEN over HOU & week 18, MIA over BUF, BAL over PIT, LAC over KC, JAX over TEN (an 11-game parlay, including 2 DEN wins)
 

MikeM

Member
SoSH Member
May 27, 2010
3,134
Florida
The above said I have always a fan of Payton and believe he's one of the better coaches in the league regardless of all the surrounding criticism.

Not a fan of this though. At all. Pretty dirty look just on player principle value. So color me not surprised when this decision is being re-visited a year from now, ala McDaniels, as something done in poor taste that potentially lingered with a bunch of guys in that locker room.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,408
Not a fan of this though. At all. Pretty dirty look just on player principle value. So color me not surprised when this decision is being re-visited a year from now, ala McDaniels, as something done in poor taste that potentially lingered with a bunch of guys in that locker room.
Considering how frequently teammates shit on Wilson and how Sean Payton had to tell him how to act like an actual human when he was hired, I'm not sure anyone is rushing to Russ's defense. If anything, I could see this move being really popular in the locker room, for both the offense and defense.
 

MikeM

Member
SoSH Member
May 27, 2010
3,134
Florida
Considering how frequently teammates shit on Wilson and how Sean Payton had to tell him how to act like an actual human when he was hired, I'm not sure anyone is rushing to Russ's defense. If anything, I could see this move being really popular in the locker room, for both the offense and defense.
I tend to think that context stuff has been greatly overblown in a mostly media driven narrative.

But again to me I'd see it just as much about a principle value line from the player vs ownership perspective this just totally crosses. You don't have to love or even like Russ to have an issue with seeing this happen to a fellow player. Not to mention the guy in that locker room who without question imo gives the team the best chance to win games. You can't even dress this up to supposedly be about winning.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,408
I tend to think that context stuff has been greatly overblown in a mostly media driven narrative.

But again to me I'd see it just as much about a principle value line from the player vs ownership perspective this just totally crosses. You don't have to love or even like Russ to have an issue with seeing this happen to a fellow player. Not to mention the guy in that locker room who without question imo gives the team the best chance to win games. You can't even dress this up to supposedly be about winning.
This is all fair, but I don't think it's just a media narrative. Richard Sherman couldn't wait to rip on Russell Wilson once he got on TV - it just feels like there's real animosity with the guy for being a fake. It's kind of the opposite of the Aaron Rodgers thing where we presume that his teammates dislike him because we dislike him, but then you see him on Hard Knocks and they all love the guy because he's one of them (whether we believe that act or not is another story altogether).

And I could see also maybe these guys wondering if Russ does give them the best chance to win games. Maybe they like Stidham in practice, maybe Stidham has better rapport with the receivers. IDK, could be that you're totally correct, but I just think there's a potential here that players on the team are actually on board with it because they think "F Russ, don't let him get his money, he's been a poison since he got here, good riddance."
 

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,488

j-man

Member
Dec 19, 2012
3,697
Arkansas
I didn't. The "reasonable" scenario is the division - 2 DEN wins, 2 KC losses. Type in "win the #7 seed" and then come back to me. Here's what I got - week 17, KC over CIN, LV over IND, SEA over PIT, NE over BUF, TEN over HOU & week 18, MIA over BUF, BAL over PIT, LAC over KC, JAX over TEN (an 11-game parlay, including 2 DEN wins)
all i did in the playoff was week 17 ne wins + den wins week 18 den wins + mia wins den is in yeah the div is the better chioce
 

j-man

Member
Dec 19, 2012
3,697
Arkansas
Tell you what:

Staple Jeudy and a first day pick to Wilson, and I'm cool with taking him.

Draft a QB, let him sit for a year under Wilson, and let's get this show on the road.
i wouild staple jeudy with him that wouild be a good idea to pair jerdy with him but denver does not have a round 2 pick
 

amfox1

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 6, 2003
6,834
The back of your computer
all i did in the playoff was week 17 ne wins + den wins week 18 den wins + mia wins den is in yeah the div is the better chioce
DEN (7-8) is a game behind PIT, CIN, JAX, IND and HOU (all 8-7) and tied with LV with two games to go. If DEN doesn't win the division, it has to beat out five of those six teams for the last playoff spot. Any playoff scenario that doesn't deal with any of these teams is not a serious one.
 

j-man

Member
Dec 19, 2012
3,697
Arkansas
ciny conf rec is 3-7 If pitt loses in sea they will to balt as well it is very likely the 7 seed will go to the winner of hou/indy hou has the head to head and indy/jax has way better conf rec than den i still ex jax to beat car even without Lawrence now if vegas beat indy they have a good shot and tenn took hou to OT last time
 

singaporesoxfan

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2004
11,890
Washington, DC
I wonder how this could affect the Broncos in trying to attract premier free agents in future. If any beneficial clause looks like it might be renegotiated, could that dissuade FAs from choosing Denver and/or cause them to demand more upfront to avoid the risk?
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,093
New York City
I wonder how this could affect the Broncos in trying to attract premier free agents in future. If any beneficial clause looks like it might be renegotiated, could that dissuade FAs from choosing Denver and/or cause them to demand more upfront to avoid the risk?
They didn't renegotiate the clause, tho. They asked to, Russ said no, and now Denver is moving on.

I just can't see how that would impact any future signings. Russ is its own thing.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
27,144
Newton
So, this has been going on since October, but Russ called their bluff and kept winning? They only reiterated this once they started losing the last few weeks:

Speaking Friday, Wilson said the team's decision-makers told him on "the Monday or Tuesday" after the Broncos' Oct. 29 win over the Chiefs that they would bench him if he didn't adjust that $37 million guarantee.
"They definitely told me I was going to be benched and all that," Wilson said. "That whole bye week I didn't know what was going to be the case. I was going to be ready to play, I wanted to go to Buffalo and beat Buffalo [Nov. 13]. ... I wasn't going to remove the injury guarantee, this game is such a physical game, I've played 12 years and all that.
"I want to be able to play, I want to be able to help this team win. ... I know every time I step on the field it's a physical game. I never play timid; I never play scared."
The Broncos were 3-5 after the win vs. the Chiefs, and an injury to Wilson over the season's final nine games could have triggered the guarantee if it was serious enough for him to be unable to pass a physical come March. Wilson said the NFL and its players' association "got involved," and he remained Denver's starter as the team posted wins over the Bills, the Minnesota Vikings and Cleveland Browns in the weeks that followed.
But with three losses in the past four games, including Sunday to the New England Patriots -- after which Payton was openly critical of the offense -- Wilson formally was benched.
I think Russ seems like a diva shithead based on everything I read last year -- but I do agree this kind of sucks. Why do this midseason instead of before the year begins when he's just come off the worst year of his career?
 

NDame616

will bailey
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2006
2,346
Breer (yes I know) said his market will be tough. He thinks he's doing to demand top 5-10 QB money on a multi year deal and then there's all the other "stuff" like he's a bad locker room guy, diva without the skillset anymore, etc. "How many teams do you think are ready to pay $30M a year for him and turn over their whole building to him?"
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,104
AZ
I don’t understand how it would be possible for the Broncos to cut him prior to June 1. They are projected to be $18 million over the 2024 cap. A pre-June 1 cut would add $49 million ($85m minus his salary). Figure at least $10m to get through the year, and you are looking at them needing to cut $77 million.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,298
Pittsburgh, PA
Considering how frequently teammates shit on Wilson and how Sean Payton had to tell him how to act like an actual human when he was hired, I'm not sure anyone is rushing to Russ's defense. If anything, I could see this move being really popular in the locker room, for both the offense and defense.
This sounds like the spin of a PR campaign. And whaddya know, Russ himself confirms that the Broncos basically blackmailed him to change his contract, threatening the benching if he didn't, and then following through:

View: https://twitter.com/YahooSports/status/1740855226666786873


Apparently NFLPA lawyers were involved. So, uh, count me on Team Russ for this one. Payton may be a good coach, but he and his bosses are trying to Darth Vader this deal, and it's bull.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,408
This sounds like the spin of a PR campaign. And whaddya know, Russ himself confirms that the Broncos basically blackmailed him to change his contract, threatening the benching if he didn't, and then following through:

View: https://twitter.com/YahooSports/status/1740855226666786873


Apparently NFLPA lawyers were involved. So, uh, count me on Team Russ for this one. Payton may be a good coach, but he and his bosses are trying to Darth Vader this deal, and it's bull.
You’re mixing up two different ideas between my post and yours: whether what the Broncos are doing is ethical (yours) and whether players on the Broncos care (mine). I don’t know if what the Broncos doing is ethical - it comes off as unseemly, but OTOH, Russ isn’t living up to his huge contract and they’re using whatever leverage they have to lower their risk. That’s not being “blackmailed.” Is it blackmailing when players hold out? It’s the same threat.

We do know that most of his ex Seahawks teammates don’t like him and that much of last season was clouded by rumors of Broncos players being pissed at him. That all makes me wonder how many folks in the locker room are pitying poor old Russ and his 12 bathroom house. It’s not part of the spin to believe that not a lot of players care about this and might be excited for Stidham in the same way the Seahawks couldn’t wait for the Geno Smith experience.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,298
Pittsburgh, PA
I don’t know if what the Broncos doing is ethical - it comes off as unseemly, but OTOH, Russ isn’t living up to his huge contract and they’re using whatever leverage they have to lower their risk. That’s not being “blackmailed.” Is it blackmailing when players hold out? It’s the same threat.
I have no special information and thus no strong opinion on what the Broncos players think of Wilson.

But re: the bolded, it's not the same thing. Using near-term on-field actions as leverage in contract negotiations is BS. And I say the same in other sports in the rare instances it happens - like Sergiño Dest at Barcelona. When a player holds out, it's during training camp and amounts to saying "pay me better / extend me, or cut me / use the contract provisions to punish me". A team saying they will hurt their on-field product, do something that's not in the best interests of the football team's performance, for the sake of trying to save some money down the line, is something that their own fans should revolt over, and fans of other teams should be shaming the team over. Either he's the best QB on the team right now, and therefore should play regardless of contract status, or he's not, and he shouldn't play, regardless of contract status / value. Dangling playing time as a carrot, while the rest of the team is fighting for a playoff spot - in a way that suggests the team's success isn't the determining factor of who the coaches play - makes a mockery of the idea that they're trying their hardest to win, and devalues the efforts of every other player in that locker room who's busting their ass every day. It elevates the financial considerations (in a league with the highest margins and tightest salary cap in global pro sports) over the sporting considerations, at the decisive moments of the season. Any fan of a team should find that disgusting. There is a time and a place for that, and it's the off-season.

I don't get how people manage to twist themselves into knots to justify rooting for management over labor, and justifying unfair tactics to which labor has no proportionate response. I'm an MBA-holding ardent capitalist, and this is about as clear-cut a case as you get of "clearly labor is the good guy here". If they threatened to leak some damaging personal information to the media if he didn't accept a contract change, would that also be fair play, in your eyes? Just ordinary use of leverage in a negotiation, right? Nothing else like decency or team success ought to factor in, yeah? Good grief.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,408
I don't get how people manage to twist themselves into knots to justify rooting for management over labor, and justifying unfair tactics to which labor has no proportionate response. I'm an MBA-holding ardent capitalist, and this is about as clear-cut a case as you get of "clearly labor is the good guy here". If they threatened to leak some damaging personal information to the media if he didn't accept a contract change, would that also be fair play, in your eyes? Just ordinary use of leverage in a negotiation, right? Nothing else like decency or team success ought to factor in, yeah? Good grief.
You tried to “AHA” me with the Russ interview, even though it didn’t have anything to do with the post you quoted. I’m not twisting myself into knots over anything - I just am not sure if Russ’ teammates give a shit about his labor struggle considering that Russ’ teammates usually think he’s an asshole.

As to the rest of it, you invent a hypothetical that is so extreme that it’s useless. Would it be bad if the Broncos put a gun to a child’s head and forced Russ to renegotiate his contract? Yes, I think it would be. We can safely say that.

None of this would be happening if Russ was still obviously better than his replacement. If he was, they’d happily pay him the money on schedule. He doesn’t have leverage because he’s not that good now, same way a player has leverage to hold out when they’re very good. If you want to say Russ is the good guy here, have at it, I’m not hung up on that part. I just don’t think teammates or fans are going to revolt because he’s not generally well-liked and his play hasn’t made up for his deficiencies in that area.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,104
AZ
I’m pretty pro player and think that this was really heavy handed by the Broncos. But at least there was a linkage between what they were asking of him and the threat. It wasn’t just a threat of non-playing to try to get him to give up money.

I think the idea was, look, we are terrible this year. Russ is really bad and we are very exposed here. If he gets hurt, like an ACL, it is for nothing. We are not winning the Super Bowl, and we will be stuck with a $38 million guarantee for a hurt player that we can’t play or trade, needing a QB. So, look, it ain’t happening this year, so we are going to keep you healthy so we don’t have to worry about that guarantee. At least then we know we will have you as a player, for the salary we are paying you.

But look, if you want to keep playing, and risk an injury that could be bad for you and terrible for our salary cap, that is your call. We will not bench you. But we have to get relief on that injury guarantee. So, you make the call.

I am not saying that is a cool thing to do to a player but I do kind of understand. Also, when he pushed back, they relented. The story is getting covered like they gave him the ultimatum this week and that is why they benched him. They didn’t. It happened in October. They relented. But now they would be facing a really tough position if he gets injured in the next two games. So they are going to keep him healthy. His contract is still what it is. He just doesn’t have the injury guarantee now. For the exact reason that they are protecting him from injury so he won’t need it.
 

Old Fart Tree

the maven of meat
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 10, 2001
14,146
Boulder, CO
Breer (yes I know) said his market will be tough. He thinks he's doing to demand top 5-10 QB money on a multi year deal and then there's all the other "stuff" like he's a bad locker room guy, diva without the skillset anymore, etc. "How many teams do you think are ready to pay $30M a year for him and turn over their whole building to him?"
I’m guessing he and his agent will be surprised at how mild the interest will be.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,298
Pittsburgh, PA
You tried to “AHA” me with the Russ interview, even though it didn’t have anything to do with the post you quoted. I’m not twisting myself into knots over anything - I just am not sure if Russ’ teammates give a shit about his labor struggle considering that Russ’ teammates usually think he’s an asshole.
I was jumping off from your post, not rebutting it. I'm adding context to those rumors you're hearing, because it sure seems plausible that they're a leg of the pressure campaign on Wilson. I'll take responsibility for that not being clear enough initially.

None of this would be happening if Russ was still obviously better than his replacement. If he was, they’d happily pay him the money on schedule. He doesn’t have leverage because he’s not that good now, same way a player has leverage to hold out when they’re very good. If you want to say Russ is the good guy here, have at it, I’m not hung up on that part. I just don’t think teammates or fans are going to revolt because he’s not generally well-liked and his play hasn’t made up for his deficiencies in that area.
If Russ weren't better, they wouldn't have to threaten a benching, they'd just do it because he'd have earned it. He's started all 15 games this season, his last few games' TD/INT ratios have been 2/1, 1/0, 2/0... his TDs, INTs, ANY/A, passer rating, have all been much better than last year and most of them comparable to when he was a pro bowler in 2021 (all while massively dialing down his air yards per attempt, this is not luck / YAC driven). Let's not act like he's Mac Jones out there, in your rush to fire him out of a cannon.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,093
New York City
I have no special information and thus no strong opinion on what the Broncos players think of Wilson.

But re: the bolded, it's not the same thing. Using near-term on-field actions as leverage in contract negotiations is BS. And I say the same in other sports in the rare instances it happens - like Sergiño Dest at Barcelona. When a player holds out, it's during training camp and amounts to saying "pay me better / extend me, or cut me / use the contract provisions to punish me". A team saying they will hurt their on-field product, do something that's not in the best interests of the football team's performance, for the sake of trying to save some money down the line, is something that their own fans should revolt over, and fans of other teams should be shaming the team over. Either he's the best QB on the team right now, and therefore should play regardless of contract status, or he's not, and he shouldn't play, regardless of contract status / value. Dangling playing time as a carrot, while the rest of the team is fighting for a playoff spot - in a way that suggests the team's success isn't the determining factor of who the coaches play - makes a mockery of the idea that they're trying their hardest to win, and devalues the efforts of every other player in that locker room who's busting their ass every day. It elevates the financial considerations (in a league with the highest margins and tightest salary cap in global pro sports) over the sporting considerations, at the decisive moments of the season. Any fan of a team should find that disgusting. There is a time and a place for that, and it's the off-season.

I don't get how people manage to twist themselves into knots to justify rooting for management over labor, and justifying unfair tactics to which labor has no proportionate response. I'm an MBA-holding ardent capitalist, and this is about as clear-cut a case as you get of "clearly labor is the good guy here". If they threatened to leak some damaging personal information to the media if he didn't accept a contract change, would that also be fair play, in your eyes? Just ordinary use of leverage in a negotiation, right? Nothing else like decency or team success ought to factor in, yeah? Good grief.
This is insane. What a bunch of overwrought drivel.

Russ isn't a coal miner making 2 pounds a month. He's still getting paid. A LOT. He's still wildly rich. But sometimes it doesn't work out. It is worth mentioning that it VERY much didn't work out with Russ in Seattle.

Nobody is rooting for management over labor. But people are rooting against Russ because he's a fake as fuck poser. Meanwhile, he's made over 200 million dollars in his career. Seems like labor has done pretty well here, overall.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,298
Pittsburgh, PA
Russ isn't a coal miner making 2 pounds a month. He's still getting paid. A LOT. He's still wildly rich. But sometimes it doesn't work out. It is worth mentioning that it VERY much didn't work out with Russ in Seattle.

Nobody is rooting for management over labor. But people are rooting against Russ because he's a fake as fuck poser. Meanwhile, he's made over 200 million dollars in his career. Seems like labor has done pretty well here, overall.
It's the principle of the thing, man. He's a player the team signed a contract with, they made a bargain taking into account all their risk factors and having done so, they want to undo it to their benefit using bullshit forms of leverage. It seems like the union very nearly had a grievance over it, and rightly so. It doesn't matter how much he's made, if they'll do that to Russell Wilson they'll do it to a dozen marginal players on the roster where we'll never hear about it because they meekly submit to being treated like shit (while getting CTE, and then being discarded like christmas present packaging once they've had their health wrung out of them for the team's profit). I'm not shedding tears for Russell Wilson, who sporting-wise I personally hope fails because I've rooted against him for a decade. I'm thinking about this being another log on the fire of the NFL being incredibly shitty to their players, a plantation mentality. If you don't like the terms you've bargained for, you and your billion-dollar money-printing machine, then bargain better next time. There are other ways to solve that problem in the meantime, besides treating the performance of the team as some minor matter, a chip to be used when it might suit the budgetary planning.

But forgive me, I wouldn't want to force you to read any more drivel.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2003
62,093
New York City
It's the principle of the thing, man. He's a player the team signed a contract with, they made a bargain taking into account all their risk factors and having done so, they want to undo it to their benefit using bullshit forms of leverage. It seems like the union very nearly had a grievance over it, and rightly so. It doesn't matter how much he's made, if they'll do that to Russell Wilson they'll do it to a dozen marginal players on the roster where we'll never hear about it because they meekly submit to being treated like shit (while getting CTE, and then being discarded like christmas present packaging once they've had their health wrung out of them for the team's profit). I'm not shedding tears for Russell Wilson, who sporting-wise I personally hope fails because I've rooted against him for a decade. I'm thinking about this being another log on the fire of the NFL being incredibly shitty to their players, a plantation mentality. If you don't like the terms you've bargained for, you and your billion-dollar money-printing machine, then bargain better next time. There are other ways to solve that problem in the meantime, besides treating the performance of the team as some minor matter, a chip to be used when it might suit the budgetary planning.

But forgive me, I wouldn't want to force you to read any more drivel.
They asked Russ to change the contract language. He said no. They kept playing Russ. Now that Denver is eliminated with two games left, they are making sure they won't be stuck paying an injury guarantee for a guy they don't want next year.

Russ is still getting paid his contract. Where is the fire?
 

Commander Shears

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 24, 2005
1,023
They asked Russ to change the contract language. He said no. They kept playing Russ. Now that Denver is eliminated with two games left, they are making sure they won't be stuck paying an injury guarantee for a guy they don't want next year.

Russ is still getting paid his contract. Where is the fire?
Denver hasn’t been eliminated.