2023-24 Celtics

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,236
Here
Last edited:

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,236
Here
If they are 85% favorites in 3 Eastern Conference series they are ~60% favorites to reach the finals and 55% to win in the finals that gets you to 33%. Add in some injury risk that’ll decay away as we get closer to the postseason and there ya go.
Injuries I get, but imo they should not be below 90% against anyone in the East, and round one should be higher. They haven’t lost 4 of 7 all season and are undefeated at home against the East. They are that damned good.

I also think the Celtics should be significant favorites in any finals matchup.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,248
Injuries I get, but imo they should not be below 90% against anyone in the East, and round one should be higher. They haven’t lost 4 of 7 all season and are undefeated at home against the East. They are that damned good.

I also think the Celtics should be significant favorites in any finals matchup.
Denver beat the Celtics twice quite easily and is objectively a better team in closeout situations. Denver could get upset along the way, but not sure the Celtics would be significant favorites over the Nuggets.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,847
Melrose, MA
ESPN ran a graphic about the Celtics FG% in crunch time at various time intervals. They excluded OT data and were using FG% instead of EFG%, so I thought I'd run the numbers and compare to Denver including OT and using EFG%. I chose Denver because they are the team universally regarded as the best crunch time offense. These numbers are inclusive (meaning 5 minute number include all the 4 minutes and less numbers, and so on):

With the score within -5 to +5, time left in 4th quarter and/or OT.

10 seconds left: Boston 12.5% (1-6 2s, 0-2 3s), Denver 62.5% (1-2, 1-2)
30 seconds left: Boston 19.0% (4-14, 0-7), Denver 40.0% (3-7, 2-8)
1 minute left: Boston 51.2% (11-24, 7-18), Denver 45.7% (10-17, 4-18)
2 minutes left: Boston 51.7% (24-49, 15-41), Denver 61.4% (35-50, 9-29)
3 minutes left: Boston 52.3% (37-73, 21-58), Denver 71.3% (51-78, 14-43)
4 minutes left: Boston 53.1% (45-88, 27-73), Denver 64.0% (67-101, 21-53)
5 minutes left: Boston 53.6% (58-109, 31-86), Denver 62.9% (82-122, 25-68)

Edit: Fixed an error 16.7%->12.5% for Boston EFG% with 10 seconds or less.
That tracks. They don't have a lot of work in critical, final minute situations and their execution is consistently poor. Denver, on the other hand, is dominant, because Jokic.

I'm curious what the Celtics defense looks like in those final minute situations (efg against).

This has to be the #1 knock on Mazzulla as coach, BTW. This team does/tries to do just about everything else right, but in the final minute all Joe's stuff gets roundfiled and we settle for bad Tatum looks.
 

Imbricus

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 26, 2017
4,879
If they are 85% favorites in 3 Eastern Conference series they are ~60% favorites to reach the finals and 55% to win in the finals that gets you to 33%. Add in some injury risk that’ll decay away as we get closer to the postseason and there ya go.
This is a good exercise in the harsh reality of multiplicative probabilities, that even heavily favored teams have to win successive high probability though not 100% probability events. Steph Curry is an excellent free throw shooter, at 91.5%. Yet the chance he'll make his next 8 free throws, shooting at that percentage, is a shade under 50%.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,419
FACT...going ISO with the defense dug in is a really hard way to make a basket
It’s also a real good way of avoiding turnovers against that pressure while controlling clock. I watched a game the other night, I forget who now, they kept running the same stuff in the final minutes as they did all game….got outscored 14-0, had the ball in the wrong guys hands nearly every possession, and lost the game. It is hard to score in these end of game possessions but having the ball in your best scorers hands while controlling other factors involved is almost always going to be a teams best option.
 
Last edited:

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,236
Here
Denver beat the Celtics twice quite easily and is objectively a better team in closeout situations. Denver could get upset along the way, but not sure the Celtics would be significant favorites over the Nuggets.
The home game loss was a major fluke, and Boston just has a better team by a fair margin. Imo, with home court, Boston should win a 7-game series at least 75% of the time against Denver. Their net rating is a whopping 7 points above Denver’s. I know with Murray it’s a different team, but Boston is still significantly better imo. I think allowing past playoff disappointment factor in actually lets Boston off the hook.
This is a good exercise in the harsh reality of multiplicative probabilities, that even heavily favored teams have to win successive high probability though not 100% probability events. Steph Curry is an excellent free throw shooter, at 91.5%. Yet the chance he'll make his next 8 free throws, shooting at that percentage, is a shade under 50%.
I am aware of the math, but I still think without any major longer term injuries, the expectation should be Boston is about a coinflip to win the title. I’m unsure how to quantify injury risk, because everyone has injury risk.
 
Last edited:

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,248
That tracks. They don't have a lot of work in critical, final minute situations and their execution is consistently poor. Denver, on the other hand, is dominant, because Jokic.

I'm curious what the Celtics defense looks like in those final minute situations (efg against).

This has to be the #1 knock on Mazzulla as coach, BTW. This team does/tries to do just about everything else right, but in the final minute all Joe's stuff gets roundfiled and we settle for bad Tatum looks.
Ime and Stevens coached the same way at the end of games regarding Tatum.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,419
The home game loss was a major fluke, and Boston just has a better team by a fair margin. Imo, with home court, Boston should win a 7-game series at least 75% of the time against Denver. Their net rating is a whopping 7 points above Denver’s. I know with Murray it’s a different team, but Boston is still significantly better imo. I think allowing past playoff disappointment factor in actually lets Boston off the hook.
Playoff basketball is more matchup specific than how teams performed against the other 28 teams rendering reg season net rating fairly worthless once you have the matchup. I wholeheartedly disagree with these percentages in a Denver series. They very well may be a nightmare matchup for us.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,236
Here
Playoff basketball is more matchup specific than how teams performed against the other 28 teams rendering reg season net rating fairly worthless once you have the matchup. I wholeheartedly disagree with these percentages in a Denver series. They very well may be a nightmare matchup for us.
I don’t see it. To me, it comes down to how Boston shoots the 3. If they shoot it as they have all season, they should handle anyone. I believe expectations should be that they continue their performance into and through the playoffs. This is a team with 5 All-Star caliber starters.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,419
I don’t see it. To me, it comes down to how Boston shoots the 3. If they shoot it as they have all season, they should handle anyone. I believe expectations should be that they continue their performance into and through the playoffs. This is a team with 5 All-Star caliber starters.
Denver won’t have home court but if they did the series would be a pick ‘em or Nuggets slight favorite based on the current numbers. Boston is +210 to win Title, Denver +300 but that differential is almost all tied into the paths they face to get there.
 

teddykgb

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
11,121
Chelmsford, MA
Stevens did not coach the same in close and late and frequently drew up innovative plays to get baskets for people. Tatum was younger then but I think it’s just inaccurate to keep saying it was the same under him
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,847
Melrose, MA
The home game loss was a major fluke, and Boston just has a better team by a fair margin. Imo, with home court, Boston should win a 7-game series at least 75% of the time against Denver. Their net rating is a whopping 7 points above Denver’s. I know with Murray it’s a different team, but Boston is still significantly better imo. I think allowing past playoff disappointment factor in actually lets Boston off the hook.
I think you could say the game getting to the late game situation it did might have been a fluke. But there is nothing whatsoever flukish about Denver's excellence in those situations or the Celtics mediocrity in them.

Ime and Stevens coached the same way at the end of games regarding Tatum.
I disagree about Stevens, but, that aside, what difference does it make? Mazulla does a lot of things differently than Stevens and Ime, much of it, at least this year, for the good.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,236
Here
I think you could say the game getting to the late game situation it did might have been a fluke. But there is nothing whatsoever flukish about Denver's excellence in those situations or the Celtics mediocrity in them.
The Celtics have largely been very good in those situations this year, and the expectation should be for that to continue. This is a very different roster construction than years past. Again, they are being let off the hook because “same old Celtics,” even though it’s a very new team that has shown itself to be superior to past iterations.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
Boston is +210 to win Title, Denver +300 but that differential is almost all tied into the paths they face to get there.
The WC and Denver's path will be MUCH harder this season. Denver is very dependent on the health of their TOP5, all will need to play sizeable minutes throughout the playoffs (11-9 without Murray this season).
They faced little resistance from the Suns + the 3 PLAY IN teams last year.

Not having Bruce Brown will rear its head with their rather pedestrian bench: Reggie Jackson/Braun/Watson.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
It’s also a real good way of avoiding turnovers against that pressure while controlling clock. I watched a game the other night, I forget who now, they kept running the same stuff in the final minutes as they did all game….got outscored 14-0, had the ball in the wrong guys hands nearly every possession, and lost the game. It is hard to score in these end of game possessions but having the ball in your best scorers hands while controlling other factors involved is almost always going to be a teams best option.
Ray Allen, Paxson, Posey, Kerr, Bowen, Green, Horrey, etc, etc, etc all liked the kick-out pass from their superstars in big spots.

Joker's superpower is scoring & PASSING, which makes him very dangerous at the end of games.

Tatum is the Celtic's best player. BUT his offense isn't superior enough compared to his 4 teammates to always feel the need/pressure of taking the last shot at the end of Quarters & games (esp when opponents double him) YMMV
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,313
I disagree about Stevens, but, that aside, what difference does it make? Mazulla does a lot of things differently than Stevens and Ime, much of it, at least this year, for the good.
Stevens was definitely better at getting good shots ATO and end of game. He's one of the best ever at that.

Joe (and staff, but ultimate credit should go to the top guy) seems better at a lot of the other stuff, including buy-in and consistent effort, particularly wrt offensive execution and schemes.

People forget how checked-out on Brad the team was by the end, and they were still very inconsistent under Ime and crisis CJM. Joe this year really fixed that part of the team culture.
 

Red Averages

owes you $50
SoSH Member
Apr 20, 2003
9,220
Injuries I get, but imo they should not be below 90% against anyone in the East, and round one should be higher. They haven’t lost 4 of 7 all season and are undefeated at home against the East. They are that damned good.

I also think the Celtics should be significant favorites in any finals matchup.
Ok.
90% favorites vs the 8 seed
80% favorites vs the 4/5 winner
70% favorites vs the 2/3 winner.
65% favorites in the finals.
33% chance.

The point holds.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,791
This discussion feels a bit like missing forrest for the trees. Regardless of what our individual expectations are for this Celtics team, anything short of a finals appearance will likely be portrayed in terms of being a "disaster" and may well lead to changes in the top of the roster as well as the coaching staff. So while this team isn't guaranteed even getting out of the first round, this season is an abject failure if they don't at least play for the title and very likely will be considered a huge fail by many if they don't win it all.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
44,236
Here
Ok.
90% favorites vs the 8 seed
80% favorites vs the 4/5 winner
70% favorites vs the 2/3 winner.
65% favorites in the finals.
33% chance.

The point holds.
That’s not what I said, but it‘s probably pointless to keep going down this path because clearly my expectations are well above Vegas’s, though one caveat is I am assuming health and obviously understand if players go down for an extended of time that changes things.

But, ultimately, DeJesus is right.
And, I would argue, those are pretty optimistic odds from @Red Averages. This isn’t the 1990s, there is much more talent spread throughout the league.
It’s not the 90s, but the talent gap between the Celtics and everyone else in the East is pretty massive. Net rating is relative, after all. Unless the Sixers get a somehow in-game shape Embiid back and that’s the first round matchup (fuck the Heat, Celtics must crush), the Celtics should be the biggest favorite in the East since the Bulls Imo.
 
Last edited:

SteveF

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,054
I'm curious what the Celtics defense looks like in those final minute situations (efg against).
With the score within -5 to +5, time left in 4th quarter and/or OT.

10 seconds left: 37.5% (3-4 2s, 0-4 3s)
30 seconds left: 27.5% (4-11, 1-9)
1 minute left: 33.3% (12-30, 4-24)
2 minutes left: 40.7% (19-51, 12-40)
3 minutes left: 42.6% (25-69, 20-60)
4 minutes left: 45.7% (40-91, 26-82)
5 minutes left: 48.3% (47-102, 33-98)

Looks like the league median EFG% in clutch time (as defined by the NBA, the 5 minutes number above) is ~50.5%.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,282
Imaginationland
That’s not what I said, but it‘s probably pointless to keep going down this path because clearly my expectations are well above Vegas’s, though one caveat is I am assuming health and obviously understand if players go down for an extended of time that changes things.

But, ultimately, DeJesus is right.
It’s not the 90s, but the talent gap between the Celtics and everyone else in the East is pretty massive. Net rating is relative, after all. Unless the Sixers get a somehow in-game shape Embiid back and that’s the first round matchup (fuck the Heat, Celtics must crush), the Celtics should be the biggest favorite in the East since the Bulls Imo.
It's more than a slight possibility that the Celtics end up with the hardest possible draw in the east - Philly (with Embiid) in round 1, Knicks (with Randle and Anunoby) in round 2, and Bucks in round 3. When healthy those are undoubtedly the 2-4 best teams in the east, in whatever order you want. Celtics are probably 75% likely to win each round (if those are the opponents, and healthy), which is about a 48% chance to get to the finals.
 
Last edited:

Tudor Fever

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2004
3,682
Maine
Yea there is no chance they are 90% to win the first round series.
90% is a great estimate. The 8 seed has defeated the 1 seed 6 times since the 8-team format started in 1984. 30 years, 60 series, so it’s happened in exactly 10% of the series.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,847
Melrose, MA
It was good to see the defense slam the door like that (55 points in final 3 quarters) against a team that has been plaing well offensively of late.
 

Erik Hanson's Hook

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 20, 2013
1,082
This discussion feels a bit like missing forrest for the trees. Regardless of what our individual expectations are for this Celtics team, anything short of a finals appearance will likely be portrayed in terms of being a "disaster" and may well lead to changes in the top of the roster as well as the coaching staff. So while this team isn't guaranteed even getting out of the first round, this season is an abject failure if they don't at least play for the title and very likely will be considered a huge fail by many if they don't win it all.
I'll take it a step further and say that for me, this Celtics iteration represents the last remnants of the 2001 to 2018 Boston sports dynasty. There is tremendous regional pressure on this team IMO

Edit: whatever "regional pressure" means, lol. I guess I'm trying to get at expectations...and perhaps why the hidden layer of angst beneath
 
Last edited:

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
In my lifetime (born in 66), the longest championship drought, across all four major sports, has been 15 years, from the Celtics in 86 to the Pats in 2001.
Other than that, the longest was 5 years. Which was just tied again. So I need Cs or Bs to win this year.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,313
I know Zion got some FTs, but I thought the Cs really had one of their first "adjusted to the new NBA" games there. They were way, way more physical on defense (especially Jaylen and Jrue), and took advantage of the looser whistle.

On offense, they started to find ways to play through the muck. KP, in particular, doesn't look like he's waiting around for a midrange whistle that won't come, and they've adjusted more to being banged and grabbed off-ball.

The 2022 playoffs were mucked up, and I think 2024 will feel similar. Bring it on.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,419
Ray Allen, Paxson, Posey, Kerr, Bowen, Green, Horrey, etc, etc, etc all liked the kick-out pass from their superstars in big spots.

Joker's superpower is scoring & PASSING, which makes him very dangerous at the end of games.

Tatum is the Celtic's best player. BUT his offense isn't superior enough compared to his 4 teammates to always feel the need/pressure of taking the last shot at the end of Quarters & games (esp when opponents double him) YMMV
You misunderstood my position. Tatum in iso is able to make that decision to shoot or make the one pass for the catch and shoot while controlling the clock. I’m anti-ball movement in those end of game spots as there are so many things that can go wrong as I listed above.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,313
You misunderstood my position. Tatum in iso is able to make that decision to shoot or make the one pass for the catch and shoot while controlling the clock. I’m anti-ball movement in those end of game spots as there are so many things that can go wrong as I listed above.
I'm very much on your side here (in general, and with Tatum in particular), but with one huge caveat: teams have started loading up on Tatum really, really hard in those spots, since he isn't quite keeping them honest with passes. The game theoretic balance just isn't quite there.

He's started to keep teams honest in end-of-quarter and late shot clock situations, so I think he's capable of it. It's more of a 10-20% tweak than anything, but would probably unlock his base end-of-game iso a lot.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
You misunderstood my position. Tatum in iso is able to make that decision to shoot or make the one pass for the catch and shoot while controlling the clock. I’m anti-ball movement in those end of game spots as there are so many things that can go wrong as I listed above.
I get that in theory, but JT makes it hard on himself against dug in defenses. He's been taking difficult shots against double teams and avoiding the pass at a pretty high rate. We saw more Mazzulla-ball with the ball in White/KPs hands today while burning clock. Being a little more diverse will create better looks for JT.

As far as TOs, Tatum probably turns the ball over at a similar rate when going ISO vs. their normal offensive set.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
I know Zion got some FTs, but I thought the Cs really had one of their first "adjusted to the new NBA" games there. They were way, way more physical on defense (especially Jaylen and Jrue), and took advantage of the looser whistle.

On offense, they started to find ways to play through the muck. KP, in particular, doesn't look like he's waiting around for a midrange whistle that won't come, and they've adjusted more to being banged and grabbed off-ball.

The 2022 playoffs were mucked up, and I think 2024 will feel similar. Bring it on.
Yea, there was some frustration with the Refs on the game thread. Understandable. Lots of contact, bodying on the perimeter, bumping from behind, slapping at the ball, players barking, & quick trigger Techs for hand waves. It's a very inconsistent whistle from the start of the regular season. BUT in some ways, it feels like a halfcourt, grind it out "playoff whistle".

At the end of Q2, several Pelican players argued with the ref which let Derrick White go end-to-end, in under 4 seconds, against nobody for a wide-open 3. Celtic first lead of the game going into the half. The Pels were a mess in Q3, game over.

Celtic players need to lock in and avoid being distracted by crappy officiating (not easy). In some ways, they could benefit from playing under these conditions since these are glorified pre-season games anyway.

ALSO Jaylen Brown's defense on Zion was borderline spectacular. I need to go back and watch, BUT it seemed Zion was unstoppable & getting anywhere in Q1 (he's trimmed down). Until JB just started picking him up on the perimeter and knocking Zion off his line relentlessly. JB was challenging him at the rim (along with KP help). Q2/Q3 was probably the Celtics best defense of the season, which is a positive development heading to the playoffs.

Maybe Brown is the Jokic whisperer?
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
After DEN game, JB said he wanted more reps against Jokic. So maybe (hopefully) you’re correct.
Although post-game JB mentioned that his back was hurting so the pounding can’t be good for him.
I recall hearing JB say that post-Denver game. If the refs are going to allow bumping/physicality on the perimeter we want Jaylen locking up all the NBA Alpha's. He's much thicker than Tatum

Karalis was also saying JB has left-hand pain & needs x-rays when he gets back to Boston:eek:
 

m0ckduck

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
1,783
A couple observations, since I rarely get to watch C's games wire to wire:
  • Pritchard was important yesterday, even though the box score makes it look like he did almost nothing. The pace and intensity ratcheted up as soon as he got in the game. If there's a weakness to the Holiday-White tandem, it can sometimes feel very composed— generally a good thing, but they needed more franticness yesterday coming out of the first Q. That might be Pritchard's destiny for the playoffs: someone who doesn't necessarily get a lot of minutes in games where the starters are playing effectively, but someone you roll the dice with when the team is trailing and needs more energy. (Edit: this was an anecdotal observation and +/- only has him at +3 last night, so maybe I'm attributing too much to PP here. But watching in real time, it felt to me that his energy fed into the team's overall effort.)
  • Not seeing it with Xavier Tillman. I'm not bemoaning the trade, given the cost: as discussed before, he's a useful situational matchup guy and insurance against a front-line injury. But I don't see the offensive game blossoming enough to become a rotation guy— there's just a pervasive lack of feel to his moves. Every time the ball finds him or Horford, I'm never sure for a moment which one it is... but if something fluid happens offensively, then I know it's Al... and if something mechanical happens, it's clearly X. His biggest value to the club might be impersonating Tony Brothers effectively come playoff time so the C's can handcuff the latter to a radiator and nobody notices he's gone.
  • Teams that don't have a stretch big are really dead in the water against this team. The C's were letting Valancunas and Nance launch from 3 without bothering to contest. KP was dropping on every P-n-R and just terrorizing the smaller Pelican players who tried to get to the cup. It was impressive. (Edit: I see Nance is actually shooting it at 42% on the season, but on low volume— to my eyes, it seemed the the C's were content to give him open looks from out there— but perhaps I'm misremembering and it was more Valancunas only)
  • Pelicans have a lot of good pieces— but, man, they need some consolidation. They really don't a single complete 2-way player on that team, esp with Ingram out. Talented as Zion is, there are holes all over his game.
 
Last edited:

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
Pritchard was important yesterday, even though the box score makes it look like he did almost nothing. The pace and intensity ratcheted up as soon as he got in the game. If there's a weakness to the Holiday-White tandem, it can sometimes feels very composed— generally a good thing, but they needed more franticness yesterday coming out of the first Q. That might be Pritchard's destiny for the playoffs: someone who doesn't necessarily get a lot of minutes in games where the starters are playing effectively, but someone you roll the dice with when the team is trailing and needs more energy. (Edit: this was an anecdotal observation and +/- only has him at +3 last night, so maybe I'm attributing too much to PP here. But watching in real time, it felt to me that his energy fed into the team's overall effort.)
PP is an energy boost off the Celtic bench (JJ Redick recently noted it on his pod) with the speed of his dribble after an opponent made basket. It's noticeable compared to the JAYs who slowly walk the ball up after a make. PP's box may look empty but that doesn't reflect his ability to push pace & create immediate cross-matches in the half-court. I'm firmly in the camp that White/PP should initiate the offense more often when they are on the floor.

Also, late Q1 was the 2nd time in two months the Celtics were down double digits in a game (Denver early Q4 was the other).
Pretty dominant hoops from a potentially all-time great Celtic team.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,784
I stopped watching the Pels game live, and went back to it later that night. I was very pleased with the way the Celtics adjusted and turned up their defense. It took the Pels 28 1/2 minutes to score 37 more points, to match what they scored in the 12 minutes of first quarter

That first quarter was ugly. The live ball TOs by the Jays help ignite the Pels’ offense, and they got hot from three. NO was 15-24 in the first, including 5-11 from deep, but only 19-62 the last three quarters, including 8-24 from three. Boston held the Pels to a gristly 11-44 in the middle two quarters, and only 6 FTs.

If Boston can play defense like this in the playoffs, they will be difficult to beat
 

lars10

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
11,887
I stopped watching the Pels game live, and went back to it later that night. I was very pleased with the way the Celtics adjusted and turned up their defense. It took the Pels 28 1/2 minutes to score 37 more points, to match what they scored in the 12 minutes of first quarter

That first quarter was ugly. The live ball TOs by the Jays help ignite the Pels’ offense, and they got hot from three. NO was 15-24 in the first, including 5-11 from deep, but only 19-62 the last three quarters, including 8-24 from three. Boston held the Pels to a gristly 11-44 in the middle two quarters, and only 6 FTs.

If Boston can play defense like this in the playoffs, they will be difficult to beat
They’re already difficult to beat just playing normally. If they play defense like that.. they won’t be beat.
 

Montana Fan

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 18, 2000
8,930
Twin Bridges, Mt.
199 stat filled minutes for the Big 6 which could easily have been 210. The game was playoff like for the C’s. Look forward to buckling in for a serious run at the title. Celts are gonna be a tough out.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,313
I stopped watching the Pels game live, and went back to it later that night. I was very pleased with the way the Celtics adjusted and turned up their defense. It took the Pels 28 1/2 minutes to score 37 more points, to match what they scored in the 12 minutes of first quarter

That first quarter was ugly. The live ball TOs by the Jays help ignite the Pels’ offense, and they got hot from three. NO was 15-24 in the first, including 5-11 from deep, but only 19-62 the last three quarters, including 8-24 from three. Boston held the Pels to a gristly 11-44 in the middle two quarters, and only 6 FTs.

If Boston can play defense like this in the playoffs, they will be difficult to beat
The bad shooting from the Pels wasn't even all bad variance: the Celtics were contesting absolutely everything, except from bad shooters. The looks the Pels got after the 1st quarter were just utter garbage.
 

Montana Fan

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 18, 2000
8,930
Twin Bridges, Mt.
The bad shooting from the Pels wasn't even all bad variance: the Celtics were contesting absolutely everything, except from bad shooters. The looks the Pels got after the 1st quarter were just utter garbage.
On the Pels broadcast, Antonio Daniels called out the Celts’ defensive effort in exactly this manner. With a hand in their face, the Pels were way below average shooting.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,726
L
ALSO Jaylen Brown's defense on Zion was borderline spectacular. I need to go back and watch, BUT it seemed Zion was unstoppable & getting anywhere in Q1 (he's trimmed down). Until JB just started picking him up on the perimeter and knocking Zion off his line relentlessly. JB was challenging him at the rim (along with KP help). Q2/Q3 was probably the Celtics best defense of the season, which is a positive development heading to the playoffs.

Maybe Brown is the Jokic whisperer?
It was incredible. Zion himself seemed flummoxed that he couldn’t just bully JB to get to a spot like he could anyone else.

I think JB/Horford/X is about as good of a trio as you can get to defend Giannis/Zion
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,282
Imaginationland
L

It was incredible. Zion himself seemed flummoxed that he couldn’t just bully JB to get to a spot like he could anyone else.

I think JB/Horford/X is about as good of a trio as you can get to defend Giannis/Zion
Yup, Zion is basically a bouncier Giannis with a lower center of gravity. It's the same defense, just easier because Zion is out of shape for an NBA player and Giannis is as relentlessly physical as any top player since prime Westbrook or Miami Lebron.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,427
Santa Monica
Yup, Zion is basically a bouncier Giannis with a lower center of gravity. It's the same defense, just easier because Zion is out of shape for an NBA player and Giannis is as relentlessly physical as any top player since prime Westbrook or Miami Lebron.
With Jaylen, X, Horford, & Jrue the Giannis Retaining Wall has never been stronger
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,299
Pittsburgh, PA
ALSO Jaylen Brown's defense on Zion was borderline spectacular. I need to go back and watch, BUT it seemed Zion was unstoppable & getting anywhere in Q1 (he's trimmed down). Until JB just started picking him up on the perimeter and knocking Zion off his line relentlessly. JB was challenging him at the rim (along with KP help). Q2/Q3 was probably the Celtics best defense of the season, which is a positive development heading to the playoffs.

Maybe Brown is the Jokic whisperer?
I only finished my rewatch this evening (was out last night), but absolute co-sign there. NOLA scored 37 points in the first quarter (helped, admittedly, by probably a bit of luck on their 3s), and then 31 points in Q2 and Q3... combined. Probably aren't many teams who had 31 points across 2 consecutive quarters of a game this year. Maybe that abysmal Knicks - Philly game a few weeks ago that finished 79-73... yep, Knicks finished the first half with 31 points. But still.

Jaylen Brown was the standout, although just about everyone had some big defensive plays, and more important than any individual was how they played off of each other, their communication, their switches, their positioning to help. Jrue's jump ball call on a Zion drive (which Zion then knocked out of bounds on the jump tip) was a brilliant play that was only possible because of how they were helping the helper by hedging on the perimeter so he could get in there and try to help. But yeah, JB just was living in Zion's head rent free, knew where he was going to drive before Zion himself did. He still got got a few times but shut down a huge percentage of those opportunities, largely un-helped.