Red Sox, Ceddanne Rafaela agree to contract extension

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,679
Curious too what this extension adds to the 2024 CBT, frontloading salary from future years. Between this and Bello (and Casas and Houck, reportedly), the extension wave adds some context to the 2024 payroll angst over the winter.

Hard not to think they’re gearing up for major spending down in a year or two, given the effect of these extensions.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,281
Curious too what this extension adds to the 2024 CBT, frontloading salary from future years. Between this and Bello (and Casas and Houck, reportedly), the extension wave adds some context to the 2024 payroll angst over the winter.
Is it not too late to do that, given that the season has begun?
 

BigSoxFan

Member
SoSH Member
May 31, 2007
47,280
Regardless of whether or not I think this is a good deal for the Sox (TBD), very happy for Rafaela. Overcame very long odds to get to this point.
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,246
I mean, we can't sign the guys as good as the Braves guys early cuz we don't have those guys, but people were 100% saying "Why don't the Sox do this, why don't we sign guys early?". Then we do, and people are like "Man, this is early."
 

Fishercat

Svelte and sexy!
SoSH Member
May 18, 2007
8,358
Manchester, N.H.
Also, I'll be honest, given what FA deals for CFs are, he doesn't have to do that much for it to not hurt the team. For 10M in CF you're probably getting a great glove with a deeply inconsistent bat, or a decent bat who is passable in CF. I know we'd have CR for six years at x+arbitration dollars regardless but I don't think stabilizing that value and ensuring he can take that worry off his plate, and getting some upside at the backend, is that huge of a gamble.

If he's terrible and unplayable? Well...add him to the list of guys the Sox signed and who bombed. At least this one is relatively lower financial risk.

I would imagine part of the calculation is that if CR is as good in CF and in the MI as people think, you completely solidify a guy who will make the life of the pitching staff a lot easier going forward.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,821
If they are locking this guy up that means they think he is going to get "expensive" (in the forward value sense) really quickly. It may be a bad call but if they believe in him they are supposed to extend him.
Well he can't get "expensive" for a few years, as he doesn't even hit Arbitration 1 until 2027. And that won't be very expensive. It'll only really hit the Sox in the last couple of years of arb, which won't happen til 2028 and 2029, and a lot can happen between now and then.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,821
I mean, we can't sign the guys as good as the Braves guys early cuz we don't have those guys, but people were 100% saying "Why don't the Sox do this, why don't we sign guys early?". Then we do, and people are like "Man, this is early."
I won't speak for anyone else, but my only hesitation here is that we haven't seen him with the ability to hit MLB pitching. The guys the Braves extended showed more MLB prowess at this point. As far as I can recall, anyway. I could be wrong.
 

Big Papi's Mango Salsa

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2022
1,204
Because for most of his career he's been a free swinger with a barely-workable BB/K ratio? It's not outside the realm of possibility his bat won't fully translate to the majors and he'll be a defensive ++ CF with moderate speed.

That's not nothing, but you don't want to see significant resources locked up in that sort of player.

His upside is much much higher. (And the Sox clearly know his makeup, approach, adaptability, etc. more than we do here.)

So while hoping the Sox have correctly pegged his bat as viable (113 ML ABs so far) I expect a lot of people here are also waiting to see what the $/years are. There's a spectrum of good-deal-regardless/acceptable-risk/oh-man-I-hope-this-works. I think we're all a bit tired of the last category.
I agree with the overall tenor of "I'm excited, but lets see the terms".

But I'm curious - what makes you say "moderate" speed. Maybe it's semantics. But BBSavant grades him as 85th percentile sprint speed in 2023 and 89th in the miniscule sample of this season. But watching him backs that up - he flies out there on the basepaths and more importantly, covers a ton of ground in CF.

His bat may not translate, but assuming the deal covers something like 8 years of team control in some capacity (guessing buying out one year of FA with an option to buy out the 2nd) he'd only be 30 and in the middle of his athletic prime should still be pretty darn fast, making him at worst an excellent defensive CF with very good to excellent speed (depending on how one wants to categorize 85% speed, but I'd personally call it far better than moderate).
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,821
I love how athletic the teams is becoming. That alone makes for a more exciting brand of baseball, IMO.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
43,106
AZ
Curious too what this extension adds to the 2024 CBT, frontloading salary from future years. Between this and Bello (and Casas and Houck, reportedly), the extension wave adds some context to the 2024 payroll angst over the winter.

Hard not to think they’re gearing up for major spending down in a year or two, given the effect of these extensions.
I have a feeling that this is going to be mostly a time-shifting move when we see the details. If they can spend some money this year and stay under the cap in order to save some money in future years, they seem eager to do it. Even if it's just buying the reasonable value of the arbitration years.

I actually think it's pretty clever.
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,791
Well he can't get "expensive" for a few years, as he doesn't even hit Arbitration 1 until 2027. And that won't be very expensive. It'll only really hit the Sox in the last couple of years of arb, which won't happen til 2028 and 2029, and a lot can happen between now and then.
By definition the team thinks this is a money saving move for them. People will absolutely question it - and they should.

However those qualifying this transaction one way or another are being silly. There isn't one human being that can correctly deem this an over or unerpay because we have no outcomes with which to judge it, even when we get the details.

We don't know what sort of player Rafaela will become - how can we grade the contract in isolation?
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,759
I won't speak for anyone else, but my only hesitation here is that we haven't seen him with the ability to hit MLB pitching. The guys the Braves extended showed more MLB prowess at this point. As far as I can recall, anyway. I could be wrong.
I think you're focusing on the downside of an early signing (i.e. we don't have enough info to know he can hit major league pitching) and not the upside of an early signing (i.e. this contract should be much cheaper than one he would theoretically sign after he proves he can hit MLB pitching).

Yes, there is more risk, but locking up with more uncertainly should be priced into the contract. Like everyone else said, we'll have to wait on the numbers to have a full opinion.

But an early signing here (especially with elite D and a high floor), may be a feature not a bug.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,679
Speier: “Terms are unknown. Pure speculation: Colt Keith’s 6-yr, $28.6425M deal w/3 options …”

Keith’s contract options [edit: club options] were $10 million in 2030, $13 million in 2031 and $18 million in 2032.
 

Rovin Romine

Johnny Rico
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
24,630
Miami (oh, Miami!)
I agree with the overall tenor of "I'm excited, but lets see the terms".

But I'm curious - what makes you say "moderate" speed. Maybe it's semantics. But BBSavant grades him as 85th percentile sprint speed in 2023 and 89th in the miniscule sample of this season. But watching him backs that up - he flies out there on the basepaths and more importantly, covers a ton of ground in CF.

His bat may not translate, but assuming the deal covers something like 8 years of team control in some capacity (guessing buying out one year of FA with an option to buy out the 2nd) he'd only be 30 and in the middle of his athletic prime should still be pretty darn fast, making him at worst an excellent defensive CF with very good to excellent speed (depending on how one wants to categorize 85% speed, but I'd personally call it far better than moderate).
Good point. It was semantics, but he has very good speed. I suppose I am waiting to see if it translates into a SB skill in the majors. (Not everyone makes the jump but I think he probably will.)
 

Petagine in a Bottle

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 13, 2021
12,350
It’s impossible to assess how good the deal is without knowing the deal; this is a guy they already had under contract for a long time. So they lock in cost certainty, which is good if he plays well, potentially not if he doesn’t. So, it’s all about the terms to be able to have any kind of guess of whether this is likely to be good value or not- even then, it’s kind of impossible to tell. But, hopefully!
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,791
Here at SoSH Motors, we dont even care what kind of car it is.
The difference here is we aren't the buyer of the car. Nobody here is a party to the transaction and presumably both sides have far more information than some random in their mom's basement.
 

Max Power

thai good. you like shirt?
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
8,031
Boston, MA
As far as value, so far Rafaela is at 0.2 bWAR for 2024, after 10 games. That's a 3.2 bWAR pace, and doesn't include any defensive value yet (it's all oWAR so far). So unless they are paying him $25m per starting now,... I am not worried about bad value.
That's very kind of you, but the way baseball economics work you have to screw the productive younger players to have money to waste on older players when they break down. The Red Sox don't have to pay him any more than $725,000 this year and control his rights for 5 more.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,357
As far as value, so far Rafaela is at 0.2 bWAR for 2024, after 10 games. That's a 3.2 bWAR pace, and doesn't include any defensive value yet (it's all oWAR so far). So unless they are paying him $25m per starting now,... I am not worried about bad value.
A lot of comps get made to JBJ (for good reason); Fangraphs pegs his first Boston stint, ages 23-30 with only three positive offensive years, as worth around $125m.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,679
That deal would have zero team risk associated with it, assuming those are team and/or mutual options.
Thanks - clarified above, those are indeed club options in Keith’s contract.

Keith’s bat is a little more of a sure thing than Rafaela’s, and he had a higher evaluation as a prospect, FWIW. On the other hand, he may be a DH long-term.

Pretty curious to see how it all shakes out. I didn’t expect Rafaela would be considered this much of a lock, which to me suggests a kind of pointed long-term plan. I’m not off the sign Soto train yet, but we sure have a lot of outfielders, especially if Bleis rebounds as expected.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
That's very kind of you, but the way baseball economics work you have to screw the productive younger players to have money to waste on older players when they break down. The Red Sox don't have to pay him any more than $725,000 this year and control his rights for 5 more.
In a pure dollars calculus, this is correct. But I think it's also good business to "overspend" by a bit (as compared to the minimum salaries and what arbitration might bring at the relevant time) to help ensure that outside perceptions of incompetence/notgivingashit/whatever don't infect the clubhouse.
 

DeadlySplitter

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 20, 2015
33,689
The source was mlbtraderumoras.com. I had trouble adding the link, so I just posted what I saw. Lighten up a little.
No? Think you misread the blurb:

The Red Sox have agreed to an extension with outfielder/second baseman Ceddanne Rafaela, reports Chris Cotillo of MassLive.com. He’s the second young, core player the team has locked up in the past few weeks; Boston also signed righty Brayan Bello to a six-year, $55MM deal in late March.
https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2024/04/red-sox-ceddanne-rafaela-extension.html
 

Sprowl

mikey lowell of the sandbox
Dope
SoSH Member
Jun 27, 2006
34,670
Haiku

sezwho

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
2,024
Isle of Plum
The Brewers gave Chourio $82 million before he ever played an MLB game so this is nothing new.
It’s new for the Red Sox, at least at this scale.
The difference here is we aren't the buyer of the car. Nobody here is a party to the transaction and presumably both sides have far more information than some random in their mom's basement.
Hey, its my basement.
 

richgedman'sghost

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2006
1,895
ct
The source was mlbtraderumoras.com. I had trouble adding the link, so I just posted what I saw. Lighten up a little.
As soon in the posts above, you were very careless. The numbers you quoted were for Bello's extension. Try to do better next time and don't commit an unforced error
 

Red(s)HawksFan

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 23, 2009
20,961
Maine

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,614
The difference here is we aren't the buyer of the car. Nobody here is a party to the transaction and presumably both sides have far more information than some random in their mom's basement.
Yeah, I butchered the metaphor. Just trying to point out that making ironclad declarations with little information is the coin of the realm.
 

chrisfont9

Member
SoSH Member
That's very kind of you, but the way baseball economics work you have to screw the productive younger players to have money to waste on older players when they break down. The Red Sox don't have to pay him any more than $725,000 this year and control his rights for 5 more.
Well sure, I get how arb works, so presumably this is actually an "extension" in that it goes beyond the arb years. Otherwise there would be no reason for the Sox to do this. It would be tantamount to negating the CBA and would presumably draw some private rebukes across the league.
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,729
Rogers Park
Presumably the press would say “buy out arb years” instead of extension of it was just through 2029 or whatever, yes?
 

Yaz4Ever

MemBer
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2004
11,293
MA-CA-RI-AZ-NC
Presumably the press would say “buy out arb years” instead of extension of it was just through 2029 or whatever, yes?
I’m excited to sign this kid long-term but I would never assume the local press would be unable to butcher it
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
8,883
Bleis put on 33 (!) lbs of muscle between getting hurt and this season. That could affect where he projects to play in the field.

Sounds like one of those good problems.

- Marlo
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,717
But I'm curious - what makes you say "moderate" speed. Maybe it's semantics. But BBSavant grades him as 85th percentile sprint speed in 2023 and 89th in the miniscule sample of this season. But watching him backs that up - he flies out there on the basepaths and more importantly, covers a ton of ground in CF.
Yeah, I was going to say, we've already watched Little Rafi turn a routine line drive down the LF line into a triple. He may not be Jarren Duran fast, but he's fast.

Yeah, I think this makes some sense. It’s debatable that timeline might even be moved up a year or two, depending where they view Anthony long term.
At the least it guarantees them options as they have the spot stabilized for the length of the deal (I'm going to guess six with a couple of option years).

Its for sure an overpay. I have a spreadsheet that I worked on all by myself that shows it!
Oh yeah‽‽‽ Well I have a spreadsheet that I did that shows that the Red Sox locked Rafaela up for 189% below market value for the next eight years!!! And mine is peer reviewed by this guy that I work with and my Boston Sports Facebook Group!!!

Here at SoSH Motors, we dont even care what kind of car it is.
My name is Chaim Bloom and I can paint that car for $99.95!
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,791
Yeah, I butchered the metaphor. Just trying to point out that making ironclad declarations with little information is the coin of the realm.
You didn't -:the original post proclaiming anyone who blindly accepts this as good deal is essentially a sucker made that mistake.

Imo, Sox fans should not cheer spending for spending's sake - we all know that can be bad - but we spend way too much time worrying over other people's money. If FSG is paying $5.675mm AAV too much for Rafaela why should I care? If that's the difference between acquiring another player or not, fans have far bigger problems than being smarter than their front office.
 

SuperManny

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2005
763
Washington, DC
Yeah, I butchered the metaphor. Just trying to point out that making ironclad declarations with little information is the coin of the realm.
Given the front office's frugalness under Breslow I'm not concerned that they overpaid. I would be shocked if it is not team friendly given the amount of existing control the Sox had.

This is what they should be doing since they have extra CBT space, hopefully Casas and Houck are next
 

Sam Ray Not

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
8,872
NYC
Not what I expected to come out of the eclipse to.
Ceddanne Chipper Nicasio Marte Rafaela is an anagram for “Ceddanne, Panoramic Eclipse Aria Father.” Make of it what you will…

(I did not know “Chipper” was one of his middle names; mom apparently a Braves fan).
 

AlNipper49

Huge Member
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 3, 2001
44,920
Mtigawi
You didn't -:the original post proclaiming anyone who blindly accepts this as good deal is essentially a sucker made that mistake.

Imo, Sox fans should not cheer spending for spending's sake - we all know that can be bad - but we spend way too much time worrying over other people's money. If FSG is paying $5.675mm AAV too much for Rafaela why should I care? If that's the difference between acquiring another player or not, fans have far bigger problems than being smarter than their front office.
It’s also a big difference with inflation. You are spending un-inflated dollars now looking forward five years from now. Contracts can out-pace inflation as well. It’s a perfect way to spend resources in a year or years you probably shouldn’t be going over. Like mentioned above, it does carry some risk, but so does everything. With that said, I’m assuming terms are decent because I would have expected Tristan next.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,575
Ceddanne Chipper Nicasio Marte Rafaela is an anagram for “Ceddanne, Panoramic Eclipse Aria Father.” Make of it what you will…

(I did not know “Chipper” was one of his middle names; mom apparently a Braves fan).
Funny to think that Ceddanne's mother got into the Braves presumably because of Willemstad's own Andruw Jones only to become more connected to Chipper.
 

simplicio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 11, 2012
5,357
Through 2031, his age 30 season, starting this year and buying out 2 FA years.