Search results

THose are per game, 18 GP 3.6 MPG so about 65 minutes.

Maybe, but losing a year is much less of a disincentive for a QB than any other position. Skipping a year on a bad team with a bad line might actually give him a year or two at the end of his career.

Couldn't stay healthy and didn't look like the same guy. Also, you miss 10 games with concussions in a year and I'm not much interested, that's not usually a recipe for success even if he didn't have the other injury issues.

I would guess Tatum's number is pretty good and Brown's is bad as well. Ok, quick eyeball.... 86 players have 10+ GP with a USG of 15% or higher in clutch situations per nba.com. Tatum is 38th in AST% among them. ( Luka is 2nd, Lillard is 4th, Beal is 52nd) Jaylen in 71st. The worst guys I...

Tatum's AST% is 21%, he's definitely facilitating more. In clutch situations it drops to 16% Jaylen... 20.2%, drops in Clutch time to..... 5.6% Jaylen is really the guy just going full black hole in the clutch.

In his defense, he didn't like that they consistently had terrible lines. DAL spent a lot of resources building a good line, and one would expect they will continue to emphasize it.

I don't think Nesmith is in that group, he's a rookie with what should be a complementary skill-set. I do think it's basically saying... yeah the low ceiling wings need to go.

The question though isn't... would he do better than Cam, it's... given the incredible price it would take, how confident are you in his fit that you can build a title winner around him. People were just pointing out that of the top QBs in the league he's one of the worse fits in terms of...

View: https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1365007710496948239 LOL... oh we didn't demand a trade, but y'know hypothetically he'd love to play for one of these teams IF he were traded

Brady also... doesn't have that much control? I mean he has some, but at no point in his career did they call him into FA and draft prep and get his opinion on what they should do on the O-line.

Grant and Semi seem the obvious ones as non-dynamic. Carsen is probably the flip side of not knowing his role is to be a complementary player and take open shots not dominate the ball

Oh to be clear he's really good, I just think the fit is awkward given why he wants out of SEA. I don't think he'd be happier here. As an example, I think Watson is a much better fit here if we're talking about trading a ton of assets for a QB.

Seems like a bad fit. A lot of the things Wilson supposedly doesn't like about Carroll are true even more so of Bill. While on the flip side Bill isn't going to love a guy who thinks he deserves more input and less criticism than anyone else because he's the QB, and on-field while a good O-line...

#8, after trading down, but yeah still ridiculous Even more ridiculous honestly since some teams are dumb and take RBs too early, is his take that Fields will fall to #24? There is nothing Casserly loves more than a RB and nothing he hates more than a Black QB.

Not planning to post every day, but I took a break from work, and this fall was almost perfect, made 1 tiny trade : 15- Trey Lance (doubtful, but sometimes a QB falls) 46- Zaven Collins 96- Amari Rodgers (only way this got better would have been if Moore had fallen 2 more spots to me) 120- Brady...

Could they? Go take a look at the unsigned players.... it's dire. He's there to be traded or cut in a TPE trade or when a buyout comes along, his value is he plays hard on D and that's all you usually ask for in your deep bench guys.

As a note, this was not aimed at you, but another poster claiming TT is a 3rd string C and we should have used the MLE to sign a magical wing. Though the underlying point is close enough, TT is a very valuable part of the team, and that's with everything going basically perfectly with the other...

One note... it's almost impossible to get a $28M S&T this offseason unless they are dumping Kemba. S&T hard caps you and we won't have enough space under the hard cap to get $28M in

Because the argument "we should have gotten a mediocre bench wing instead of our starting C" doesn't sound as good as "we should have gotten a mediocre bench wing instead of a 3rd string C". I agree though, he started slow, but he's played the 4th most minutes and he's been a very valuable...