Jeff Van GULLY said:
So we fire an Ivy league coach just to hire a different Ivy league coach?
Edit: Just kidding, sort of.
I'm a (University of) Michigan guy who grew up in the Boston area rooting for BC hoops (still do).
I am not a Tommy Amaker fan.
He got his first shot as a big-boy head coach at Seton Hall in the Big East back when it was still a powerful conference, and he had an up-and-down record there. However, there were folks connected to the program that were not at all sad to see him go.
Michigan was his next big-boy gig. He was an awful recruiter that was hired after Michigan bottomed out in the wake of the Ed Martin booster scandal. The teams were really bleh, there was little talent, and Amaker was viewed as a carpetbagger who was still looking to cash in on the Coach K halo. Goodbye and good riddance there.
He's obviously done a good job at Harvard, but as Donahue (apparently) also showed, the Ivy League is a bit more of an even playing field athlete-wise for obvious reasons. You get the occasional upper-tier player come through, and when they do you make hay. Donahue had that at Cornell with Wittman.
Part of Donahue's downfall at BC seems to be related to recruiting. Based on Amaker's track record, I wouldn't expect a ton of improvement here... he hasn't shown a great deal of ability to compete in either the old Big East or the Big Ten. He might get you to the middle of the league. If that's okay with the Bald Eagles, then go for it.
Otherwise, I'd look elsewhere...