2016-17 General MLB Offseason Thread

Snodgrass'Muff

oppresses WARmongers
SoSH Member
Mar 11, 2008
27,644
Roanoke, VA
Also, I don't think top-notch closers are properly valued by WAR, but that is a different and lengthy discussion.
This. A thousand times this.

I'd be comfortable betting the house that the Sox don't win the division last year without Kimbrel. I might even bet that they don't make the playoffs without him. Even using Fangraphs WAR, which rated him higher, he was only worth 1.2 wins. They won the division by 4 games (and the Wild Card by 5), so you might say that Kimbrel only accounted for a little more than a quarter of that difference.

However, WAR does not effectively account for the trickledown effect we would have seen if Koji was a our closer last year when all of the injuries in the pen happened. Or the impact on the rotation if they were even more hampered in their ability to pull struggling/tiring starters.

Pull Kimbrel from the pen and replace him with the mythical replacement level player, and at the very least I think they are a WC team instead of a division winner, and I wouldn't be surprised in the least if they had ended up 5 or 6 games worse than they actually finished. Maybe more.
 

ehaz

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 30, 2007
4,954
Turner is 32 and has only had 500 PAs once in his career. He has blossomed since coming to the Dodgers three years ago but I'm still not sure how comfortable I'd feel betting on him for his 32-35 years especially if that included giving up a first round pick as well as a change of environment.

Also, I don't think top-notch closers are properly valued by WAR, but that is a different and lengthy discussion.
According to Tom Tango's WARcel system Turner projects to be a better bet than even Cespedes, let alone Fowler, Encarnacion, Desmond, etc. Fowler got $85, Desmond got $70M (to reportedly play 1B), and Cespedes got $110. The 'change of environment' is leaving the NL West and Dodger Stadium, I'd rank that as a positive.

I agree with you, top-notch closers are not properly valued by WAR, but I cannot fathom the suggestion that Melancon is as valuable as Turner. He must really want to stay in LA.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,186
You're still not factoring in the first round pick, signing Turner would have cost one and signing Melancon did not.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,186
And FWIW I don't think any of those guys were good signings (Cespedes, Fowler, Desmond). Cespedes would have been a lot better if he could play competent CF or if NY didn't already have three corner outfielders under contract that needed to play. People seem to forget every winter that the majority of big-money signings end up hurting the signing team more than help them, especially as the game gets younger in recent years.
 

EricFeczko

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 26, 2014
4,851
Justin Turner grew up and played HS/college ball in southern california. I wouldn't be surprised if the location factored into the deal.
I would be very surprised if other teams could afford him at that price.
 

Tyrone Biggums

nfl meets tri-annually at a secret country mansion
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2006
6,424
ChiSox just inked the Dutch Oven for a year. Really good low risk signing. Cooper might do wonders with Holland. Hahn is doing exactly what he needs to do in order to be successful 2 or 3 years down the road.
 

Hank Scorpio

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 1, 2013
6,995
Salem, NH
This. A thousand times this.

I'd be comfortable betting the house that the Sox don't win the division last year without Kimbrel. I might even bet that they don't make the playoffs without him. Even using Fangraphs WAR, which rated him higher, he was only worth 1.2 wins. They won the division by 4 games (and the Wild Card by 5), so you might say that Kimbrel only accounted for a little more than a quarter of that difference.

However, WAR does not effectively account for the trickledown effect we would have seen if Koji was a our closer last year when all of the injuries in the pen happened. Or the impact on the rotation if they were even more hampered in their ability to pull struggling/tiring starters.

Pull Kimbrel from the pen and replace him with the mythical replacement level player, and at the very least I think they are a WC team instead of a division winner, and I wouldn't be surprised in the least if they had ended up 5 or 6 games worse than they actually finished. Maybe more.
The other thing WAR doesn't look at is that not all innings are created equal. Kimbrel, and closers in general, are entering games where there performance is immediately tied to the outcome of the game. A mediocre/bad mop-up guy isn't going to cost you a lot of games if they're entering when you're up 8-0 or down 10-2. A mediocre/bad closer could put up a 3.70 ERA, but cost you 7 or 8 games over a top-shelf guy.
 

John Marzano Olympic Hero

has fancy plans, and pants to match
Dope
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2001
24,628
On today's Uni-Watch, Paul Lucas says Wahoo isn't completely gone:

• However, the Wahoo caps will still be worn with the navy alternates on the road. (Or at least that’s the officially designated cap for that jersey on the road. Given the way teams tend to mix and match these days, I wouldn’t be surprised to see any Cleveland cap being paired with any jersey.)
 

richgedman'sghost

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
May 13, 2006
1,885
ct
According to Rosenthal, beginning with the 2018 season, teams will be required to start getaway games no later than 437 local time. In addition, if a team has a game the next day in a different city, the game can not start earlier than 5pm. For example, the situation the Red Sox faced this past August where they had a night game in Baltimore followed by an afternoon game in Detroit would no longer be allowed. The Orioles could still plY the Sox in a night game but then the Detroit game would also have to be a night game. Why they have to wait until 2018 to implement this I don't know. Couldn't they just change the start times if 2017 games if need be?
 

nvalvo

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
21,679
Rogers Park
Ziegler is old as the hills, but if some of these relievers are worth $60 and $80m, I would have guessed he'd get more than that.
 

Tyrone Biggums

nfl meets tri-annually at a secret country mansion
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2006
6,424
looks like EE got paid in Cleveland
Is it just me or does it seem like parity is dead for next year. It seems like 4 teams have a legitimate shot. The Cubs Red Sox Indians and Dodgers. Everyone else has zero shot. Interesting...just my opinion of course.
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,234
Is it just me or does it seem like parity is dead for next year. It seems like 4 teams have a legitimate shot. The Cubs Red Sox Indians and Dodgers. Everyone else has zero shot. Interesting...just my opinion of course.
It's baseball. Those may be the 4 best teams, but gotta be at least a 50% chance one of the other 26 wins the WS next year.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,186
Is it just me or does it seem like parity is dead for next year. It seems like 4 teams have a legitimate shot. The Cubs Red Sox Indians and Dodgers. Everyone else has zero shot. Interesting...just my opinion of course.
Baseball almost never works like that, I dare you to keep that in your signature all season and see how it works out.
 

Mike Greenwall

Member
SoSH Member
Nice pick up by Cleveland. He was the scariest bat in that TO lineup. At least he's out of the AL east.
Toronto not only loses EE, now they're realizing they're probably stuck with Joey Bats.

As for the above conversation, there does seem to be a real gap between Cubs, Red Sox, Dodgers and Cleveland. But I would probably take the field as of right now.
 

Papelbon's Poutine

Homeland Security
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2005
19,615
Portsmouth, NH
Nice pick up by Cleveland. He was the scariest bat in that TO lineup. At least he's out of the AL east.
Toronto not only loses EE, now they're realizing they're probably stuck with Joey Bats.

As for the above conversation, there does seem to be a real gap between Cubs, Red Sox, Dodgers and Cleveland. But I would probably take the field as of right now.
How are they stuck with Joey Bats?
 

DaubachmanTurnerOD

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
673
The other thing WAR doesn't look at is that not all innings are created equal. Kimbrel, and closers in general, are entering games where there performance is immediately tied to the outcome of the game. A mediocre/bad mop-up guy isn't going to cost you a lot of games if they're entering when you're up 8-0 or down 10-2. A mediocre/bad closer could put up a 3.70 ERA, but cost you 7 or 8 games over a top-shelf guy.
WAR does incorporate a leverage index for relievers.

At least, fWAR does (the Fangraphs authors frequently make that point), and I believe that the only difference between theirs and B-Ref is that B-Ref uses RA9, so rWAR likely accounts for leverage as well (but I could be wrong about that).
 

Tyrone Biggums

nfl meets tri-annually at a secret country mansion
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2006
6,424
Nationals? Giants? Rangers? Mets?
While you can never count out the Giants for obvious reasons, the Mets and Nationals usually lose one of their core guys at some point. Even at full health the gap between the Dodgers/Cubs and the Mets and Nationals is pretty significant. Maybe I'm wrong but just in my opinion it seems pretty clear.

Rangers? There is a clear gap with them and the Sox/Indians.
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Rangers? There is a clear gap with them and the Sox/Indians.
This whole concept of who can and can't win is a little strange to me, especially in an era with 2 wild cards per league in which two 80-something win teams met in the World Series as recently as 2014 (Royals and Giants).

More specifically, the Rangers finished 1st in the AL in the regular season and should have a full year from Darvish, Mazara, and Lucroy in 2017. I agree that they're not as talented as the Sox or Indians overall, but a rotation of injured Kluber, Josh Tomlin, and drone aficionado Trevor Bauer just ran through the AL playoffs all the way to Game 7 of the World Series. It's hard to say in December who will be rounding into form in October.
 

Plympton91

bubble burster
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2008
12,408
Is it just me or does it seem like parity is dead for next year. It seems like 4 teams have a legitimate shot. The Cubs Red Sox Indians and Dodgers. Everyone else has zero shot. Interesting...just my opinion of course.
Max Scherzer, Stephen Strasburg, Tanner Roark, Bryce Harper, Adam Eaton, Trea Turner, Daniel Murphy, and Anthony Rendon would like a word with you.
 

Savin Hillbilly

loves the secret sauce
SoSH Member
Jul 10, 2007
18,783
The wrong side of the bridge....
Max Scherzer, Stephen Strasburg, Tanner Roark, Bryce Harper, Adam Eaton, Trea Turner, Daniel Murphy, and Anthony Rendon would like a word with you.
Jose Altuve, Carlos Correa, Alex Bregman, George Springer, Lance McCullers et al might beg for a moment to chat as well.

But really, moondog80 and jon abbey gave the best answer. That's just not how baseball works. Nobody's a lock to make the playoffs, and almost nobody is a lock to miss them. And even assuming all four of the teams Tyrone tabbed make the playoffs, there will be six other teams in there and absolutely any of them could get hot and win it all.
 

Oppo

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 5, 2009
1,576
Gallardo (edit: plus $2) to Sea
S Smith to Bal

Minor move, but makes sense for both sides. Sea needed a 5th starter I guess (other SP: Felix, Iwakuma, Paxton, Miranda, Karns, Whalen, Heston) Bal needed a LH OF and now can fit Ubaldo and Miley in the rotation! Gallardo due $13 and Smith $7 next year. Details unknown, but Balt expected to pay about have of Gallardos $.
 
Last edited:

MakMan44

stole corsi's dream
SoSH Member
Aug 22, 2009
19,363
Braves trade Mallex Smith and Shae Simmons to the M's for 2 prospects and the M's then flipped Smith and 2 of their own prospects to the Rays for Drew Smyly

A's sign Santiago Casilla to a 2 year deal
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
71,186
Dammit, not surprising, but I was really hoping to see him out of the division. At least they lost Encarnacion...
 

moondog80

heart is two sizes two small
SoSH Member
Sep 20, 2005
8,234
A bit silly to think he would sign a deal for significantly less than a qualifying offer in January.
Why? Players/agents misread the market all he time. Nelson Cruz signed for 8 mil after turning down a 14 mil qualifying offer. I'm actually surprised Toronto would give him more significantly more jab the QO given his apparent lack of other suitors. Good for him though. And good for me not having to read any more threads about whether or not the Sox should sign him.