2018 AFCCG: Jags v. Pats (Non-Brady Edition)

bradmahn

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
591
The Pats’ defense is 31st in DVOA.

Which I don’t think means jack shit, but if you agree with that, then I don’t know why you’d cite their numbers about Jacksonville’s defense as though they are meaningful.

I mean, the Chiefs were 4th in offensive DVOA. Should we marvel that the Titans managed to slow that offensive juggernaut? Or should we instead question the validity of non-transparent statistical measures?
Or you can recognize how badly the team played in the first six weeks and how that anchor is being raised with each passing week (weighted DVOA rank of 22nd at the end of the season and presently 17th).
 

CantKeepmedown

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
2,588
Portland, ME
Hmm, maybe he hit it on a helmet of a lineman. Jeff Howe says he’s expected to play barring an unexpected setback.
Jesus, I really hope that's just "reporter" speak. "Expected to play barring a setback" does not sound great at all. 3 days to heal and see how it feels come Sunday.

Of course I expect him to play. But I was really hoping this was just lingering from the late in the season report about the hand. Not a new injury. Color me concerned.
 

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,451
deep inside Guido territory
Jesus, I really hope that's just "reporter" speak. "Expected to play barring a setback" does not sound great at all. 3 days to heal and see how it feels come Sunday.

Of course I expect him to play. But I was really hoping this was just lingering from the late in the season report about the hand. Not a new injury. Color me concerned.
We’ll have to see his status at practice tomorrow. If he’s a DNP, yeah let’s panic. I expect he’ll be limited every day and listed as questionable or probable.
 

bagwell1

New Member
Jul 31, 2006
442
Jacksonville
I previously pointed out conventional metrics that make the Jags' run defense look just as poor as DVOA does. When every stat that I look at tells me that the Jaguars have a bad run defense (including DVOA), I don't see any possible conclusion besides the fact that the Jaguars have a bad run defense. Do you have anything to back up the argument that the Jags have a good run defense? Or that the Patriots have a mediocre rushing offense?
.
Fyi,the Jags run defense was 7th best in yards per attempt after the Marcell Dareus trade over the last 9 weeks. Not saying it is amazing but I would not call it bad anymore.
It was terrible the first 7 weeks which skews numbers....
 

Sportsbstn

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 8, 2004
8,794
We’ll have to see his status at practice tomorrow. If he’s a DNP, yeah let’s panic. I expect he’ll be limited every day and listed as questionable or probable.
He would likely go to doubtful at some point. I would bet a very large amount there is zero chance, absolute zero that Brady is a DNP.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
8,923
Dallas
The more superstars and injuries don’t happen the more useful DVOA is. This year it has been admittedly less useful and it’s usefullness is already questionable. Pats were 31st overall in defensive DVOA for the regular season. Their weighted rank though is 17th. What DVOA says matches what I’ve seen; the Pats had a bad start to the season but righted the ship and when everyone not on the IR is healthy they are an average unit with the potential to be slightly above average. They can also play below average but the floor performance expectation after say week 4 vs now? I expect a below average floor now after week 4 I expected a dumpster fire as the floor.
 

bagwell1

New Member
Jul 31, 2006
442
Jacksonville
Fyi,the Jags run defense was 7th best in yards per attempt after the Marcell Dareus trade over the last 9 weeks. Not saying it is amazing but I would not call it bad anymore.
It was terrible the first 7 weeks which skews numbers....
For additional info, they were dead last at 5.16 pre Dareus. Post 3.69.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,975
Here
Hmm, maybe he hit it on a helmet of a lineman. Jeff Howe says he’s expected to play barring an unexpected setback.
Starting QB hurts throwing hand on helmet of lineman prior to Pats playoff game with the Jaguars. Where have we heard this before?
 

DJnVa

Dorito Dawg
SoSH Member
Dec 16, 2010
54,051
Every single player is expected to play barring an unexpected setback.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dion Lewis led the NFL in rushing for the second half of the season. Think on that for a second. On a team with the NFL MVP at QB, on a team whose OLine has generally been thought of as a weakness, on a team whose best OLineman from last year (Pro Bowler) hasn't played since early in the year, a 5'-8" RB led the NFL in rushing over the last 8 games of the season. The cold part of the season. The "Smashmouth/Old-Time/Separate the men from the boys" part of the season. More yards than Bell, than Gurley, than anyone.

I think it is safe to say that the Patriots do NOT have a mediocre running game.
 

Stitch01

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
18,155
Boston
The Pats’ defense is 31st in DVOA.

Which I don’t think means jack shit, but if you agree with that, then I don’t know why you’d cite their numbers about Jacksonville’s defense as though they are meaningful.

I mean, the Chiefs were 4th in offensive DVOA. Should we marvel that the Titans managed to slow that offensive juggernaut? Or should we instead question the validity of non-transparent statistical measures?
Weighted defense is 22nd, which seems about right to a touch light to me.

Not sure why you wouldnt think the Pats are a good running team. Lewis grades very well by statistical and subjective measures. Even if you dont believe in DVOA as a bit of a black box (and it does historically tend to overrate the Pats running game IMO) or the #1 rating in adjusted line yards, they come out as average to very good on more discrete/objective measurements like power success, stuffed percentage, etc. They're 16th in pass/run ratio. They're a good running team, maybe as good as a Pats team has been at running since '04.

KC was 4th in DVOA in no small part due to Kelce. The Titans didnt really slow down the Chiefs when Kelce was in the game.
 

Soxy

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2008
6,095
Fyi,the Jags run defense was 7th best in yards per attempt after the Marcell Dareus trade over the last 9 weeks. Not saying it is amazing but I would not call it bad anymore.
It was terrible the first 7 weeks which skews numbers....
For additional info, they were dead last at 5.16 pre Dareus. Post 3.69.
Yards per carry is a flawed metric (every metric is, really), but let's ignore that. Was it Dareus? Or was it the schedule? The correct answer is probably a little bit of both. These are the teams they played over those last 9 weeks, and their ranking in rushing yards per carry:

Bengals - 29th
Chargers - 26th
Browns - 6th
Cardinals - 31st
Colts - 28th
Seahawks - 21st
Texans - 16th
49ers - 17th
Titans - 15th

One team in the top third of the league (though it's the Browns, which.... c'mon). Three teams in the top half of the league (though the two non-Browns teams are the two lowest ranked teams in the top half). Five teams in the bottom third of the league, including 4 of the worst 7 teams in the league.

Contrast that to their first 7 games:

Texans - 16th
Titans - 15th
Ravens - 19th
Jets - 20th
Steelers - 25th
Rams - 7th
Colts - 28th

One team in the top third of the league. Three teams in the top half of the league (though again, with two as low as you can get and still be in the top half). Two teams in the bottom third of the league.

Jacksonville sure played a lot of shitty rushing offenses, huh? And yet, they still finished with bad rushing defense stats. Seems like a salient point.

While we're at it, let's look at the passing offenses they've faced, and their rank in net yards/attempt:

Texans - 20th
Titans - 17th
Ravens - 32nd
Jets - 21st
Steelers - 6th
Rams - 7th
Colts - 29th
Bengals - 22nd
Chargers - 2nd
Browns - 31st
Cardinals - 23rd
Colts - 29th
Seahawks - 15th
Texans - 20th
49ers - 18th
Titans - 17th

Three top-10 passing offenses, four middling passing offenses, and a bunch of teams in the bottom third of the league. So they played a lot of shitty passing offenses too. (Which is a point I've made a few times throughout this season: Jacksonville has beat up on a bunch of bad offenses. Hey, you can only play the team in front of you. But let's see this defense do it on the road in Foxboro.)

Bringing it back to the running game: the Patriots will be the best rushing team they've faced outside of the LA Rams. Those Rams finished 7th in yards per attempt, 8th in rushing yards, and 9th in rushing DVOA. Pats finished 12th in rushing yards per attempt, 10th in rushing yards, and 3rd in rushing DVOA. Gurley finished with 116 yards on 23 carries, in case you were wondering.

The Steelers made the mistake of coming out empty set, trying to spread the Jags out and throw the ball against the best passing defense in the NFL. I don't think the Patriots will make the same mistake. I don't think they'll be afraid to throw it (take another look at that schedule the Jags played). But I don't think Brady will be throwing the ball 50+ times again unless something went horribly wrong and they have to play catch-up. The running game should be a big part of the offensive plan.
 

streeter88

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 2, 2006
1,807
Melbourne, Australia

bagwell1

New Member
Jul 31, 2006
442
Jacksonville
Yards per carry is a flawed metric (every metric is, really), but let's ignore that. Was it Dareus? Or was it the schedule? The correct answer is probably a little bit of both. These are the teams they played over those last 9 weeks, and their ranking in rushing yards per carry:

Bengals - 29th
Chargers - 26th
Browns - 6th
Cardinals - 31st
Colts - 28th
Seahawks - 21st
Texans - 16th
49ers - 17th
Titans - 15th

One team in the top third of the league (though it's the Browns, which.... c'mon). Three teams in the top half of the league (though the two non-Browns teams are the two lowest ranked teams in the top half). Five teams in the bottom third of the league, including 4 of the worst 7 teams in the league.

Contrast that to their first 7 games:

Texans - 16th
Titans - 15th
Ravens - 19th
Jets - 20th
Steelers - 25th
Rams - 7th
Colts - 28th

One team in the top third of the league. Three teams in the top half of the league (though again, with two as low as you can get and still be in the top half). Two teams in the bottom third of the league.

Jacksonville sure played a lot of shitty rushing offenses, huh? And yet, they still finished with bad rushing defense stats. Seems like a salient point.

While we're at it, let's look at the passing offenses they've faced, and their rank in net yards/attempt:

Texans - 20th
Titans - 17th
Ravens - 32nd
Jets - 21st
Steelers - 6th
Rams - 7th
Colts - 29th
Bengals - 22nd
Chargers - 2nd
Browns - 31st
Cardinals - 23rd
Colts - 29th
Seahawks - 15th
Texans - 20th
49ers - 18th
Titans - 17th

Three top-10 passing offenses, four middling passing offenses, and a bunch of teams in the bottom third of the league. So they played a lot of shitty passing offenses too. (Which is a point I've made a few times throughout this season: Jacksonville has beat up on a bunch of bad offenses. Hey, you can only play the team in front of you. But let's see this defense do it on the road in Foxboro.)

Bringing it back to the running game: the Patriots will be the best rushing team they've faced outside of the LA Rams. Those Rams finished 7th in yards per attempt, 8th in rushing yards, and 9th in rushing DVOA. Pats finished 12th in rushing yards per attempt, 10th in rushing yards, and 3rd in rushing DVOA. Gurley finished with 116 yards on 23 carries, in case you were wondering.

The Steelers made the mistake of coming out empty set, trying to spread the Jags out and throw the ball against the best passing defense in the NFL. I don't think the Patriots will make the same mistake. I don't think they'll be afraid to throw it (take another look at that schedule the Jags played). But I don't think Brady will be throwing the ball 50+ times again unless something went horribly wrong and they have to play catch-up. The running game should be a big part of the offensive plan.
you win.
 

dcmissle

Deflatigator
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Aug 4, 2005
28,269
I thought I saw left somewhere.

Edit, or was that another, older injury?
Saturday, 35 of 53 for 327 and a passer rating of 102.5.

So when did this happen ... Brady’s last series?

I had heard, but have not been able to find, that Jerry Thornton reported a “broken hand “ BEFORE the Titans game. Which struck me as curious because you’ll never find a Pats loyalist stouter than Jerry, and a hand injury to Brady was never listed IIRC. In that connection, consider this:

https://operations.nfl.com/media/2683/2017-nfl-injury-report-policy.pdf

A few hours ago, Thornton was asked whether today’s report involved what Thornton was talking about. He said he’d look into it, and an hour later joked that Brady’s “strain” was caused by his SB rings.

https://mobile.twitter.com/jerrythornton1?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^author

Who the fuck knows at this point?

Karen G, reportedly. Practice injury:

https://mobile.twitter.com/kguregian?ref_src=twsrc^tfw&ref_url=https://cdn.rawgit.com/s9e/s9e.github.io/master/iframe/twitter.min.html#953763467273654273
 
Last edited:

Kenny F'ing Powers

posts way less than 18% useful shit
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2010
14,476
Is this ESPN's way of whipping the Jags into a "they're disrespecting us" frenzy? Or are these ratings complete and utter BS? Because it would seem that the Jags defense is pretty good, and the offense put up 28 on PIT this past week.
Third option: it's true.
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
63,942
Rotten Apple
Is this ESPN's way of whipping the Jags into a "they're disrespecting us" frenzy? Or are these ratings complete and utter BS? Because it would seem that the Jags defense is pretty good, and the offense put up 28 on PIT this past week.
The Tomato Can take will devour us all before too long.
 

Dr. Gonzo

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 8, 2010
5,220

A little more info from Globe beat writer Jim McBride. Brady has the cut on his hand from a handoff in practice.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,015
Mansfield MA
Not sure why you wouldnt think the Pats are a good running team. Lewis grades very well by statistical and subjective measures. Even if you dont believe in DVOA as a bit of a black box (and it does historically tend to overrate the Pats running game IMO) or the #1 rating in adjusted line yards, they come out as average to very good on more discrete/objective measurements like power success, stuffed percentage, etc. They're 16th in pass/run ratio. They're a good running team, maybe as good as a Pats team has been at running since '04.
The issue with DVOA (and really, any rate stat) when it comes to the Patriots running game is that they are a gameplan team that runs a lot in advantageous matchups and does not run in disadvantageous matchups. So when they play the Ravens, they might run the ball 10 times and throw it 50; against the Colts, they run the ball 40 times and throw 20. It looks like they're awesome running the ball because the overall efficiency is very good, but the numbers are skewed because they don't run against teams when they can't.

There is something of that effect going on this year - they ran for 190+ yards in both meetings with the Bills, who were 31st in rushing defense DVOA, but I think you're right and they've shown more ability to run against top Ds. They went 29 for 99 against Denver (#2 rush D DVOA), 19 for 80 against Carolina (#6), 25 for 118 and 38 for 147 in two meetings with the Jets (#11), and most recently, 27 for 102 vs the Titans (#7). So they've run the ball fairly often and with reasonable effectiveness against just about anybody.
 

Sportsbstn

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 8, 2004
8,794
If the line moves in the next day or two in favor of the Jags, then...everybody panic!
If the books thought it was a real question if brady was going to play, the line would be OTB. That would concern me a hell of a lot more than a line moving.
 

Captaincoop

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
13,488
Santa Monica, CA
It doesn't seem like there's much question that he'll play. The question is how much will this affect his performance.

The Patriots aren't going to give us any clue, so we get to spend three days reading tea leaves.
 

RG33

Certain Class of Poster
SoSH Member
Nov 28, 2005
7,224
CA
Clearly the stories of Brady’s decline have had some substance to them. Old man hands are much more susceptible to cuts and bruising than young man hands.
 

SemperFidelisSox

Member
SoSH Member
May 25, 2008
31,347
Boston, MA
I’m not a doctor but wouldn’t an x-ray for a cut suggest it was deep enough to be concerned about tissue or nerve damage? X-rays aren’t usually done for your average cut.
 

Ed Hillel

Wants to be startin somethin
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2007
43,975
Here
I’m not a doctor but wouldn’t an x-ray for a cut suggest it was deep enough to be concerned about tissue or nerve damage? X-rays aren’t usually done for your average cut.
More likely it there was both a cut and impact and they were making sure the impact didn’t break anything. I have no idea how a minor collision during a handoff could cause a deep gash.
 

luckiestman

Son of the Harpy
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
32,788
It’s always somethin’.

And,


If he cut his hand and there was any swelling, or pain, they are taking an X-Ray.

Man I love this scene. First you mention Joe Gibbs, now this. As Peter King would say, “weird”.