2020 Coaching Carousel: #AnyoneButMcDaniels

RedOctober3829

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
55,434
deep inside Guido territory
Yup, stay as far away as you can from this cesspool, Josh.

Stefanski presented a detailed vision of how he will approach the head coaching job. He made it clear he was willing to yield to certain DePodesta standards, such as an analytics person with a head set and access to the coaching staff on game days, in addition to certain Haslam likes, such as hours-long, Monday-after, owner-coach meetings.
Stefanski returned to the Vikings (they lost 27-10 to the 49ers on Saturday) having improved on the impression he left last year. His willingness to work with coaching, analytics and ownership types in ways agreeable to DePodesta and Haslam were big selling points.
McDaniels arrived Friday, smartly dressed, Fitbit trim and in a better mindset than ever to address a crowd of important strangers with respect but conviction.
He appreciated all the amenities of an interview (the Browns are regarded as gracious hosts) but focused on a few cold, hard questions.
Would they take to him as a person and as a leader? There had been a sense he and DePodesta would get to know each other quickly and be kindred spirits. This is thought to have become the case.
Would the Browns show a willingness to applaud his detailed presentation on the sweeping makeover that would be needed for him to want the job? This is where the trouble with his candidacy came to a head.

The Browns were as detailed with him as to the parts of their system they want to keep, or expand, as he was with them as to necessary changes.
In the end, both came to a similar conclusion: It wasn’t a great fit.
The Browns want to hang on to some of the ideas they still think can work. McDaniels had quite different ideas.
https://www.cantonrep.com/sports/20200112/steve-doerschuk-josh-mcdaniels-wouldnrsquot-back-down-browns-owner-backed-away
View: https://twitter.com/DustinFox37/status/1216510921947914240?s=19
 

lostjumper

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 27, 2009
1,279
Concord, NH
So le me see if I have this right. The Browns interview Josh and he says he wants to make some changes to the organization to improve football operations. Mostly likely to mirror the way things are run at Gillette for the last 20 years during a period of historic success. And the Browns say, no thanks, we think our way is working just. Huh...
 

IdiotKicker

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 21, 2005
10,815
Somerville, MA
I'll give the Browns credit. Most football teams prefer to fail in ways that are conventional and conservative to avoid the public appearance of being embarassed. The Browns are happy to fail in ways that are new and revolutionary on a regular basis, and I think we're all better for having access to this type of failure.

The Cleveland Browns - Failure is All of the Options, Even the Run-Pass Option.
 

loshjott

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2004
14,984
Silver Spring, MD
Are the Browns wrong? McDaniels as a head coach is most known for drafting Tim Tebow in the first round. He wasn't good in Denver and he was capricious at best in last year's dance with the Colts. The NFL is full of guys who are great coordinators but lousy head coaches (Wade Phillips, Norv Turner, etc.). Less so guys like BB who were great HCs after being fired elsewhere. And BB's track record is not exactly great in grooming good HCs.

I have no idea if the Browns are ahead of the curve here, or are morons. But good for them for sticking to their plan and giving it a shot.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,533
Are the Browns wrong? McDaniels as a head coach is most known for drafting Tim Tebow in the first round. He wasn't good in Denver and he was capricious at best in last year's dance with the Colts. The NFL is full of guys who are great coordinators but lousy head coaches (Wade Phillips, Norv Turner, etc.). Less so guys like BB who were great HCs after being fired elsewhere. And BB's track record is not exactly great in grooming good HCs.

I have no idea if the Browns are ahead of the curve here, or are morons. But good for them for sticking to their plan and giving it a shot.
The part about consulting the owner about game plans by Friday? (assuming the tweet above is accurate) I dont think that qualifies as being ahead of the curve. The only response to that is the one Dr. Westfall gave to Dr. Gideon.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,334
Are the Browns wrong? McDaniels as a head coach is most known for drafting Tim Tebow in the first round. He wasn't good in Denver and he was capricious at best in last year's dance with the Colts. The NFL is full of guys who are great coordinators but lousy head coaches (Wade Phillips, Norv Turner, etc.). Less so guys like BB who were great HCs after being fired elsewhere. And BB's track record is not exactly great in grooming good HCs.

I have no idea if the Browns are ahead of the curve here, or are morons. But good for them for sticking to their plan and giving it a shot.
I do not know whether Josh McD will be a good head coach or not. I also do think it is possible that getting feedback (not veto, but just hearing perspective) from an analytics team could be helpful for an NFL team. But I am pretty sure that having Haslem review the game plan is not a helpful step for any head coach.
 

loshjott

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 30, 2004
14,984
Silver Spring, MD
The part about consulting the owner about game plans by Friday? (assuming the tweet above is accurate) I dont think that qualifies as being ahead of the curve. The only response to that is the one Dr. Westfall gave to Dr. Gideon.
Love the St. Elsewhere reference, tho I don't remember the specifics.

On further thought, that makes no sense, especially since coaches develop game plan by Tues night and players get them on Weds, and practice to them Weds-Thurs. What can happen Friday to change that?
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,533
Love the St. Elsewhere reference, tho I don't remember the specifics.

On further thought, that makes no sense, especially since coaches develop game plan by Tues night and players get them on Weds, and practice to them Weds-Thurs. What can happen Friday to change that?
What better time for a meddlesome owner to meddle than after things are set up.

"A Moon For the Misbegotten"
Original air date: September 30, 1987

St. Eligius is saved (and any damage from the above-mentioned "Wrecker's Ball" repaired), but it falls under the new ownership of Ecumena Corporation, a national managed health care concern. (The use of "Ecumena" garnered some real-life controversy, as Humana thought the use of that name sounded too much like its own; the trademark-infringement lawsuit that ensued prompted NBC to begin airing post-episode disclaimers stating that Ecumena was indeed fictional,[8] and to change the corporate name mid-season to "Weigert."[9]) Ecumena's choice to head St. Eligius, Dr. John Gideon, mixed like oil and water with the St. Eligius staff, especially Dr. Westphall, who, in the final scene of this episode (and Ed Flanders's last moment as a St. Elsewhere series regular), delivers his resignation "in terms you can understand"—by dropping his pants and exposing his bare buttocks to Gideon ("You can kiss my ass, pal"). This scene, which would normally be considered controversial, was preserved by NBC's censors as they did not consider Westphall's display to be erotic in nature.[10]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/St._Elsewhere#cite_note-10
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,104
Pittsburgh, PA
The Cleveland Browns - Failure is All of the Options
What a fantastic 2020 season thread title.

In startup parlance, when a founder reaches a crossroads where the organization has outgrown his particular skillset and calling and needs different leadership to continue growing, and investors recommend that he give up operational control (but not equity - he can still enjoy the financial gains), it's called a "Rich vs King" decision. i.e., which would you rather be: Rich, or King? Pick one.

Jimmy Haslam III (let's remember that he inherited the team from daddy) has chosen "tinpot dictator" for 20 years, despite being repeatedly presented with the choice again and again and also the consequences of his wrong choice. Romeo Crennel and Butch Davis brought him all the way to mediocrity, but lately it seems even that's too much to aspire to. Best seasons since the Browns' re-founding in 1999:

2002: +24 point differential, 9-7, lost wild card (Davis)
2007: +20 point differential, 10-6, missed playoffs (Crennel)
2018: -33 point differential, 7-8-1, missed playoffs but was in contention the final week, theoretically! (Hue Jackson, Greggggg Williams)

That's right, they've had two positive-PD seasons in 21 years.

Love the St. Elsewhere reference, tho I don't remember the specifics.
Hey the show aired 1982-1988, what could possibly be hipper than a 35-year-old reference to an obscure show that almost nobody here is going to get?
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,013
Mansfield MA
Love the St. Elsewhere reference, tho I don't remember the specifics.

On further thought, that makes no sense, especially since coaches develop game plan by Tues night and players get them on Weds, and practice to them Weds-Thurs. What can happen Friday to change that?
Yep, this is dumb. Involve analytics Monday / Tuesday. Friday / Saturday is too late. "Uh, guys, I know we practiced getting matchups with our tight end on the linebacker all week, but analytics says we should throw to our #2 WR instead so never mind what we practiced."

In startup parlance, when a founder reaches a crossroads where the organization has outgrown his particular skillset and calling and needs different leadership to continue growing, and investors recommend that he give up operational control (but not equity - he can still enjoy the financial gains), it's called a "Rich vs King" decision. i.e., which would you rather be: Rich, or King? Pick one.
And Haslam never has to make this choice. He gets Rich no matter what, even if he is a terrible King. Make these owners suffer in the pocketbook for being crappy year after year and you might see the lousy owners make smarter decisions.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,533
What a fantastic 2020 season thread title.

In startup parlance, when a founder reaches a crossroads where the organization has outgrown his particular skillset and calling and needs different leadership to continue growing, and investors recommend that he give up operational control (but not equity - he can still enjoy the financial gains), it's called a "Rich vs King" decision. i.e., which would you rather be: Rich, or King? Pick one.

Jimmy Haslam III (let's remember that he inherited the team from daddy) has chosen "tinpot dictator" for 20 years, despite being repeatedly presented with the choice again and again and also the consequences of his wrong choice. Romeo Crennel and Butch Davis brought him all the way to mediocrity, but lately it seems even that's too much to aspire to. Best seasons since the Browns' re-founding in 1999:


Hey the show aired 1982-1988, what could possibly be hipper than a 35-year-old reference to an obscure show that almost nobody here is going to get?
Hey now....those years are also known as "the prime of my life." And the show was far more "groundbreaking" than "obscure." (Youd know that if you were old.) ;)

But to your point....the Rich/King decision is spot on with Haslam. He came from outside football, but with so many teams run -- or soon to be run -- by children of significant owners, it's probably applicable to the likes of Mike Brown, too.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,104
Pittsburgh, PA
Hey now....those years are also known as "the prime of my life." And the show was far more "groundbreaking" than "obscure." (Youd know that if you were old.) ;)

But to your point....the Rich/King decision is spot on with Haslam. He came from outside football, but with so many teams run -- or soon to be run -- by children of significant owners, it's probably applicable to the likes of Mike Brown, too.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogKqQc4q6y0


And yeah, something tells me support for a strong estate tax is rising in the state of Ohio.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,104
Pittsburgh, PA
Better or worse than an owner who's a meth-addled public embarrassment? You be the judge!

Either way, McDaniels dodged yet another bullet, while remaining better paid than some head coaches anyway. I'm of the opinion that we're still a while from being able to conclude that Frank Reich is in an environment where he can be long-term successful. Everyone thought he was the New Hotness when his team was 5-2, but then he lost close ones to Pittsburgh and Miami and kinda stumbled to a 2-7 finish and 7-9 overall.

Still cracks me up that in 2016, the Patriots may well have had the 3 best QBs in the division on their roster. Maybe Tannehill is actually better than Brissett, but I don't think it's a slam dunk either way.
 

snowmanny

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2005
15,744
It makes a lot of sense for McDaniels to wait until he gets a job on his terms. He's young, has time, has a steady gig, will have other offers, but the next HC job might be his last chance to succeed in that role. The Browns job is also tough because you have two relatively stable franchises in the division....plus the Bengals and they are getting Burrow. I'd put the over/under on playoff wins by the Browns over the next five years at about 1.5.

I wonder if he would have taken the NYG job or the Dallas job.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
22,104
Pittsburgh, PA
Giants maybe. Dallas I bet his issues (with Jerry Jones) would have been the same as here, just on a bigger stage. If you have non-football people controlling football decisions, it leads only to misery and failure.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,802
AZ
Are the Browns wrong? McDaniels as a head coach is most known for drafting Tim Tebow in the first round. He wasn't good in Denver and he was capricious at best in last year's dance with the Colts. The NFL is full of guys who are great coordinators but lousy head coaches (Wade Phillips, Norv Turner, etc.). Less so guys like BB who were great HCs after being fired elsewhere. And BB's track record is not exactly great in grooming good HCs.

I have no idea if the Browns are ahead of the curve here, or are morons. But good for them for sticking to their plan and giving it a shot.
I think it's possible that some team will figure out a way to essentially head coach by committee in a way that leads to success. (Though, like everything in the NFL, it won't make a bit of difference without a very good QB.) Might the Browns be on to it? We'll see.

I guess for present purposes, the bottom line is that this is 180 degrees from what the greatest coach of all time seems to have believed is the right way to run the railroad for the last 25 years. That doesn't mean it's not right for 2020 forward. But it does mean that it is a very poor fit for a guy who has mentored under that coach for many years.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,493
It makes a lot of sense for McDaniels to wait until he gets a job on his terms. He's young, has time, has a steady gig, will have other offers, but the next HC job might be his last chance to succeed in that role. The Browns job is also tough because you have two relatively stable franchises in the division....plus the Bengals and they are getting Burrow. I'd put the over/under on playoff wins by the Browns over the next five years at about 1.5.

I wonder if he would have taken the NYG job or the Dallas job.
I get the sense that the pre-existing GM isn’t is his preferred setup.
 

mauf

Anderson Cooper × Mr. Rogers
Moderator
SoSH Member
Looks like the opportunities are passing on him. He should have taken the Indy job unless it is 100% certain he’s BB’s heir apparent. You always take the HC job when it’s available to you.
I disagree with the bolded part, at least for someone as financially secure as McD. But I agree the decision to pass on Indy was curious, unless you think he had an inking that Luck would retire young (and I can’t imagine he did).
 

Sad Sam Jones

Member
SoSH Member
May 5, 2017
2,550
In startup parlance, when a founder reaches a crossroads where the organization has outgrown his particular skillset and calling and needs different leadership to continue growing, and investors recommend that he give up operational control (but not equity - he can still enjoy the financial gains), it's called a "Rich vs King" decision. i.e., which would you rather be: Rich, or King? Pick one.

Jimmy Haslam III (let's remember that he inherited the team from daddy) has chosen "tinpot dictator" for 20 years, despite being repeatedly presented with the choice again and again and also the consequences of his wrong choice. Romeo Crennel and Butch Davis brought him all the way to mediocrity, but lately it seems even that's too much to aspire to.
Randy Lerner was the 2nd generation Browns owner who hired Butch Davis and Romeo Crennel. When it comes to the Browns, Haslam is a self-made mess.
 

kelpapa

Costanza's Hero
SoSH Member
Feb 15, 2010
4,647
Dude was a head coach for ten years, and he immediately takes a job as OC within his old division? He probably would have had a head coaching opportunity at some point in the next year, right?

To be clear, I didn't think he was a good coach, but figured he would get another opportunity soon.
 

RetractableRoof

tolerates intolerance
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2003
3,836
Quincy, MA
Dude was a head coach for ten years, and he immediately takes a job as OC within his old division? He probably would have had a head coaching opportunity at some point in the next year, right?

To be clear, I didn't think he was a good coach, but figured he would get another opportunity soon.
I feel like he gets points around the league for putting up with Jerry. I don't know that his record, and general absence from the playoffs are enough to have gotten him another head coaching gig. It's not like he got 2 years to show his value - he had an extended run. Now if he sets the world on fire with the Giants and they become an offensive powerhouse or something, then I think he gets another shot.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,328
Hingham, MA
I feel like he gets points around the league for putting up with Jerry. I don't know that his record, and general absence from the playoffs are enough to have gotten him another head coaching gig. It's not like he got 2 years to show his value - he had an extended run. Now if he sets the world on fire with the Giants and they become an offensive powerhouse or something, then I think he gets another shot.
He is #54 on the all time wins list. Think about that. Think about how many coaches there have been in NFL history.
 

RetractableRoof

tolerates intolerance
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2003
3,836
Quincy, MA
He is #54 on the all time wins list. Think about that. Think about how many coaches there have been in NFL history.
Yes, that is impressive. But in my mind, that's a function of being able to withstand Jerry's crap more so than wizardry on his part. I feel like if you take any of the top 10 coaches in the NFL (your picks, not mine), hand them the Cowboys talent, they'd have a better record - and more playoff games. With the offensive lines they've had, the skill positions they've had, the QB talent they've had (all at the same time for the most part), as a team they have under performed to my liking. I can't think how many times I saw them fall just short, and thought to myself "feels like they've turned a corner - they are going to be tough next year". And the next year, and the next year...

Now, I'm not blaming him for all of that, because if one could take the same vacuum I'm offering these top 10 coaches and hand it to Jason (without Jerry over his shoulder), maybe he does better as well. But I just don't see it.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,328
Hingham, MA
Yes, that is impressive. But in my mind, that's a function of being able to withstand Jerry's crap more so than wizardry on his part. I feel like if you take any of the top 10 coaches in the NFL (your picks, not mine), hand them the Cowboys talent, they'd have a better record - and more playoff games. With the offensive lines they've had, the skill positions they've had, the QB talent they've had (all at the same time for the most part), as a team they have under performed to my liking. I can't think how many times I saw them fall just short, and thought to myself "feels like they've turned a corner - they are going to be tough next year". And the next year, and the next year...

Now, I'm not blaming him for all of that, because if one could take the same vacuum I'm offering these top 10 coaches and hand it to Jason (without Jerry over his shoulder), maybe he does better as well. But I just don't see it.
Look I don’t think he’s a great coach either. He may not even be an average coach. But it’s hard to win more games than you lose as a 10 year coach in the NFL. It’s fairly rare company.
 

RetractableRoof

tolerates intolerance
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 1, 2003
3,836
Quincy, MA
Look I don’t think he’s a great coach either. He may not even be an average coach. But it’s hard to win more games than you lose as a 10 year coach in the NFL. It’s fairly rare company.
That's my point though, those are probably underwhelming counting stats for a team with the talent they've had.

Of the 10:
1 partial season of 5-3
4 seasons of 8-8.
4 winning seasons (12-4, 13-3, 9-7, 10-6)
1 debacle of a 4-12 season (he probably should have been fired after that season)

Of those 10 seasons, there are only 2 that you can hang your hat on. And while it hasn't been the AFC East, there have been no juggernauts in the NFC East during that time either. One could reasonably argue he left very winnable games on the table in every single year beyond the 12-4 & 13-3 seasons. Games like the last 2 season ending Dolphin games for BB and the Patriots. Garrett's teams always find a way to lose a crucial game (give them a pass for the Dez Bryant non-catch game - they wuz robbed).

One could argue that after the 3rd consecutive 8-8 season to start his head coaching career he would have been fired from a lot of teams.

So his win totals IMO are below expectation for the talent the team had, and the only reason he accumulated that many was the fact that the moron owner didn't replace him. I think across the league, for these same reasons, there is a sense that the Cowboys under Garrett under performed. He wasn't getting another head coaching job, without showing something as an OC first.
 
Last edited: