Well, we KNOIW it’s gonna blow up on the Mets. Just a question of time…!!Yep, that's all fair. I don't think a team can realistically spend like the Mets currently are under the current CBA and not have it blow up on them big time, but we'll see.
Well, we KNOIW it’s gonna blow up on the Mets. Just a question of time…!!Yep, that's all fair. I don't think a team can realistically spend like the Mets currently are under the current CBA and not have it blow up on them big time, but we'll see.
Right, but speaking for the rest of baseball, a Yankees team that wins it only once every 10 or so years is a RELIEF!!A consistently good team that routinely makes the playoffs is fine by me too. If they keep giving themselves playoff opportunities, they'll break through again. With a little better injury luck, probably sooner rather than later.
And I kind of hope they don’t trade any of the middle infield prospects. Let’s see what the kids can do, it’s more interesting.I think the Yankees could have a special season if two out of these three things happen:
1) They find a solid SP to slot in at #2 or #3 in the rotation.
2) Gleyber plays closer to his potential.
3) The team avoids catastrophic (season ending type) injuries.
I like this team a lot so far.
I missed this before posting, I think so yes.Arbitration day. Wonder if this is what has stalled the trade market.
I think this is indeed what they tried, but the White Sox claimed him, so NY's 40 man is back to 39 for now.I would think the league would not look kindly on that, maybe this is one of those deals where they claim him (Aybar), then drop him from the 40 man pretty quickly and hope no one else claims him and he wants to stay.
I can't help but feel very, very weird when I look at it. It just feels wrong. But new name new me. Game thread success may vary.Crow’s new screen name is the biggest, and possibly most impactful, move of the off-season.
Haven't you had the same handle since the YES days?I can't help but feel very, very weird when I look at it. It just feels wrong. But new name new me. Game thread success may vary.
Yes, I have. And the yp-forums.net days, which you were also a part ofHaven't you had the same handle since the YES days?![]()
I mean, we don’t need to relitigate that here, but NY easily won all three home games in that ALCS, outscoring HOU 19-5 in those. I’m pretty sure he knows more about the specifics than us.Just speaking to the media fluff I suppose, but Cashmsn has gone on the record saying the main reason the Yanks are in a WS drought is the 2017 Astros. Bad look.
https://theathletic.com/news/brian-cashman-yankees-in-world-series-drought-because-of-illegal-and-horrific-actions-by-astros/CaahiodAk5tY/
Impossible to prove that the cheating impacted anything so, yeah, not sure why you go there. And it’s not like they dealt with an Astros situation every year since 2009. Seems to me that Cashman is feeling some pressure to deliver.Just speaking to the media fluff I suppose, but Cashmsn has gone on the record saying the main reason the Yanks are in a WS drought is the 2017 Astros. Bad look.
https://theathletic.com/news/brian-cashman-yankees-in-world-series-drought-because-of-illegal-and-horrific-actions-by-astros/CaahiodAk5tY/
Definitely the last, I also think it’s frustrating for him to essentially not be allowed to explain his spending limitations to the media, because teams can’t talk about international kids like Arias and Mayea before signing them and even then it’s kind of gross to talk about young kids in that context.Impossible to prove that the cheating impacted anything so, yeah, not sure why you go there. And it’s not like they dealt with an Astros situation every year since 2009. Seems to me that Cashman is feeling some pressure to deliver.
Yeah, it’s obviously a tough job and he’s done quite well in it so the "ha, haven't won since 2009!" stuff is lazy analysis. But that comes with the territory of the job. He clearly benefits from a strong financial backing but he's also made a ton of really good moves and he turned a team that was aging out fast into one that was arguably some trash cans away from a title and has been in the title mix basically every year. He's got 4 top 100 guys on MLB's list and a pretty solid farm behind them so to hear the 2009 stuff has to be a little frustrating. But I also think you need to avoid the temptation of responding to it and just take the high road. Not a major blunder or anything though. Just doesn't come off great in a world of 3 second media clips.Definitely the last, I also think it’s frustrating for him to essentially not be allowed to explain his spending limitations to the media, because teams can’t talk about international kids like Arias and Mayea before signing them and even then it’s kind of gross to talk about young kids in that context.
You know how irritated this decision makes me, but I think that kind of quietly they essentially took away his bullpen decision making for the upcoming season and more than ever, his role is a glorified press secretary,. I still hate that he has this job, though.On the other hand, he hired and continues to employ Boone.
Fair. I can’t defend that one. No idea why he has that job.On the other hand, he hired and continues to employ Boone.
How many little in-game decisions could have swung some of those super tight playoff series over the past few years? Boone is Cashman’s hubris personified.You know how irritated this decision makes me, but I think that kind of quietly they essentially took away his bullpen decision making for the upcoming season and more than ever, his role is a glorified press secretary,. I still hate that he has this job, though.
I kind of want to start a thread called 'Facial Hal', maybe if that nickname starts to get around (heh), they'd finally dump that antiquated and insulting rule.
Here is my thoughts on this. If Trout had a beard/facial hair and the Yankees traded for him. And Trout refused to shave what happens?I kind of want to start a thread called 'Facial Hal', maybe if that nickname starts to get around (heh), they'd finally dump that antiquated and insulting rule.
He wouldn't refuse.Here is my thoughts on this. If Trout had a beard/facial hair and the Yankees traded for him. And Trout refused to shave what happens?
Do they make an exception for him? And if they do, that just proves how antiquated the damn facial hair rule is.
Cole was the one who could have challenged it successfully, the Dodgers only stopped bidding because he told them he preferred NY.Here is my thoughts on this. If Trout had a beard/facial hair and the Yankees traded for him. And Trout refused to shave what happens?
Do they make an exception for him? And if they do, that just proves how antiquated the damn facial hair rule is.
I honestly don't think they would. They know that's part of the Yankee Way.Cole was the one who could have challenged it successfully, the Dodgers only stopped bidding because he told them he preferred NY.
Judge also could probably make it happen now as part of a new contract, you need someone who the team needs much more than they need the team and there aren't many of those.
Birds love nesting in tall bearsIt's a stupid rule but I honestly don't think the players care that much. They can grow whatever they want in the winter.
I also think sometimes I look at other teams and their players look like they just woke up and put a uniform on. Maybe there's a middle ground, goatees, staches, and bears of a certain length are okay but nothing that a bird could nest in.