Yeah man, Kemba sucks, this is not a surprise. Unbelievable we were able to get off his money. Too bad Ime is trying to kill Al.
A team like OKC burying a good player like Al sure seems counter-productive. I get they were tanking, but it isn't like he's so good he was going to win them many more games. Why not play him 18-20 minutes a game in a way that shows off his skills (and that in Philly he was just in a bad position) and show how he can still be productive? Wouldn't that be more in OKC's long-term interest?Yeah man, Kemba sucks, this is not a surprise. Unbelievable we were able to get off his money. Too bad Ime is trying to kill Al.
OKC basically ended up with 2 first round picks for trading Horford.A team like OKC burying a good player like Al sure seems counter-productive. I get they were tanking, but it isn't like he's so good he was going to win them many more games. Why not play him 18-20 minutes a game in a way that shows off his skills (and that in Philly he was just in a bad position) and show how he can still be productive? Wouldn't that be more in OKC's long-term interest?
Everyone in the league knows what Horford is. The only thing that playing him accomplished is potential downside be it injury and/or not giving youth minutes in a tank season. It benefits Horford too as he doesn’t have to go through the pain and torture of losing on a rebuilding team…..he got to spend time at home with his family and work out when he wanted while getting paid.A team like OKC burying a good player like Al sure seems counter-productive. I get they were tanking, but it isn't like he's so good he was going to win them many more games. Why not play him 18-20 minutes a game in a way that shows off his skills (and that in Philly he was just in a bad position) and show how he can still be productive? Wouldn't that be more in OKC's long-term interest?
Yes. But he's cheap and he's a name.Wouldn't they know this, like, prior to obtaining him?
More Terry than MaMo tho.The SoSH free agent year always bring devisiveness to the team. Smh.
You'd think he wouldn't make a difference, but they were winning a decent number of games before he got shut down. Every loss counts when you're tanking. (Plus Horford being a known quantity whose market value goes up if he's rested/doesn't play).A team like OKC burying a good player like Al sure seems counter-productive. I get they were tanking, but it isn't like he's so good he was going to win them many more games. Why not play him 18-20 minutes a game in a way that shows off his skills (and that in Philly he was just in a bad position) and show how he can still be productive? Wouldn't that be more in OKC's long-term interest?
Totally fair, you're right -- as are the comments above about Al.You'd think he wouldn't make a difference, but they were winning a decent number of games before he got shut down. Every loss counts when you're tanking. (Plus Horford being a known quantity whose market value goes up if he's rested/doesn't play).
Lakers have a tough stretch coming up too. I think it’s like 7 of their next 9 against teams with a winning record and many of them at home. One of the losing teams is OKC who pretty much own this Laker team and have zero fear of them.
I'm beginning to wonder if his ignorance was really a cover for recovering from injuries. His situation is incredibly bizarre. He's essentially retired and he's young.Moving on to Irving, you have to wonder what his basketball value is at present. He can't play in many places, won't play in other situations and despite his basketball brilliance, the guy doesn't give off any indication that he loves basketball (contrast with Durant who, when not being the GOAT of petty social media, seems to be all about hoops) or competing anymore.
If the Nets tried to move him today, who would take him even if you removed cap considerations etc? I can see both sides but were I a GM, he would be the absolute last option to look at as any sort of roster addition these days.
Edit: And I say this knowing that his skillset would fit nicely with the current C's roster. As we know, that won't work in reality.
It is bizarre but on the other hand, Irving has a ring and has earned close to $200mm prior to this season. You might be right - maybe this is him doing the NBA early-retirement-still-getting-them-checks move.I'm beginning to wonder if his ignorance was really a cover for recovering from injuries. His situation is incredibly bizarre. He's essentially retired and he's young.
Stop spreading misinformation.I could likely score on LeBron 2.13 times out of 100,000 attempts.
Dammit. One fewer team set up for 2BIGZ.
Irving has also been injury prone over the past few years, and that doesn't usually get better as a player gets older.Moving on to Irving, you have to wonder what his basketball value is at present. He can't play in many places, won't play in other situations and despite his basketball brilliance, the guy doesn't give off any indication that he loves the sport (contrast with Durant who, when not being the GOAT of petty social media, seems to be all about hoops) or competing anymore.
If the Nets tried to move him today, who would take him even if you removed cap considerations etc? I can see both sides but were I a GM, he would be the absolute last option to look at as any sort of roster addition these days.
Edit: And I say this knowing that his skillset would fit nicely with the current C's roster. As we know, that won't work in reality.
Injury prone is putting it nicely. He's been hurt and missed the end of his team's season in 3 of the last 4 years. Even before you get to the off the court stuff, he's totally unreliable.Irving has also been injury prone over the past few years, and that doesn't usually get better as a player gets older.
To me, this suggests the odds of Lillard being dealt go up. Its a gutsy move for a new GM given Lillard is the face of their franchise but Dame is 32 in July and that core feels like its tested its ceiling. A potential Lillard deal would likely garner a much better return than McCollum too.View: https://twitter.com/trailblazers/status/1466816427524964353
Neil Olshey fired after internal investigation.
VERY interesting since he was the one most tied to the idea that coach was the issue (it wasn't) and that the defensive problems weren't a roster issue (they are).
Probably takes a bit for them to hire a new GM, but after that.... I would expect CJ McCollum to become very available.
Edit- Independent not internal.
McCollum+ for Simmons was my immediate knee-jerk reaction when Ben initially asked out. CJ is a better version of Seth Curry, who has flourished in PhillyView: https://twitter.com/trailblazers/status/1466816427524964353
Neil Olshey fired after internal investigation.
VERY interesting since he was the one most tied to the idea that coach was the issue (it wasn't) and that the defensive problems weren't a roster issue (they are).
Probably takes a bit for them to hire a new GM, but after that.... I would expect CJ McCollum to become very available.
Edit- Independent not internal.
Yes absolutely. A new GM is going to want to make it HIS team anyway if at all possible and the Blazers were easy to blow up anyway. I’d expect both to be available as well as your Nurkics and (so overrated) Covington.The other question is whether, with a new GM, they simply decide it is time to blow it up. They seem stuck in the middle to me. So it could be an "and" rather than "or' on Dame/McCollum
If they put Dame, McCollum, Covington, and Nurkic on market they could get a very nice set of assets back.
Yep, some of us threw out Jaylen Brown fake trades a few days ago but I'm not moving JB for Dame.I wonder what Dame’s trade value looks like these days. I’d guess it’s taken a pretty big hit from last year’s playoffs (when he looked like the tier A franchise player he’d been for a half-decade) to now, after the worrisome core issues, a 700-minute sample this season in which he has put up .526 TS, and a desultory Team USA showing where he looked physically diminished (why did he play in the Olympics with core issues, again?)
I assume/hope the core issues are nowhere near the level of Kemba’s knees or IT’s hip, but I’d think even the whiff of physical decline, with his contract that escalates to almost $50M in 2024-25, might give many GMs pause. If they were going to blow it up, the optimal time to do it might have been at the end of last season. As it stands, they’re probably better off keeping Dame and letting him heal up and show he’s still Dame and not Kemba/IT Redux.
As for CJ: I’ve been advocating trading him for years (including for Wiggins, which I still think would have been great for them) but I suspect his trade value at age 30 is now borderline negative.
I’d do it for Smart/Horford/young’ns and picks or something like that but obviously they wouldn’t. His shooting is way down this year. Might be related to injury or could be a sign of a decline. We’ll see. In any event, I wouldn’t be too excited to have his age 32-35 seasons at the money he’s getting paid.Yep, some of us threw out Jaylen Brown fake trades a few days ago but I'm not moving JB for Dame.
Dame has IT/Kemba written all over him, the decline will be sharp/sudden
Agreed, deal built around Horford's salary + young guys + draft picks is worth it for BostonI’d do it for Smart/Horford/young’ns and picks or something like that but obviously they wouldn’t. His shooting is way down this year. Might be related to injury or could be a sign of a decline. We’ll see. In any event, I wouldn’t be too excited to have his age 32-35 seasons at the money he’s getting paid.
You really think they would seriously ask for Tatum given Lillard’s age? Maybe, but I think Jaylen is the logical place to start. I’m still at the point where moving Jaylen would be tough but I’d at least listen. Feel like any major shake up like this would involve other moving parts since I don’t think replacing Jaylen with Lillard really solves anything.That's a great trade proposal...for the Celtics. I know no more than anyone here but if Boston were to engage with Portland on Lillard right now, my guess is the Blazers start by asking for Tatum but will not do a deal with the Celtics for less than Brown+.
As a side note, I would consider the deal depending on the other parts and Jaylen is one of my favorite current players. I understand why others would not even consider this deal. In any event, Lillard isn't even on the market yet and I am guessing the true contenders will have pole position over the middling teams like Boston.
Edit: to clarify, while health is clearly an issue for Lillard at present, I am making the assumption its not a long term decline issue. It it is, that is a different story altogether.
I assume that every trade conversation between Boston and another NBA team starts off with a discussion of what would it take to pry Tatum away. If I were calling, I would tell my counterpart proactively that I am asking early and often every time so they know what to expect. And I would also expect the Celtics to utter a Logan Roy type response in each instance.You really think they would seriously ask for Tatum given Lillard’s age? Maybe, but I think Jaylen is the logical place to start. I’m still at the point where moving Jaylen would be tough but I’d at least listen. Feel like any major shake up like this would involve other moving parts since I don’t think replacing Jaylen with Lillard really solves anything.
1st step is to bring home their original prodigal sonMaybe PDX could be sold on native son Payton Pritchard's box office appeal?
They can ask but Tatum isn't happening.You really think they would seriously ask for Tatum given Lillard’s age? Maybe, but I think Jaylen is the logical place to start. I’m still at the point where moving Jaylen would be tough but I’d at least listen. Feel like any major shake up like this would involve other moving parts since I don’t think replacing Jaylen with Lillard really solves anything.
But but, he “retired.”Ainge to Portland rumors are heating up.
Yeah, Jaylen+ for Lillard doesn't make much sense to me unless it's part of a larger roster restructuring. It's fair from a potential value standpoint since, when healthy, Lillard is a better talent but doesn't make sense to shorten this team's window when it doesn't appear to be close to contending.They can ask but Tatum isn't happening.
Doubt Brown + more Celtic assets is even considered by Boston.
Don't love the idea of moving a 25yr old All-Star (3yrs @$80MM) wing for a 31.5yr old PG that is eventually going to cost ~$50MM (next 4yrs @$177MM). I know it's Monopoly money to some, but not sure that's a clever way to budget a payroll for Tatum's peak seasons.