2021-22 NBA Off-season Thread

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
Agreed. The only way Detroit does that deal for SGA is if OKC could somehow get the #2 pick for Green.
That's what I was thinking when I heard this rumor last night. If I knew that I were getting SGA and Green for sure, I'd think about sending Cade. Otherwise, no way from a Detroit POV. They sold a shitload of tickets on lottery night. SGA plus Bouknight/Kuminga doesn't sell tickets, but Cade does.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
Agreed. The only way Detroit does that deal for SGA is if OKC could somehow get the #2 pick for Green.
There’s nothing they can give Houston to make a trade of Cunningham/Green palatable. Not even their draft picks back because the entire point of the picks is to actually get someone like Cunningham/Green. Maybe they could supply Toronto or Cleveland with enough #1s to swap #6 for #3 or #4? That would be the one opening I could see.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
By the way, I know that CC is the consensus #1, but I have he and Green as 1a/1b on my board. Green is a much better scorer even though CC has a much better overall game.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,307
Santa Monica
https://www.audacy.com/weei/sports/celtics/76ers-price-for-ben-simmons-is-bad-news-for-celtics

WEEI is the absolute worst

according to WEEI, Phila turned down this:

The Raptors recently offered Philadelphia guards Kyle Lowry, Fred VanVleet, OG Anunoby, and the No. 4 overall pick for Simmons, according to Action Network's Matt Moore (otherwise known as “Hardwood Paroxysm” on Twitter).

then if you open up the article you get this quote:

"Multiple sources including those close to talks said a proposed framework including Raptors guards Kyle Lowry, Fred VanVleet, OG Anunoby, and the 4th overall pick in Thursday’s draft for Simmons was rejected by Toronto."
 

chilidawg

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 22, 2015
5,947
Cultural hub of the universe
Jay King playing GM for the Celtics this Summer.

the athletic is a very worthy sub, here are the highlights

https://theathletic.com/2732467/2021/07/27/trading-tristan-thompton-re-signing-marcus-smart-and-more-celtics-gm-king-for-a-day/?source=dailyemail

1. Draft RaiQuan Gray Bleighjenbergenator
2. Sign Evan Fournier to a three-year, $51-million contract
3. Sign Otto Porter to a two-year, $12.1 million contract
4. Sign Ish Smith to a one-year minimum contract

5. Offer Marcus Smart a three-year contract extension $56MM
6. Offer Robert Williams a four-year, $44-million extension
7. Trade Tristan Thompson, Romeo Langford and 2022 second-round pick for Kyle Anderson
8. Trade Grant Williams for Danuel House

The results

Point guards: Marcus Smart, Payton Pritchard, Ish Smith
Wings: Jayson Tatum, Jaylen Brown, Evan Fournier, Aaron Nesmith, Danuel House, Carsen Edwards
Swings: Kyle Anderson, Otto Porter Jr., RaiQuan Gray
Centers: Robert Williams, Al Horford, Moses Brown
1.Draft the Bleighjenbergenator
2. Yes
3. Yes
4. Yes
5. Yes
6. Yes
7/8 I'm keeping Langford if possible, and dumping Edwards for a 2nd or something. Probably TT gets traded for something too. Maybe VB ends up on a 2 way and we bring Kornet back as a 4th big.

Guards: Smart, Smith, PP
Wings: JB, Langford, Nesmith, Fournier, Langford
Swings: Tatum, Porter, VB, GW
Bigs: TL, Horford, Brown.
 
Last edited:

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
WEEI is the absolute worst

according to WEEI, Phila turned down this:

The Raptors recently offered Philadelphia guards Kyle Lowry, Fred VanVleet, OG Anunoby, and the No. 4 overall pick for Simmons, according to Action Network's Matt Moore (otherwise known as “Hardwood Paroxysm” on Twitter).

then if you open up the article you get this quote:

"Multiple sources including those close to talks said a proposed framework including Raptors guards Kyle Lowry, Fred VanVleet, OG Anunoby, and the 4th overall pick in Thursday’s draft for Simmons was rejected by Toronto."
And well they should reject that deal. Morey missed his chance.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,941
Memphis absorbs a contract into their cap space to move up for Giddey or to move up again for Bouknight, their other target. If I’m a Grizz fan I love the aggressiveness to move up for only cap space while adding a year on your starting 5’s deal as Jonas was expiring and looking to get paid next summer so you don’t lose him for nothing (or forced to overpay into an awful contract).
The only problem is that Adams was awful last year & paying him 2/$35m is not a feature.

He was supposed to work with Zion but the Pels had the equivalent of the 2nd worst defensive rating with Zion + Adams & the equivalent of the 2nd best with Zion - Adams. Don't see him working any better with JJJ. Just a straight salary eat for draft compensation deal.

What could SGA even be really traded for? A package of draft picks? I don't know how that even starts to make sense for a team who owns pretty much every pick for the next 5 years.

The Detroit deal makes some sense but outside of that, I can't see one that does. They are a rebuilding team so they'd be looking for players going into their 2nd and 3rd NBA seasons I would guess?

If they are "shopping" him, it makes me wonder if they know something we don't.

Maybe for Anthony Edwards if they really like him? LaMelo isn't going anywhere.
SGA might become disgruntled real quick if he has to keep getting shut down to aid the tank. Maybe they want to get ahead of the curve on that.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,276
The only problem is that Adams was awful last year & paying him 2/$35m is not a feature.

He was supposed to work with Zion but the Pels had the equivalent of the 2nd worst defensive rating with Zion + Adams & the equivalent of the 2nd best with Zion - Adams. Don't see him working any better with JJJ. Just a straight salary eat for draft compensation deal.
The Pelicans defensive intensity all season under Van Gundy was pathetic. How much of that is on Adam’s? Opponents shot 38% from 3. I don’t think Adam’s began sucking at 27 in a new system with new teammates. More then anything he’s a system guy and nobody on that team was playing within a strong system under Van Gundy......which is why he was fired. Most importantly for the Grizzlies they get a physical body to avoid JJJ playing against a certain number of pure 5’s and getting beat up.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,941
The Pelicans defensive intensity all season under Van Gundy was pathetic. How much of that is on Adam’s? Opponents shot 38% from 3. I don’t think Adam’s began sucking at 27 in a new system with new teammates. More then anything he’s a system guy and nobody on that team was playing within a strong system under Van Gundy......which is why he was fired. Most importantly for the Grizzlies they get a physical body to avoid JJJ playing against a certain number of pure 5’s and getting beat up.
The Pels being significantly worse with Adams on the floor isn't a great look, no matter how disastrous they were overall.

& having an immobile big certainly can increase 3p% for a variety of obvious & less obvious reasons.

Adams' game is just getting more antiquated the longer he's in the league in terms of inability to do anything helpful for an offense, being an awful ft shooter & not being suited for modern defense.

If they want someone to bang with bigs we have a slightly used TT available for ~half the price.

All that being said, I still think they got ok value to take it on.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,276
The Pels being significantly worse with Adams on the floor isn't a great look, no matter how disastrous they were overall.

& having an immobile big certainly can increase 3p% for a variety of obvious & less obvious reasons.

Adams' game is just getting more antiquated the longer he's in the league in terms of inability to do anything helpful for an offense, being an awful ft shooter & not being suited for modern defense.

If they want someone to bang with bigs we have a slightly used TT available for ~half the price.

All that being said, I still think they got ok value to take it on.
My point was that Adam’s is a “fit” guy and not an influencer. Of course a big can be exposed on switches at times but why was his team 2nd best in the league the prior year in Def 3-pt %? As I said, I doubt he began regressing at an age when he should be entering his prime in the right system and the right role. Going from a guy like Donovan who connects with his players and has a disciplined defensive system to whatever that was SVG was doing last year had to have been a culture shock to him.

If they wanted an expiring contract for Jonas they would have simply kept Jonas. There is a ton of value in a player who has two years to go as you gain a ton of flexibility be it continuity on the floor and/or trade value next summer
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,307
Santa Monica
The Pels being significantly worse with Adams on the floor isn't a great look, no matter how disastrous they were overall.

& having an immobile big certainly can increase 3p% for a variety of obvious & less obvious reasons.

Adams' game is just getting more antiquated the longer he's in the league in terms of inability to do anything helpful for an offense, being an awful ft shooter & not being suited for modern defense.

If they want someone to bang with bigs we have a slightly used TT available for ~half the price.

All that being said, I still think they got ok value to take it on.
I'll lay off slamming the Grizz for now but this was a GREAT deal for the Pelicans. They unloaded ~72MM + 4yrs of lackluster play and got a good/cheap player in Valanciunas.

Per Cleaning the Glass, the Pelicans had a minus-0.5 net rating and gave up 117.8 points per 100 possessions when Williamson shared the floor with Adams and Bledsoe. When Zion was on the floor without them, the Pelicans posted a plus-8.0 net rating and surrendered a 108.6 defensive rating.


The cost: 7 slots in the 1st round + mid-20s 2022 Laker's pick.

The Celtics aren't the only team with 2 young All-Star wings on their roster. Zion and Ingram' just added a Center that can spread the floor for them.

They'll now threaten to match any Lonzo deal in RFA, which should depress his value.

Good grief: SVG played Bledsoe the most minutes on that roster. This team will get a bump with Ball, Hart, Kira Lewis, & NAW sopping up those minutes

How often do you save $58MM and immediately get better?
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,941
I'll lay off slamming the Grizz for now but this was a GREAT deal for the Pelicans. They unloaded ~72MM + 4yrs of lackluster play and got a good/cheap player in Valanciunas.

Per Cleaning the Glass, the Pelicans had a minus-0.5 net rating and gave up 117.8 points per 100 possessions when Williamson shared the floor with Adams and Bledsoe. When Zion was on the floor without them, the Pelicans posted a plus-8.0 net rating and surrendered a 108.6 defensive rating.


The cost: 7 slots in the 1st round + mid-20s 2022 Laker's pick.

The Celtics aren't the only team with 2 young All-Star wings on their roster. Zion and Ingram' just added a Center that can spread the floor for them.

They'll now threaten to match any Lonzo deal in RFA, which should depress his value.

Good grief: SVG played Bledsoe the most minutes on that roster. This team will get a bump with Ball, Hart, Kira Lewis, & NAW sopping up those minutes

How often do you save $58MM and immediately get better?
Well, the amazing thing is the guy who intentionally acquired those contracts & the lol $20m for 1 year coach who utilized them, still had a job enabling him to give up draft capital to get off those contracts.

So it's hard for me to really call this a huge win for the Pels.

Is there anything confirming that David Griffin is actually good at his job?
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,307
Santa Monica
Well, the amazing thing is the guy who intentionally acquired those contracts & the lol $20m for 1 year coach who utilized them, still had a job enabling him to give up draft capital to get off those contracts.

So it's hard for me to really call this a huge win for the Pels.

Is there anything confirming that David Griffin is actually good at his job?
did anyone here say or imply "David Griffin is actually good at his job"?

It was a good deal in light of the player coming back, cap space, the players leaving and Lonzo/Hart hitting RFA.

Signing Steven Adams to that deal was dumb. You just don't pay guys like him big money for numerous years. Adams contract, fit, continuity, non-influencer status, whatever else HRB is coming up with seems like a stretch. You can add big body Centers for next to nothing. TT at 9.7MM can do everything Adams does. Tristan will be even cheaper next summer. And it's not a guarantee the Pels lose JV for nothing, they could do a S+T or get a TPE if they don't bring him back.

Like this trade/deal, that's it, don't really have an opinion about Griffin
 
Last edited:

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,941
did anyone here say or imply "David Griffin is actually good at his job"?

It was a good deal in light of the player coming back, cap space, the players leaving and Lonzo/Hart hitting RFA.

Signing Steven Adams to that deal was dumb. You just don't pay guys like him big money for numerous years. Adams contract, fit, continuity, non-influencer status, whatever else HRB is coming up with seems like a stretch. You can add big body Centers for next to nothing. TT at 9.7MM can do everything Adams does. Tristan will be even cheaper next summer. And it's not a guarantee the Pels lose JV for nothing, they could do a S+T or get a TPE if they don't bring him back.

Like this trade/deal, that's it, don't really have an opinion about Griffin
The Griffin question/tangent was a bit of a nonseqitur. I think he's probably going to waste this cap space on overpaying Kyle Lowry to sneak into the playoffs to save his job rather than building a long-term team around Zion though, & just muck things up more.

Clearing cap space is only good if you do good things with your cap space.
 

cheech13

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 5, 2006
1,608
I generally think Griffin is slightly above average as a GM based on the totality of his moves in Cleveland and New Orleans but clearing cap space and trading picks to open a spot for a veteran PG like Lowry when you traded Jrue Joliday the prior summer for 75 cents on the dollar is a real head scratcher.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
Is there anything confirming that David Griffin is actually good at his job?
I think we've seen with confidence that if you put Lebron James on the roster a Griffin-built team can be good. This is also true if you put Lebron on a roster assembled by a four-year old using a magic eight ball, I acknowledge....
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,307
Santa Monica
The Griffin question/tangent was a bit of a nonseqitur. I think he's probably going to waste this cap space on overpaying Kyle Lowry to sneak into the playoffs to save his job rather than building a long-term team around Zion though, & just muck things up more.

Clearing cap space is only good if you do good things with your cap space.
sure, I have no idea what DG will do next. But if I squint I could see the Pels having a max spot available next Summer by moving Lonzo in a S+T for an asset in the next month.

Zion + Ingram + max All-Star in the Summer of 2022 would be the start of an interesting BIG3.

None of that was possible before yesterdays deal
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
I'll lay off slamming the Grizz for now but this was a GREAT deal for the Pelicans. They unloaded ~72MM + 4yrs of lackluster play and got a good/cheap player in Valanciunas.

Per Cleaning the Glass, the Pelicans had a minus-0.5 net rating and gave up 117.8 points per 100 possessions when Williamson shared the floor with Adams and Bledsoe. When Zion was on the floor without them, the Pelicans posted a plus-8.0 net rating and surrendered a 108.6 defensive rating.

The cost: 7 slots in the 1st round + mid-20s 2022 Laker's pick.

The Celtics aren't the only team with 2 young All-Star wings on their roster. Zion and Ingram' just added a Center that can spread the floor for them.

They'll now threaten to match any Lonzo deal in RFA, which should depress his value.

Good grief: SVG played Bledsoe the most minutes on that roster. This team will get a bump with Ball, Hart, Kira Lewis, & NAW sopping up those minutes

How often do you save $58MM and immediately get better?
And the main cost is trading down in the flat portion of a pretty damn flat draft after 5 or so. Fucking swindle imo.
 

HowBoutDemSox

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 12, 2009
10,131
The Griffin question/tangent was a bit of a nonseqitur. I think he's probably going to waste this cap space on overpaying Kyle Lowry to sneak into the playoffs to save his job rather than building a long-term team around Zion though, & just muck things up more.

Clearing cap space is only good if you do good things with your cap space.
This sentiment is similar to Justin Verrier’s recent piece in the Ringer that is also critical of Griffin and makes the case that New Orleans is falling into the same trap they did with Davis, focusing too much on trying to win now rather than building long term around their young star: https://www.theringer.com/nba/2021/7/27/22595749/zion-williamson-anthony-davis-new-orleans-pelicans
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,941
sure, I have no idea what DG will do next. But if I squint I could see the Pels having a max spot available next Summer by moving Lonzo in a S+T for an asset in the next month.

Zion + Ingram + max All-Star in the Summer of 2022 would be the start of an interesting BIG3.

None of that was possible before yesterdays deal
Beal seems to be the only semi-timeline-appropriate guy who fits that description.

They just got way too lucky to get Zion to be in the mediocre spot they're in now. They easily could have built up a fun deep roster or turned their assets into something useful, but they just haven't done anything like...intelligent.

So I guess I'd feel better about this trade if it was someone else cleaning up Griffin's mistakes.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,941

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,650
I'll lay off slamming the Grizz for now but this was a GREAT deal for the Pelicans. They unloaded ~72MM + 4yrs of lackluster play and got a good/cheap player in Valanciunas.

Per Cleaning the Glass, the Pelicans had a minus-0.5 net rating and gave up 117.8 points per 100 possessions when Williamson shared the floor with Adams and Bledsoe. When Zion was on the floor without them, the Pelicans posted a plus-8.0 net rating and surrendered a 108.6 defensive rating.

The cost: 7 slots in the 1st round + mid-20s 2022 Laker's pick.

The Celtics aren't the only team with 2 young All-Star wings on their roster. Zion and Ingram' just added a Center that can spread the floor for them.

They'll now threaten to match any Lonzo deal in RFA, which should depress his value.

Good grief: SVG played Bledsoe the most minutes on that roster. This team will get a bump with Ball, Hart, Kira Lewis, & NAW sopping up those minutes

How often do you save $58MM and immediately get better?
That +/- change is almost all Adams.
Adjusting for terrible Redick numbers....
Zion/Adams/Bledsoe all on.... -1
Zion/Bledsoe on, Adams off.... +7

Swapping Ball for Bledsoe goes to +12, but it's noisy, few possessions and some of the most used real lineups are negative, getting some big bumps from Zion/Lonzo deep bench guys units that I assume were up against scrubs. Easiest way to tell is that the sample of Zion/Ingram minutes without one of Ball/Bledsoe are really limited, the Pels actually played their best with those 4 together
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,941
And the main cost is trading down in the flat portion of a pretty damn flat draft after 5 or so. Fucking swindle imo.
Teams don't necessarily agree with that flatness - reporting is the Knicks have been trying to trade 19 & 21 to move up & have been incapable of getting a lottery pick for that package.

So it would cost at least a mid-1st to get from 17 to 10, so the draft pick compensation isn't too bad in terms of market value of picks.

Also, the Grizzlies tend to do smart things & build their team in an intelligent manner, so I would default to thinking in hindsight they will win this trade.
 

wade boggs chicken dinner

Member
SoSH Member
Mar 26, 2005
30,742
I'll lay off slamming the Grizz for now but this was a GREAT deal for the Pelicans. They unloaded ~72MM + 4yrs of lackluster play and got a good/cheap player in Valanciunas.

Per Cleaning the Glass, the Pelicans had a minus-0.5 net rating and gave up 117.8 points per 100 possessions when Williamson shared the floor with Adams and Bledsoe. When Zion was on the floor without them, the Pelicans posted a plus-8.0 net rating and surrendered a 108.6 defensive rating.

The cost: 7 slots in the 1st round + mid-20s 2022 Laker's pick.

The Celtics aren't the only team with 2 young All-Star wings on their roster. Zion and Ingram' just added a Center that can spread the floor for them.

They'll now threaten to match any Lonzo deal in RFA, which should depress his value.

Good grief: SVG played Bledsoe the most minutes on that roster. This team will get a bump with Ball, Hart, Kira Lewis, & NAW sopping up those minutes

How often do you save $58MM and immediately get better?
BTW, only $3.9M of Bledsoe's 2022-23 contrack is guaranteed so the actual savings is like $40-something million, not $58M. https://wgno.com/sports/one-and-done-report-pelicans-send-adams-bledsoe-to-memphis-in-salary-dump/

But point taken.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,497
around the way
Teams don't necessarily agree with that flatness - reporting is the Knicks have been trying to trade 19 & 21 to move up & have been incapable of getting a lottery pick for that package.

So it would cost at least a mid-1st to get from 17 to 10, so the draft pick compensation isn't too bad in terms of market value of picks.

Also, the Grizzlies tend to do smart things & build their team in an intelligent manner, so I would default to thinking in hindsight they will win this trade.
In hindsight, yeah Memphis might make other moves and this benefits them somehow. But New Orleans is trading two shit players for a decent one and moving down seven spots this year outside of the top 5 (obviously moving from 1 to 8 is different from 10-17). Bledsoe is toast. This is great for them.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,941
In hindsight, yeah Memphis might make other moves and this benefits them somehow. But New Orleans is trading two shit players for a decent one and moving down seven spots this year outside of the top 5 (obviously moving from 1 to 8 is different from 10-17). Bledsoe is toast. This is great for them.
Top 10 protected Lakers 1st isn't nothing either, but obviously talent/capspace-wise it's a big boost.

I'm not sure if people would look at it the same way if they traded 15 + a future 1st for the salary dump, which is basically the least it would cost to move from 17 to 10 if my understanding of the current market is accurate.
 

Auger34

used to be tbb
SoSH Member
Apr 23, 2010
9,455
Teams don't necessarily agree with that flatness - reporting is the Knicks have been trying to trade 19 & 21 to move up & have been incapable of getting a lottery pick for that package.

So it would cost at least a mid-1st to get from 17 to 10, so the draft pick compensation isn't too bad in terms of market value of picks.

Also, the Grizzlies tend to do smart things & build their team in an intelligent manner, so I would default to thinking in hindsight they will win this trade.
The Grizzlies are generally a good front office but their other trade of this manner was with the Heat for Justise Winslow….which didn’t receive a great reaction at the time and turned out to be an unmitigated disaster.

l understand the idea behind what theyre doing, using their available finances to trade for assets since it’s unlikely anyone would sign there in FA, but it seems like they took on A LOT for not too much of a gain.

I don’t know if I’d call it a swindle but I definitely think it’s a pretty poor trade for Memphis
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,941
The Grizzlies are generally a good front office but their other trade of this manner was with the Heat for Justise Winslow….which didn’t receive a great reaction at the time and turned out to be an unmitigated disaster.

l understand the idea behind what theyre doing, using their available finances to trade for assets since it’s unlikely anyone would sign there in FA, but it seems like they took on A LOT for not too much of a gain.

I don’t know if I’d call it a swindle but I definitely think it’s a pretty poor trade for Memphis
Idk, my recollection of the reaction was more like this:

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cbssports.com/nba/news/nba-trade-grades-heat-win-andre-iguodala-sweepstakes-grizzlies-hit-home-run-with-justise-winslow/amp/

They got a 1st to take on Igoudala's expiring contract & flipped him for a lottery ticket. Just because they lost that lottery doesn't mean it wasn't a good series of transactions or in any way disastrous.

Smart non-destination teams churn assets & use their space to take shots & keep a cohesive timeline.

Dumb non-destination teams sign those players to the bad contracts they need to dump to begin with.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,375
I think DET is looking at the same thing as OKC... is SGA a guy you want to be the sole max guy you start to build around, because you need to decide quick on that. SGA strikes me as a guy you have to max if you have him, but he immediately becomes one of those "yeah he's a max guy, but he's not a MAX guy" and now you're locked into him with not much else on the roster, and SGA doesn't strike me as the #1 on a top team.
Little late to the party on this, but SGA seems like exactly the kind of guy you don't worry about giving the Max rookie extension to. He won't be the #1 option on any team, but he fits on every team. You could sign him to a $35 million a year contract and if he's not getting you to the promised land and you need to reset with picks, most contenders or fringe playoff teams would be lining up to call with a fat package of picks and swaps to make him the second or third star on their roster.

Simmons is such a pain in the ass to trade for value because the basketball fit sucks with most teams. A 6'6" switchable point guard who can actually shoot and create, not just theoretically, will retain value no matter the size of the contract in today's NBA.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
Yes, but he's not worth downgrading from #1 to #6. Everyone agrees that he's a fine running mate, but Cunningham and Green are legitimate top 10 prospects. Giving up that upside for a second or third banana is counterproductive.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
Agreed---the toughest thing to get in the NBA is the first two stars. SGA, to me, is a third guy on a championship team and you can't give up a rare shot at getting one of those first two stars to get him, much as I like him.
 

Sam Ray Not

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
8,871
NYC
Agreed---the toughest thing to get in the NBA is the first two stars. SGA, to me, is a third guy on a championship team and you can't give up a rare shot at getting one of those first two stars to get him, much as I like him.
Putting up 25.3 pts per 36 on .623 true shooting (.418 from 3, .808 ft) with 5.1 rebounds and 6.3 assists — at age 22 — says “third guy” to you?
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,941
Yes, but he's not worth downgrading from #1 to #6. Everyone agrees that he's a fine running mate, but Cunningham and Green are legitimate top 10 prospects. Giving up that upside for a second or third banana is counterproductive.
I think I'd do SGA + 5 for 1 in a hypothetical world.

Not if I'm Detroit, though, because Cade has expressed that he actually wants to be there.

Of course, I still think Mobley is going to be the best player in this draft.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
In 35 games on a garbage team not trying to win, though....don't get me wrong, I like him a lot. I see the case he is a number two on a contender; I'm not sure myself.

Ringer did not have him in their top 25, ESPN had him 38th, right next to Marcus Smart pre-season (which presumably has gone up some!).

Box-score stats aside, you think he's the best or second-best guy on any of the final 4 teams? Not on Milwaukee, not on Phoenix for me (one can debate with Paul), not on the Clippers. I guess you can argue he's better than Atlanta's number two...whether they are a contender really one can debate. Lakers, Nuggets, Celtics, Heat other teams I think he's third on.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
I think I'd do SGA + 5 for 1 in a hypothetical world.

Not if I'm Detroit, though, because Cade has expressed that he actually wants to be there.

Of course, I still think Mobley is going to be the best player in this draft.
The problem is that at #6 you're most likely looking at a guy whose 1% projection is Shawn Marion (Jonathan Kuminga) with real questions about whether or not he'll ever hit it. So you'd go into the draft (at #1 or #2) with a real shot at getting that guy you can build a team around, and leave the draft still needing that guy.

This isn't football or hockey, you go as far as your stars take you. Trading a potential star for a running mate won't get you where you want to go (the playoffs). Now if OKC had #5 and Scottie Barnes lasted that long I might be tempted (because there's a non-zero chance that he becomes the best player from this pool). But even then I'd need a lot of extra value to make the trade because Barnes might not be anything more than a poor man's Ben Simmons.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
In 35 games on a garbage team not trying to win, though....don't get me wrong, I like him a lot. I see the case he is a number two on a contender; I'm not sure myself.

Ringer did not have him in their top 25, ESPN had him 38th, right next to Marcus Smart pre-season (which presumably has gone up some!).

Box-score stats aside, you think he's the best or second-best guy on any of the final 4 teams? Not on Milwaukee, not on Phoenix for me (one can debate with Paul), not on the Clippers. I guess you can argue he's better than Atlanta's number two...whether they are a contender really one can debate. Lakers, Nuggets, Celtics, Heat other teams I think he's third on.
Khris MIddleton was just the #2. Or Jrue Holiday. SGA would be just fine depending on who is partner is.
 

JM3

often quoted
SoSH Member
Dec 14, 2019
14,941
The problem is that at #6 you're most likely looking at a guy whose 1% projection is Shawn Marion (Jonathan Kuminga) with real questions about whether or not he'll ever hit it. So you'd go into the draft (at #1 or #2) with a real shot at getting that guy you can build a team around, and leave the draft still needing that guy.

This isn't football or hockey, you go as far as your stars take you. Trading a potential star for a running mate won't get you where you want to go (the playoffs). Now if OKC had #5 and Scottie Barnes lasted that long I might be tempted (because there's a non-zero chance that he becomes the best player from this pool). But even then I'd need a lot of extra value to make the trade because Barnes might not be anything more than a poor man's Ben Simmons.
Yeah, I don't think we disagree on much of anything there.

Except I'm lower on Cade.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
Khris MIddleton was just the #2. Or Jrue Holiday. SGA would be just fine depending on who is partner is.
Yeah, honestly if Boston had missed the postseason and landed a top 2 pick I'd be willing to roll the dice on a trade as adding SGA to the JayCrew would vault them into the first tier. But neither Houston or Detroit is at that stage of development yet. And if I were running the Raptors (same conditionals) I might be really tempted to add SGA+ to my lineup (but there'd need to be considerably more to it than #6).
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,276
The Grizzlies are generally a good front office but their other trade of this manner was with the Heat for Justise Winslow….which didn’t receive a great reaction at the time and turned out to be an unmitigated disaster.

l understand the idea behind what theyre doing, using their available finances to trade for assets since it’s unlikely anyone would sign there in FA, but it seems like they took on A LOT for not too much of a gain.

I don’t know if I’d call it a swindle but I definitely think it’s a pretty poor trade for Memphis
It all depends on what Giddey turns out to be which by all accounts was their target in getting above the 11th pick.
 

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
Yeah, honestly if Boston had missed the postseason and landed a top 2 pick I'd be willing to roll the dice on a trade as adding SGA to the JayCrew would vault them into the first tier. But neither Houston or Detroit is at that stage of development yet. And if I were running the Raptors (same conditionals) I might be really tempted to add SGA+ to my lineup (but there'd need to be considerably more to it than #6).
Agreed, and SGA would be a spectacular fit next to them. But he would also be the third guy in that set-up...