2022-2023 General Celtics thread

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,266
I'd agree but white has been durable and delivering. Horford is at a position of need. I guess I should have included Grant - but he seems to me to not be quite up to the level of these four.
Yeah I don’t like to grade in order of value as they each fill a specific role and need on this team. That’s a sign of a potentially great team where fit and role is more important than who is the better overall player. My take on Brogdon is that he checks all those boxes and is the most talented as well.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,659
Melrose, MA
Serious question, who's the third best player on the team at this point?
  • Horford
  • White
  • Brogdon
  • Smart
There is a ton of parity there... they have all been fantastic.
I'd rank them this way:

1T. Smart
1T. Horford
3. Brogdon
4. White

As an all-around player, I think Smart is the best. Although Horford would be the hardest guy to replace right now because Brogdon, White, and Pritchard is better PG depth than Kornet, Vonleh, and Blake is C depth.

What makes it weird is that Brogdon is unquestionably the best offensive player of the four, but I would also call him unquestionably the worst defensive player of the four. I give him the nod for #3 over White because his offense is so good (and just what the team was missing last June).

Ranking just the PGs:

Offense: 1. Brogdon, 2. Smart, 3. White
Defense: 1. Smart, 2. White, 3. Brogdon
Overall: 1. Smart, 2. Brogdon, 3. White
 

koufax32

He'll cry if he wants to...
SoSH Member
Dec 8, 2006
9,106
Duval
I assume Horford gets the day off tomorrow. In a perfect world, so would Jaylen. I think that’s a bit too far though.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,712
I'd rank them this way:

1T. Smart
1T. Horford
3. Brogdon
4. White
DARKO likes Smart best of those 4 as well.

Threw Timelord in there too just for fun.

Pretty strong team when these five are 3 through 7 (plus one of the top 2 is MVP level) .

Without JT and JB, that's still a clear playoff starting 5 right there. Plus even then, a solid bench with PP, Hauser, Grant, Kornet.




DARKO3rd.png
 
Last edited:

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
11,495
around the way
Man, Marcus, White, and TL have fairly understandable scatter plots there. Brogdon is pretty up and down, and Al's last 18 months or so look like two different guys wearing the 42.

edit: I wish that Bowiac dropped by more.
 

tbrown_01923

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2006
780
Brogdon hasn't been in a groove since returning from his injury, but when he has healthy on he's been good.

The thought that it might be robet Williams is enticing, but there is so much for him to overcome this season. He's not likely to get the kind of minutes regular season given horford, Williams, and kornet.

It's fun to watch them and the bench mob. The team is deep.
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,712
Man, Marcus, White, and TL have fairly understandable scatter plots there. Brogdon is pretty up and down, and Al's last 18 months or so look like two different guys wearing the 42.
Yeah, you have to look at the data points rather than the best fit line for guys like Al. His last 2 years have been good and just a very slow trend down from his early 30s.

The best fit line being is dragged down by that valley a few years ago that's probably not entirely relevant to his current production.
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,651
It's bizarre that the Celtics are 0-2 against Cleveland, 1-2 against Chicago, and 15-0 against everyone else.

Here's their margins of victory: 9, 7, 6, 18, 4, 15, 3, 16, 19, 9, 4, 25, 8, 13, 18, 9

So in their wins, they'v e only had a "close" outcome (within 5 points) three times. 13 wins have all been five or more points. 7 of the 16 have been by double digits. But here's the thing: they've only had one abject blowout win (25 points over Atlanta). I know they can take their foot off the gas when up big, but they've just consistently been manhandling teams without the overall margin of victory being aided by a few 30 point blowouts. It's just consistent, relentless excellence, almost no matter the opponent.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,143
It's bizarre that the Celtics are 0-2 against Cleveland, 1-2 against Chicago, and 15-0 against everyone else.

Here's their margins of victory: 9, 7, 6, 18, 4, 15, 3, 16, 19, 9, 4, 25, 8, 13, 18, 9

So in their wins, they'v e only had a "close" outcome (within 5 points) three times. 13 wins have all been five or more points. 7 of the 16 have been by double digits. But here's the thing: they've only had one abject blowout win (25 points over Atlanta). I know they can take their foot off the gas when up big, but they've just consistently been manhandling teams without the overall margin of victory being aided by a few 30 point blowouts. It's just consistent, relentless excellence, almost no matter the opponent.
The numbers support that eye test: the Celtics are something like +10 net rating in the 4th quarter this year, and consistently drop the hammer as the game progresses.

"Be good without trying too hard and then execute consistently in the 4th" is exactly what you want from a good team in the NBA regular season.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,770
Before Coach Joe put in the third string, the Celtics were up by 24 points, a lead built with eight more three-pointers than the Wizards. This offensive improvement through the first quarter of Mazzulla’s first season has been impressive.

It will be interesting to see how Rob Williams will affect the offense. Will Mazzulla start both AL and TL, which could result in a lot less open driving space than we’ve seen when Horford starts and sets up from three? Will they use Rob off the bench, as a supercharged version of Kornet, with that bomb squad unit of Brogdon, PP, Hauser, and one of the Jays? Will they start Rob with either White or Grant, giving the second unit even more long range firepower, with AL, Hauser, Brodgon, White/Grant,, and a Jay?
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,659
Melrose, MA
It will be interesting to see how Rob Williams will affect the offense. Will Mazzulla start both AL and TL, which could result in a lot less open driving space than we’ve seen when Horford starts and sets up from three? Will they use Rob off the bench, as a supercharged version of Kornet, with that bomb squad unit of Brogdon, PP, Hauser, and one of the Jays? Will they start Rob with either White or Grant, giving the second unit even more long range firepower, with AL, Hauser, Brodgon, White/Grant,, and a Jay?
Al has really become a spot up shooter on offense. He's attempting a career low number of 2 point attempts per game and per 36 minutes, while he is attempting a career high 3-point percentage (57% of his FGA are from three).

Spaced, 5-out sets will be harder with Rob in the game, but they will be able to run pick and roll, use Rob as a high=post passer, etc. I would imagine they will work him in gradually give how well the rest of the teamis playing but also how important Rob will be for playoff defense.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,301
Santa Monica
Serious question, who's the third best player on the team at this point?
  • Horford
  • White
  • Brogdon
  • Smart
There is a ton of parity there... they have all been fantastic.
Playing next to our two-headed monster you want defense, screening, passing, & efficient scoring. That's why starting Smart, TL, Horford, White or Grant makes sense over Brogdon. A healthy TimeLord is the 3rd best player with the JAYs.

Brogdon is their 3rd best offensive player.

The idea of starting your 5 best offensive players is good for HS/College but inefficient use of rotations at the NBA level. It is also why vacuum player analysis is pretty bad when talking about who starts/rotations.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,301
Santa Monica
Al has really become a spot up shooter on offense. He's attempting a career low number of 2 point attempts per game and per 36 minutes, while he is attempting a career high 3-point percentage (57% of his FGA are from three).

Spaced, 5-out sets will be harder with Rob in the game, but they will be able to run pick and roll, use Rob as a high=post passer, etc. I would imagine they will work him in gradually give how well the rest of the teamis playing but also how important Rob will be for playoff defense.
If they continue to shoot 40% from 3 as a team, 4 out and Rob will be silly good offensively. He'll be slamming home or passing out a lot of the 60% they miss from 3. His defensive rebounding will also lead to more transition baskets
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,535
Al has really become a spot up shooter on offense. He's attempting a career low number of 2 point attempts per game and per 36 minutes, while he is attempting a career high 3-point percentage (57% of his FGA are from three).
I think what Horford is doing now is what Kevin McHale would have done if a 6'11 post player taking 250 3PT shots wasn't considered heresy like it was in the early 90s. McHale dabbled in the 3 as his feet went, but never took more than 70 of them in a season.
 

tbrown_01923

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2006
780
Playing next to our two-headed monster you want defense, screening, passing, & efficient scoring. That's why starting Smart, TL, Horford, White or Grant makes sense over Brogdon. A healthy TimeLord is the 3rd best player with the JAYs.
I lean towards a healthy timelord, particularly on his trajectory of imporvement, being the 3rd best player on this team. But we haven't seen it this season, and we don't know to the extent we will see it and over which time periods. As you look at what white, brodgon, smart, horford, and grant have done they have all been very good, with such a complimentary set of skills, it's difficult for me to clearly identify the "3rd best player". Whats more interesting is there is a group of four-five players that could be top 3ish players on a lot of teams (would require some projection outside of the celtics).

It's one thing to say the celtics are deep. Hauser and Pritchard are evidence of that, but this team is deep on VERY GOOD talent. If you optimistically include timelord there are 6 players, in addition to JT and JB, that are starting quality.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,143
From the article:

The driving force behind Boston’s elite offense is how many spot-up threes they generate from touching the paint and playing inside-out basketball. So far, 72.9% of their total three-point attempts have come from catch-and-shoot opportunities. That’s slightly up from last season (70.3%). They are shooting 41.0% on those looks, the second-highest percentage in the league.
Given the quality of the Cs' spot-up shooters, a lot of this offense is probably sustainable with only light regression.

The shot quality they get is ridiculous; it's at the level of peak "LeBron + shooters" teams, by the eye test (better, by the stats).
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,170
Imaginationland
From the article:


Given the quality of the Cs' spot-up shooters, a lot of this offense is probably sustainable with only light regression.

The shot quality they get is ridiculous; it's at the level of peak "LeBron + shooters" teams, by the eye test (better, by the stats).
I think there's some pretty stiff regression coming for at least some of Boston's role players - here is what they are at this year, vs the last 2 years:

Horford - .487 vs .348
Hauser - .489 vs .432 (obviously a bigger sample this year)
White - .439 vs .325
Brogdon - .443 vs .363
Williams - .437 vs .398
Pritchard - .444 vs .412

Hauser, Grant and Pritchard probably aren't too far off we can hope to expect (and Brogdon's % isn't far above what he averaged in Milwaukee, where his role in the offense was similar to what it is now), but Horford and White in particular, unless they've learned something new, are due for some rough times even considering the extra space they are currently getting. The real good news is that our looks like this with our main shooters having NOT gotten off to particularly good starts from 3:

Tatum - .352 vs .367
Brown - .344 vs .376
Smart - .318 vs .330

Could get some regression the other way for these guys, who have taken the most 3 point shots so far this year.
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,410
I think there's some pretty stiff regression coming for at least some of Boston's role players - here is what they are at this year, vs the last 2 years:

Horford - .487 vs .348
Hauser - .489 vs .432 (obviously a bigger sample this year)
White - .439 vs .325
Brogdon - .443 vs .363
Williams - .437 vs .398
Pritchard - .444 vs .412

Hauser, Grant and Pritchard probably aren't too far off we can hope to expect (and Brogdon's % isn't far above what he averaged in Milwaukee, where his role in the offense was similar to what it is now), but Horford and White in particular, unless they've learned something new, are due for some rough times even considering the extra space they are currently getting. The real good news is that our looks like this with our main shooters having NOT gotten off to particularly good starts from 3:

Tatum - .352 vs .367
Brown - .344 vs .376
Smart - .318 vs .330

Could get some regression the other way for these guys, who have taken the most 3 point shots so far this year.
There does certainly appear to be a lot of ripe situations for regression. On the other hand, if we end up not seeing as much
regression as we should expect, that could offer a lot of insight into the offensive strategy being employed (tactics + personnel). This team is fascinating like that thus far.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,481
From the article:


Given the quality of the Cs' spot-up shooters, a lot of this offense is probably sustainable with only light regression.

The shot quality they get is ridiculous; it's at the level of peak "LeBron + shooters" teams, by the eye test (better, by the stats).
What is huge for this team is that nearly to a man, you are comfortable with the spot up shooters putting the ball on the floor to recycle the in-out play for a better look OR attack a closeout. Grant can still be a little shaky if he chooses to dribble after a pump fake but it has been better than last year at least. But everyone else is a real threat to drive, and even Hauser has flashed some ability there. At the very least they are all locked into the ball movement needed to make the offense tick.

And nobody is missing out on shots they might feel like they deserve. The distribution of shots has been quite good.
 

Euclis20

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2004
8,170
Imaginationland
There does certainly appear to be a lot of ripe situations for regression. On the other hand, if we end up not seeing as much
regression as we should expect, that could offer a lot of insight into the offensive strategy being employed (tactics + personnel). This team is fascinating like that thus far.
It really is something. They've got 5 players in the top 25 in 3p% and are first overall at an even .400 (last year they were 14th, at .356).
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
18,183
I think there's some pretty stiff regression coming for at least some of Boston's role players - here is what they are at this year, vs the last 2 years:

Horford - .487 vs .348
Hauser - .489 vs .432 (obviously a bigger sample this year)
White - .439 vs .325
Brogdon - .443 vs .363
Williams - .437 vs .398
Pritchard - .444 vs .412

Hauser, Grant and Pritchard probably aren't too far off we can hope to expect (and Brogdon's % isn't far above what he averaged in Milwaukee, where his role in the offense was similar to what it is now), but Horford and White in particular, unless they've learned something new, are due for some rough times even considering the extra space they are currently getting. The real good news is that our looks like this with our main shooters having NOT gotten off to particularly good starts from 3:

Tatum - .352 vs .367
Brown - .344 vs .376
Smart - .318 vs .330

Could get some regression the other way for these guys, who have taken the most 3 point shots so far this year.
Just need to note that the Derrick White's shooting in general was well below his career average last season. So the actual distance between his "true" ability and current numbers could be a bit less.
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,143
Just need to note that the Derrick White's shooting in general was well below his career average last season. So the actual distance between his "true" ability and current numbers could be a bit less.
Also, as has been noted here and by the tuned-in beat guys like Weiss, he did substantial (and noticeable) work over the summer to speed up his release and get more arc on the ball.

I imagine he'll regress somewhat, but I'd be surprised if it's back to his career average, based on technique and look quality.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,301
Santa Monica
Just need to note that the Derrick White's shooting in general was well below his career average last season. So the actual distance between his "true" ability and current numbers could be a bit less.
he is also parking himself in the corner office more than ever (32% of his attempts vs 18% historically), where he shoots better

wouldn't shock me if he shot 40% for the season after telling the world he was going to work on it and his improved selection
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,535
From the article:


Given the quality of the Cs' spot-up shooters, a lot of this offense is probably sustainable with only light regression.

The shot quality they get is ridiculous; it's at the level of peak "LeBron + shooters" teams, by the eye test (better, by the stats).
It's like if the goal of Pete Carril's best Princeton teams or Bill Walton's great Portland team was to hit 3s instead of getting layups. A great marriage of time-tested offensive tactics and an analytic approach to the most valuable shots in this era.
 

Fishy1

Head Mason
SoSH Member
Nov 10, 2006
6,081
Also, as has been noted here and by the tuned-in beat guys like Weiss, he did substantial (and noticeable) work over the summer to speed up his release and get more arc on the ball.

I imagine he'll regress somewhat, but I'd be surprised if it's back to his career average, based on technique and look quality.
Yes. From the preseason people have noted his release and arc look better. Do I doubt he's a 44% three-point shooter? Of course. But I'd like to think he doesn't crash that hard and settles in around 36-40%, which would be a big bounce-back for him and probably a career high.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,266
It's like if the goal of Pete Carril's best Princeton teams or Bill Walton's great Portland team was to hit 3s instead of getting layups. A great marriage of time-tested offensive tactics and an analytic approach to the most valuable shots in this era.
Carril and Pitino’s systems weren’t to get an open three “instead” of a layup it was to get an open three OR a layup. Both ahead of their time as “mid-range deniers.”
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,266
Hornets players available Monday:

Theo Maledon
Kelly Oubre
Jalen McDaniels
PJ Washington
Mason Plumlee
James Bouknight
Nick Richards
Kai Jones
Bryce McGowens
 

DeJesus Built My Hotrod

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 24, 2002
48,544
This discussion is so awesome.
Hornets players available Monday:

Theo Maledon
Kelly Oubre
Jalen McDaniels
PJ Washington
Mason Plumlee
James Bouknight
Nick Richards
Kai Jones
Bryce McGowens
That's depressing. They looked to be in ascension with Ball and Bridges and now here they are. NBA purgatory...
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,301
Santa Monica
Hornets are firmly in the Race to VICTORy. Scoot isn't a bad consolation prize

I see Purgatory as more middle of the road, with a few declining players, and no picks to dream on.
The Nets, Wolves, and Lakers are all in their own special hell.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,266
This discussion is so awesome.
That's depressing. They looked to be in ascension with Ball and Bridges and now here they are. NBA purgatory...
This could be a poor teams Duncanesque tank if they end up with the 1st or 2nd pick along with a healthy Ball and Bridges, who I’m hearing is going to be returning to the Hornets soon.
 

JCizzle

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 11, 2006
20,608
This could be a poor teams Duncanesque tank if they end up with the 1st or 2nd pick along with a healthy Ball and Bridges, who I’m hearing is going to be returning to the Hornets soon.
Bridges? I assumed that he’d never play in the NBA again. Certainly not this soon.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,266
Bridges? I assumed that he’d never play in the NBA again. Certainly not this soon.
I expected signed during season to multi-year deal with the NBA suspending him for rest of year. That’s what I always thought in my head once the plea happened and heard similar since then. We shall see.
 

ManicCompression

Member
SoSH Member
May 14, 2015
1,370
Hornets are firmly in the Race to VICTORy. Scoot isn't a bad consolation prize
Let's hope not. If there's an owner who could completely ruin the Vic experience, it's Michael Jordan. I'd be happy with a frozen envelope situation if they have the worst record - generationally talented players should be funneled almost anywhere else.
 

Eddie Jurak

canderson-lite
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Dec 12, 2002
44,659
Melrose, MA
Hornets players available Monday:

Theo Maledon
Kelly Oubre
Jalen McDaniels
PJ Washington
Mason Plumlee
James Bouknight
Nick Richards
Kai Jones
Bryce McGowens
This game was absolute craytown, with the Hornets missing Rozier, Ball, Hayward, and Bridges.

Of course, the Celtics were without Brown, Horford, and (of course) Rob. Blake! started, picked up a couple of quick fouls, and Mazzulla pretty much just left him in. Made a couple of hustle plays keepung rebounds alive and hit a wide open three to open the game.

The Celtics went crazy in the first running out to an 43-16 lead with 2:40 left. Then they started fucking around and trying all sorts of fancy passes none of which worked. They were trying to be the Globetrotters but ended up more like the Washington Generals. They wound up with 6 turnovers in the first, most at the end of the quarter, but, incredibly, Charlotte could not take advantage. At the end of one, it was 45-19.

Boston, with mostly bench players on the floor, did not play that well at the start of the second, with Charlotte eventually cutting the lead to 19 by outscoring the Celtics 14-9 in the first 3.5 minutes. The Celtics finally got it going about halfway through the quarter, with the catalyst being, unbelievably, a one-handed alley-oop dunk by Blake!, who managed to get way above the rim somehow. Charlotte outscored the Celtics 36-33 in the second, but the Celtics were up 78-55. Despite 10 turnovers in the half.

The third quarter was all Boston, Celtics winning the quarter 43-27 to up their lead to 121-82. Tatum missed a driving layup at the end or it would have set the Celtic record for points through three quarters; only twice in all of Celtic history have the Celtics scored more than 120 through three. Tatum and Smart were done for the night after 3, Tatum with 35 points, Smart with 22 and a career high 15 assists.

The fourth quarter was mostly bench guys, though Blake! (who had a second less impressive dunk later in the game), White and Grant got a few minutes in the 4th. Charlotte outscored the bench unit 23-19 but that did not change much.

As a team, the Celtics shot 59%, but they were at about 68% through three quarters. They had 40 assists. They shot 24-52 from three.

Hauser had a pair of blocks along with his more typical 11 points on 3-6 from three kind of game.

Just crazy.

Edit: Just so no one thinks I am making this up:

View: https://twitter.com/celtics/status/1597401409552404480?s=20&t=7Y_zZcOCqP37JIBAoZyRSg

Boston Celtics: Do ya thing 91
 

Reverend

for king and country
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2007
64,410
This jumped out at me and made me laugh:

The fourth quarter was mostly bench guys, though Blake! . . . got a few minutes in the 4th.
Blake! Not a “bench guy.”

Because, of course, he was a starter.

This team…
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,660
NOVA
he is also parking himself in the corner office more than ever (32% of his attempts vs 18% historically), where he shoots better

wouldn't shock me if he shot 40% for the season after telling the world he was going to work on it and his improved selection
Yes and you can see the difference this year with what I imagine is a Coach Joe emphasis. When you watch White, he is purposeful in making sure he gets to the corner and when he isn't there, his teammates are waving him to get there. If there's someone in transition already in the corner and they don't get immediate action, that player cuts through and White takes his place. Also, I haven't looked at the stats but my eyes tell me White is shooting more in transition this year and more in rhythm from balls coming in - out. Honestly, any shooter will be better in these situations.
 

riboflav

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 20, 2006
9,660
NOVA
In other words, we know Grant is a great corner three point shooter but he is not a great three point shooter (you know what I mean). There is a difference. Grant will never be compared to Steph, Klay, et al. But what can he do like a lot of NBA players who CAN shoot, he can knock down corner threes and in - out threes off of someone else's penetration/paint touch/kick. Give him a long closeout and you will suffer the consequences. We are seeing that this year with other guys like White, too.
 

The Mort Report

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 5, 2007
7,002
Concord
Finally, I've seen enough. Joe is the real deal Holyfield and I am here for it.
Joe’s got a bit of Bill in him. He genuinely seems to hate being interviewed and asked unimportant questions. He was jokingly asked if he put Blake in a Time Machine before the game and was having none of it