2024 Tennis

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
75,918
Sinner is in trouble against Medvedev, tied at one set all and down a break late in the 3rd.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
75,918
Ridiculous that these two matches are being played simultaneously, the only two men's matches of the day and they're both must-see for fans. At least they are using two channels to show both.
 

ifmanis5

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 29, 2007
67,268
Rotten Apple
Sinner really took command back pretty quickly. And yeah, very bad for these huge matches to be on at the same time.

Update: Medvedev took control back and won the tie break. Hope this goes 5 sets.
 
Last edited:

AMS25

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 29, 2008
3,452
Holland on the Plains
Ridiculous that these two matches are being played simultaneously, the only two men's matches of the day and they're both must-see for fans. At least they are using two channels to show both.
I'm watching one on TV and one on my laptop. However, I'll have to leave in 15 minutes to take one of my sons to the dentist so boo.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
75,918
Medvedev knocks out Sinner in 5, Alcaraz starting to pull ahead in the other one.
 

Dim13

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,137
The mucky muck
I think Sinner is hurt, he's not going to win.
He took a medical time out in the second set. By all accounts, he looked pale (well, paler than usual), and had his heart rate and blood pressure checked on the court. He was battling something for sure.
 

Dim13

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,137
The mucky muck
Turns out that De Minaur did hurt himself on match point the other day. He withdraws, giving Djokovic the walkover. He'll play the winner of Musetti/Fritz in the semis.
 

jezza1918

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,999
South Dartmouth, MA
Fritz - down 2 sets to 1 and serving down 0-40 at 2-2 in the 4th - climbs out of that hole and about 15 minutes later serves out a 6-3 set. Onto the 5th we go.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
75,918
Kind of a dud tournament, maybe we’ll still get an Alcaraz/Djokovic final.
 

Dim13

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,137
The mucky muck
This Vekic/Paolini match is high drama. Vekic was up a break twice in the 3rd and lost them. Paolini had match point and lost it. Both battling hard, but Vekic looks like she’s laboring more.
 

johnmd20

mad dog
Suspended
Dec 30, 2003
64,901
New York City
This Vekic/Paolini match is high drama. Vekic was up a break twice in the 3rd and lost them. Paolini had match point and lost it. Both battling hard, but Vekic looks like she’s laboring more.
She had a 2nd match point and got way conservative on every ground stroke.

And now it's 6-6, going to the T Breaker.
 

Dim13

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
2,137
The mucky muck
I was rooting for Paolini and I’m happy she won, but man, did Vekic ever show a ton of heart and fight when she was pretty obviously exhausted.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
25,647
Pittsburgh, PA
I will state once again, futilely, that there shouldn't be match tiebreakers at 6-6 in the 3rd. They should go on at least to 12-12 before doing that. And TV scheduling constraints (which is also the given reason why the Grand Slam Committee hasn't changed to have the women play best-of-5 sets) are much less of an issue at/after the R16, so surely they could have people play a bit longer at least starting then, to see if it can be decided the old fashioned way.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
75,918
I will state once again, futilely, that there shouldn't be match tiebreakers at 6-6 in the 3rd. They should go on at least to 12-12 before doing that.
I would guess the majority of the players would disagree? It's about trying to stay healthy through two weeks of matches, your idea would only make that that much harder and we have so many players dropping out already.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
75,918
Men's semis tomorrow should be good, really rooting hard for another Alcaraz/Djokovic final. If that happened, I am about 50/50 but Novak getting to 25 would be something. Sampras only got to 13!
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
25,647
Pittsburgh, PA
I would guess the majority of the players would disagree? It's about trying to stay healthy through two weeks of matches, your idea would only make that that much harder and we have so many players dropping out already.
I'm not sure. A majority of the top-20 women's players at one point favored going to best-of-5 sets in slams, so I don't think the players likeliest to go deep in these events were focused on that, as much as the additional opportunities for their better talent to win out. Basically the reasoning from this article.

The match-tiebreak rule applies to both men's and women's, of course, so I do wonder if the men's players would agree or not. But it didn't exist at most of the slams up until a few years ago, and I don't remember complaints about it. After the Isner-Mahut marathon, Wimbledon changed to exactly what I'm suggesting - a tiebreak at 12-12 in the final set - which of course was used to decide the Djokovic-Federer Final in 2019. It's not some outrageous novelty or something.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
75,918
I would agree for the Finals of both men's/women's that it could go to 12-12 before a tiebreak but I would vote against in the earlier rounds.
 

jon abbey

Shanghai Warrior
Moderator
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
75,918
Alcaraz loses a first set tiebreak to Medvedev, but wins fairly easily after that in 4.
 

InstaFace

The Ultimate One
SoSH Member
Sep 27, 2016
25,647
Pittsburgh, PA
An absolute wild statistic. He just puts so much pressure on you to be perfect in general, and then that gets exacerbated in breakers.
And that's by-definition going up against someone who is playing well enough that he just won 6 out of 12 games against Djokovic. Just plain nuts.
 

jezza1918

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 19, 2005
3,999
South Dartmouth, MA
And that's by-definition going up against someone who is playing well enough that he just won 6 out of 12 games against Djokovic. Just plain nuts.
Most times that's true. But in some cases it goes to a breaker because Djokovic is playing down, or off. and even still he manages to tighten things up and win. Not trying to refute your point, but build on it.