pitt is cashed they plob will spit @ ciny or @ den throughI don’t think the chiefs are likely to win out. I’d say likely they drop a game. To be likely to win 4 games in a row you need to be 10+ point favs on each.
Chiefs are a 3 point fav at the moment vs Chargers
Then they get Steelers / Bengals / Broncos.
I’d say they likely finish 3-1, same as I expect Pats to finish. Pats own the tiebreaker.
Titans have the easier schedule, Steelers / 49ers / Dolphins / Texans, and are the team that worries me on the fight for the 1 seed
And here's the flip side to "If the Bills had just run a dozen designed runs for Allen, they would have beaten the Pats on MNF"
BAL is 8-5 and in some trouble. I agree that KC is looking tough and that BUFF will be a handful (assuming health for Allen). It’s trite but the difference maker is really Belichick for me; his ability to manipulate a game if Pats can play mistake free.My totally subjective rankings:
AFC
1. KC - I do not like this, Sam I am.
2. NE - A complete team right now.
3. Buf - I still think they're really good.
4. Ind - They're doing a lot of good things and will be a handful.
5. Ten - Especially if they get Henry back at full strength.
6. Cin - Explosive on offense, but it's....Cincinnati.
7. Bal - They're 9-4 so it seems crazy to have them this low, but that's where I've got them.
8. LAC - They're pretty good but I don't think they're better than the top 7.
9. Cle - Meh.
10. Den - Meh.
NFC
1. TB - They're still the champs.
2. Ari - I need to see Murray do it in the playoffs but they're pretty good all around.
3. GB - If the D shows up, they're very tough.
4. LAR - If Stafford plays well, this team is going to be hard to beat.
5. Dal - Another "you've got to prove it to me" team, but they have the pieces to be very good.
6. SF - I can't believe they're back in the playoff mix after the start they had to the season.
7. Min - Meh. They can be good or they can be bad.
8. Phi - Yuck.
9. Was - Yuck.
10. NO - Yuck.
The NFC is very top heavy and after the first few teams the quality drops off considerably. They have five teams at 6-7 vying for that last playoff spot. Six teams at either 7-6 or 6-7 vying for the last two spots. Reasonable chance an 8-9 team makes the playoffs in the NFC.
The AFC is solid up and down. Now that KC is playing like they are, and given that NE barely lost to both TB and Dal, I think the way these teams are playing right now, the AFC is the better conference. Better in depth for sure, and even at the top, I'd take KC and NE going up against the top of the NFC.
The playoffs are going to be great this year.
By current standings, here's the current playoff matchups:
AFC
1 NE bye
7 Buf at 2 Ten - I like Buf in that game unless Henry is back and playing at near 100%.
6 Ind at 3 KC - A tough matchup for KC given these teams' relative strengths and weaknesses.
5 LAC at 4 Bal - Could go either way. I could see the Chargers winning.
NFC
1 Ari bye
7 Was at 2 GB - Don't see the Pack losing that one.
6 SF at 3 TB - Don't see Tampa losing that one, though I could see SF giving them fits.
5 LAR at 4 Dal - This would be a great matchup.
I would say Baltimore is in serious trouble not just trouble. I ain’t a Lamar Jackson guy as I think he stinks but the next 3 games are on home against Green Bay, at Cincinnati, home against the Rams. Then they finish at home with Pittsburgh. Their only saving grace is 3 of 4 at home. 9-8 or 8-9 is a definite reality for them.BAL is 8-5 and in some trouble. I agree that KC is looking tough and that BUFF will be a handful (assuming health for Allen). It’s trite but the difference maker is really Belichick for me; his ability to manipulate a game if Pats can play mistake free.
I agree with this. I think their volatility means they are not much of a real contender - they're not getting the bye, and I have a hard time seeing them win 4 games in a row against the teams at the top. But good Herbert, like we saw yesterday without his best receiver, is absolutely good enough to cause problems for the Chiefs on Thursday or in any individual playoff matchup.The Chargers are so unpredictable that I wouldn't be surprised by any score. But I think they can definitely win if Herbert plays well.
Typically I would agree, but the Buffalo weakness really is exploited by the NE strength (run O vs run D). Plus the loss of White is really a problem if the Pats do start forcing 9 man boxes in better weather.If the Pats beat them in 2 weeks, but they still manage to sneak into the playoffs, it will be hard to beat the same team 3 times within a matter of weeks, and Buffalo will have a huge chip on their shoulder.
There are a lot of really solid running teams in the AFC playoff hunt. NE and Indy are the obvious ones, but so are Tennessee (pending a healthy Henry), Baltimore and Cleveland (4th in rushing DVOA). The Bills really are built to beat KC, and only KC. I think it's still too early to take a victory lap and say that was the wrong move - the division may again go through the Pats, but the conference may go through KC.Typically I would agree, but the Buffalo weakness really is exploited by the NE strength (run O vs run D). Plus the loss of White is really a problem if the Pats do start forcing 9 man boxes in better weather.
Sure Buffalo should be able to score better but it's not obvious after the struggles with Run D how Buffalo would match up against NE or Indy in a playoff game especially on the road.
For another opinion, FO gives Buffalo a 15% chance at the division.Maybe I'm just overly nervous but I still think Buffalo has a realistic shot at beating out the Pats for the division (caveat: if Allen is reasonably healthy). Their 2H against the Bucs show what they're capable of doing and so I'd give them ~40% odds of winning in Foxboro. The other 3 games are all at home against weaker opponents (Panthers, Falcons and Jets) so if they win the Pats game it's fairly reasonable to think they can run the table. In that scenario in order for NE to still take the division they'd have to run the table on the rest of their games which include a tough 50/50 game this week (@indy) and another one @Mia to finish the reg season.
All told call it .4 (Buf beats NE) x .667 (Buf wins other 3 games) x .75 (NE doesn't win all of its other 3) = .20
fivethirtyeight has them at 20% (using different odds than my assumptions for the 3 components) so it seems to work out
So there is no way this game will be seen in the NYC market. What a bonehead move. I guess Jags at Jets will be equally entertaining.
Well obviously the NYC market is going to show a NYC team first and foremost, no matter how bad they are and no matter what other great games are being played. If the Pats were terrible, we'd still want the Pats shown here in New England over a better game involving non-NE teams.So there is no way this game will be seen in the NYC market. What a bonehead move. I guess Jags at Jets will be equally entertaining.
Tank for Thibodeaux?Well obviously the NYC market is going to show a NYC team first and foremost, no matter how bad they are and no matter what other great games are being played. If the Pats were terrible, we'd still want the Pats shown here in New England over a better game involving non-NE teams.
Plus...Jax-NYJ might have some something at stake before it's all said and done.
I never expected that the Jets would not be on in the NYC market. What I hoped for was that the Patriots game would get flexed out of that time slot. Based on that Reiss tweet I was not alone in thinking (praying) that might happen. This Covid resurgence means I am not going anywhere near a sports bar so Red Zone it is.Well obviously the NYC market is going to show a NYC team first and foremost, no matter how bad they are and no matter what other great games are being played. If the Pats were terrible, we'd still want the Pats shown here in New England over a better game involving non-NE teams.
Plus...Jax-NYJ might have some something at stake before it's all said and done.
If you go to sportsurge.net you can pick up a link to watch the game. If you have Apple TV, you can mirror your computer or tablet to the TV and depending on your internet speed there isn't much of a delay. Otherwise, you can take an HDMI cable and connect your computer to the TV.I never expected that the Jets would not be on in the NYC market. What I hoped for was that the Patriots game would get flexed out of that time slot. Based on that Reiss tweet I was not alone in thinking (praying) that might happen. This Covid resurgence means I am not going anywhere near a sports bar so Red Zone it is.
its Free and legal on the Yahoo Sports appI never expected that the Jets would not be on in the NYC market. What I hoped for was that the Patriots game would get flexed out of that time slot. Based on that Reiss tweet I was not alone in thinking (praying) that might happen. This Covid resurgence means I am not going anywhere near a sports bar so Red Zone it is.
very boneheaded also if denver wins the next 2 weeks nbc needs to flex DEN @ LAC on SNF because winner gets in loser has to hope Buff falsSo there is no way this game will be seen in the NYC market. What a bonehead move. I guess Jags at Jets will be equally entertaining.
538 has the Pats winning the division at >99% if they win next weekend.The Patriots loss does open the door for Miami still in the Division. They still have the Jets, at New Orleans, at Tennessee and then New England. Next week is not a hat and tshirt game unless the Jets pull a stunner today.
Damn, next week's schedule for the 7-7s and betterThis has to be unprecedented the way it is clustered.
I think there is an error somewhere in this scenario, since it would mean that if the Patriots beat Buffalo this weekend, they would clinch the division, and we know that they can’t mathematically clinch with just a win against Buffalo this weekend.Divisional race
1. NE 9-5, vs Buf, vs Jax, at Mia
2. Buf 8-6, at NE, vs Atl, vs NYJ
3. Mia 7-7, at NO, at Ten, vs NE
I think in order of difficulty from easiest to hardest, their remaining schedules are: Buffalo, New England, Miami.
I don't see Buffalo losing to either Atlanta or the Jets. I could see NE losing to Miami (isn't that place always a problem for the Pats?). The Dolphins could lose all three of their remaining games, and obviously are in the worst spot to begin with.
If Buffalo beats NE this weekend, the Pats would need (thanks to that stupid week 1 loss to Miami) to win out and have the Bills lose to either Atlanta or the Jets. Neither of those is likely, but hey, we never thought they'd lose to Jacksonville either. If the Pats win this week, they've locked up the tiebreaker over Buffalo, so that eliminates the Bills from divisional title contention. Then it's about the Dolphins, should they beat the Saints. The Pats would have a two game lead with two to go, so all NE would need is one win or one Miami loss. But if somehow the Pats were then to lose to Jax and Mia was to beat Ten, it would leave one game for the division - Pats at Miami. Which would be crazy.
Actually, there's still a real chance for a three-way tie atop the AFC East.
Pats beat Buf and lose to Jax and Mia, putting them at 10-7, 2-2 in H2H games among the three teams, and having a 4-2 divisional record.
Buf loses to NE and beats Atl and NYJ, putting them at 10-7, 2-2 in H2H games among the three teams, and having a 4-2 divisional record.
Mia wins all three games, putting them at 10-7, 2-2 in H2H games among the three teams, and having a 4-2 divisional record.
Then it's on to, what, conference records? In that case:
- NE would be 8-4.
- Buf would be 7-5.
- Mia would be 7-5.
So in a three-way tie, the Pats look like they'd win the division. It's only if it ends up tied between NE and Mia (meaning the Dolphins have beaten the Pats twice) without Buffalo in the mix, that the Pats would lose out on tiebreakers.
Still...coming down to a crazy, awesome finish in the division, never mind the conference as a whole.
I don't believe that scenario is discounted.I think there is an error somewhere in this scenario, since it would mean that if the Patriots beat Buffalo this weekend, they would clinch the division, and we know that they can’t mathematically clinch with just a win against Buffalo this weekend.
Ok I get it, so New England can’t clinch with a win Sunday vs Buffalo because Miami could still win the division on a head to head tiebreaker if both teams finish ahead of Buffalo, but NE wins if all three finish tied. Thanks, I was confused.I don't believe that scenario is discounted.
If the Bills beat the Pats, the Pats would need the Bills to lose one or more of their remaining games while the Pats win out in order to win the division. All tiebreakers would favor the Bills in that scenario. Miami would still be alive for the division if they beat the Saints, but would need for the Bills to lose their remaining 2 games.
If the Pats beat Buffalo, the Bills would be eliminated from winning the division. The best the Bills could finish would be 10-7, while the Pats could be no worse than 10-7, and H2H would favor the Pats, as does the 3-way tie scenario above.
However if the Pats beat Buffalo, the Dolphins would still have a shot if they win out and the Pats lose out while Buffalo loses 1 more game to finish 9-8. Which is why Sunday cannot be a hat & T-shirt game. The Pats would still clinch if the Dolphins lose, but that game isn't until Monday night.
Miami is 6-2 vs New England in the last 8 in Miami. Conveniently stopping at 8 since I’m a Miami fan…. I could see NE losing to Miami (isn't that place always a problem for the Pats?).
There's no need to even put an end date on it, they've owned the Patriots in Miami since the beginning of time. Per the below link, Miami is 39-17 all time in Miami vs. the Pats. In the Brady era, the Pats went 8-10 there (won in 2008 with Cassel so 9-10 total from 2001-2019). The Pats did win 7 out of 10 down there from 2003-2012, but are 2-6 since. Bledsoe only won there twice in his Pats career (he went 2-6).Miami is 6-2 vs New England in the last 8 in Miami. Conveniently stopping at 8 since I’m a Miami fan…
If you wanted to go to an even 10, it’s 6-4…which is still impressive considering the chasm that’s separated these teams the past decade.
Sharing since I happened to look this up recently. Thinking about the end of the season, I also had the thought that Miami has had NE’s number at home, and wasn’t sure if I was misguidedly romanticizing a couple wins or that was actually the case.
Fact.The NFL says that if the Patriots win and the Dolphins lose on Monday then the Patriots will clinch the AFC East.
Yes, the NFL is correct.The NFL says that if the Patriots win and the Dolphins lose on Monday then the Patriots will clinch the AFC East.
So regardless of what happens vs Buffalo and Jacksonville, the game in Miami is going to matter/impact the Patriots playoff chances/seeding.There's no need to even put an end date on it, they've owned the Patriots in Miami since the beginning of time. Per the below link, Miami is 39-17 all time in Miami vs. the Pats. In the Brady era, the Pats went 8-10 there (won in 2008 with Cassel so 9-10 total from 2001-2019). The Pats did win 7 out of 10 down there from 2003-2012, but are 2-6 since. Bledsoe only won there twice in his Pats career (he went 2-6).
https://www.footballdb.com/teams/nfl/new-england-patriots/teamvsteam?opp=17&ha=A
Nothing that happens in Miami shocks me.Well hopefully it won't impact the Patriots playoff CHANCES, though it will quite likely impact the Pats' playoff SEEDING.
I mean, for it to impact the Pats' playoff chances, NE needs to lose to Buffalo and then Miami at the end (assuming they beat Jax in between). That would put them at 10-7 and in with a pile of teams probably with the same record. Then it all comes down to all sorts of tiebreaker scenarios.
Yeah but that's without MAC JONESMiami is 6-2 vs New England in the last 8 in Miami.