ALDS vs. MFY—Buckle Up

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,194
BULLPEN

Barnes: 2.0 ip, 0 h, 0 r, 0 er, 1 bb, 1 k
Brasier: 2.1 ip, 1 h, 0 r, 0 er, 2 bb, 4 k
Hembree: 3.0 ip, 0 h, 0 r, 0 er, 3 bb, 2 k
Kelly: 2.1 ip, 1 h, 0 r, 0 er, 0 bb, 1 k
TOT: 9.2 ip, 2 h, 0 r, 0 er, 6 bb, 8 k, 0.00 era, 0.83 whip, 7.4 k/9

Add in..
Porcello: 0.2 ip, 1 h, 0 r, 0 er, 0 bb, 0 k
Sale: 1.0 ip, 0 h, 0 r, 0 er, 0 bb, 1 k

But...
Kimbrel: 2.1 ip, 2 h, 3 r, 3 er, 2 bb, 4 k
Workman: 0.2 ip, 4 h, 1 r, 1 er, 1 bb, 2 k
Throw ERod in there somewhere, giving up a 3 run dinger to Sanchez.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,194
True, but the lead runner was on second and didn't try to score.
I didn't hear the TBS guys mention it but Merloni after the game said that Hernandez should have tagged and gone to third on Sanchez' fly ball. I thought that would have increased the pressure even more; given that Kimbrel was throwing pitches all over the place and/or it's a tie game if Nunez/Pearce don't make that play.
 

dhappy42

Straw Man
Oct 27, 2013
15,770
Michigan
I didn't hear the TBS guys mention it but Merloni after the game said that Hernandez should have tagged and gone to third on Sanchez' fly ball. I thought that would have increased the pressure even more; given that Kimbrel was throwing pitches all over the place and/or it's a tie game if Nunez/Pearce don't make that play.
If there’s one hard-and-fast rule in baseball it’s: don’t make the third out at third base. I’m not gonna do the saber-math, but if there’s even a 5% chance Hechevarria would have been thrown out at third, don’t go. Even if the math favored going, the habit of following the rule overrides in the heat of the moment.

Edit: what Lose said.
 
Last edited:

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,543
Werner was more likeable when he was enabling Bill Cosby:

Similar thoughts of that series had echoed in the mind of team chairman Tom Werner.
“Painful,” he said. “I really thought they were going to catch up.”
Is it that fucking hard to say, "It got tight, but the whole organization has faith in our players to pull through and they did."
 

Merkle's Boner

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 24, 2011
3,820
Werner was more likeable when he was enabling Bill Cosby:



Is it that fucking hard to say, "It got tight, but the whole organization has faith in our players to pull through and they did."
Sure, except it wouldn't be true, and would seem so transparent it would induce laughter from the reporter. I appreciate his honesty.
 

Humphrey

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 3, 2010
3,194
If there’s one hard-and-fast rule in baseball it’s: don’t make the third out at third base. I’m not gonna do the saber-math, but if there’s even a 5% chance Hernandez would have been thrown out at third, don’t go. Even if the math favored going, the habit of following the rule overrides in the heat of the moment.

Edit: what Lose said.
Don't shoot. I'm only the messenger in this case. The way Benintendi caught the ball he was in position to make a solid throw. None of the replays show anything else ... not sure what picture Merloni could see to tell him that.
 

j44thor

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
11,015
Is there an MVP named for DS series? My pick would be Porcello...pitched great in Game 4 of course, but the outs he got in Game 1 when the bullpen was struggling to throw strikes just restored order and flipped the game.
I would have gone Eovaldi. MFY had all the momentum after the game 2 win going home and Eovaldi just mowed them down. No one would have faulted him for a 4 IP 3 R performance given what we had just witnessed at Fenway. Instead he badly out pitches the MFY "ace" guaranteeing the series at worst returns to Fenway.
That enables Rick to pitch with a lot less pressure in game 4.
 

dhappy42

Straw Man
Oct 27, 2013
15,770
Michigan
I’m not coaching kids anymore, but if I were, I’d use this series as an example of how important “the little things” in baseball are: good catching technique (Leon in Game One,) good jumps on fly balls and line drives (all three Sox OFers, every game, but not McCutchen and Gardner in games three and four,) Red Sox base-running, throwing first-pitch strikes, etc.

There’s been some comment about “inches” and the Sox winning because things fell their way. I’d have to rewatch the games and take notes, but that’s not what I saw. I saw one team make the most of its opportunities with heads-up-play and hustle and the other team either pressing too much (exception the Sox middle relievers in game one [edit: and Kimbrel, obviously]) or simply not executing well when it counted.
 
Last edited:

uncannymanny

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 12, 2007
9,097
Was able to make a better quality version.

Awesome thanks! Among all of the great moments, this was probably my favorite of the series and is sort of a microcosm of the whole thing. We wanted them and we were ready for them.

56 and same here, except...

...as stressful as the Kimbrel 9th was, I’m glad that we got their hopes up, then dashed them. I’d never have planned it that way, but letting the MFY fans smell, but not taste victory, made it all the better. Beating them 4-3 was weirdly better than beating them 4-1.

This was especially the case following the humiliating 16-1 beatdown, which was delicious in its own right.
Totally agree. Lured them right into the mouse trap, then *snap*.

What's the last utterance? I can't lip read it, but inquiring minds... "The Fuck? Get back in the box. Then______?"
I thought it was “the fuck, get in the fucking box. God damn”
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,662
Brasier seemed really nervous at the start of this series. But man did he come on. Here's his batter-by-batter performance:

G1 - Voit - single
G1 - Gregorius - ground out
G1 - Andujar - wild pitch, walk
G2 - McCutchen - strikeout
G2 - Judge - reached on error
G2 - Voit - walk
G2 - Stanton - strikeout
G2 - Sanchez - strikeout
G4 - Voit - fly out
G4 - Walker - strikeout
G4 - Sanchez - pop out

Overall, hitters went 1-8 with two walks and four strikeouts. Retired the last five batters he faced, three of them by strikeout.

I think he has gotten over the playoff nerves, and I think he should be ready to roll in the ALCS.
 

Skiponzo

Member
SoSH Member
I was talking to my brother after the game last night. I asked him how we survived and stayed (relatively) sane in 2004. He said he has no idea.

Games 1 and especially 4 probably took years off my life, but it's worth it.
Right? I remember being so crazy laser focus on each pitch, even moreso than any other playoffs, that I think I would just move to the next pitch mentally no matter what happened. I think that's how I survived...though I am sure I've lost a few years off the backend of my life.

Imagine that there are people in the world who aren't sports fans.
I feel really honestly sorry for these people.
 

DennyDoyle'sBoil

Found no thrill on Blueberry Hill
SoSH Member
Sep 9, 2008
42,837
AZ
Sale is the MVP for me. Going into the series, I thought three things needed to happen. Sox righties needed to pitch well, we needed to stay close in homers, and Sale needed to be great. I was hoping but not expecting that both Porcello and Eovaldi would be good. But really I didn’t think they both would win on the road. I thought that one would come through but they would beat the other in a close one and we would need Sale to be great twice.

Turns out once, plus a bullpen inning, was enough.

While winning a track meet game in Price’s start was a possibility, I really wasn’t expecting it. That team is tough on lefties. Price and EdRo were unlikely to be the heroes. Sale needed to be excellent and it’s harder for him. He makes it look easy at times but that lineup is a real grind on lefties no matter how good.

Staying even in HRs is the real surprise. That felt like it would be a telltale stat. If you had told me before the series it would end up being 4 to 4, I would have felt really good given how the Sox are better at scratching out runs. That they got 16 in one game instead of spreading them out just a little more I guess made two of the games tense though.
 

dhappy42

Straw Man
Oct 27, 2013
15,770
Michigan
Sale is the MVP for me. Going into the series, I thought three things needed to happen. Sox righties needed to pitch well, we needed to stay close in homers, and Sale needed to be great. I was hoping but not expecting that both Porcello and Eovaldi would be good. But really I didn’t think they both would win on the road. I thought that one would come through but they would beat the other in a close one and we would need Sale to be great twice.

Turns out once, plus a bullpen inning, was enough.

While winning a track meet game in Price’s start was a possibility, I really wasn’t expecting it. That team is tough on lefties. Price and EdRo were unlikely to be the heroes. Sale needed to be excellent and it’s harder for him. He makes it look easy at times but that lineup is a real grind on lefties no matter how good.

Staying even in HRs is the real surprise. That felt like it would be a telltale stat. If you had told me before the series it would end up being 4 to 4, I would have felt really good given how the Sox are better at scratching out runs. That they got 16 in one game instead of spreading them out just a little more I guess made two of the games tense though.
Porcello, Sale, Eovaldi... whichever. All three were great. And I think it’s great when the series MVP isn’t an obvious decision... and the bench player who hit for the cycle isn’t even in the running. Teamwork.
 

chawson

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
4,675
Brasier seemed really nervous at the start of this series. But man did he come on. Here's his batter-by-batter performance:

G1 - Voit - single
G1 - Gregorius - ground out
G1 - Andujar - wild pitch, walk
G2 - McCutchen - strikeout
G2 - Judge - reached on error
G2 - Voit - walk
G2 - Stanton - strikeout
G2 - Sanchez - strikeout
G4 - Voit - fly out
G4 - Walker - strikeout
G4 - Sanchez - pop out

Overall, hitters went 1-8 with two walks and four strikeouts. Retired the last five batters he faced, three of them by strikeout.

I think he has gotten over the playoff nerves, and I think he should be ready to roll in the ALCS.
Looks like 2019 closer material.

Kidding, but whatta gift this guy has been. We're gonna have to be major players in the relief market next year replacing Kimbrel and Kelly (and projections for Smith and Thornburg). A strong postseason would make me feel pretty good about giving Brasier the 7th.
 

BuellMiller

New Member
Mar 25, 2015
451
No. I'm too dumb for that. I just use MLB The Show 18 on the PS4 :)

I'd be curious to see how yours works. I was on a walk last night and reading SoSH and read about your sim for a moment and a longer part of my walk was devoted to wondering how yours works.

Set the game up and let it play itself (CPU v CPU). I do it on Madden before the Pats play the Super Bowl and essentially it's just a good way to kill 30-45 minutes before the game.
My college roommates and I did this before SB 36. We turned it off in the 2nd quarter after Brady threw 6 interceptions. Granted he was rated like a 70 at the start of that season. And Warner had thrown like 4 himself, so the CPU wasn't exactly the greatest.

wrt to BaseballJones game, that sounds similar to an old Excel macro i put together to do a monte carlo simulation of baseball/softball teams and optimizing batting orders. Used batters BA/OBP/SLG to estimate those numbers for singles, doubles, etc. Mine didn't have differences in K/GO/FO, or hard hits vs soft hits. I think I just used some random percentage fixed for all players for going from 1st to 3rd or scoring from 2nd on a single (or 1st from a double); these were modified based on # of outs. Adjusted slightly OBP and SLG of each player based on SB and CS as well (e.g. each SB slightly raised the SLG, and each CS lowered each value...not the most accurate, but it worked for what I was going for, i think). To incorporate pitching, I just averaged BA/OBP/SLG between pitchers and batters for each matchup...Your method probably would have saved a bit of computation, though.
 

soxhop411

news aggravator
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2009
46,463
Re: Kimbrel wildness

From WEEI

The struggling Craig Kimbrel attempting to find his way through the most powerful lineup in the majors while seemingly not having a good idea where his pitches were going. In the end, the result was a seven-batter, 28-pitch (with just 13 strikes) outing that included the final three outs of the Red Sox' American League Division Series with the Yankees.

Sure, everyone knew that closing a game out in Yankee Stadium against the heart of this New York order wasn't going to be easy, but few believed it was going to be this difficult.

"Well, it got a little exciting there at the end," said Kimbrel.

So, what was wrong with the closer?

One notable issue was Kimbrel consistently needing to wipe his hand on the dirt and his uniform due to what looked like an exorbitant amount of moisture on the pitcher's hand. For that, the pitcher had a theory.

"The ball was a little slick," Kimbrel said. "I don’t know if it had to do with (home plate umpire Angel Hernandez's) bag. If they were coming out of his bag a little slick. I was just trying to get some of the moisture off my hand so I could get a good grip of the ball. I don’t think it’s abnormal. Late in the game, we get kind of used to that as pitchers."
But the bigger issue was how wild Kimbrel became, starting with a four-pitch, leadoff walk to Aaron Judge. After Kimbrel allowed two runs on two hits and a walk, stranding a pair, Red Sox pitching coach Dana LeVangie said he believed the issue has been identified.

"We talk about some things that I feel like he does when he's pretty consistent. He got away from it a little bit tonight," LeVangie told WEEI.com. "There was extra effort and energy, which you could all see. But he does one thing that I feel like in his delivery that kind of locks him in and allows him to ride the slope down, he wasn't doing it tonight, so we'll talk about it moving forward.
https://weei.radio.com/blogs/rob-bradford/what-was-wrong-craig-kimbrel-red-sox-think-they-know
 

BaseballJones

ivanvamp
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
24,662
I think it may have been mentioned, but it's amazing that since Sanchez' bomb in Fenway, the Yankees scored four runs. NONE of them on a hit.

Game 3:
- 4th - Gregorius grounds out, scoring Voit
Game 4:
- 5th - Gardner hits SF scoring Sanchez
- 9th - Walker hit by pitch scoring Judge
- 9th - Sanches hits SF scoring Gregorius

So not only couldn't they hit the ball out of the park, they couldn't even drive in a single run with a hit. That's really hard to believe.
 

JimD

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 29, 2001
8,692
I was talking to my brother after the game last night. I asked him how we survived and stayed (relatively) sane in 2004. He said he has no idea.

Games 1 and especially 4 probably took years off my life, but it's worth it.
I have no idea either. The bottom of the 9th last night was the closest I've come to that 2004 ALCS since then. Once Judge and Gregorious were on base, one part of my mind began imagining scenarios where each Yankee batter was going to be the hero (Stanton redeems himself with a three-run bomb ... no, wait, Voit does and becomes a True Yankee, no, Sanchez hits a grand slam...), while another part was screaming at Kimbrel to stop f****** around and thrown goddam strikes already. And this was just one half-inning - there were so many moments in those three games in '04 where it just felt like the Yankees would finally wake up and doom would strike and end our fantasies of an incredible comeback. For a few minutes last night, it felt that way again.
 

dhappy42

Straw Man
Oct 27, 2013
15,770
Michigan
I have no idea either. The bottom of the 9th last night was the closest I've come to that 2004 ALCS since then. Once Judge and Gregorious were on base, one part of my mind began imagining scenarios where each Yankee batter was going to be the hero (Stanton redeems himself with a three-run bomb ... no, wait, Voit does and becomes a True Yankee, no, Sanchez hits a grand slam...), while another part was screaming at Kimbrel to stop f****** around and thrown goddam strikes already. And this was just one half-inning - there were so many moments in those three games in '04 where it just felt like the Yankees would finally wake up and doom would strike and end our fantasies of an incredible comeback. For a few minutes last night, it felt that way again.
I was having ‘86 flashbacks. Penultimate game choke resulting in series loss.
 

Bunt4aTriple

Member (member)
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
4,384
North Yarmouth, ME
Was walking with my family in front of the Rodin museum in Paris this afternoon in my Sox hat. Saw a dude with a Yankees hat on (NY and LA hats are pretty ubiquitous here), but this guy looked American, so I waited for him to make eye contact. When he did, you could just see him surrender and I sat, "C'est domage," and shrugged my shoulders. It was awesome.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,339
I think it may have been mentioned, but it's amazing that since Sanchez' bomb in Fenway, the Yankees scored four runs. NONE of them on a hit.

Game 3:
- 4th - Gregorius grounds out, scoring Voit
Game 4:
- 5th - Gardner hits SF scoring Sanchez
- 9th - Walker hit by pitch scoring Judge
- 9th - Sanches hits SF scoring Gregorius

So not only couldn't they hit the ball out of the park, they couldn't even drive in a single run with a hit. That's really hard to believe.
Only 1 run on a non homer hit in game 1 as well, Sox pen may have been a bit shaky with control but they did an amazing job of pitching out of jams and limiting damage all series
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,543
Only 1 run on a non homer hit in game 1 as well, Sox pen may have been a bit shaky with control but they did an amazing job of pitching out of jams and limiting damage all series
There might be a connection. Not that Sox relievers were ever control artists, but "DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES ALLOW HOME RUNS" might have affected them a bit in Game 1.
 

geoduck no quahog

not particularly consistent
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 8, 2002
13,024
Seattle, WA
I haven't read anything about Nunez' option on that last play: pocket the ball and hold the runner at 3rd.

Was that a possibility?

Or was the only play throwing to first...

(I gather if the ball had skipped by Pearce, the winning run would've scored, right?)

All-in-all and amazing finish. Reminded me of Butler, when I looked around at nobody and said, "Did the Pat's just f'n win?"
 

Byrdbrain

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
8,588
Sure it would have been possible for him to pocket the ball, the run wouldn't have scored if he did.
From that angle the throw came it was certainly possible, maybe likely that the winning run would have scored.
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
It has probably been noted elsewhere but the Sox led by 3+ runs heading into 19 of a possible 34 MFY batting innings (first inning of games 1 and 2 weren’t possible). So while games 1 and 4 ended up tight, that’s a pretty dominant series performance. The early multi run leads allowed cushion for the pen which was huge.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,543
It has probably been noted elsewhere but the Sox led by 3+ runs heading into 19 of a possible 34 MFY batting innings (first inning of games 1 and 2 weren’t possible). So while games 1 and 4 ended up tight, that’s a pretty dominant series performance. The early multi run leads allowed cushion for the pen which was huge.
It also helped to neutralize the impact of the NY pen.
 

TFisNEXT

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Jul 21, 2005
12,537
It also helped to neutralize the impact of the NY pen.
Yep. It was extremely important to hit their starters. That was obvious coming in, but it really hits home when you watched how the bats mostly went silent in games 1 and 4 after the starters were out and they brought in their good relievers....Vazquez's insanely cheap game winner off Britton not withstanding. (Which is also an awesome FU to the MFY in that park)
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
It also helped to neutralize the impact of the NY pen.
Kind of but the reason games 1 and 4 got close was because the Sox didn’t tack on like they did most of the season. They won 108 games despite a mediocre pen because they punished opposing pens when they had a lead. Always blew games open late. Didn’t happen this series.
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
Kind of but the reason games 1 and 4 got close was because the Sox didn’t tack on like they did most of the season. They won 108 games despite a mediocre pen because they punished opposing pens when they had a lead. Always blew games open late. Didn’t happen this series.
To be fair though, isn’t that a lot easier to do against the 3rd and 4th guys out of the pen for Baltimore and Toronto? The Yankees had 3 former All Star closers to go to and a quick hook if someone got in trouble.
 

Wake49

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 11, 2016
507
You know damn well Yankee fans were ready to declare it the equivalent
I heard a few try to make that correlation but there’s a huge difference between coming back from a 3-0 deficit in a 7-game series than coming back from a 2-1 deficit in a 5-gamer.
 

Leskanic's Thread

lost underscore
Silver Supporter
SoSH Member
Jul 16, 2005
2,787
Los Angeles
I was having ‘86 flashbacks. Penultimate game choke resulting in series loss.
This didn't occur to me until Anderson said "and the Red Sox are one strike away!" That caused the heart palpitations to jump even faster. Just glad I didn't hear any announcers mention how many outs were left after Sale got the first batter in the 8th...

(So many years of success for Boston sports teams, and yet I am still fundamentally broken. What a ride.)
 

streeter88

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 2, 2006
1,807
Melbourne, Australia
I was having ‘86 flashbacks. Penultimate game choke resulting in series loss.
This didn't occur to me until Anderson said "and the Red Sox are one strike away!" That caused the heart palpitations to jump even faster.
I had both of these same thoughts. 1986 was really traumatic for me - my school was 50/50 Boston vs New Yorkers in 1986, and I actually left for 6 months after the WS. Escaped for a semester to DC for my sanity.

Watching Kimbrel nearly disintegrate yesterday was... ....not fun.
 

Lose Remerswaal

Experiencing Furry Panic
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
I haven't read anything about Nunez' option on that last play: pocket the ball and hold the runner at 3rd.

Was that a possibility?

Or was the only play throwing to first...

(I gather if the ball had skipped by Pearce, the winning run would've scored, right?)

All-in-all and amazing finish. Reminded me of Butler, when I looked around at nobody and said, "Did the Pat's just f'n win?"

The runner on second would have scored to tie the game, but unlikely the runner from first would have scored, too, to win the game.

He could have eaten the ball. I'm glad he did not
 

tims4wins

PN23's replacement
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
37,330
Hingham, MA
To be fair though, isn’t that a lot easier to do against the 3rd and 4th guys out of the pen for Baltimore and Toronto? The Yankees had 3 former All Star closers to go to and a quick hook if someone got in trouble.
Oh for sure. My point was more that they didn’t exactly neutralize the MFY pen. Their pen kind of kept them in the series.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,543
Oh for sure. My point was more that they didn’t exactly neutralize the MFY pen. Their pen kind of kept them in the series.
Neutralize might not have been the best choice of words, since they were effective. Early leads helped prevent optimal deployment of keeping NYY ahead.
 

joe dokes

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
30,543
Oh for sure. My point was more that they didn’t exactly neutralize the MFY pen. Their pen kind of kept them in the series.
Neutralize might not have been the best choice of words, since they were effective. Early leads helped prevent optimal deployment of keeping NYY ahead.
 

Saints Rest

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Sure it would have been possible for him to pocket the ball, the run wouldn't have scored if he did.
From that angle the throw came it was certainly possible, maybe likely that the winning run would have scored.
Nope. If the ball had skipped past, Mookie would have corralled it (showing Perfect Fundamentals) and gunned out the runner at the plate. Not just adding a nut-punch to the gut-punch but forever replacing Captain Jetes’ play to cut down Jeremy Giambi in all the highlights from years gone by.
</fan fiction >