I don’t think he’s the best CB nor the best WR in the draft. He might end up being the best one of those, once he spends a year or two honing his craft at one position. But any team trying to make a 2 way player out of him is making a mistake.Why is this?
I was just thinking the other day that if you believe in a “wisdom of the crowd” approach he’s the least risky guy to draft because everyone agrees he’s great.
The advanced stats people love him; the more traditional “tools and skills” people love him; there may be criticisms that I haven’t see , but from what I have he’s the only guy in the top 5-10 that everyone agrees should be top 3
And it’s not like we couldn’t use a great corner
What are you seeing different here?
he’s a tremendous collfootball player. But there’s a lot of projection with him - he might be the best CB if he focuses on that full time and gets a lot of good coaching. He might end up a great WR if he gives up defense and ends up in the right scheme etc
A lot comes down to what Hunter wants to do. Is he adamant that he’s a 2 way guy? Does he stick with his better position (CB) or does he stick with the higher paying position (WR)?
lastly, I don’t trust the Pats current coaches to be able to develop a unique talent. If they want an elite defender, just take Graham or Johnson or even one of the top edge guys. If they want to fix their offense, McMillan or reaching a bit for Banks makes more sense.