Are we not doing game goats any more? (Week 9 @ Titans)

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,964
Lowe has been our best O-lineman, he's a bad run blocker, but he's been a pretty mediocre passblocker. He's not a long term starting LT, but he's nowhere near as bad as the rest of the line (except Onwenu at guard), the O-line is terrible because Brown/Jordan/Robinson/Jacobs are all deep depth players.
 

Van Everyman

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2009
28,900
Newton
Maye is the only guy on the offense that’s any good.
I know everyone is really feeling their "THIS ROSTER IS COMPLETELY WITHOUT MERIT" oats and all. But there is some middling talent on it:
  • Stevenson -- he's not Derrick Henry and his ball security issues this season were worrisome but it's actually hard to fathom where they'd be offensively without him. Which is saying something.
  • Douglas -- he's clearly still inconsistent game to game but a solid possession receiver.
  • Henry -- he's a terrible blocker and commits way too many penalties (welcome to the club) but he is fairly reliable as a receiver.
  • Bourne -- clearly rusty from the injury and also committing penalties and brain freezes right now, but he's decent as well.
None of the other guys barring Hooper have enough of a track record to really be on this list. And listen, none of these guys are *great* or even "really good" -- Stevenson is probably the guy who on a Ravens or some other super talented team puts up great numbers week-in and week-out. But they're not out and out bad players. The problem, as always, is that the line is terrible and that means these guys have less time to get open, get even less separation and are more often having to make contested catches. They're starting from a low talent floor, but it's a bad recipe for them to get their sea legs.
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
I know everyone is really feeling their "THIS ROSTER IS COMPLETELY WITHOUT MERIT" oats and all. But there is some middling talent on it:
Man, as a "There's a silver lining!" post I was excited to see it... but 4 "decent" guys is pretty thin gruel. :)

Every offense in the NFL has "some middling talent on it," right? Even the Panthers have Hubbard, Brooks, Legette, etc. Anyway, just typing the name Drake Maye right now makes me happy, no matter who else Is on the depth chart.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
12,917
around the way
I know everyone is really feeling their "THIS ROSTER IS COMPLETELY WITHOUT MERIT" oats and all. But there is some middling talent on it:
  • Stevenson -- he's not Derrick Henry and his ball security issues this season were worrisome but it's actually hard to fathom where they'd be offensively without him. Which is saying something.
  • Douglas -- he's clearly still inconsistent game to game but a solid possession receiver.
  • Henry -- he's a terrible blocker and commits way too many penalties (welcome to the club) but he is fairly reliable as a receiver.
  • Bourne -- clearly rusty from the injury and also committing penalties and brain freezes right now, but he's decent as well.
None of the other guys barring Hooper have enough of a track record to really be on this list. And listen, none of these guys are *great* or even "really good" -- Stevenson is probably the guy who on a Ravens or some other super talented team puts up great numbers week-in and week-out. But they're not out and out bad players. The problem, as always, is that the line is terrible and that means these guys have less time to get open, get even less separation and are more often having to make contested catches. They're starting from a low talent floor, but it's a bad recipe for them to get their sea legs.
I don't think that anyone who's sour on the roster doesn't think that there are redeemable players on the 53-man. Of course there are good players on both sides, plus some ST guys. That doesn't mean that it's not bad. It is bad. It has some good players. Just not enough of them.
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,304
Westwood MA
I blame this loss, the losses before it and any that come after it on Kraft.

I thought he was this super savvy businessman who knew what it took to have a successful football team, it starts from the top, trickles down to the coaches and then to the players.

He's proven me wrong; he had a chance to do a complete reset once he fired Belichick; hire a top shelf coach and fill out the staff with quality coaches but instead, he promoted from withing, hired a guy with zero head coaching experience because "He's a fine young man" or "I just saw something in his eyes" or some other such nonsense.

Then he hired a bunch of bargain basement coaches to fill out the staff, if this last draft is any indication, his hand picked GM has a long way to go as far as identifying talent, the one no brainer pick at #3 has turned out fine so far, but that's it, this past draft overall is horrendous as of now.

This team needs anywhere from 15 to 18 players with actual talent to fill out a starting 22, their current talent level is terrible, beyond terrible really. It's going to take several quality drafts and some good to very good free agent signings to turn this around, not to mention better coaches from top to bottom.

Imagine losing to Miami with a QB they signed off the street, Jacksonville and the one win Titans until yesterday; whoever said they are in their soft part of their schedule was kidding themselves.

I still can't believe they beat the Jets, who then went out and beat the Texans, a team that waxed the Patriots, they are 2-7 but could easily be 0-9.

This is 100% on him.
 

8slim

has trust issues
SoSH Member
Nov 6, 2001
28,304
Unreal America
I know everyone is really feeling their "THIS ROSTER IS COMPLETELY WITHOUT MERIT" oats and all. But there is some middling talent on it:
  • Stevenson -- he's not Derrick Henry and his ball security issues this season were worrisome but it's actually hard to fathom where they'd be offensively without him. Which is saying something.
  • Douglas -- he's clearly still inconsistent game to game but a solid possession receiver.
  • Henry -- he's a terrible blocker and commits way too many penalties (welcome to the club) but he is fairly reliable as a receiver.
  • Bourne -- clearly rusty from the injury and also committing penalties and brain freezes right now, but he's decent as well.
None of the other guys barring Hooper have enough of a track record to really be on this list. And listen, none of these guys are *great* or even "really good" -- Stevenson is probably the guy who on a Ravens or some other super talented team puts up great numbers week-in and week-out. But they're not out and out bad players. The problem, as always, is that the line is terrible and that means these guys have less time to get open, get even less separation and are more often having to make contested catches. They're starting from a low talent floor, but it's a bad recipe for them to get their sea legs.
Middling talent is fair. It's also likely that at least 3 of these guys, if not all 4, won't be here the next time this franchise makes the playoffs.
 

Toe Nash

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 28, 2005
5,870
02130
If I had a team that had a shot at the playoffs, the only guy there I wouldn't be trying to upgrade is Douglas and he is limited. Bourne and Henry were useful three years ago but not now and Rham is very replaceable. On a good team they'd be OK but they wouldn't be elevating the level of the team, if that makes sense.

My larger concern is that the other side of the ball doesn't have much either even if they get the injured / arrested guys back. It takes multiple years to rebuild and they keep extending that out until they start nailing drafts.
 

Smiling Joe Hesketh

Throw Momma From the Train
Moderator
SoSH Member
May 20, 2003
37,672
Deep inside Muppet Labs
I think part of the concern is that Wolf said they want to emulate the Green Bay model which (feel free to correct me) primarily relied on drafts to restock talent and not so much on free agency. The concern is that if they need to upgrade 22-25 players, doing do via the draft would take forever, AND Wolf's ability to pick good players is still very much in question.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,068
Mansfield MA
I think part of the concern is that Wolf said they want to emulate the Green Bay model which (feel free to correct me) primarily relied on drafts to restock talent and not so much on free agency. The concern is that if they need to upgrade 22-25 players, doing do via the draft would take forever, AND Wolf's ability to pick good players is still very much in question.
That's how Ted Thompson, who Wolf mostly worked under, operated. But Wolf has worked other places where things operated differently, so it's not 100% clear to me whether he subscribes to that philosophy or whether he was just keeping his powder dry because the 2024 Patriots figured to suck even with a 2021-esque spending orgy. We'll see.

Also worth noting: Wolf did not come up the college scouting side like Thompson did. He largely worked on the pro side. That may influence both his philosophy and his strengths and weaknesses as an evaluator.

I wouldn't say Wolf did a good job this past offseason, but it's also worth noting that this team not only had all the flaws you see on the field every Sunday but also a situation where many of its best players - Dugger, Onwenu, Henry, Bourne, Andrews - were hitting free agency. The priority this offseason was taking care of their own, which history tells us is the smartest way to spend money.
 

lexrageorge

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 31, 2007
20,257
If I had a team that had a shot at the playoffs, the only guy there I wouldn't be trying to upgrade is Douglas and he is limited. Bourne and Henry were useful three years ago but not now and Rham is very replaceable. On a good team they'd be OK but they wouldn't be elevating the level of the team, if that makes sense.

My larger concern is that the other side of the ball doesn't have much either even if they get the injured / arrested guys back. It takes multiple years to rebuild and they keep extending that out until they start nailing drafts.
Henry is the epitome of league average tight end in this NFL era.

But, yeah, if they cannot draft, this will be a really long rebuild. While drafting well alone is not sufficient to compete in the NFL, it is a necessary step.
 

NomarsFool

Member
SoSH Member
Dec 21, 2001
9,449
Henry is the epitome of league average tight end in this NFL era.
It's probably partly a function of the suckitude that is the Patriots' WR room, but he is probably among the top 10-15 TEs in the NFL this season in terms of production.
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,288
That's how Ted Thompson, who Wolf mostly worked under, operated. But Wolf has worked other places where things operated differently, so it's not 100% clear to me whether he subscribes to that philosophy or whether he was just keeping his powder dry because the 2024 Patriots figured to suck even with a 2021-esque spending orgy. We'll see.

Also worth noting: Wolf did not come up the college scouting side like Thompson did. He largely worked on the pro side. That may influence both his philosophy and his strengths and weaknesses as an evaluator.

I wouldn't say Wolf did a good job this past offseason, but it's also worth noting that this team not only had all the flaws you see on the field every Sunday but also a situation where many of its best players - Dugger, Onwenu, Henry, Bourne, Andrews - were hitting free agency. The priority this offseason was taking care of their own, which history tells us is the smartest way to spend money.
I don’t know that they’re getting their money’s worth on the Dugger, Peppers, Bourne extensions. Onwenu maybe if he’s a guard but would they have re-signed him if playing tackle was off the table?

Henry, Jennings and Barmore seem like good extensions. Schooler, Bourne and Stevenson seem like wastes for various and obvious reasons but they have cash to burn so why not. Extending Godchaux is questionable

retaining your own talent is key, obviously, but they had money to do more with external options to actually elevate the talent base on the roster. They spent about 22M on absolute garbage and JAG (Okorafor, Hawkins, Takitaki, Watts, Osborn, Hooper)

If moving forward, Antonio Gibson and Joey Slye are the big upgrades we can expect externally, it’s going to be years before this team is good again unless Wolf nails the drafting in a way which, based on 2024, seems beyond this front office (including Groh)
 

CoffeeNerdness

Member
SoSH Member
Jun 6, 2012
9,745
I thought he was this super savvy businessman who knew what it took to have a successful football team, it starts from the top, trickles down to the coaches and then to the players.
I don't know all the ins and outs of Robert Kraft's business history, but it's worth noting that in 2017 he spent $20 mil on an eSports team in a league that ended up failing spectacularly. A recent book on the history of Blizzard (the developers of Overwatch) showed that when this league was cooked up the Blizzard execs expected to sell teams in the league for $250k until Bobby Kotick stepped in and decided to grift the living piss out of people like Kraft and sell teams for $20 mil. Probably just a drop in the bucket, but perhaps a sign his days of being savvy in the business world are long gone.
 

Super Nomario

Member
SoSH Member
Nov 5, 2000
14,068
Mansfield MA
I don’t know that they’re getting their money’s worth on the Dugger, Peppers, Bourne extensions. Onwenu maybe if he’s a guard but would they have re-signed him if playing tackle was off the table?

Henry, Jennings and Barmore seem like good extensions. Schooler, Bourne and Stevenson seem like wastes for various and obvious reasons but they have cash to burn so why not. Extending Godchaux is questionable

retaining your own talent is key, obviously, but they had money to do more with external options to actually elevate the talent base on the roster. They spent about 22M on absolute garbage and JAG (Okorafor, Hawkins, Takitaki, Watts, Osborn, Hooper)

If moving forward, Antonio Gibson and Joey Slye are the big upgrades we can expect externally, it’s going to be years before this team is good again unless Wolf nails the drafting in a way which, based on 2024, seems beyond this front office (including Groh)
I can't really blame Wolf for Peppers or Barmore (who you count in the good category even though he hasn't played). I like the Schooler signing; Bourne and Dugger and Stevenson, we'll see. Onwenu is probably worth similar as a really good guard versus an averageish tackle (and of course he's done both this year).

But whether you liked these re-signings or not, Wolf was put in a position where he had to make decisions on these guys because they weren't under contract for 2024. Onwenu wasn't just going to automatically be on this team the way Keion White is ... he's here because Wolf brought him back.

I agree, the external signings sucked. I don't know whether you're counting Brissett in that $22M but he's no great shakes either.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
37,964
I can't really blame Wolf for Peppers or Barmore (who you count in the good category even though he hasn't played). I like the Schooler signing; Bourne and Dugger and Stevenson, we'll see. Onwenu is probably worth similar as a really good guard versus an averageish tackle (and of course he's done both this year).

But whether you liked these re-signings or not, Wolf was put in a position where he had to make decisions on these guys because they weren't under contract for 2024. Onwenu wasn't just going to automatically be on this team the way Keion White is ... he's here because Wolf brought him back.

I agree, the external signings sucked. I don't know whether you're counting Brissett in that $22M but he's no great shakes either.
Wolf to me fell in the middle.... he didn't make any particularly good external signings, his re-signings were generally good. He avoided bad deals (not entirely clear that was by plan) but also his low risk moves almost all failed. It's not the worst outcome, but it does mean they have a lot of work to do year 2.
 

Hoya81

Member
SoSH Member
Feb 3, 2010
8,889
I think part of the concern is that Wolf said they want to emulate the Green Bay model which (feel free to correct me) primarily relied on drafts to restock talent and not so much on free agency. The concern is that if they need to upgrade 22-25 players, doing do via the draft would take forever, AND Wolf's ability to pick good players is still very much in question.
That absolutely makes sense for Green Bay, who have to work around a unique cash flow situation, but not when you have an owner with deep pockets.
 

Dr Strangeglove

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 14, 2005
130
Mililani, HI
These threads are the best part of this season. Shout out to Harry Hooper, and to whoever it was (can't find it now) who suggested presenting deflated game balls to good performers in a loss. Both those comments made me LOL. This year's team? Not so much.
 

CPT Neuron

Got Pitching?
SoSH Member
Dec 4, 2001
3,572
Biddeford, ME
These threads are the best part of this season. Shout out to Harry Hooper, and to whoever it was (can't find it now) who suggested presenting deflated game balls to good performers in a loss. Both those comments made me LOL. This year's team? Not so much.

LOL is about the best thing this team has made me do all year - trust the process or something like that.
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,304
Westwood MA
I don't know all the ins and outs of Robert Kraft's business history, but it's worth noting that in 2017 he spent $20 mil on an eSports team in a league that ended up failing spectacularly. A recent book on the history of Blizzard (the developers of Overwatch) showed that when this league was cooked up the Blizzard execs expected to sell teams in the league for $250k until Bobby Kotick stepped in and decided to grift the living piss out of people like Kraft and sell teams for $20 mil. Probably just a drop in the bucket, but perhaps a sign his days of being savvy in the business world are long gone.
We all lose our fastball as we age, he's no exception.

I knew it would be a bumpy ride once Brady and Belichick were gone, but again, I assumed on his watch it would never get this bad, they are actually worse than they were last year, which is saying something.

Their roster is beyond terrible, it's going to take several top shelf drafts and a number of savvy free agent signings to turn this around.

They are lucky they are not 0-9, still can't believe they beat the Jets.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,849
It's probably partly a function of the suckitude that is the Patriots' WR room, but he is probably among the top 10-15 TEs in the NFL this season in terms of production.
If the only tight end production was receptions and yards, then yeah, that's true.

But if you have a tight end playing 82% of the offensive snaps like Henry is, there are other parts of the job that are important. He sucks at those, so that top 10-15 production, IMO, makes him roughly a top 25 tight end in the NFL.

Which, to be fair, makes him the #1 receiving threat on the Patriots.
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,849
That absolutely makes sense for Green Bay, who have to work around a unique cash flow situation, but not when you have an owner with deep pockets.
Yep, and they had the benefit of Aaron Rodgers at QB, which stabilizes a lot and allows them to go draft hunting and stockpiling picks like crazy. I think they may have been caught off guard at how good Jordan Love got so quickly, so it looks like it's going to keep working for them. Since 2019, Green Bay has made 23 picks in the 1st 3 rounds (8 1sts, 8 2nds and 7 3rds). Because they didn't need to fill the QB position, it allowed them to accumulate 2 additional first, 2 additional 2nds and an additional 3rd in a 6 year period.

Conversely, the Patriots have had 22 picks in the 1st 3 rounds, but every single one of their extra picks were in 2019 and 2020 (they had 1 1st, 3 2nd and 6 3rd round picks those years). In the last 4 drafts, the Pats have only had a 1st, a 2nd and a 3rd in each year. The Patriots were poised to use that Packers model with Brady, starting in 2019, but in the 2019 and 2020 drafts, they came away with these 10 guys in the 1st 3 rounds (Harry, Joejuan Williams, Winovich, Damian Harris, Cajuste, Duggar, Uche, Jennings, Asiasi, Keene). Brady then was like "I'm out" and the roster hasn't recovered since.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
26,967
We all lose our fastball as we age, he's no exception.

I knew it would be a bumpy ride once Brady and Belichick were gone, but again, I assumed on his watch it would never get this bad, they are actually worse than they were last year, which is saying something.

Their roster is beyond terrible, it's going to take several top shelf drafts and a number of savvy free agent signings to turn this around.

They are lucky they are not 0-9, still can't believe they beat the Jets.
I don't think it will take *that* much to turn it around. First of all, the most important position on the team seems to be solved in Maye.

They'll load up on high draft picks this year. They have tons of money. Their roster is like having a team of #3 and #4 starters. Guys that are decent, but not remotely good enough to be the best players on your team at those positions. In other words, they're perfectly adequate NFL players, but not when they're the best options you have. It's not bad, for example, having Demario Douglas as one of your WRs. It *is* bad, however, when Demario Douglas is the best WR you have.

For example, imagine this receiving corps with a Justin Jefferson, Jamaar Chase, Tyreek Hill (yuck), Ceedee Lamb, etc., as WR1. Suddenly you have that stud and now the other guys have room to maneuver because of the attention paid to that stud WR1.

Or imagine the OL with a stud LT. Everyone else slots into their appropriate spot and instead of a guy who's much more suited to be a rotational backup guy having to get 60 snaps a game as a starter, he can just fill in when needed.

They have the ammo to get those really good players that bump everyone else down on the depth chart in this draft and in free agency. The question is whether they can make the actual right moves.
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,304
Westwood MA
I don't think it will take *that* much to turn it around. First of all, the most important position on the team seems to be solved in Maye.

They'll load up on high draft picks this year. They have tons of money. Their roster is like having a team of #3 and #4 starters. Guys that are decent, but not remotely good enough to be the best players on your team at those positions. In other words, they're perfectly adequate NFL players, but not when they're the best options you have. It's not bad, for example, having Demario Douglas as one of your WRs. It *is* bad, however, when Demario Douglas is the best WR you have.

For example, imagine this receiving corps with a Justin Jefferson, Jamaar Chase, Tyreek Hill (yuck), Ceedee Lamb, etc., as WR1. Suddenly you have that stud and now the other guys have room to maneuver because of the attention paid to that stud WR1.

Or imagine the OL with a stud LT. Everyone else slots into their appropriate spot and instead of a guy who's much more suited to be a rotational backup guy having to get 60 snaps a game as a starter, he can just fill in when needed.

They have the ammo to get those really good players that bump everyone else down on the depth chart in this draft and in free agency. The question is whether they can make the actual right moves.
This is the most important part; " The question is whether they can make the actual right moves."

Can they make the right moves to find a #1 stud receiver and a stud LT?

It remains to be seen whether Kraft is willing to spend the money necessary to fix this shitshow of a team; we'll see.

Throwing money around in free agency is not always the answer; they tried that in 2021 and it did not work out very well.

As in at all.

Teams for the most part don't let stud receivers and left tackles walk; if they do, you have to overpay to get them.

By a lot.

You have to nail the draft and sign the right free agents vs just spending for the sake of spending.

I can't believe how light on talent this roster is, it's comically bad and as you said, full of back ups who have no business starting.

This organization has cratered and have gone back to 1990 and 1981 level bad.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
26,967
This is the most important part; " The question is whether they can make the actual right moves."

Can they make the right moves to find a #1 stud receiver and a stud LT?

It remains to be seen whether Kraft is willing to spend the money necessary to fix this shitshow of a team; we'll see.

Throwing money around in free agency is not always the answer; they tried that in 2021 and it did not work out very well.

As in at all.

Teams for the most part don't let stud receivers and left tackles walk; if they do, you have to overpay to get them.

By a lot.

You have to nail the draft and sign the right free agents vs just spending for the sake of spending.

I can't believe how light on talent this roster is, it's comically bad and as you said, full of back ups who have no business starting.

This organization has cratered and have gone back to 1990 and 1981 level bad.
Yeah, that's the million dollar question. No idea. Obviously in order to get where they want to go, they'll need those things. All the great Pats' teams had those things. One could, I suppose, argue over whether Branch or Brown was a true #1, but the latter championship teams had prime Gronk and prime Edelman. Oh, and the GOAT at QB. They also had really, really terrific LT - Light, Solder, Trent Brown (when Brown was motivated and playing well).
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,288
This is the most important part; " The question is whether they can make the actual right moves."

Can they make the right moves to find a #1 stud receiver and a stud LT?

It remains to be seen whether Kraft is willing to spend the money necessary to fix this shitshow of a team; we'll see.

Throwing money around in free agency is not always the answer; they tried that in 2021 and it did not work out very well.

As in at all.

Teams for the most part don't let stud receivers and left tackles walk; if they do, you have to overpay to get them.

By a lot.

You have to nail the draft and sign the right free agents vs just spending for the sake of spending.

I can't believe how light on talent this roster is, it's comically bad and as you said, full of back ups who have no business starting.

This organization has cratered and have gone back to 1990 and 1981 level bad.

the spending spree in 2021, other than Jonnu Smith, actually worked out pretty well. Agholor was slightly overpaid (got low end #2 money and produced a #3 type impact). Judon and Henry were excellent acquisitions. Godchaux and Bourne were solid pickups. Karras was excellent although they messed up by not signing him longer term. Trent Brown was a solid signing (even with his flaws)

Henry Anderson was a flop but hardly a budget buster. Mills wasn’t a good signing but not really problematic.


Their problem was a lack of QB, not that they spent the money on the wrong guys

You can, in fact, quickly bolster a roster’s talent with free agent pickups. Hard to do a full rebuild that way, of course. But Henry, Judon, Godchaux and Bourne were all money well spent.
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,288
If the only tight end production was receptions and yards, then yeah, that's true.

But if you have a tight end playing 82% of the offensive snaps like Henry is, there are other parts of the job that are important. He sucks at those, so that top 10-15 production, IMO, makes him roughly a top 25 tight end in the NFL.

Which, to be fair, makes him the #1 receiving threat on the Patriots.
you’re not seriously suggesting there are 24(ish) better TE in the NFL than Henry? Even with his blocking issues, the idea that almost every team has a better TE is crazy.
 

ShaneTrot

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Nov 17, 2002
6,794
Overland Park, KS
the spending spree in 2021, other than Jonnu Smith, actually worked out pretty well. Agholor was slightly overpaid (got low end #2 money and produced a #3 type impact). Judon and Henry were excellent acquisitions. Godchaux and Bourne were solid pickups. Karras was excellent although they messed up by not signing him longer term. Trent Brown was a solid signing (even with his flaws)

Henry Anderson was a flop but hardly a budget buster. Mills wasn’t a good signing but not really problematic.


Their problem was a lack of QB, not that they spent the money on the wrong guys

You can, in fact, quickly bolster a roster’s talent with free agent pickups. Hard to do a full rebuild that way, of course. But Henry, Judon, Godchaux and Bourne were all money well spent.
This is the way I feel. Hopefully, they have learned their lesson and will pick up like 4 or 5 5-8 million a year players. They can afford it. You can get serviceable LBs, OGs, and run-stuffing DTs for that money.
 

dynomite

Member
SoSH Member
But, yeah, if they cannot draft, this will be a really long rebuild. While drafting well alone is not sufficient to compete in the NFL, it is a necessary step.
They have the ammo to get those really good players that bump everyone else down on the depth chart in this draft and in free agency. The question is whether they can make the actual right moves.
Sorry if this is a hot take, but this is part of why I want to layer Wolf and make a Godfather offer to Nick Caserio to lure him back from Houston as "Team President" or whatever (I recognize Jonathan Kraft is President, but you get the idea) and let Caserio make a decision on Wolf/Mayo/etc. Since 2019 this organization has gone from mediocre to bad to competing for worst in the NFL for the 2nd year in a row. They seem to have hit on the most important cornerstone in Maye and a few other pieces on defense, but the list of successes over the past 5 seasons is stunningly small.

So while I can't pass judgment from afar, I have decided with the limited information at my disposal that my ideal scenario is to move Robert Kraft to "Emeritus Owner" or whatever, Jonathan to CEO of the organization, and bring in Caserio to take a bottom-up and top-down review of the entire franchise and get it back onto solid ground, from conditioning to game strategy. Find a new Ernie Adams. Whatever.

And do it now while there's time to get a better front office and management structure in place and use the "ammo" they have to sign players and draft high in every round.

(To those who know: Drafted this over the weekend and am posting now don't worry I'm still working just needed a break)
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,304
Westwood MA
Yeah, that's the million dollar question. No idea. Obviously in order to get where they want to go, they'll need those things. All the great Pats' teams had those things. One could, I suppose, argue over whether Branch or Brown was a true #1, but the latter championship teams had prime Gronk and prime Edelman. Oh, and the GOAT at QB. They also had really, really terrific LT - Light, Solder, Trent Brown (when Brown was motivated and playing well).
How quickly they can rebuild depends a lot on what free agents are available and how deep/talented the 2025 NFL draft is, specifically in areas of need, but the way their roster is currently constituted, they have multiple areas of need.

They need to spend wisely while Maye is on a rookie contract and surround him with talent.
 

BaseballJones

slappy happy
SoSH Member
Oct 1, 2015
26,967
How quickly they can rebuild depends a lot on what free agents are available and how deep/talented the 2025 NFL draft is, specifically in areas of need, but the way their roster is currently constituted, they have multiple areas of need.

They need to spend wisely while Maye is on a rookie contract and surround him with talent.
100% agree.
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,304
Westwood MA
the spending spree in 2021, other than Jonnu Smith, actually worked out pretty well. Agholor was slightly overpaid (got low end #2 money and produced a #3 type impact). Judon and Henry were excellent acquisitions. Godchaux and Bourne were solid pickups. Karras was excellent although they messed up by not signing him longer term. Trent Brown was a solid signing (even with his flaws)

Henry Anderson was a flop but hardly a budget buster. Mills wasn’t a good signing but not really problematic.


Their problem was a lack of QB, not that they spent the money on the wrong guys

You can, in fact, quickly bolster a roster’s talent with free agent pickups. Hard to do a full rebuild that way, of course. But Henry, Judon, Godchaux and Bourne were all money well spent.
They have so many holes it will be interesting to see who they sign, I'd rather they spread money around and sign multiple players like they did in 2021 vs a couple of very high end talents as this rebuild is going to take some time.

They went 10-7/playoffs, then 8-9, then 4-13, also had Judon and Bourne get hurt.
 
Oct 12, 2023
1,288
Do you have a feel for how deep the 2025 draft will be or is it too early to determine that?
like any draft, it has its deep groups and not so deep groups. And like any draft class in November, it’s in flux for a while because who knows what players will return back to school

it’s a great year for RB’s, safeties, off ball LB though. The more valuable positions are a mixed bag. I think the CB class looks terrific (elite talent and deep) but the WR group looks mediocre (couple elite guys, then a big drop), QB looks bad but not Pickett-class bad, etc
 

Deathofthebambino

Drive Carefully
SoSH Member
Apr 12, 2005
42,849
you’re not seriously suggesting there are 24(ish) better TE in the NFL than Henry? Even with his blocking issues, the idea that almost every team has a better TE is crazy.
That's exactly what I'm suggesting.

Off the top of my head:

Kelce
Kittle
Andrews
Njoku
Goedert
Hockenson
Likely
Laporta
Pitts
McBride
Engram
Kmet
Ferguson
Kincaid
Bowers
Freiermuth
Waller
Schultz
Ertz
Otton

Almost every one of those guys is a better receiver than Henry.

I'd put Henry in a tier with guys like Dawson Knox, Gesicki, Higbee, Fant, Jonnu, Conklin, Musgrave, Kraft, etc.

So yeah, the idea that Hunter Henry is a top 10-15 tight end is, IMO, comical, unless we're grading by fantasy stats and not what you need from a tight end playing 82% of his team's snaps. Shit, a lot of posts in this thread about how the Pats can't run the ball. That makes sense, because their offensive line sucks and Henry is among the worst run blockers at his position in the NFL (but we generally ignore Henry when discussing their issues with run blocking).
 

54thMA

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 15, 2012
10,304
Westwood MA
like any draft, it has its deep groups and not so deep groups. And like any draft class in November, it’s in flux for a while because who knows what players will return back to school

it’s a great year for RB’s, safeties, off ball LB though. The more valuable positions are a mixed bag. I think the CB class looks terrific (elite talent and deep) but the WR group looks mediocre (couple elite guys, then a big drop), QB looks bad but not Pickett-class bad, etc
Thanks.

So I guess finding that #1 elite WR via the 2025 draft is not looking too promising at this point, unless they take one of the couple of elite guys with their first round pick.
 

SMU_Sox

queer eye for the next pats guy
SoSH Member
Jul 20, 2009
9,295
Philly
Overall this is a mediocre draft at the top. It’s likely somewhat of a down year. COVID has made the last 3-4 drafts rough. This is the last year of the super COVID 7-8 year starters (technically will be a handful of guys next year but not like this year). So development should start to go back to normal and we see more normal classes.
 

Jimbodandy

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 31, 2006
12,917
around the way
Sounds like a good draft to trade down a little from that top 5 pick to some team that's QB starved and take more shots at filling holes. Obviously OT is a big hole, but we need depth basically everywhere. More spaghetti at the wall please.