I ask this out of genuine curiosity for the direction that both sides are taking: was this a case of Spurs playing poorly, or Arsenal clicking, or both?
I saw the game threading re: the huge gaps in the lines and midfield ineffectiveness for Spurs. Nuno's tactics are a muddle, and Spurs' early successes flatter to deceive, I think it's fair.
Also have to take into account the amped-up derby crowd.
But- how well would Arsenal have done against a well-drilled side? Is the lineup that Arteta has (eventually) landed on really that good?
I'll hang up and listen.
Last year Arsenal finished in 8th place with 58 points overall. After 19 matches they were in 11th places with 24 points last year, so that's 24 vs 34 points for the first half vs second half of the year. 68 points would have put them 3rd overall in the league just ahead of Manchester United and way behind Liverpool and City.
As I said in my earlier post, I think the starting lineup and first 3-4 players off the bench is night and day from the team being run out their most of the year last season. Laca, Pepe and Lokonga are players that can absolutely be regular starters for top 4 competing teams in the EPL. AMN, who I agree is really more of a wing back is okay to start games, but Tierney has been injury prone, so with another injury to him or rest or knock for Tomiyasu then the back line looks really shaky.
Arsenal was dreadful the first 3 games, but you had a bunch of players out with injuries/covid as well as a few transfers (Odegaard and Tomiyasu) that hadn't arrived yet. This led to having at least 4 starters in each of the first 3 games out of the group of Mari, Balogun, Martinelli, Holding, Cedric, Chambers, Kolasinac.
I think this team should be able to compete for 3rd and 4th place this season and it would be disappointing to finish outside of 6th.