Especially since Eustace has already been caught shading the truth with his original statements when he claimed commitments to work with groups.
Eustace claimed committed to work with the Carnegie Initiative.
They had two corrections. The initial one from the group stating they had met and discussed potentially working together but hadn't worked with him.
View: https://twitter.com/CarnegieInit/status/1589407037711994880?s=20&t=AflYJv6nUmpND5TcdTiSAQ
Then the second one where I assume after some calls from Eustace King they released one from the co-founder saying to clarify further they didn't say he was a liar. But in writing it they also contradict Eustace again. Cause the co-founder says he met with King (only) and the outcome was it would be better for them to move on and not pursue in engaging with Miller.
View: https://twitter.com/CarnegieInit/status/1589454916594323456?s=20&t=AflYJv6nUmpND5TcdTiSAQ
Which is funny they are clarifying they said Eustace King didn't lie by pointing out he actually lied.
Cause why would Eustace say the met with and committed to working with a group, but even when they are trying to protect Eustace they say "our agreement was that he should pursue other avenues"