Not disdaining, just observing. It worked.Any points is a bonus.
Guess not.Figure out a way to get to a shootout, and steal another point.
Won the first face-off and proceeded to treat the puck like a live grenade.No idea why Nash gave the puck up.
ok now that the game is over does anyone know the answer to this?Completely random question but does anyone know how the tv timeout rules work in hockey? I know there are 3 per period, first whistle that isn’t a goal, icing or a whistle during a power play under 14, under 10 and under 6.
However what happens when you get under 10 and haven’t had a commercial break yet like just happened in this third? They took their first commercial break and then came back from the break and got a whistle rather quickly on a goalie coverup but didn’t take another break. What are the rules when that happens?
Thought that was Grz actually.No idea why Nash gave the puck up.
Maybe it was. I thought it was a righty.Thought that was Grz actually.
They are not able to maintain possession in OT. Not sure what it is but when they are able to win it is generally on turnovers and odd man rushes. For the most part the other team dominates possession in OTWon the first face-off and proceeded to treat the puck like a live grenade.
Nah it was definitely a lefty, he was trying to feed it down to Nash. I thought he should have gone cross ice to Marchand or dumped it hard around.Maybe it was. I thought it was a righty.
That’s the nature of 3 on 3. Odd man rushes and turnovers. Shooting the puck means conceding an odd man rush the other way unless the shot goes in.They are not able to maintain possession in OT. Not sure what it is but when they are able to win it is generally on turnovers and odd man rushes. For the most part the other team dominates possession in OT
This is true, but I’ve seen other teams get shots off and scoring chances and still get possession back. Too many times the bruins get hemmed in their own zone and are unable to change lines and become exhausted. They don’t seem to do that very often the other way. Whatever though, for the most part I could care less about that because it won’t matter in the payoffs and they may be the best 5 on 5 team in the nhlThat’s the nature of 3 on 3. Odd man rushes and turnovers. Shooting the puck means conceding an odd man rush the other way unless the shot goes in.
Wikipedia:ok now that the game is over does anyone know the answer to this?
Ahhh perfect. So there has to be a minute of gameplay between timeouts. That makes sense, thanks bud!Wikipedia:
Commercial time-outs are taken after 4-minute intervals at the 14:00, 10:00 and 6:00 marks in each period when both teams are at even strength. However, there are no commercial time-outs after a goal, after an icing, during a power-play, during the last 30 seconds of the first and second period or last two minutes of the third period. Also, there must be at least one minute of play between commercial time-outs and an effort must be done to identify the situations where a video review might happen in order to NOT go into a commercial time-out. [9] Additionally there are no timeouts, commercial or team, granted during a shootout. Due to these restrictions, it is possible that not all of the scheduled breaks are taken, in which case sometimes a network will take a timeout at the conclusion of the game to make up for it before signing off on the broadcast.
Best 5 on 5 team there is baby! I cannot wait for the PlayoffsAt least there's no 3 on 3 in the playoffs
I hear that. I'll even go one further—health aside*, that team needed a lot more to go right than this team will to reach the promised land. Those guys had to grind hard, to the point that most of us didn't think there was enough top end talent to get the job done. The top line could disappear for stretches, they were bad on the power play and were eternally in need of puck-moving defensemen—it is insane to look at the roster now and remember how bad that specific problem was back then, and Kaberle didn't really fix it—and they played that entire playoffs on a knife's edge besides the Philly series.Playoff bound and cup bound baby. This teaM is giving me the same feeling I had in 2011
Of course not. Krejci got up and played. The league doesn't care about hits to the head. They care about how the sight of injured players on the ice looks on TV and the internet.No suspension for Schenn per CBS