Cade to Black: 2021 NBA Draft Thread

Lazy vs Crazy

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 18, 2005
6,422
Are the Celtics even going to use their 2nd rounder this year? It won't be another Yam?
Tacko or Waters is gone and their 2nd is going on a 2way most likely.

About trading Jaylen, I think setting the clock back several years will not go over well with Tatum.
 

Cesar Crespo

79
SoSH Member
Dec 22, 2002
21,588
Tacko or Waters is gone and their 2nd is going on a 2way most likely.

About trading Jaylen, I think setting the clock back several years will not go over well with Tatum.
I'd think Yam is taking up one of those 2 ways but maybe not. He was trying to get out of his contract last I heard.
 

BigMike

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 26, 2000
23,250
Pistons win. Good for them, they haven't had much luck in these before
 

Pablo's TB Lover

Member
SoSH Member
Sep 10, 2017
5,999
Pistons getting #1 is a feel-good outcome, they have been in the wilderness a while. As opposed to the Houston insta-tank or Cavs getting ANOTHER horseshoe up their ass.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
Also why would Houston be looking for a quick rebuild. They have a complete shit roster
Because they mortgaged their draft future for a lottery protected Wizards' #1 and the right to pay John Wall the GNP of Bolivia. If they'd landed #1 there's no way they make the deal, but as their draft future otherwise relies on the mediocre '22 draft they might give real consideration to swapping Jalen Green for Jalen Brown.
 

BigMike

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 26, 2000
23,250
Because they mortgaged their draft future for a lottery protected Wizards' #1 and the right to pay John Wall the GNP of Bolivia. If they'd landed #1 there's no way they make the deal, but as their draft future otherwise relies on the mediocre '22 draft they might give real consideration to swapping Jalen Green for Jalen Brown.
In hopes of what? Competing for a spot in the play in game for a couple of years before Brown shoots his way out of town?

At the same time, I really can't see why the Celtics would break up a team that is a legitimate finals contender next year if they get the depth signings right, and dealing their second best player for a guy who Might be as good as Brown in 4 seasons (and as all draft picks has a complete bust downside), and yes I know this opens cap space
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
Because after '23 their draft belongs to OKC. So putting together a competitive team today helps the franchise long term. Not everyone is looking to process the shit out of their rebuild. For a team like Houston it's not even a real option as the '22 draft isn't very good. Morey made some bad decisions at the end, but about one thing he was right, the toughest part of building an NBA team is finding the first star.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,302
Santa Monica
Because after '23 their draft belongs to OKC. So putting together a competitive team today helps the franchise long term. Not everyone is looking to process the shit out of their rebuild. For a team like Houston it's not even a real option as the '22 draft isn't very good. Morey made some bad decisions at the end, but about one thing he was right, the toughest part of building an NBA team is finding the first star.
Suggs, Green or Mobley?
 

radsoxfan

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 9, 2009
13,712
I'm probably in the minority here, but I really don't see it at all with Cade. Would take Mobley or Suggs ahead of him.

And no, I would not trade Jaylen for a top 3 pick.
 

Jed Zeppelin

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 23, 2008
51,481
I'm probably in the minority here, but I really don't see it at all with Cade. Would take Mobley or Suggs ahead of him.

And no, I would not trade Jaylen for a top 3 pick.
Yeah, Jaylen is on a good contract and has value either as a 2nd or 3rd fiddle to Tatum or in trade for a current star. You only trade him for a draft pick if you’re committing to a rebuild and/or to pissing off Tatum.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,273
Plus if you could get Jalen Suggs I’d do it. I think he’s a special player.
Man, I thought so too for much of the year......then he went like a month and a half when he looks as uncomfortable and hesitant shooting the ball as Ben Simmons. I’m talking uncontested 3’s in the flow on secondary breaks. I’m not saying he’s a Ben or Markelle but he absolutely showed signs of the yips if you were paying attention to him (and I was).
 

cheech13

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 5, 2006
1,608
So it took some lottery luck, but would you rather have the #2 pick in this draft, Ben Simmons or Levert/Allen? Did the Houston GM low-key play this right?
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,642
So it took some lottery luck, but would you rather have the #2 pick in this draft, Ben Simmons or Levert/Allen? Did the Houston GM low-key play this right?
Why would they be exclusive? Their pick this year had nothing to do with the Harden trade. I guess maybe they lost a few more games, but that's parsing it way too much for something as luck based as the lottery.
 

cheech13

Member
SoSH Member
Jan 5, 2006
1,608
Why would they be exclusive? Their pick this year had nothing to do with the Harden trade. I guess maybe they lost a few more games, but that's parsing it way too much for something as luck based as the lottery.
It’s lottery luck but they would not have been bad enough to land in the top five if they took those other players. They would have been mediocre. Maybe I’m giving the GM too much credit but it seems like the goal was to be as bad possible to keep their pick this year.
 

scottyno

late Bloomer
SoSH Member
Dec 7, 2008
11,339
It’s lottery luck but they would not have been bad enough to land in the top five if they took those other players. They would have been mediocre. Maybe I’m giving the GM too much credit but it seems like the goal was to be as bad possible to keep their pick this year.
I doubt the difference between having a partial season of Allen and a more partial season of Levert (remember he missed a bunch of time with the pacers) and the partial seasons of Oladipo and then Olynyk they got would have been the 5 extra wins they needed to not end up with a top 2 pick.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
So it took some lottery luck, but would you rather have the #2 pick in this draft, Ben Simmons or Levert/Allen? Did the Houston GM low-key play this right?
Way back when I made the joke that Houston’s best use of Simmons would be to move him to OKC to get their drafts back (plus some of OKC’s prospects since the Thunder would mistakenly view themselves as competitive and that the trade would have required Horford coming to Houston). And Houston just might have been better off with Tyrese Maxey and Lou Dort as running mates for Jalen Green. ;)

On a more serious note, as much as I love Green, I might be looking to let Orlando have him for #5, #8, whatever else you can get (I’d settle for swapping John Wall for Gary Harris and Terrence Ross) and use those picks on Scottie Barnes and one of the Johnsons (Jalen or Keon).
 

Apisith

Member
SoSH Member
Oct 19, 2007
3,216
Bangkok
Don’t we want the highest ceiling talent we can get? That’s Green, for me. We can suck again next year and land another high pick. Trading down doesn’t seem like the right strategy.

Let’s see what we can get for Wood. Will the Warriors give up Wiseman for him? Maybe we throw in another first round pick or two. The Warriors have a timeline.

Wiseman + Green + another high ceiling wing next year. That’s the best route for being a title-challenging team IMO.
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
Don’t we want the highest ceiling talent we can get? That’s Green, for me. We can suck again next year and land another high pick. Trading down doesn’t seem like the right strategy.

Let’s see what we can get for Wood. Will the Warriors give up Wiseman for him? Maybe we throw in another first round pick or two. The Warriors have a timeline.

Wiseman + Green + another high ceiling wing next year. That’s the best route for being a title-challenging team IMO.
I completely agree with you on Green, he’s #2 on my board. But Barnes is #3 on my board, and I might swap out Green for Barnes with the right mix of extras because I think there’s a non-zero chance that he ends up being the best player from this pool (even though Cade almost certainly wears that crown).
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,302
Santa Monica
Don’t we want the highest ceiling talent we can get? That’s Green, for me. We can suck again next year and land another high pick. Trading down doesn’t seem like the right strategy.

Let’s see what we can get for Wood. Will the Warriors give up Wiseman for him? Maybe we throw in another first round pick or two. The Warriors have a timeline.

Wiseman + Green + another high ceiling wing next year. That’s the best route for being a title-challenging team IMO.
Wiseman straight up for Wood is more than a fair deal for GSW, if you so desire.

With the Warriors timeline, they should be adding another asset (like Poole)
 
Last edited:

PedroKsBambino

Well-Known Member
Lifetime Member
SoSH Member
Apr 17, 2003
31,335
It’s lottery luck but they would not have been bad enough to land in the top five if they took those other players. They would have been mediocre. Maybe I’m giving the GM too much credit but it seems like the goal was to be as bad possible to keep their pick this year.
I hear you but that is a bit too cute for me---you just don't know how the team will perform. If you wanted to tank you could trade for Simmons (for all his warts still the best single asset they had available) and sat him a bunch.

Whether they made the right choice will be a function of Simmons development with a new team/in a new situation and how those picks turn out
 

lovegtm

Member
SoSH Member
Apr 30, 2013
12,150
I hear you but that is a bit too cute for me---you just don't know how the team will perform. If you wanted to tank you could trade for Simmons (for all his warts still the best single asset they had available) and sat him a bunch.

Whether they made the right choice will be a function of Simmons development with a new team/in a new situation and how those picks turn out
When you are moving down to 18 if you miss the top 4, and the top of the draft is really good, you need to get a bit cute and a bit lucky.
 

BigMike

Moderator
Moderator
SoSH Member
Sep 26, 2000
23,250

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,302
Santa Monica
Isn't Bassey considered a Late 1, early 2 in this draft
I use the Tankathon mock site since they have adv #s, video, its short/compact and it doesn't have tons of ads.
They have Bassey out of the draft and #60 on their Big Board

http://www.tankathon.com/mock_draft

http://www.tankathon.com/big_board

The mocks are pretty inconsistent in regards to late 1sts/2nds (@nighthob is more attuned to this stuff than most of the professional sites). For example, all the mocks had Immanuel Quickley going in the 2nd round last season, and he jumped off the page to a lot of us. He turned out to be a good late 1st by the Knicks. It's the same with Quentin Grimes this season IMO.

also BIGs do have a tendency to be dropping in recent drafts with the plethora of fungible/experienced 5s signing cheap/short deals at the NBA level

yea you're right, ESPN has Bassey going in the late First Round to the Lakers

https://www.espn.com/nba/insider/story/_/id/31639869/2021-nba-mock-draft-projections-all-60-picks-lottery

Neither the Ringer (KOC) or CBS mock him in the First Round. Bleacher Report has him going very early in the 2nd round (but Queta at #57)

You're probably right to suspect Bassey is too talented, he should be drafted.
His advanced metrics are excellent. He's 2-time Conf. USA defensive POY, can shoot, with size/athleticism.

If he makes it to 45, he'd be a nice pick and sent to Maine for the first few months. Mostly I want the C's to use one of their 2-ways on a BIG since TL /Horford will need rest and want some cheap depth there.
 
Last edited:

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
I’m hoping that Duke slips to #45. I like Grimes, but he’s basically Nesmith Lite Ice. Duke has the quickness to defend 1s and the length/strength to be switchable (6’4” 205 with a +4/+5 wingspan). He handles the ball well enough to get the ball across mid court and hand it off to the JayCrew. He’s sort of an ideal 3&D combo guard for the modern game.
 

TripleOT

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 4, 2007
7,770
I’m hoping that Duke slips to #45. I like Grimes, but he’s basically Nesmith Lite Ice. Duke has the quickness to defend 1s and the length/strength to be switchable (6’4” 205 with a +4/+5 wingspan). He handles the ball well enough to get the ball across mid court and hand it off to the JayCrew. He’s sort of an ideal 3&D combo guard for the modern game.
I agree. His people here in Providence think he might get drafted a lot higher than where he’s being mocked.
 

Cellar-Door

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 1, 2006
34,642
I'm intrigued by Herbert Jones. I feel like he fits the profile of a guy who contributes from a mid second round pick (a rarity). He has NBA size, athleticism and impressive wingspan, seems to project as a guy who can defend at the NBA level. His passing stats look very strong for a guy his size. He lasted to a senior despite the physical profile because his shot was terrible. Last year he looks to have fixed something, shot a respectable 35% from 3 on by far his highest volume, 71% from the line on career high volume as well. I like guys who have the athleticism and appear to be NBA ready on one side of the ball, those are usually the guys who make it in the 2nd. If he can defend and be a plus passer on the wing, he just needs to shoot 35%+ from 3 to be a contributor.
 

HomeRunBaker

bet squelcher
SoSH Member
Jan 15, 2004
30,273
I agree. His people here in Providence think he might get drafted a lot higher than where he’s being mocked.
Yup I’m in this boat too. I see him long long gone by 45. Grimes does nothing for me as he’s redundant with Pritchard and his upside can be acquired via FA with a cheap vet who is ready to step in right away.
 

EL Jeffe

Member
SoSH Member
Aug 30, 2006
1,325
I'm intrigued by Herbert Jones. I feel like he fits the profile of a guy who contributes from a mid second round pick (a rarity). He has NBA size, athleticism and impressive wingspan, seems to project as a guy who can defend at the NBA level. His passing stats look very strong for a guy his size. He lasted to a senior despite the physical profile because his shot was terrible. Last year he looks to have fixed something, shot a respectable 35% from 3 on by far his highest volume, 71% from the line on career high volume as well. I like guys who have the athleticism and appear to be NBA ready on one side of the ball, those are usually the guys who make it in the 2nd. If he can defend and be a plus passer on the wing, he just needs to shoot 35%+ from 3 to be a contributor.
Yup, I like Jones too. I think he can be a a little bit like Josh Jackson, if JJ had better basketball character. I think he'll defend and be versatile on that end of the court. Like you said, he can handle the ball and create for others. Looks like he can make an open 3, even if mechanically it's not the prettiest shot. But as an energy wing who plays hard, defends, and has some skill--you can do a lot worse in the mid 2nd round.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,302
Santa Monica
damn

Quentin Grimes #1 on Combine winners

Grimes was considered a potential lottery pick coming out of high school. But a rough freshman year at Kansas followed by a transfer to Houston dropped his stock significantly. He’s been slowly climbing up boards all year with elite shooting, tough defense and an unselfish approach to the game.

His strong showing at the combine should give his draft stock another bounce onto the bubble of the first round. He scored a combine-high 27 points in his second game after posting 12 points, 6 rebounds and 3 assists in the first game. Grimes ended up shooting 9-for-14 from 3-point land in those two games and showed off the playmaking that teams saw in high school but didn’t see much in college.

NBA teams are looking for guards who can play and defend both backcourt positions and shoot the rock. Grimes was likely to be a late second-round pick before the combine. Did he do enough to crack the first round at the combine? Based on his background, excellent stats this past season at Houston (one of the best teams in the country) and performance on the court, I’d say yes.
 

benhogan

Granite Truther
SoSH Member
Nov 2, 2007
20,302
Santa Monica
Yup I’m in this boat too. I see him long long gone by 45. Grimes does nothing for me as he’s redundant with Pritchard and his upside can be acquired via FA with a cheap vet who is ready to step in right away.
Grimes will be a + defender. He's much bigger/stronger than Pritchard, will be over a year younger when drafted and cheaper. But doubt Grimes is there at 45
 

nighthob

Member
SoSH Member
Jul 15, 2005
12,704
I'm intrigued by Herbert Jones. I feel like he fits the profile of a guy who contributes from a mid second round pick (a rarity). He has NBA size, athleticism and impressive wingspan, seems to project as a guy who can defend at the NBA level. His passing stats look very strong for a guy his size. He lasted to a senior despite the physical profile because his shot was terrible. Last year he looks to have fixed something, shot a respectable 35% from 3 on by far his highest volume, 71% from the line on career high volume as well. I like guys who have the athleticism and appear to be NBA ready on one side of the ball, those are usually the guys who make it in the 2nd. If he can defend and be a plus passer on the wing, he just needs to shoot 35%+ from 3 to be a contributor.
My problem with Jones is that jumpers that bad rarely work against the increased speed of the NBA game. If he committed himself to being Drew Hanlen’s adopted son and completely rebuilding the jumper (right now he looks like he shotputs the basketball in the direction of the hoop) he could be an actual rotational player (read Semi replacement+).

I know he shot .351 from three last year, but it was on so few shots to likely be nothing more than statistical noise.

I have to take a closer look at Scottie Lewis, his measurements are weird, he’s 6’4” with an absurd +8 wingspan, but only an 8’6” standing reach. Which doesn’t seem a lot. But he’s my next deep dive on film.