Kyle was an offensive coordinator under his dad when Kyle was about 30. But yes, agreed that the Pats situation is unusual.But Tim McVay didn't coach in the NFL, Sean didn't coach under his grandfather and Kyle Shanahan didn't coach under his dad and tried to establish himself elsewhere precisely for this reason. Nepotism is rampant in the NFL, but even in the field it's rare to see a son be co-DC under his father.
Now, I'm a huge Steve Belichick fan and think the defense became much better when he gained more responsibilities and love everything I've heard from and about the guy, so it's not like it hurt the Patriots. It's just unusual even in the NFL context.
Seems like Steve B was indeed ready for it.I agree this was the point of McCourtey's story. But, this can be true and you can also be put off by BB elevating his son to a position he was admittedly not ready for. Nepotism sucks, whether it ultimately works out or not.
And they actually needed all three of those guys that year, thanks to the BS Deflategate suspension....to say nothing of the stacked QB room. Brady, Garoppolo, Brissett. Our third QB back then, now has 48 starts and 76 games played in the NFL, 7 years later.
And they had only like 6 games of Gronk that year. In the 5 games where Gronk played with Brady in 2016, he had 24/529/3And they actually needed all three of those guys that year, thanks to the BS Deflategate suspension.
That team was an absolute wagon and one of the most underrated teams ever.
#3 offense (points)
#1 defense (points)
#1 point differential (by a whopping 57 points, 3.6 per game!)
Avg margin of victory: +11.9 per game
They only lost two games all season:
- 16-0 vs. Buffalo when the Pats were playing with Brissett at QB, who had a broken thumb in his throwing hand
- 31-24 vs. Seattle when the Pats had 1st and goal at Seattle 2 yard line at the end of the game and somehow couldn't punch it in
Other than that...perfection, including two dominant playoff wins in the AFC (34-16 over Hou and then 36-17 over Pit), and the greatest comeback in SB history in the Super Bowl against league MVP Matt Ryan.
That's kind of how I read this, too. "He's green but that group can almost coach itself -- and he will learn a ton from them." Seems like it kind of worked out that way.I don't think BB puts Steve in that position if there wasn't already in place a group of seasoned, smart, veterans like McCourty, Chung, and Harmon.
https://www.usatoday.com/in-depth/graphics/2022/11/22/nfl-coaches-nepotism-filled-dozens-positions/10702777002/Look through some media guides. It really is not.
So of the 10 picks in the 1st round at or after the Patriots original pick..... one had his option picked up, one agreed to an extension for less than the option (though could earn slightly more if he hits a ton of incentives) one is dead, and another out of the league, then 6 had their options declinedI wasn’t quite sure where to put this. Lots of comments and discussion online about how many players who were selected in the first round of the 2020 draft have not had their fifth year option picked up.
that was the year the Patriots traded out of the first altogether.
How did Brady hold the Rams to three points in SB53? I'm one of those guys if you're going to rattle off a bunch of statements supporting your argument, that none of the statements actually support the opposing side.Asante Samuel - not a fan of BB.
"Absolutely not," said Samuel when asked if Belichick was the greatest head coach ever. "Are you crazy? Look at his record without Tom [Brady]. You've got to win without Tom. One thing I learned about being great is you got to be great in different situations. It was all Tom. I was there. I saw it. It was Tom. Everybody know it. Tom know it but he ain't gonna admit it because he wants to be politically correct. That's why I'm here and I'm going to tell the truth."
I love the "it was all..." part of that. Yeah sure. It was Tom that had the pick six and held the Greatest Show on Turf to 17 points. It was Tom that held the previously unstoppable Rams offense to 3 points in a 13-3 win in SB 53. It was Tom that held Peyton Manning to 3 points and 14 points in the playoffs when Peyton was with Indy. It was Tom that called the double pass from Edelman to Amendola. Obviously I'm not saying that Tom wasn't the biggest on-field part of their incredible 20-year run. OBVIOUSLY he was. By a mile. But it wasn't JUST Tom that allowed NE to have all that success.
In fact, if Asante makes that pick in SB 42, and someone had suggested that their Lombardi was "all Tom", I bet Asante would have been gravely offended by that.
I got what you were saying and I agree. I just didn't know why you said it to me as if I was actually saying that it was Brady that held the Rams to three points.Ok. I whiffed. Apparently I was the one saying things that were the opposite of my argument. I'm going to go eat some buffalo wings now in penance.
Sorry, I didn't mean to drag that here necessarily. I just didn't know what thread Samuel's comments should go in. But it definitely was worth mentioning.I like that we are having the Brady versus Belichick argument in multiple threads now.
We’ve been thinking for years that Belichick is chasing Shula, but maybe he was actually simply waiting for Brady to retire.
It's easier to appreciate players like Mahomes and Kelce when they aren't standing between the Pats and the super bowl.That was great. Between this and his SNL gig, I'm really warming to Travis. Plus, the respect both Kelce brothers have for BB, Brady, and Gronk--as well as Edelman--made this that much more enjoyable, along with Jules's "milk and cum" comment.
You don't always have to hate the competition. That's where the "Beat LA" chant came from, respect for an opponent and dislike of another.It's easier to appreciate players like Mahomes and Kelce when they aren't standing between the Pats and the super bowl.
I mean, they are, but we've gotta get through like 10 other teams first.
For me…. I think KC is phenomenal but I don’t want Mahomes to even come close to what Brady accomplished, and I don’t want KC to even sniff 6 rings.You don't always have to hate the competition. That's where the "Beat LA" chant came from, respect for an opponent and dislike of another.
I felt this way for a while, but honestly, I'm not sure I care all that much any more. I still root against them in every single game but if they end up winning 6 titles? I would just have to respect that, knowing how incredibly hard it is. I could see Mahomes getting 3 or 4. We'll see after that.For me…. I think KC is phenomenal but I don’t want Mahomes to even come close to what Brady accomplished, and I don’t want KC to even sniff 6 rings.
Yeah, I get that. Rooting against them is fine. But a lot of them are pretty likeable guys and fun to watch. I save my sports hate for the bad guys and teams that somehow messed with us in the past (the assault/predatory guys & Baltimore/Indy/NYJ).For me…. I think KC is phenomenal but I don’t want Mahomes to even come close to what Brady accomplished, and I don’t want KC to even sniff 6 rings.
They are certainly less insufferable without Hill. I don’t love the Mahomes sideline dancing and the Kelce preening but they seem like good dudes.Yeah, I get that. Rooting against them is fine. But a lot of them are pretty likeable guys and fun to watch. I save my sports hate for the bad guys and teams that somehow messed with us in the past (the assault/predatory guys & Baltimore/Indy/NYJ).